Gupta–Hunnic Wars: Difference between revisions

8,654 bytes added ,  Tuesday at 12:22
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 614: Line 614:
|-
|-
|}
|}
== Aftermath ==
=== Collapse of Huna power ===
[[File:The defeat of the Ephalites, or White Huns A.D. 528.jpg|thumb|The defeat of the [[Alchon Huns|Huna emperor]] [[Mihirakula]] by King [[Yashodharman]] at [[Sondani]] in 528 CE (early 20th century illustration).]]
The [[Alchon huns]], following their loss to [[Yashodharman|Yaśodharman]] at [[Sondani]], withdrew to the mountainous country, the fortified town of Sakala ([[Sialkot]]), the [[Himalayas|Himalayan]] foothills in northern [[Pakistan]] between the [[Jhelum]] river, [[Chenab]] river, and [[Ravi River]], and the region from which [[Toramana]] had launched his conquests.{{sfn|Bakker|2020|p=99}}
=== Rise of Shaivism ===
All of the royal families of these successor states including the [[Alchon Hun|Alchon]] [[Mihirakula]] had embraced [[Shaivism|Saivism]], which had equally profound effects. [[Vaisnavism]] had been rendered obsolete by the fall of the Empire, particularly in its former lands. A theological innovation that specifically aided in this growth was Saivism's ability to provide access to both humdrum rewards and superformance power, in addition to this political component. This was accomplished by human agent lineages personifying god. This provided the [[Shaiva|Śaiva]] officials with a unique advantage over their [[Vaishnava|Vaisnava]] counterparts. This is a unique factor, while Vaisnavism's diminished political standing following the collapse of the [[Gupta Empire]]. [[Shaivism|Saivism]] particularly gained traction in the regions of former [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] territories. Although [[Vaishnavism|Vaisnavism]] flourished in the regions of [[Kashmir]] and [[Southern India]].{{sfn|Bakker|2020|p=99}}
=== Gupta-Aulikara War ===
[[File:Sri Yashodharman.jpg|thumb|upright=1.18|The name [[File:Gupta allahabad shrii.jpg|14px]] [[File:Gupta allahabad y.svg|14px]] [[File:Gupta allahabad sho.jpg|16px]] [[File:Gupta allahabad dh.svg|10px]] [[File:Gupta allahabad rmm.jpg|14px]] ''Śrī Yaśodharmma'' ("Lord Yashodharman") in [[Gupta script]] in Line 4 of the [[Mandsaur stone inscription of Yashodharman-Vishnuvardhana]].<ref name="EG">{{cite book |last1=Fleet |first1=John Faithfull |title=Inscriptions Of The Early Gupta Kings And Their Successors |date=1960 |pages=150–158 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.463254/page/n387}}</ref>]]
Vajra, who succeeded Baladitya II, did not surpass his predecessor's accomplishments. Despite his construction of an additional monastery at [[Nalanda]] and his depiction as a devout [[Buddhist]] by [[China|Chinese]] sources, he proved incapable of resisting the formidable [[Yashodharman|Yaśodharman]] of [[Malwa]]. However, the rapid expansion of [[Malavas|Malava]] power was soon curtailed, likely through the influence of emerging feudatory royal houses rather than direct [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] intervention.{{sfn|Goyal|1967|p=354}}
Evidence from the [[Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh]] stone inscription suggests that either Isvaravarman or his successor, presumably Isanavarman, successfully repelled a threat originating from 'the city of [[Dhara (city)|Dhar]]'. This conflict, occurring in the second quarter of the sixth century, likely corresponds to the invasion led by [[Yasodharman]]. The [[Maukhari]] kings played a significant role in opposing the [[Malavas|Malava]] adventurer, receiving support from these feudatories.{{sfn|Goyal|1967|p=354}}
Through alliances with such feudatories, Kumāragupta III, the son of Narasimhagupta II, and Vishnugupta Chandraditya, the son and successor of Kumāragupta III, were able to retain control of the imperial throne until the middle of the sixth century AD. These alliances were crucial for the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta dynasty's]] survival amidst political instability and external threats.{{sfn|Goyal|1967|p=354}}
{{Location map+
|India
|float      = right
|width      = 220
|caption    = The 532 AD [[Mandsaur stone inscription of Yashodharman-Vishnuvardhana]] mentions victorious campaigns against northern kings (probably referring to the victory against the [[Alchon Huns]] at [[Sondani]]), and against "mighty kings of the east", including a campaign across the [[Vindhya range]].
|nodiv      = 1
|mini      = 1
|relief=yes
|places    =
{{location map~ |India |lat=25|N |long=81|E |label=Campaign through the [[Vindhya range]]|position=right |label_size=70|mark=Arrow-060(000).svg|marksize=25 }}
{{location map~ |India |lat=24.07|N |long=75.08|E |label=[[Sondani inscription|Sondani]]|position=bottom |label_size=70|mark=Red Star.gif|marksize=20}}
}}
The [[Gupta Empire]] faced significant challenges during [[Yashodharman]]'s conquests, as he expanded his victorious campaigns across [[North India]]. Despite initial successes, [[Yashodharman|Yasodharman's]] ability to consolidate his conquests was limited, resulting in a short-lived reign reminiscent of a meteoric rise and fall. The circumstances surrounding his downfall remain unclear, but it is likely that the disintegration of the [[Gupta Empire]], triggered by his victories, contributed to his demise.<ref name="A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF INDIA,VOL.3,PART1 : DASGUPTA, K.K.,ED. Internet Archive">{{Cite book |last=DASGUPTA |first=K. K. |url=http://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.12720 |title=A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF INDIA,VOL.3,PART1 |date=1960 |publisher=PEOPLES OF PUBLISHING HOUSE |page=96}}</ref>
The emergence of powers like the [[Maukharis]] and [[Later Gupta dynasty|Later Guptas]] during this period suggests a shifting political landscape influenced by [[Yashodharman]]'s actions. It is possible that the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] Emperor orchestrated [[Yashodharman]]'s defeat by rallying these forces against him. Alternatively, [[Yashodharman]] may have succumbed to the chaos he instigated to dismantle the [[Gupta Empire]].<ref name="A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF INDIA,VOL.3,PART1 : DASGUPTA, K.K.,ED. Internet Archive" />
=== Disintegration of the Gupta Empire ===
The [[Gupta Empire]], a beacon of stability and prosperity in ancient [[India]], faced a tumultuous period following the demise of [[Budhagupta]], its illustrious ruler. This era was characterized by internal discord, exacerbated by external threats, which precipitated the empire's gradual decline. Succession disputes emerged as a primary catalyst for the empire's instability, leading to fragmentation and partition. The absence of a clear line of succession plunged the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta realm]] into uncertainty, opening the door to rival claimants vying for power.<ref>{{Cite book |editor=R. C. Majumdar |url=http://archive.org/details/classicalage03bhar |title=History and Culture of the Indian People, Volume 03, The Classical Age |date=1970 |publisher=Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan |others=Public Resource |page=33-34}}</ref>
Among these contenders were Narasimhagupta, [[Budhagupta]]'s brother, and his successors. Narasimhagupta, known by the honorific title Baladitya, assumed the throne amidst a backdrop of political turmoil and uncertainty. However, his ascendancy was not without challenge, as other claimants, such as Vainyagupta and Bhanugupta, also sought to assert their authority. Vainyagupta's rule, centered in [[Bengal]], and Bhanugupta's reign, commemorated in an inscription at [[Eran]], added further complexity to the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] political landscape. The inscription detailing [[Bhanugupta]]'s exploits suggests [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] efforts to resist external threats, particularly the incursions of [[Huna people|Huna]] chief [[Toramana]].<ref name="History and Culture of the Indian People, Volume 03, The Classical Age : R. C. Majumdar, General Editor Internet Archive">{{Cite book |editor=R. C. Majumdar |url=http://archive.org/details/classicalage03bhar |title=History and Culture of the Indian People, Volume 03, The Classical Age |date=1970 |publisher=Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan |others=Public Resource |page=34}}</ref>
Narasimhagupta's reign witnessed both triumph and tragedy. His notable victory over [[Huna people|Huna]] chief Mihirakula demonstrated [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] military prowess, yet internal discord continued to erode the empire's stability. As rival factions vied for supremacy, the [[Gupta Empire]] entered a period of decline marked by territorial loss and political fragmentation. These tumultuous events marked a pivotal chapter in [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] history, signaling the empire's eventual demise and the end of an era of unparalleled prosperity and cultural flourishing in ancient [[India]].<ref name="History and Culture of the Indian People, Volume 03, The Classical Age : R. C. Majumdar, General Editor Internet Archive" />


==Notes==
==Notes==
1,735

edits