Aryan: Difference between revisions

1,045 bytes added ,  22 July 2023
Cleanup: Grammar fix. Source modification.
m (Removing protection template from an unprotected page)
(Cleanup: Grammar fix. Source modification.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
{{About|the cultural and historical concept}}
{{About|the cultural and historical concept}}


{{cleanup lang|date=October 2021}}<!-- especially {{PIE}} -->
{{Indo-European topics}}
{{Indo-European topics}}
{{Hinduism}}
{{Hinduism}}
'''Aryan''' or '''Arya''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɛər|i|ə|n}};<ref>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/aryan "Aryan"]. ''[[Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary]].''</ref> [[Proto-Indo-Iranian language|Indo-Iranian]] {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}) is a term originally used as an [[ethnocultural]] self-designation by [[Indo-Iranians]] in ancient times, in contrast to the nearby outsiders known as 'non-Aryan' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|an-arya}}).<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> In [[Ancient India]], the term ''ā́rya'' was used by the [[Indo-Aryan peoples|Indo-Aryan speakers]] of the [[Vedic period]] as an [[endonym]] (self-designation) and in reference to a region known as ''[[Āryāvarta]]'' ('abode of the Aryas'), where the Indo-Aryan culture emerged.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}} In the ''[[Avesta]]'' scriptures, ancient [[Iranian peoples]] similarly used the term ''airya'' to designate themselves as an [[ethnic group]], and in reference to their mythical homeland, ''[[Airyanem Vaejah|Airyanǝm Vaēǰō]]'' ('expanse of the Aryas' or 'stretch of the Aryas').<ref name=":5" /><ref name="Gnoli" /> The [[Word stem|stem]] also forms the [[etymological]] source of place names such as ''[[Name of Iran#Etymology of "Iran"|Iran]]'' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryānām}}) and ''[[Alania]]'' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryāna-}}).<ref name="Mallory" />
'''Aryan''' or '''Arya''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɛər|i|ə|n}};<ref>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/aryan "Aryan"]. ''[[Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary]].''</ref> [[Proto-Indo-Iranian language|Indo-Iranian]] {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}) is a term originally used as an [[ethnocultural]] self-designation by [[Indo-Iranians]] in ancient times, in contrast to the nearby outsiders known as 'non-Aryan' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|an-arya}}).<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> In [[Ancient India]], the term ''ā́rya'' was used by the [[Indo-Aryan peoples|Indo-Aryan speakers]] of the [[Vedic period]] as an [[endonym]] (self-designation) and in reference to a region known as ''[[Āryāvarta]]'' ('abode of the Aryas'), where the Indo-Aryan culture emerged.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}} In the ''[[Avesta]]'' scriptures, ancient [[Iranian peoples]] similarly used the term ''airya'' to designate themselves as an [[ethnic group]], and in reference to their mythical homeland, ''[[Airyanem Vaejah|Airyanǝm Vaēǰō]]'' ('expanse of the Aryas' or 'stretch of the Aryas').<ref name=":5" /><ref name="Gnoli" /> The [[Word stem|stem]] also forms the [[etymological]] source of place names such as ''[[Name of Iran#Etymology of "Iran"|Iran]]'' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryānām}}) and ''[[Alania]]'' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryāna-}}).<ref name="Mallory" />


Although the stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}} may be of [[Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] (PIE) origin,<ref name=":2" /> its use as an ethnocultural self-designation is only attested among Indo-Iranian peoples, and it is not known if PIE speakers had a term to designate themselves as 'Proto-Indo-Europeans'. In any case, scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the idea of being an ''Aryan'' was religious, cultural, and linguistic, not racial.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}<ref name=":0">{{harvnb|Witzel|2001|p=24|ps=: "''Arya''/''ārya'' does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)"}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{harvnb|Anthony|2007|p=408|ps=: "The ''Rigveda'' and ''Avesta'' agreed that the essence of their shared parental Indo-Iranian identity was linguistic and ritual, not racial. If a person sacrificed to the right gods in the right way using the correct forms of the traditional hymns and poems, that person was an Aryan."}}</ref>
Although the stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}} may be of [[Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] (PIE) origin,<ref name=":2" /> its use as an ethnocultural self-designation is only attested among Indo-Iranian peoples, and it is not known if PIE speakers had a term to designate themselves as 'Proto-Indo-Europeans'. In any case, scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the idea of being an ''Aryan'' was religious, cultural, and linguistic, not racial.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}<ref name=":0">{{harvnb|Witzel|2001|p=24|ps=: "''Arya''/''ārya'' does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)"}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{harvnb|Anthony|2007|p=408|ps=: "The ''Rigveda'' and ''Avesta'' agreed that the essence of their shared parental Indo-Iranian identity was linguistic and ritual, not racial. If a person sacrificed to the right gods in the right way using the correct forms of the traditional hymns and poems, that person was an Aryan."}}</ref>


In the 1850s, the term '[[Aryan race|Aryan]]' was adopted as a [[Historical race concepts|racial category]] by French writer [[Arthur de Gobineau]], who, through the later works of [[Houston Stewart Chamberlain]], influenced the [[Nazism and race|Nazi racial ideology]].{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} Under [[Nazi Germany|Nazi rule]] (1933–1945), the term applied to most inhabitants of Germany excluding [[History of the Jews in Germany|Jews]], [[Romani_people|Roma]], and [[Slavs]] such as [[Czechs]], [[Polish people|Poles]] or [[Russians]].<ref name=":7">{{Cite book|last=Gordon|first=Sarah Ann|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/9946459|title=Hitler, Germans, and the "Jewish Question"|date=1984|publisher=Princeton University Press|others=Mazal Holocaust Collection|isbn=0-691-05412-6|location=Princeton, N.J.|pages=96|oclc=9946459}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Longerich|first=Peter|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/610166248|title=Holocaust : the Nazi persecution and murder of the Jews|date=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-280436-5|location=Oxford|pages=83,241|oclc=610166248}}</ref> Those classified as 'non-Aryans,' especially Jews,<ref>{{cite web|date=2020|title=Aryan {{!}} Arian, adj. and n.|url=https://oed.com/view/Entry/11296|url-status=live|website=Oxford English Dictionary|quote=Under the Nazi régime (1933–45) applied to the inhabitants of Germany of non-Jewish extraction. cf. 1933 tr. Hitler's ''Mein Kampf'' in ''Times'' 25 July 15/6: "The exact opposite of the Aryan is the Jew." 1933 Education 1 Sept. 170/2: "The basic idea of the new law is that non-Aryans, that is to say mainly Jews..."}}</ref> were [[Racial policy of Nazi Germany|discriminated against]] before suffering the [[Genocide|systematic mass killing]] known as [[the Holocaust]].<ref name=":7" /> The atrocities committed in the name of [[Aryanism|Aryanist]] supremacist ideologies have led academics to generally avoid the term 'Aryan', which has been replaced in most cases by '[[Indo-Iranians|Indo-Iranian]]', although the South Asian branch is still known as '[[Indo-Aryan peoples|Indo-Aryan]]'.<ref name=":6" />
In the 1850s, the term '[[Aryan race|Aryan]]' was adopted as a [[Historical race concepts|racial category]] by French writer [[Arthur de Gobineau]], who, through the later works of [[Houston Stewart Chamberlain]], influenced the [[Nazism and race|Nazi racial ideology]].{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} Under [[Nazi Germany|Nazi rule]] (1933–1945), the term applied to most inhabitants of Germany excluding [[History of the Jews in Germany|Jews]], [[Romani_people|Roma]], and [[Slavs]] such as [[Czechs]], [[Polish people|Poles]] or [[Russians]].<ref name=":7">{{Cite book|last=Gordon|first=Sarah Ann|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/9946459|title=Hitler, Germans, and the "Jewish Question"|date=1984|publisher=Princeton University Press|others=Mazal Holocaust Collection|isbn=0-691-05412-6|location=Princeton, N.J.|pages=96|oclc=9946459}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Longerich|first=Peter|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/610166248|title=Holocaust : the Nazi persecution and murder of the Jews|date=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-280436-5|location=Oxford|pages=83,241|oclc=610166248}}</ref> Those classified as 'non-Aryans,' especially Jews,<ref>{{cite web|date=2020|title=Aryan {{!}} Arian, adj. and n.|url=https://oed.com/view/Entry/11296 |website=Oxford English Dictionary|quote=Under the Nazi régime (1933–45) applied to the inhabitants of Germany of non-Jewish extraction. cf. 1933 tr. Hitler's ''Mein Kampf'' in ''Times'' 25 July 15/6: 'The exact opposite of the Aryan is the Jew.' 1933 Education 1 Sept. 170/2: 'The basic idea of the new law is that non-Aryans, that is to say mainly Jews...'}}</ref> were [[Racial policy of Nazi Germany|discriminated against]] before suffering the [[Genocide|systematic mass killing]] known as [[the Holocaust]].<ref name=":7" /> The atrocities committed in the name of [[Aryanism|Aryanist]] supremacist ideologies have led academics to generally avoid the term 'Aryan', which has been replaced in most cases by '[[Indo-Iranians|Indo-Iranian]]', although the South Asian branch is still known as '[[Indo-Aryan peoples|Indo-Aryan]]'.<ref name=":6" />


== Etymology ==
== Etymology ==
Line 16: Line 16:


=== Indo-Iranian ===
=== Indo-Iranian ===
The [[Sanskrit language|Sanskrit]] word ''ā́rya'' ([[wiktionary:आर्य|आर्य]]) was originally an ethnocultural term designating those who spoke [[Vedic Sanskrit]] and adhered to Vedic cultural norms (including religious rituals and poetry), in contrast to an outsider, or ''an-ā́rya'' ('non-Arya').{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}} By the time of the [[Buddha]] (5th–4th century BCE), it took the meaning of 'noble'.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=4}} In [[Old Iranian languages]], the [[Avestan]] term ''airya'' ([[Old Persian]] ''ariya'') was likewise used as an ethnocultural self-designation by ancient [[Iranian peoples]], in contrast to an ''[[Aneran|an-airya]]'' ('non-Arya'). It designated those who belonged to the 'Aryan' (Iranian) ethnic stock, spoke the language and followed the religion of the 'Aryas'.<ref name=":5">{{harvnb|Bailey|1987|ps=: "It is used in the ''Avesta'' of members of an ethnic group and contrasts with other named groups (Tūirya, Sairima, Dāha, Sāinu or Sāini) and with the outer world of the ''An-airya'' 'non-Arya'."}}</ref><ref name="Gnoli">{{harvnb|Gnoli|2006|ps=: "Mid. Pers. ''ēr'' (plur. ''ērān''), just like Old Pers. ''ariya'' and Av. ''airya'', has an evident ethnic value, which is also present in the abstract term ''ērīh'', 'Iranian character, Iranianness'."}}</ref>
The [[Sanskrit language|Sanskrit]] word ''ā́rya'' ([[wiktionary:आर्य|आर्य]]) was originally an ethnocultural term designating those who spoke [[Vedic Sanskrit]] and adhered to Vedic cultural norms (including religious rituals and poetry), in contrast to an outsider, or ''an-ā́rya'' ('non-Arya').{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}} By the time of the [[Buddha]] (5th–4th century BCE), it took the meaning of 'noble'.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=4}} In [[Old Iranian languages]], the [[Avestan]] term ''airya'' ([[Old Persian]] ''ariya'') was likewise used as an ethnocultural self-designation by ancient [[Iranian peoples]], in contrast to an ''[[Aneran|an-airya]]'' ('non-Arya'). It designated those who belonged to the 'Aryan' (Iranian) ethnic stock, spoke the language and followed the religion of the 'Aryas'.<ref name=":5">{{harvnb|Bailey|1987|ps=: "It is used in the ''Avesta'' of members of an ethnic group and contrasts with other named groups (Tūirya, Sairima, Dāha, Sāinu or Sāini) and with the outer world of the ''An-airya'' 'non-Arya'."}}</ref><ref name="Gnoli">{{harvnb|Gnoli|2006|ps=: "Mid. Pers. ''ēr'' (plur. ''ērān''), just like Old Pers. ''ariya'' and Av. ''airya'', has an evident ethnic value, which is also present in the abstract term ''ērīh'', 'Iranian character, Iranianness'."}}</ref>


These two terms derive from the reconstructed [[Proto-Indo-Iranian language|Proto-Indo-Iranian]] stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}- or {{lang|iir-x-proto|āryo}}-,<ref>{{harvnb|Szemerényi|1977|pp=125–146}}; {{harvnb|Watkins|1985|p=3}}; {{harvnb|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=304}}; {{harvnb|Fortson|2011|p=209}}</ref> which was probably the name used by the prehistoric [[Indo-Iranians|Indo-Iranian peoples]] to designate themselves as an ethnocultural group.<ref name=":3">{{harvnb|Benveniste|1973|p=295|ps=: "''Arya'' ... is the common ancient designation of the 'Indo-Iranians'."}}</ref>{{Sfn|Gamkrelidze|Ivanov|1995|pp=657–658}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=456}} The term did not have any [[Race (human categorization)|racial]] connotation, which only emerged later in the works of 19th-century Western writers.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}<ref name=":0"/>{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}} According to [[David W. Anthony]], "the ''[[Rigveda]]'' and ''[[Avesta]]'' agreed that the essence of their shared parental Indo-Iranian identity was linguistic and ritual, not racial. If a person sacrificed to the right gods in the right way using the correct forms of the traditional hymns and poems, that person was an Aryan."{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}}
These two terms derive from the reconstructed [[Proto-Indo-Iranian language|Proto-Indo-Iranian]] stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}- or {{lang|iir-x-proto|āryo}}-,<ref>{{harvnb|Szemerényi|1977|pp=125–146}}; {{harvnb|Watkins|1985|p=3}}; {{harvnb|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=304}}; {{harvnb|Fortson|2011|p=209}}</ref> which was probably the name used by the prehistoric [[Indo-Iranians|Indo-Iranian peoples]] to designate themselves as an ethnocultural group.<ref name=":3">{{harvnb|Benveniste|1973|p=295|ps=: "''Arya'' ... is the common ancient designation of the 'Indo-Iranians'."}}</ref>{{Sfn|Gamkrelidze|Ivanov|1995|pp=657–658}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=456}} The term did not have any [[Race (human categorization)|racial]] connotation, which only emerged later in the works of 19th-century Western writers.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}<ref name=":0"/>{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}} According to [[David W. Anthony]], "the ''[[Rigveda]]'' and ''[[Avesta]]'' agreed that the essence of their shared parental Indo-Iranian identity was linguistic and ritual, not racial. If a person sacrificed to the right gods in the right way using the correct forms of the traditional hymns and poems, that person was an Aryan."{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}}
Line 50: Line 50:
=== Ancient India ===
=== Ancient India ===
[[File:Late Vedic Culture (1100-500 BCE).png|thumb|The approximate extent of ''Āryāvarta'' during the late [[Vedic period]] (ca. 1100-500 BCE). ''Aryavarta'' was limited to northwest India and the western Ganges plain, while [[Greater Magadha]] in the east was habitated by non-Vedic Indo-Aryans, who gave rise to Jainism and Buddhism.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|2007}}{{sfn|Samuel|2010}}]]
[[File:Late Vedic Culture (1100-500 BCE).png|thumb|The approximate extent of ''Āryāvarta'' during the late [[Vedic period]] (ca. 1100-500 BCE). ''Aryavarta'' was limited to northwest India and the western Ganges plain, while [[Greater Magadha]] in the east was habitated by non-Vedic Indo-Aryans, who gave rise to Jainism and Buddhism.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|2007}}{{sfn|Samuel|2010}}]]
[[Vedic Sanskrit]] speakers viewed the term ''ā́rya'' as a religious–linguistic category, referring to those who spoke the Sanskrit language and adhered to Vedic cultural norms, especially those who worshipped the Vedic gods ([[Indra]] and [[Agni]] in particular), took part in the sacrifices and festivals, and practiced the art of poetry.<ref>{{harvnb|Kuiper|1991|p=96}}; {{harvnb|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}}; {{harvnb|Bryant|2001|p=61}}; {{harvnb|Anthony|2007|p=11}}</ref>
[[Vedic Sanskrit]] speakers viewed the term ''ā́rya'' as a religious–linguistic category, referring to those who spoke the Sanskrit language and adhered to Vedic cultural norms, especially those who worshipped the Vedic gods ([[Indra]] and [[Agni]] in particular), took part in the [[yajna]] and festivals, and practiced the art of poetry.<ref>{{harvnb|Kuiper|1991|p=96}}; {{harvnb|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}}; {{harvnb|Bryant|2001|p=61}}; {{harvnb|Anthony|2007|p=11}}</ref>


The 'non-Aryas' designated primarily those who were not able to speak the ''āryā'' language correctly, the ''[[Mleccha]]'' or ''Mṛdhravāc.''{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=vii}} However, ''āryā'' is used only once in the [[Vedas]] to designate the language of the texts, the Vedic area being defined in the ''[[Aranyaka|Kauṣītaki Āraṇyaka]]'' as that where the ''āryā vāc'' ('Ārya speech') is spoken.{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=2}} Some 35 names of Vedic tribes, chiefs and poets mentioned in the ''[[Rigveda]]'' were of 'non-Aryan' origin, demonstrating that [[cultural assimilation]] to the ''ā́rya'' community was possible, and/or that some 'Aryan' families chose to give 'non-Aryan' names to their newborns.{{Sfn|Kuiper|1991|pp=6–8, 96|p=}}{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=11}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=453}} In the words of Indologist [[Michael Witzel]], the term ''ārya'' "does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)".{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=24}}
The 'non-Aryas' designated primarily those who were not able to speak the ''āryā'' language correctly, the ''[[Mleccha]]'' or ''Mṛdhravāc.''{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=vii}} However, ''āryā'' is used only once in the [[Vedas]] to designate the language of the texts, the Vedic area being defined in the ''[[Aranyaka|Kauṣītaki Āraṇyaka]]'' as that where the ''āryā vāc'' ('Ārya speech') is spoken.{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=2}} Some 35 names of Vedic tribes, chiefs and poets mentioned in the ''[[Rigveda]]'' were of 'non-Aryan' origin, demonstrating that [[cultural assimilation]] to the ''ā́rya'' community was possible, and/or that some 'Aryan' families chose to give 'non-Aryan' names to their newborns.{{Sfn|Kuiper|1991|pp=6–8, 96|p=}}{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=11}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=453}} In the words of Indologist [[Michael Witzel]], the term ''ārya'' "does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)".{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=24}}
Line 155: Line 155:
==== North European hypothesis ====
==== North European hypothesis ====
{{main|North European hypothesis}}
{{main|North European hypothesis}}
[[File:Passing_of_the_Great_Race_-_Map_2.jpg|thumb|280x280px|"Expansion of the Pre-Teutonic Nordics" — Map from ''[[The Passing of the Great Race]]'' by [[Madison Grant]], showing hypothesized migrations of Nordic peoples]]
[[File:Passing_of_the_Great_Race_-_Map_2.jpg|thumb|280x280px|"Expansion of the Pre-Teutonic Nordics" — map from ''[[The Passing of the Great Race]]'' by [[Madison Grant]], showing hypothesized migrations of Nordic peoples]]
In the meantime, the idea that Indo-European languages had originated from South Asia gradually lost support among academics. After the end of the 1860s, alternative models of [[Indo-European migrations]] began to emerge, some of them locating the [[Proto-Indo-European homeland|ancestral homeland]] in Northern Europe.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=268}}{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=52}} [[Karl Penka]], credited as "a transitional figure between Aryanism and Nordicism",<ref>{{Cite book|last= Hutton|first= Christopher M.|title= Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Dialectic of Volk|date= 2005|publisher= Polity|isbn= 978-0-7456-3177-6|pages= 108}}</ref> argued in 1883 that the Aryans originated in southern [[Scandinavia]].{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p= 268}}{{qn|date=October 2022}} In the early-20th century, German scholar [[Gustaf Kossinna]] (1858-1931), attempting to connect a prehistoric [[material culture]] with the reconstructed [[Proto-Indo-European language]], contended on archaeological grounds that the 'Indo-Germanic' (''Indogermanische'') migrations originated from a homeland located in northern Europe.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} Until the end of [[World War II]], scholarship on the Indo-European [[Urheimat]] broadly fell into two camps: Kossinna's followers and those, initially led by [[Otto Schrader (philologist)|Otto Schrader]] (1855-1919), who supported a [[Steppe hypothesis|steppe homeland]] in Eurasia, which became the most widespread hypothesis among scholars.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=269}}
In the meantime, the idea that Indo-European languages had originated from South Asia gradually lost support among academics. After the end of the 1860s, alternative models of [[Indo-European migrations]] began to emerge, some of them locating the [[Proto-Indo-European homeland|ancestral homeland]] in Northern Europe.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=268}}{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=52}} [[Karl Penka]], credited as "a transitional figure between Aryanism and Nordicism",<ref>{{Cite book|last= Hutton|first= Christopher M.|title= Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Dialectic of Volk|date= 2005|publisher= Polity|isbn= 978-0-7456-3177-6|pages= 108}}</ref> argued in 1883 that the Aryans originated in southern [[Scandinavia]].{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p= 268}}{{qn|date=October 2022}} In the early-20th century, German scholar [[Gustaf Kossinna]] (1858-1931), attempting to connect a prehistoric [[material culture]] with the reconstructed [[Proto-Indo-European language]], contended on archaeological grounds that the 'Indo-Germanic' (''Indogermanische'') migrations originated from a homeland located in northern Europe.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} Until the end of [[World War II]], scholarship on the Indo-European [[Urheimat]] broadly fell into two camps: Kossinna's followers and those, initially led by [[Otto Schrader (philologist)|Otto Schrader]] (1855-1919), who supported a [[Steppe hypothesis|steppe homeland]] in Eurasia, which became the most widespread hypothesis among scholars.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=269}}


Line 164: Line 164:
[[File:Birth of a nation Aryan quote.jpg|thumb|275px|An [[intertitle]] from the [[silent film]] blockbuster ''[[The Birth of a Nation]]'' (1915). "Aryan birthright" is here "white birthright", the "defense" of which unites "[[White race|whites]]" in the Northern and Southern U.S. against "[[coloreds]]". In another film of the same year, ''[[The Aryan]]'', [[William S. Hart]]'s "Aryan" identity is defined in distinction from other peoples.]]
[[File:Birth of a nation Aryan quote.jpg|thumb|275px|An [[intertitle]] from the [[silent film]] blockbuster ''[[The Birth of a Nation]]'' (1915). "Aryan birthright" is here "white birthright", the "defense" of which unites "[[White race|whites]]" in the Northern and Southern U.S. against "[[coloreds]]". In another film of the same year, ''[[The Aryan]]'', [[William S. Hart]]'s "Aryan" identity is defined in distinction from other peoples.]]


Through the works of [[Houston Stewart Chamberlain]], Gobineau's ideas influenced the [[Nazism and race|Nazi racial ideology]], which saw the "[[Aryan race]]" as innately superior to other putative racial groups.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} The Nazi official [[Alfred Rosenberg]] argued for a new "[[Blood and soil|religion of the blood]]" based on the supposed innate promptings of the Nordic soul to defend its "noble" character against racial and cultural degeneration. Rosenberg believed the [[Nordic race]] to be descended from [[Proto-Indo-Europeans|Proto-Aryans]], a hypothetical [[Prehistory|prehistoric]] people who dwelt on the [[North German Plain]] and who had ultimately originated from the lost continent of [[Atlantis]].{{refn|group=note|[[Alfred Rosenberg|Rosenberg, Alfred]], "[[The Myth of the 20th Century]]". The term "Atlantis" is mentioned two times in the whole book, the term "Atlantis-hypothesis" is mentioned just once. Rosenberg (page 24): "''It seems to be not completely impossible, that at parts where today the waves of the Atlantic ocean murmur and icebergs move along, once a blossoming land towered in the water, on which a creative race founded a great culture and sent its children as seafarers and warriors into the world; but if this Atlantis-hypothesis proves untenable, we still have to presume a prehistoric Nordic cultural center.''" Rosenberg (page 26): "''The ridiculed hypothesis about a Nordic creative center, which we can call Atlantis – without meaning a sunken island – from where once waves of warriors migrated to all directions as first witnesses of Nordic longing for distant lands to conquer and create, today becomes probable.''" Original: Es erscheint als nicht ganz ausgeschlossen, dass an Stellen, über die heute die Wellen des Atlantischen Ozeans rauschen und riesige Eisgebirge herziehen, einst ein blühendes Festland aus den Fluten ragte, auf dem eine schöpferische Rasse große, weitausgreifende Kultur erzeugte und ihre Kinder als Seefahrer und Krieger hinaussandte in die Welt; aber selbst wenn sich diese Atlantishypothese als nicht haltbar erweisen sollte, wird ein nordisches vorgeschichtliches Kulturzentrum angenommen werden müssen. ... Und deshalb wird die alte verlachte Hypothese heute Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass von einem nordischen Mittelpunkt der Schöpfung, nennen wir ihn, ohne uns auf die Annahme eines versunkenen atlantischen Erdteils festzulegen, die Atlantis, einst Kriegerschwärme strahlenförmig ausgewandert sind als erste Zeugen des immer wieder sich erneut verkörpernden nordischen Fernwehs, um zu erobern, zu gestalten."}} Under Rosenberg, the theories of [[Arthur de Gobineau]], [[Georges Vacher de Lapouge]], Blavatsky, [[Houston Stewart Chamberlain]], [[Madison Grant]], and those of [[Hitler]],<ref>Mein Kampf, tr. in The Times, 25 July 1933, p.&nbsp;15/6</ref> all culminated in [[Racial policy of Nazi Germany|Nazi Germany's race policies]] and the "[[Aryanization (Nazism)|Aryanization]]" decrees of the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. In its "appalling medical model", the annihilation of the "racially inferior" ''[[Untermensch]]en'' was sanctified as the excision of a diseased organ in an otherwise healthy body,<ref>{{citation|last=Glover|first=Jonathan|chapter=Eugenics: Some Lessons from the Nazi Experience|editor-last=Harris|editor-first=John|editor2-last=Holm|editor2-first=Soren|title=The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation|location=Oxford|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1998|pages=57–65}}</ref> which led to the [[Holocaust]].[[File:ArnoBrekerDiePartei.jpg|thumb|220x220px|[[Arno Breker]]'s sculpture ''Die Partei (The Party)'', depicting a Nazi-era ideal of the "Nordic Aryan" racial type.|left]]According to [[Nazism and race|Nazi racial theorists]], the term "Aryans" (''Arier'') described the [[Germanic peoples]],<ref>Davies, Norman (2006). ''Europe at War: 1939–1945 : No Simple Victory'', p. 167</ref> and they considered the purest Aryans to be those that belonged to a "[[Nordic race]]" physical ideal, which they referred to as the "[[master race]]".{{refn|The ''American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' states at the beginning of its definition, "[it] is one of the ironies of history that ''Aryan''<!--source is in italics-->, a word nowadays referring to the blond-haired, blue-eyed physical ideal of [[Nazi Germany]], originally referred to a people who looked vastly different. Its history starts with the ancient [[Indo-Iranians]], peoples who inhabited parts of what are now <!-- THIS IS INSIDE A LITERAL QUOTATION --> [[Greater Iran|Iran]], [[Afghanistan]], Pakistan and India. <!-- THIS IS INSIDE A LITERAL QUOTATION -->"<ref name="AHD">{{citation|last=Watkins|first=Calvert|chapter=Aryan|title=American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language|edition=4th|year=2000|location=New York|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|isbn=0-395-82517-2|quote=...when [[Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel|Friedrich Schlegel]], a German scholar who was an important early [[Indo-European studies|Indo-Europeanist]], came up with a theory that linked the Indo-Iranian words with the German word ''Ehre'', 'honor', and older Germanic names containing the element ''ario-'', such as the [[Suebi|Swiss]] {{sic}} warrior [[Ariovistus]] who was written about by [[Julius Caesar]]. Schlegel theorized that far from being just a designation of the Indo-Iranians, the word ''*arya-'' had in fact been what the Indo-Europeans called themselves, meaning [according to Schlegel] something like 'the honorable people.' (This theory has since been called into question.)|url=https://archive.org/details/americanheritage0000unse_a1o7}}</ref>|group=note}} However, a satisfactory definition of "Aryan" remained problematic during [[Nazi Germany]].<ref>Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). ''The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution'', pp, 9–11</ref> Although the physical ideal of Nazi racial theorists was typically the tall, [[blond|blond haired]], and [[Eye color|light-eyed]] Nordic individual, such theorists accepted the fact that a considerable variety of hair and eye colour existed within the racial categories they recognised. For example, [[Adolf Hitler]] and many Nazi officials had dark hair and were still considered members of the [[Aryan race]] under Nazi racial doctrine, because the determination of an individual's racial type depended on a preponderance of many characteristics in an individual rather than on just one defining feature.<ref>"The range of blond hair color in pure Nordic peoples runs from flaxen and red to shades of chestnut and brown... It must be clearly understood that blondness of hair and of eye is not a final test of Nordic race. The Nordics include all the blonds, and also those of darker hair or eye when possessed of a preponderance of other Nordic characters. In this sense the word "blond" means those lighter shades of hair or eye color in contrast to the very dark or black shades which are termed brunet. The meaning of "blond" as now used is therefore not limited to the lighter or flaxen shades as in colloquial speech. In England among Nordic populations, there are large numbers of individuals with hazel brown eyes joined with the light brown or chestnut hair which is the typical hair shade of the English and Americans. This combination is also common in Holland and Westphalia and is frequently associated with a very fair skin. These men are all of "blond" aspect and constitution and consequently are to be classed as members of the Nordic race." Quoted in Grant, 1922, p. 26.</ref> In September 1935, the Nazis passed the [[Nuremberg Laws]]. All Aryan Reich citizens were required to prove their Aryan ancestry; one way was to obtain an ''[[Ahnenpass]]'' ("ancestor pass") by providing proof through baptismal certificates that all four grandparents were of Aryan descent.<ref>Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). ''The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution'', p. 68</ref> In December of the same year, the Nazis founded ''[[Lebensborn]]'' ("Fount of Life") to counteract the falling Aryan birth rates in Germany, and to promote [[Nazi eugenics]].<ref name="bissell">{{cite news |last=Bissell |first=Kate |title=Fountain of Life |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4080822.stm |access-date=30 September 2011 |publisher=BBC Radio 4 |date=13 June 2005}}</ref>
Through the works of [[Houston Stewart Chamberlain]], Gobineau's ideas influenced the [[Nazism and race|Nazi racial ideology]], which saw the "[[Aryan race]]" as innately superior to other putative racial groups.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} The Nazi official [[Alfred Rosenberg]] argued for a new "[[Blood and soil|religion of the blood]]" based on the supposed innate promptings of the Nordic soul to defend its "noble" character against racial and cultural degeneration. Rosenberg believed the [[Nordic race]] to be descended from [[Proto-Indo-Europeans|Proto-Aryans]], a hypothetical [[Prehistory|prehistoric]] people who dwelt on the [[North German Plain]] and who had ultimately originated from the lost continent of [[Atlantis]].{{refn|group=note|[[Alfred Rosenberg|Rosenberg, Alfred]], "[[The Myth of the 20th Century]]". The term "Atlantis" is mentioned two times in the whole book, the term "Atlantis-hypothesis" is mentioned just once. Rosenberg (page 24): "''It seems to be not completely impossible, that at parts where today the waves of the Atlantic ocean murmur and icebergs move along, once a blossoming land towered in the water, on which a creative race founded a great culture and sent its children as seafarers and warriors into the world; but if this Atlantis-hypothesis proves untenable, we still have to presume a prehistoric Nordic cultural center.''" Rosenberg (page 26): "''The ridiculed hypothesis about a Nordic creative center, which we can call Atlantis – without meaning a sunken island – from where once waves of warriors migrated to all directions as first witnesses of Nordic longing for distant lands to conquer and create, today becomes probable.''" Original: Es erscheint als nicht ganz ausgeschlossen, dass an Stellen, über die heute die Wellen des Atlantischen Ozeans rauschen und riesige Eisgebirge herziehen, einst ein blühendes Festland aus den Fluten ragte, auf dem eine schöpferische Rasse große, weitausgreifende Kultur erzeugte und ihre Kinder als Seefahrer und Krieger hinaussandte in die Welt; aber selbst wenn sich diese Atlantishypothese als nicht haltbar erweisen sollte, wird ein nordisches vorgeschichtliches Kulturzentrum angenommen werden müssen. ... Und deshalb wird die alte verlachte Hypothese heute Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass von einem nordischen Mittelpunkt der Schöpfung, nennen wir ihn, ohne uns auf die Annahme eines versunkenen atlantischen Erdteils festzulegen, die Atlantis, einst Kriegerschwärme strahlenförmig ausgewandert sind als erste Zeugen des immer wieder sich erneut verkörpernden nordischen Fernwehs, um zu erobern, zu gestalten."}} Under Rosenberg, the theories of [[Arthur de Gobineau]], [[Georges Vacher de Lapouge]], Blavatsky, [[Houston Stewart Chamberlain]], [[Madison Grant]], and those of [[Hitler]],<ref>Mein Kampf, tr. in The Times, 25 July 1933, p.&nbsp;15/6</ref> all culminated in [[Racial policy of Nazi Germany|Nazi Germany's race policies]] and the "[[Aryanization (Nazism)|Aryanization]]" decrees of the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. In its "appalling medical model", the annihilation of the "racially inferior" ''[[Untermensch]]en'' was sanctified as the excision of a diseased organ in an otherwise healthy body,<ref>{{citation|last=Glover|first=Jonathan|chapter=Eugenics: Some Lessons from the Nazi Experience|editor-last=Harris|editor-first=John|editor2-last=Holm|editor2-first=Soren|title=The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation|location=Oxford|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1998|pages=57–65}}</ref> which led to the [[Holocaust]].[[File:ArnoBrekerDiePartei.jpg|thumb|220x220px|[[Arno Breker]]'s sculpture ''Die Partei (The Party)'', depicting a Nazi-era ideal of the "Nordic Aryan" racial type|left]]According to [[Nazism and race|Nazi racial theorists]], the term "Aryans" (''Arier'') described the [[Germanic peoples]],<ref>Davies, Norman (2006). ''Europe at War: 1939–1945 : No Simple Victory'', p. 167</ref> and they considered the purest Aryans to be those that belonged to a "[[Nordic race]]" physical ideal, which they referred to as the "[[master race]]".{{refn|The ''American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' states at the beginning of its definition, "[it] is one of the ironies of history that ''Aryan''<!--source is in italics-->, a word nowadays referring to the blond-haired, blue-eyed physical ideal of [[Nazi Germany]], originally referred to a people who looked vastly different. Its history starts with the ancient [[Indo-Iranians]], peoples who inhabited parts of what are now <!-- THIS IS INSIDE A LITERAL QUOTATION --> [[Greater Iran|Iran]], [[Afghanistan]], Pakistan and India. <!-- THIS IS INSIDE A LITERAL QUOTATION -->"<ref name="AHD">{{citation|last=Watkins|first=Calvert|chapter=Aryan|title=American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language|edition=4th|year=2000|location=New York|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|isbn=0-395-82517-2|quote=...when [[Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel|Friedrich Schlegel]], a German scholar who was an important early [[Indo-European studies|Indo-Europeanist]], came up with a theory that linked the Indo-Iranian words with the German word ''Ehre'', 'honor', and older Germanic names containing the element ''ario-'', such as the [[Suebi|Swiss]] {{sic}} warrior [[Ariovistus]] who was written about by [[Julius Caesar]]. Schlegel theorized that far from being just a designation of the Indo-Iranians, the word ''*arya-'' had in fact been what the Indo-Europeans called themselves, meaning [according to Schlegel] something like 'the honorable people.' (This theory has since been called into question.)|url=https://archive.org/details/americanheritage0000unse_a1o7}}</ref>|group=note}} However, a satisfactory definition of "Aryan" remained problematic during [[Nazi Germany]].<ref>Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). ''The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution'', pp, 9–11</ref> Although the physical ideal of Nazi racial theorists was typically the tall, [[blond|blond haired]], and [[Eye color|light-eyed]] Nordic individual, such theorists accepted the fact that a considerable variety of hair and eye colour existed within the racial categories they recognised. For example, [[Adolf Hitler]] and many Nazi officials had dark hair and were still considered members of the [[Aryan race]] under Nazi racial doctrine, because the determination of an individual's racial type depended on a preponderance of many characteristics in an individual rather than on just one defining feature.<ref>"The range of blond hair color in pure Nordic peoples runs from flaxen and red to shades of chestnut and brown... It must be clearly understood that blondness of hair and of eye is not a final test of Nordic race. The Nordics include all the blonds, and also those of darker hair or eye when possessed of a preponderance of other Nordic characters. In this sense the word "blond" means those lighter shades of hair or eye color in contrast to the very dark or black shades which are termed brunet. The meaning of "blond" as now used is therefore not limited to the lighter or flaxen shades as in colloquial speech. In England among Nordic populations, there are large numbers of individuals with hazel brown eyes joined with the light brown or chestnut hair which is the typical hair shade of the English and Americans. This combination is also common in Holland and Westphalia and is frequently associated with a very fair skin. These men are all of "blond" aspect and constitution and consequently are to be classed as members of the Nordic race." Quoted in Grant, 1922, p. 26.</ref> In September 1935, the Nazis passed the [[Nuremberg Laws]]. All Aryan Reich citizens were required to prove their Aryan ancestry; one way was to obtain an ''[[Ahnenpass]]'' ("ancestor pass") by providing proof through baptismal certificates that all four grandparents were of Aryan descent.<ref>Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). ''The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution'', p. 68</ref> In December of the same year, the Nazis founded ''[[Lebensborn]]'' ("Fount of Life") to counteract the falling Aryan birth rates in Germany, and to promote [[Nazi eugenics]].<ref name="bissell">{{cite news |last=Bissell |first=Kate |title=Fountain of Life |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4080822.stm |access-date=30 September 2011 |publisher=BBC Radio 4 |date=13 June 2005}}</ref>


Many American [[White Supremacist|white supremacist]] [[Neo-Nazism|neo-Nazi]] groups and prison gangs refer to themselves as 'Aryans', including the [[Aryan Brotherhood]], the [[Aryan Nations]], the [[Aryan Republican Army]], the [[White Aryan Resistance]], or the [[Aryan Circle]].{{sfn|Goodrick-Clarke|2002|pp=232–233}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Blazak|first=Randy|date=2009|title=The prison hate machine|journal=Criminology & Public Policy|volume=8|issue=3|pages=633–640|doi=10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00579.x|issn=1745-9133}}</ref> Modern nationalist political groups and neo-Pagan movements in Russia claim a direct linkage between themselves as Slavs and the ancient 'Aryans',{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} and in some Indian nationalist circles, the term 'Aryan' can also be used in reference to an alleged Aryan 'race'.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=4}}
Many American [[White Supremacist|white supremacist]] [[Neo-Nazism|neo-Nazi]] groups and prison gangs refer to themselves as 'Aryans', including the [[Aryan Brotherhood]], the [[Aryan Nations]], the [[Aryan Republican Army]], the [[White Aryan Resistance]], or the [[Aryan Circle]].{{sfn|Goodrick-Clarke|2002|pp=232–233}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Blazak|first=Randy|date=2009|title=The prison hate machine|journal=Criminology & Public Policy|volume=8|issue=3|pages=633–640|doi=10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00579.x|issn=1745-9133}}</ref> Modern nationalist political groups and neo-Pagan movements in Russia claim a direct linkage between themselves as Slavs and the ancient 'Aryans',{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} and in some Indian nationalist circles, the term 'Aryan' can also be used in reference to an alleged Aryan 'race'.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=4}}
Line 177: Line 177:
* Wendy Doniger (2017): "The opposing argument, that speakers of Indo-European languages were indigenous to the Indian subcontinent, is not supported by any reliable scholarship. It is now championed primarily by Hindu nationalists, whose religious sentiments have led them to regard the theory of Aryan migration with some asperity."<ref group=web name="Doniger_2017">Wendy Doniger (2017), [https://inference-review.com/article/another-great-story "Another Great Story"]", review of Asko Parpola's ''The Roots of Hinduism''; in: ''Inference, International Review of Science'', Volume 3, Issue 2</ref>
* Wendy Doniger (2017): "The opposing argument, that speakers of Indo-European languages were indigenous to the Indian subcontinent, is not supported by any reliable scholarship. It is now championed primarily by Hindu nationalists, whose religious sentiments have led them to regard the theory of Aryan migration with some asperity."<ref group=web name="Doniger_2017">Wendy Doniger (2017), [https://inference-review.com/article/another-great-story "Another Great Story"]", review of Asko Parpola's ''The Roots of Hinduism''; in: ''Inference, International Review of Science'', Volume 3, Issue 2</ref>
* Girish Shahane (September 14, 2019), in response to Narasimhan et al. (2019): "Hindutva activists, however, have kept the Aryan Invasion Theory alive, because it offers them the perfect strawman, 'an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument'&nbsp;... The Out of India hypothesis is a desperate attempt to reconcile linguistic, archaeological and genetic evidence with Hindutva sentiment and nationalistic pride, but it cannot reverse time's arrow&nbsp;... The evidence keeps crushing Hindutva ideas of history."<ref group=web name="Shahane_2019">Girish Shahane (September 14, 2019), [https://scroll.in/article/937043/why-hindutva-supporters-love-to-hate-the-discredited-aryan-invasion-theory ''Why Hindutva supporters love to hate the discredited Aryan Invasion Theory''], Scroll.in</ref>
* Girish Shahane (September 14, 2019), in response to Narasimhan et al. (2019): "Hindutva activists, however, have kept the Aryan Invasion Theory alive, because it offers them the perfect strawman, 'an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument'&nbsp;... The Out of India hypothesis is a desperate attempt to reconcile linguistic, archaeological and genetic evidence with Hindutva sentiment and nationalistic pride, but it cannot reverse time's arrow&nbsp;... The evidence keeps crushing Hindutva ideas of history."<ref group=web name="Shahane_2019">Girish Shahane (September 14, 2019), [https://scroll.in/article/937043/why-hindutva-supporters-love-to-hate-the-discredited-aryan-invasion-theory ''Why Hindutva supporters love to hate the discredited Aryan Invasion Theory''], Scroll.in</ref>
* Koenraad Elst (May 10, 2016): "Of course it is a fringe theory, at least internationally, where the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) is still the official paradigm. In India, though, it has the support of most archaeologists, who fail to find a trace of this Aryan influx and instead find cultural continuity."<ref name="Elst_2016">Koenraad Elst (May 10, 2016), Koenraad Elst: "I am not aware of any governmental interest in correcting distorted history", ''Swarajya Magazine''</ref>}} According to Michael Witzel, the "indigenous Aryans" position is not scholarship in the usual sense, but an "apologetic, ultimately religious undertaking".{{sfn|Witzel|2001|p=95}} A number of other alternative theories have been proposed including [[Anatolian hypothesis]], [[Armenian hypothesis]], the [[Paleolithic continuity theory]] but these are not widely accepted and have received little or no interest in mainstream scholarship.<ref>{{cite document|title=Towards a generalised continuity model for Uralic and Indo European languages|year=2002| citeseerx=10.1.1.370.8351 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World|author=David W. Anthony|pages=300–400}}</ref>
* Koenraad Elst (May 10, 2016): "Of course it is a fringe theory, at least internationally, where the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) is still the official paradigm. In India, though, it has the support of most archaeologists, who fail to find a trace of this Aryan influx and instead find cultural continuity."<ref name="Elst_2016">Koenraad Elst (May 10, 2016), Koenraad Elst: "I am not aware of any governmental interest in correcting distorted history", ''Swarajya Magazine''</ref>}} According to Michael Witzel, the "indigenous Aryans" position is not scholarship in the usual sense, but an "apologetic, ultimately religious undertaking".{{sfn|Witzel|2001|p=95}} A number of other alternative theories have been proposed including [[Anatolian hypothesis]], [[Armenian hypothesis]], the [[Paleolithic continuity theory]] but these are not widely accepted and have received little or no interest in mainstream scholarship.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Alinei |first=Mario |year=2002 |chapter=Towards a generalised continuity model for Uralic and Indo European languages |editor-last=Julku |editor-first=Kyösti |title=The Roots of Peoples and Languages of Northern Eurasia IV, Oulu 18.8–20.8.2000 |citeseerx=10.1.1.370.8351<!-- Chapter link --> |location=Oulu, Finland |publisher=Societas Historiae Fenno-Ugricae}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World|author=David W. Anthony|pages=300–400}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Arya (name)]]
* [[Airyanem Vaejah]], mythological homeland of the early Iranians, it means expanse of the Aryans
* [[Airyanem Vaejah]]
* [[Alans]], an Iranian people and ancestors of Ossetians, their name comes from word of Aryan
* [[Arya Samaj]]
* [[Aria (region)|Aria]], province of the [[Achaemenid Empire|Achaemenid]], [[Seleucid Empire|Seleucid]], and [[Parthian Empire|Parthian Empires]]
* [[Ariana]], Greco-Roman geographical term, synonym of ''Iran''
* [[Arya Samaj]], considered a [[monotheistic]] Indian [[Hindu reform movement]], their name means "Noble, i.e Aryan, Society"
* [[Graeco-Aryan]]
* [[Graeco-Aryan]]
* [[Indo-Aryan peoples]], speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, they historically themselves calls as Aryans
* [[Iran (word)|Iran]], literally means "land of Aryans"
** [[Šahrestānīhā ī Ērānšahr# Terms Eran and Eranshahr|Eranshahr]], official name of [[Sasanian Empire]], literally means "Land/Empire of Iranians"
* [[Iranian peoples]], speakers of Iranian languages, they historically themselves calls as Aryans
* [[Yamnaya culture]]
* [[Yamnaya culture]]


Line 189: Line 195:
{{reflist|2|group=note}}
{{reflist|2|group=note}}
{{reflist|2|group=web}}
{{reflist|2|group=web}}
{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}


== References ==
== References ==
Line 198: Line 203:
<!-- A -->
<!-- A -->
*{{Cite book|last=Alemany|first=Agustí|title=Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation|date=2000|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-11442-5}}
*{{Cite book|last=Alemany|first=Agustí|title=Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation|date=2000|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-11442-5}}
*{{Cite book|last=Anthony|first=David W.|title=The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2007|isbn=978-0691058870|author-link=David W. Anthony}}
*{{Cite book|last=Anthony|first=David W.|title=[[The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World]]|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2007|isbn=978-0691058870|author-link=David W. Anthony}}
<!-- B -->
<!-- B -->
*{{cite book|last=Bailey|first=H. W.|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=1987|volume=2|chapter=Arya|author-link=Harold Walter Bailey|chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/arya-an-ethnic-epithet}}
*{{cite book|last=Bailey|first=H. W.|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=1987|volume=2|chapter=Arya|author-link=Harold Walter Bailey|chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/arya-an-ethnic-epithet}}
Line 251: Line 256:
*{{Cite book|last=Witzel|first=Michael|year=2000|chapter=The Home of the Aryans|editor-first1=A.|editor-last1=Hinze|editor-first2=E.|editor-last2=Tichy|title=Festschrift fuer Johanna Narten zum 70. Geburtstag|publisher =J. H. Roell}}
*{{Cite book|last=Witzel|first=Michael|year=2000|chapter=The Home of the Aryans|editor-first1=A.|editor-last1=Hinze|editor-first2=E.|editor-last2=Tichy|title=Festschrift fuer Johanna Narten zum 70. Geburtstag|publisher =J. H. Roell}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Witzel|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Witzel|year=2001|title=Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts|volume=7|pages=1–115|journal=Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies|issue=3|doi=10.11588/ejvs.2001.3.830}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Witzel|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Witzel|year=2001|title=Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts|volume=7|pages=1–115|journal=Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies|issue=3|doi=10.11588/ejvs.2001.3.830}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Witzel|first=Michael|editor-last1=Bryant |editor-first1=Edwin |editor-last2=Patton |editor-first2=Laurie |encyclopedia=The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History |title=Indocentrism: Autochthonous visions of ancient India |date=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-79102-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NDRRNGj17EMC |access-date=25 March 2021 }}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |last=Witzel|first=Michael|editor-last1=Bryant |editor-first1=Edwin |editor-last2=Patton |editor-first2=Laurie |encyclopedia=The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History |title=Indocentrism: Autochthonous visions of ancient India |date=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-79102-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NDRRNGj17EMC |access-date=25 March 2021 }}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
*{{cite web|url=https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.ca/&httpsredir=1&article=2330&context=ocj|title=A word for Aryan originality|work=A. Kammpier |ref=none}}
* {{Cite web|url=https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.ca/&httpsredir=1&article=2330&context=ocj|title=A word for Aryan originality|author=A. Kammpier |ref=none}}
*{{Cite book| editor-last=Bronkhorst|editor-first=J.|editor2-last=Deshpande|editor2-first=M.M.|title=Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, Interpretation, and Ideology|publisher=Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University|publication-date=1999|isbn=1-888789-04-2|year=1999}}
* {{Cite book| editor-last=Bronkhorst|editor-first=J.|editor2-last=Deshpande|editor2-first=M.M.|title=Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, Interpretation, and Ideology|publisher=Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University|publication-date=1999|isbn=1-888789-04-2|year=1999}}
* {{Cite book|last =Edelman|first =Dzoj (Joy) I.|year =1999|title =On the history of non-decimal systems and their elements in numerals of Aryan languages. In: Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), "Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide"|publisher =Walter de Gruyter}}
* {{Cite book|last =Edelman|first =Dzoj (Joy) I.|year =1999|title =On the history of non-decimal systems and their elements in numerals of Aryan languages. In: Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), "Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide"|publisher =Walter de Gruyter}}
* {{citation|last1=Fussmann|first1=G.|last2=Francfort|first2=H.P.|last3=Kellens|first3=J.|last4=Tremblay|first4=X.|title=Aryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale|date=2005|publisher=Institut Civilisation Indienne|isbn=2-86803-072-6 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book|last1=Fussmann|first1=G.|last2=Francfort|first2=H.P.|last3=Kellens|first3=J.|last4=Tremblay|first4=X.|title=Aryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale|date=2005|publisher=Institut Civilisation Indienne|isbn=2-86803-072-6 |ref=none}}
* {{citation|first1 =Vyacheslav V.| last1 =Ivanov|first2 =Thomas|last2 =Gamkrelidze|title =The Early History of Indo-European Languages|journal =Scientific American|volume =262|issue =3|pages =110–116|year =<!--March--> 1990|doi =10.1038/scientificamerican0390-110 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite magazine|first1 =Vyacheslav V.| last1 =Ivanov|first2 =Thomas|last2 =Gamkrelidze|title =The Early History of Indo-European Languages|journal =Scientific American|volume =262|issue =3|pages =110–116|year =<!--March--> 1990|doi =10.1038/scientificamerican0390-110 |ref=none}}
* {{citation|last1=Lincoln|first1=Bruce|title=Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=1999 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book|last1=Lincoln|first1=Bruce|title=Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=1999 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last1=Morey|first1=Peter|last2=Tickell|first2=Alex|title=Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Hf0geg3kl7sC|year=2005|publisher=Rodopi|isbn=90-420-1927-1 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book|last1=Morey|first1=Peter|last2=Tickell|first2=Alex|title=Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Hf0geg3kl7sC|year=2005|publisher=Rodopi|isbn=90-420-1927-1 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Sugirtharajah|first=Sharada|title=Imagining Hinduism: A Postcolonial Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aIX4JYZHW2MC|year=2003|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-203-63411-0 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book|last=Sugirtharajah|first=Sharada|title=Imagining Hinduism: A Postcolonial Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aIX4JYZHW2MC|year=2003|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-203-63411-0 |ref=none}}
* {{citation|last=Tickell|first=A|year=2005|chapter=The Discovery of Aryavarta: Hindu Nationalism and Early Indian Fiction in English|title=Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism|editor1=Peter Morey|editor2=Alex Tickell|pages=25–53 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book|last=Tickell|first=A|year=2005|chapter=The Discovery of Aryavarta: Hindu Nationalism and Early Indian Fiction in English|title=Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism|editor1=Peter Morey|editor2=Alex Tickell|pages=25–53 |ref=none}}


{{Zoroastrianism}}
{{Zoroastrianism}}
Bots, trusted
7,437

edits