1,603
edits
m
Bot: Delinking broken file(s) using script (info)
CleanupBot (talk | contribs) m (→top: robot: remove incorrect protection templates) |
m (Bot: Delinking broken file(s) using script (info)) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
===Indigenous Aryan theories=== | ===Indigenous Aryan theories=== | ||
{{main article|Indigenous Aryans}} | {{main article|Indigenous Aryans}} | ||
In two books, ''Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate'' (1999) and ''Asterisk in Bhāropīyasthān'' (2007), Elst argues against the academically accepted view that the [[Indo-European languages]] originated in the [[Kurgan]] culture of the [[Central Asia]]n [[steppes]] and that the migrations to [[Indian subcontinent]] in the second millennium BCE brought a [[Indo-European languages|proto-Indo-European language]] with them.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CPP0CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA9|title=Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics|author=Walter Bär, Angelo Fiori, Umberto Rossi|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|quote=The Gimbautas hypothesis of an origin in the kurgan region and spread during the Bronze Age (between 4,000 and 2,500 BC) [...] seems to have the greatest support from archaeological and other considerations [...].|access-date=31 March 2019|isbn=9783642787829|date=6 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8q06xer0vHkC&pg=PA23|title=Languages of the World: An Introduction|last=Pereltsvaig|first=Asya|date=2012-02-09|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9781107002784}}</ref> He instead proposes that the language originated in India and it spread to Middle East and Europe when the Aryans, (who were indigenous) migrated out.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Humes|first=Cynthia Ann|date=2012|title=Hindutva, Mythistory, and Pseudoarchaeology|journal=Numen: International Review for the History of Religions|volume=59|issue=2–3|pages=178–201|doi=10.1163/156852712x630770|jstor=23244958}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XziTDAAAQBAJ|title=India: The Ancient Past: A History of the Indian Subcontinent from c. 7000 BCE to CE 1200|last1=Avari|first1=Burjor|date=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317236726|page=79|quote=A Belgian revisionist, Koenraad Elst, has nevertheless claimed that the Aryan migration was not towards India but out of India. Their ancestral homeland, their Urheimat, was the land of Sapta-Sindhava (the Punjab), and from there they expanded outwards towards Afghanistan, Iran, Central Asia and, ultimately, towards Europe.}}</ref> According to Elst, the linguistic data are a soft type of [[evidence]] and are compatible with a variety of scenarios. The dominant linguistic theories may be compatible with an out-of-India scenario for Indo-European expansion.<ref> | In two books, ''Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate'' (1999) and ''Asterisk in Bhāropīyasthān'' (2007), Elst argues against the academically accepted view that the [[Indo-European languages]] originated in the [[Kurgan]] culture of the [[Central Asia]]n [[steppes]] and that the migrations to [[Indian subcontinent]] in the second millennium BCE brought a [[Indo-European languages|proto-Indo-European language]] with them.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CPP0CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA9|title=Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics|author=Walter Bär, Angelo Fiori, Umberto Rossi|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|quote=The Gimbautas hypothesis of an origin in the kurgan region and spread during the Bronze Age (between 4,000 and 2,500 BC) [...] seems to have the greatest support from archaeological and other considerations [...].|access-date=31 March 2019|isbn=9783642787829|date=6 December 2012}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8q06xer0vHkC&pg=PA23|title=Languages of the World: An Introduction|last=Pereltsvaig|first=Asya|date=2012-02-09|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9781107002784}}</ref> He instead proposes that the language originated in India and it spread to Middle East and Europe when the Aryans, (who were indigenous) migrated out.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Humes|first=Cynthia Ann|date=2012|title=Hindutva, Mythistory, and Pseudoarchaeology|journal=Numen: International Review for the History of Religions|volume=59|issue=2–3|pages=178–201|doi=10.1163/156852712x630770|jstor=23244958}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XziTDAAAQBAJ|title=India: The Ancient Past: A History of the Indian Subcontinent from c. 7000 BCE to CE 1200|last1=Avari|first1=Burjor|date=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317236726|page=79|quote=A Belgian revisionist, Koenraad Elst, has nevertheless claimed that the Aryan migration was not towards India but out of India. Their ancestral homeland, their Urheimat, was the land of Sapta-Sindhava (the Punjab), and from there they expanded outwards towards Afghanistan, Iran, Central Asia and, ultimately, towards Europe.}}</ref> According to Elst, the linguistic data are a soft type of [[evidence]] and are compatible with a variety of scenarios. The dominant linguistic theories may be compatible with an out-of-India scenario for Indo-European expansion.<ref> | ||