Sino-Pakistan Agreement: Difference between revisions
imported>Loned (remove personal commentary) |
(robot: Create/update articles. If there is a mistake please report on my talk page.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Short description|1963 document establishing the Pakistan–China border}} | ||
{{Use Pakistani English|date=October 2019}} | {{Use Pakistani English|date=October 2019}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}} | ||
The | {{Infobox treaty | ||
|name=The Boundary Agreement between China and Pakistan, 1963 | |||
|date_signed=2 March 1963 | |||
|original_signatories=*{{flag icon|China}} [[Chen Yi (marshal)|Marshal Chen Yi]], Plenipotentiary of the Government of the People's Republic of China | |||
*{{flag icon|Pakistan}} [[Zulfikar Ali Bhutto| Z. Ali Bhutto]], Plenipotentiary of the Government of Pakistan | |||
|parties=*{{flag icon|China}} China | |||
*{{flag icon|Pakistan}} Pakistan | |||
|location_signed=Peking | |||
|languages=Chinese, English, Urdu | |||
|citations=[https://web.archive.org/web/20211025160757/https://people.unica.it/annamariabaldussi/files/2015/04/China-Pakistan-1963.pdf ] | |||
|long_name=Agreement on the boundary between China's Sinkiang and the contiguous areas<ref name=":agreement" /> | |||
|date_effective=2 March 1963<ref name=":agreement" />|wikisource=中华人民共和国政府和巴基斯坦政府关于中国新疆和由巴基斯坦实际控制其防务的各个地区相接壤的边界的协定}} | |||
It resulted in | The '''Sino-Pakistan Agreement'''{{Efn|Also known as the '''Sino-Pakistan Frontier Agreement''' and '''Sino-Pak Boundary Agreement'''.<br />Long titles include: | ||
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:sinopak.JPG|thumb|left|CM Aslam with Premiere Zhou en Lai, Foreign Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Chairman Mao | *''Agreement on the boundary between China's Sikiang and the contiguous areas''<ref name=":agreement">{{Cite journal|date=1963|title=People's Republic of China-Pakistan. Agreement on the Boundary Between China's Sinkiang and the Contiguous Areas. Peking, March 2, 1963|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2196119|journal=The American Journal of International Law|volume=57|issue=3|pages=713–716|doi=10.2307/2196119|jstor=2196119|s2cid=246002991|issn=0002-9300}}</ref> | ||
*''Agreement between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Pakistan on the boundary between China's Sinkiang and the contiguous areas, the defense of which is under actual control of Pakistan''{{sfn|The Geographer|1968|p=3}}}} is a 1963 document between the governments of [[Pakistan]] and [[People's Republic of China|China]] establishing the border between those countries in the disputed [[Kashmir region]].<ref name="Time" /> | |||
It resulted in both countries ceding over {{convert|1942|km2|sqmi}}{{clarify|date=November 2021|reason=Did both the country cede equal amounts of territory?}} to the other. Pakistan recognized Chinese [[sovereignty]] over land in [[Kashmir#Northern Areas|Northern Areas]] of Kashmir and [[Ladakh]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Noorani|first1=A.G.|date=Jan 14, 2012|title=Map fetish|publisher=Frontline|issue=Volume 29 - Issue 01|url=https://frontline.thehindu.com/static/html/fl2901/stories/20120127290108200.htm|access-date=24 January 2020}}</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Ahmed |first=Ishtiaq |title=State, Nation and Ethnicity in Contemporary South Asia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=czSm7cmhgA0C&pg=PA120 |year=1998 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=978-1-85567-578-0 |page=148}}: "As a friendly gesture some territory in the northern areas was surrendered to China and a treaty was signed which stated that there were no border disputes between the two countries."</ref> However, Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately {{convert|2050|sqmi|km2|order=flip|abbr=on}} of territory to China.<ref name="Lamb" /><ref name="Trivedi">{{Cite web|last=Trivei|first=Abishek|date=8 July 2019|title=Why the 1963 Sino-Pakistan Boundary Agreement Is Unlawful in Light of the Recent ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Chagos Archipelago, 2019|url=https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2019/07/abhishek-trivedi-sino-pakistan-boundary/|url-status=live|access-date=2021-11-07|website=www.jurist.org}}</ref> The agreement is ruled invalid and illegal by [[India]], which also claims sovereignty over part of the land. In addition to increasing tensions with India, the agreement shifted the balance of the [[Cold War]] by bringing Pakistan and China closer together while loosening ties between Pakistan and the [[United States]]. | |||
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:sinopak.JPG|thumb|left|CM Aslam with Premiere Zhou en Lai, Foreign Minister [[Zulfikar Ali Bhutto]] and Chairman [[Mao Zedong]] at a reception at the residence of Chairman Mao following the conclusion of the Sino-Pak Boundary Agreement]] --> | |||
==Issue and result== | ==Issue and result== | ||
[[File:Map India and Pakistan 1-250,000 Tile NJ 43-15 Shimshal.jpg|thumb|right|280px|A 1955 map from the US [[Army Map Service]] showing the border of pre-independence [[British India]] near Shimshal. The entire [[Shaksgam River|Shaksgam Valley]] is included, as is the [[Yarkand River|Raskam Valley]] till the confluence.]] | [[File:Map India and Pakistan 1-250,000 Tile NJ 43-15 Shimshal.jpg|thumb|right|280px|A 1955 map from the US [[Army Map Service]] showing the border of pre-independence [[British India]] near Shimshal. The entire [[Shaksgam River|Shaksgam Valley]] is included, as is the [[Yarkand River|Raskam Valley]] till the confluence.]] | ||
[[File:Alignment Official Pakistan map 1962.jpg|thumb|right|280px|Border claims prior to the agreement]] | [[File:Alignment Official Pakistan map 1962.jpg|thumb|right|280px|Border claims prior to the agreement]]{{Further|China–Pakistan_border#Description|label1=Alignment according to the 1963 Sino-Pakistani agreement}} | ||
In 1959, Pakistan became concerned that Chinese maps showed areas of Pakistan in China. In 1961, [[Ayub Khan (general)|Ayub Khan]] sent a formal | In 1959, Pakistan became concerned that Chinese maps showed areas of Pakistan in China. In 1961, [[Ayub Khan (general)|Ayub Khan]] sent a formal note to China, there was no reply. | ||
After Pakistan voted to grant China a seat in the United Nations, the Chinese withdrew the disputed maps in January 1962, agreeing to enter border talks in March. The willingness of the Chinese to enter the agreement was welcomed by the people of Pakistan. Negotiations between the nations officially began on October 13, 1962 and resulted in an agreement being signed on 2 March 1963.<ref name=Time/> It was signed by foreign ministers Chen Yi for the Chinese and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto for the Pakistani. | After Pakistan voted to grant China a seat in the United Nations, the Chinese withdrew the disputed maps in January 1962, agreeing to enter border talks in March. The willingness of the Chinese to enter the agreement was welcomed by the people of Pakistan. Negotiations between the nations officially began on October 13, 1962, and resulted in an agreement being signed on 2 March 1963.<ref name=Time/> It was signed by foreign ministers [[Chen Yi (marshal)|Chen Yi]] for the Chinese and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto for the Pakistani. | ||
The agreement resulted in China and Pakistan each withdrawing from about {{convert|750|sqmi|km2|order=flip|abbr=off}} of territory, and a boundary on the basis of the 1899 British Note to China as modified by Lord Curzon in 1905. Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately {{convert|2050|sqmi|km2|order=flip|abbr=on}} of territory to China (to which they believe it had no right in the first place). The claim given up by Pakistan was the area north of the Uprang Jilga River which also included the Raksam Plots where the Mir of Hunza had enjoyed taxing and grazing rights throughout much of the late 19th Century as part of agreements with Chinese authorities in Sinkiang. Despite this, sovereignty over area was never challenged by the Mir of Hunza, the British or the State of Jammu and Kashmir. | The agreement resulted in China and Pakistan each withdrawing from about {{convert|750|sqmi|km2|order=flip|abbr=off}} of territory, and a boundary on the basis of the 1899 British Note to China as modified by Lord Curzon in 1905. Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately {{convert|2050|sqmi|km2|order=flip|abbr=on}} of territory to China (to which they believe it had no right in the first place).<ref name="Trivedi" /> The claim given up by Pakistan was the area north of the Uprang Jilga River which also included the Raksam Plots where the [[Mir of Hunza]] had enjoyed taxing and grazing rights throughout much of the late 19th Century as part of agreements with Chinese authorities in Sinkiang. Despite this, sovereignty over area was never challenged by the Mir of Hunza, the British or the State of Jammu and Kashmir. | ||
<ref> Lamb, Alastair (1991). "Kashmir A Disputed Legacy 1846-1990" (2nd Impression). Oxford University Press. pp.40, 51, 70. {{ISBN|0-19-577424-8}}.</ref> | <ref name="Lamb"> Lamb, Alastair (1991). "Kashmir A Disputed Legacy 1846-1990" (2nd Impression). Oxford University Press. pp.40, 51, 70. {{ISBN|0-19-577424-8}}.</ref> | ||
==Significance== | ==Significance== | ||
The agreement was moderately economically advantageous to Pakistan, which received grazing lands in the deal, but of far more significance politically, as it both diminished potential for conflict between China and Pakistan and, Syed indicates, "placed China formally and firmly on record as maintaining that Kashmir did not, as yet, belong to India.<ref>{{cite news | title = Factbox: India and China border dispute festers | | The agreement was moderately economically advantageous to Pakistan, which received grazing lands in the deal, but of far more significance politically, as it both diminished potential for conflict between China and Pakistan and, Syed indicates, "placed China formally and firmly on record as maintaining that Kashmir did not, as yet, belong to India.<ref>{{cite news |title=Factbox: India and China border dispute festers |agency=[[Reuters]] |date=2006-11-15 |url=http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DEL108225.htm}}</ref> ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'', reporting on the matter in 1963, expressed the opinion that by signing the agreement Pakistan had further "dimmed hopes of settlement" of the [[Kashmir conflict]] between Pakistan and India. Under this Sino-Pakistan Agreement, Pakistani control to a part of northern Kashmir was recognized by China.<ref name="Time">{{cite magazine|date=15 March 1963|title=Signing with the Red Chinese|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,870184,00.html|url-status=dead|magazine=Time (magazine)|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130824040920/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,870184,00.html|archive-date=24 August 2013|access-date=28 October 2019}}</ref> | ||
During this period, China was in dispute with India regarding Kashmir's eastern boundary, with India making claims of the border having been demarcated beforehand and China making claims that such demarcations had never happened. Pakistan and China recognized in their agreement that the border had been neither delimited nor demarcated, providing support to the Chinese position.<ref name=" | During this period, China was in dispute with India regarding Kashmir's eastern boundary, with India making claims of the border having been demarcated beforehand and China making claims that such demarcations had never happened. Pakistan and China recognized in their agreement that the border had been neither delimited nor demarcated, providing support to the Chinese position.<ref name="Yousafzai" /> | ||
For Pakistan, which had border disputes on its eastern and western borders, the agreement provided relief by securing its northern border from any future contest. The Treaty also provided for clear a demarcation of the boundary for Pakistan, which would continue to serve as the boundary even after Kashmir dispute might be resolved.<ref name=" | For Pakistan, which had border disputes on its eastern and western borders, the agreement provided relief by securing its northern border from any future contest. The Treaty also provided for clear a demarcation of the boundary for Pakistan, which would continue to serve as the boundary even after Kashmir dispute might be resolved.<ref name="Yousafzai">{{Cite book |last=Yousafzai |first=Usman Khan |title=1963 Sino-Pak Treaty: A Legal Study into the Border Delimitation between Pakistan and China |date=13 August 2020 |isbn=979-8675050000}}</ref> | ||
According to ''[[Jane's International Defence Review]]'', the agreement was also of significance in the Cold War, as Pakistan had ties with the United States and membership in the [[Central Treaty Organization]] and the [[Southeast Asian Treaty Organization]].<ref name=Jane>{{cite journal | title = Strategic and security issues: Pakistan-China defense co-operation an enduring relationship | journal = Jane's International Defence Review | date = 1993-02-01 | access-date =28 October 2019 | url = http://www.janes.com/extract/idr93/idr00903.html| archive-url = https://archive.today/20130127023014/http://www.janes.com/extract/idr93/idr00903.html| url-status = dead| archive-date = 2013-01-27}}</ref> The agreement was part of an overall tightening of association with China for Pakistan, which resulted in Pakistan's distancing from the United States.<ref name=Jane/><ref>{{cite book | last = Dixit | first = Jyotindra Nath | title = India-Pakistan in War & Peace | publisher = Routledge | year = 2002 | isbn = 0-415-30472-5 | page = 141}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Mitra | first = Subrata Kumar |author2=Mike Enskat |author3=Clemens Spiess | title = Political parties in South Asia | publisher = Greenwood Publishing Group | year = 2004 | isbn = 0-275-96832-4 | page = 157}}</ref> After defining borders, the two countries also entered into agreements with respect to trade and air-travel, the latter of which was the first such international agreement China had entered with a country that was not [[Communist]].<ref>Syed, 93-94.</ref> | According to ''[[Jane's International Defence Review]]'', the agreement was also of significance in the Cold War, as Pakistan had ties with the United States and membership in the [[Central Treaty Organization]] and the [[Southeast Asian Treaty Organization]].<ref name=Jane>{{cite journal |title=Strategic and security issues: Pakistan-China defense co-operation an enduring relationship |journal=Jane's International Defence Review |date=1993-02-01 |access-date =28 October 2019 |url=http://www.janes.com/extract/idr93/idr00903.html |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130127023014/http://www.janes.com/extract/idr93/idr00903.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-01-27}}</ref> The agreement was part of an overall tightening of association with China for Pakistan, which resulted in Pakistan's distancing from the United States.<ref name=Jane/><ref>{{cite book |last=Dixit |first=Jyotindra Nath |title=India-Pakistan in War & Peace |publisher=Routledge |year=2002 |isbn=0-415-30472-5 |page=141}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Mitra |first=Subrata Kumar |author2=Mike Enskat |author3=Clemens Spiess |title=Political parties in South Asia |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=2004 |isbn=0-275-96832-4 |page=157}}</ref> After defining borders, the two countries also entered into agreements with respect to trade and air-travel, the latter of which was the first such international agreement China had entered with a country that was not [[Communist]].<ref>Syed, 93-94.</ref> | ||
==Relation to the claim by the Republic of China== | ==Relation to the claim by the Republic of China== | ||
{{see also|Political status of Taiwan|Foreign relations of Taiwan}} | {{see also|Political status of Taiwan|Foreign relations of Taiwan|Pakistan–Taiwan relations}} | ||
The [[Taiwan|Republic of China]] now based in and commonly known as Taiwan does not recognize any Chinese territorial changes based on any border agreements signed by the People's Republic of China with any other countries, including this one, in accordance to the [[Constitution of the Republic of China]] and its Additional Articles | The [[Taiwan|Republic of China]] now based in and commonly known as Taiwan does not recognize any Chinese territorial changes based on any border agreements signed by the People's Republic of China with any other countries, including this one, in accordance to the [[Constitution of the Republic of China]] and its Additional Articles.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/5-gp/yearbook/2001/appendix1-1.htm#1950 |title=ROC Chronology: Jan 1911 – Dec 2000 |access-date=23 April 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101229224745/http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/5-gp/yearbook/2001/appendix1-1.htm#1950 |archive-date=29 December 2010 |url-status=dead}} “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs declares border agreements signed between the Peking regime and Outer Mongolia and Pakistan illegal and not binding on the ROC.“</ref> Pakistan does not recognize the legitimacy of the ROC.{{Citation needed|date=May 2022}} | ||
== Article 6 == | |||
Article six states that pending the final settlement of the [[Kashmir dispute]] between India and Pakistan, a fresh treaty will be drawn up.{{Sfn|Ondris|2015|p=89}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[China–Pakistan Economic Corridor]] | *[[China–Pakistan Economic Corridor]] | ||
*[[Trans-Karakoram Tract]] | *[[Trans-Karakoram Tract]] | ||
== | ==Notes and references== | ||
;Notes | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
;Citations | |||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
== | ;Bibliography | ||
* {{Citation|last=Ondris|first=Peter|title=Sino-Pakistani Relations from 1960 to 1974|date=2015|url=https://fphil.uniba.sk/fileadmin/fif/katedry_pracoviska/kvas/SOS_abstracts_14.1/ondris_14_1.pdf|publisher=Department of East Asian Studies, [[Faculty of Arts, Comenius University]].}} | |||
* {{Citation | * {{Citation | ||
|author = The Geographer | |author = The Geographer | ||
Line 52: | Line 75: | ||
|archive-date =11 February 2012 | |archive-date =11 February 2012 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Further reading == | |||
* {{Cite book|title=World Press on Sino-Pakistan Agreement|date=1963|publisher=India Ministry of External Affairs|language=en}} | |||
[[Category:1960s in Jammu and Kashmir]] | [[Category:1960s in Jammu and Kashmir]] |
Latest revision as of 15:32, 24 October 2022
Agreement on the boundary between China's Sinkiang and the contiguous areas[1] | |
---|---|
Signed | 2 March 1963 |
Location | Peking |
Effective | 2 March 1963[1] |
Original signatories |
|
Parties | |
Citations | [1] |
Languages | Chinese, English, Urdu |
![]() |
The Sino-Pakistan Agreement[lower-alpha 1] is a 1963 document between the governments of Pakistan and China establishing the border between those countries in the disputed Kashmir region.[3]
It resulted in both countries ceding over 1,942 square kilometres (750 sq mi)[clarification needed] to the other. Pakistan recognized Chinese sovereignty over land in Northern Areas of Kashmir and Ladakh.[4][5] However, Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately 5,300 km2 (2,050 sq mi) of territory to China.[6][7] The agreement is ruled invalid and illegal by India, which also claims sovereignty over part of the land. In addition to increasing tensions with India, the agreement shifted the balance of the Cold War by bringing Pakistan and China closer together while loosening ties between Pakistan and the United States.
Issue and result[edit]

In 1959, Pakistan became concerned that Chinese maps showed areas of Pakistan in China. In 1961, Ayub Khan sent a formal note to China, there was no reply.
After Pakistan voted to grant China a seat in the United Nations, the Chinese withdrew the disputed maps in January 1962, agreeing to enter border talks in March. The willingness of the Chinese to enter the agreement was welcomed by the people of Pakistan. Negotiations between the nations officially began on October 13, 1962, and resulted in an agreement being signed on 2 March 1963.[3] It was signed by foreign ministers Chen Yi for the Chinese and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto for the Pakistani.
The agreement resulted in China and Pakistan each withdrawing from about 1,900 square kilometres (750 square miles) of territory, and a boundary on the basis of the 1899 British Note to China as modified by Lord Curzon in 1905. Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately 5,300 km2 (2,050 sq mi) of territory to China (to which they believe it had no right in the first place).[7] The claim given up by Pakistan was the area north of the Uprang Jilga River which also included the Raksam Plots where the Mir of Hunza had enjoyed taxing and grazing rights throughout much of the late 19th Century as part of agreements with Chinese authorities in Sinkiang. Despite this, sovereignty over area was never challenged by the Mir of Hunza, the British or the State of Jammu and Kashmir. [6]
Significance[edit]
The agreement was moderately economically advantageous to Pakistan, which received grazing lands in the deal, but of far more significance politically, as it both diminished potential for conflict between China and Pakistan and, Syed indicates, "placed China formally and firmly on record as maintaining that Kashmir did not, as yet, belong to India.[8] Time, reporting on the matter in 1963, expressed the opinion that by signing the agreement Pakistan had further "dimmed hopes of settlement" of the Kashmir conflict between Pakistan and India. Under this Sino-Pakistan Agreement, Pakistani control to a part of northern Kashmir was recognized by China.[3]
During this period, China was in dispute with India regarding Kashmir's eastern boundary, with India making claims of the border having been demarcated beforehand and China making claims that such demarcations had never happened. Pakistan and China recognized in their agreement that the border had been neither delimited nor demarcated, providing support to the Chinese position.[9]
For Pakistan, which had border disputes on its eastern and western borders, the agreement provided relief by securing its northern border from any future contest. The Treaty also provided for clear a demarcation of the boundary for Pakistan, which would continue to serve as the boundary even after Kashmir dispute might be resolved.[9]
According to Jane's International Defence Review, the agreement was also of significance in the Cold War, as Pakistan had ties with the United States and membership in the Central Treaty Organization and the Southeast Asian Treaty Organization.[10] The agreement was part of an overall tightening of association with China for Pakistan, which resulted in Pakistan's distancing from the United States.[10][11][12] After defining borders, the two countries also entered into agreements with respect to trade and air-travel, the latter of which was the first such international agreement China had entered with a country that was not Communist.[13]
Relation to the claim by the Republic of China[edit]
The Republic of China now based in and commonly known as Taiwan does not recognize any Chinese territorial changes based on any border agreements signed by the People's Republic of China with any other countries, including this one, in accordance to the Constitution of the Republic of China and its Additional Articles.[14] Pakistan does not recognize the legitimacy of the ROC.[citation needed]
Article 6[edit]
Article six states that pending the final settlement of the Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan, a fresh treaty will be drawn up.[15]
See also[edit]
Notes and references[edit]
- Notes
- ↑ Also known as the Sino-Pakistan Frontier Agreement and Sino-Pak Boundary Agreement.
Long titles include:- Agreement on the boundary between China's Sikiang and the contiguous areas[1]
- Agreement between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Pakistan on the boundary between China's Sinkiang and the contiguous areas, the defense of which is under actual control of Pakistan[2]
- Citations
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 "People's Republic of China-Pakistan. Agreement on the Boundary Between China's Sinkiang and the Contiguous Areas. Peking, March 2, 1963". The American Journal of International Law. 57 (3): 713–716. 1963. doi:10.2307/2196119. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2196119. S2CID 246002991.
- ↑ The Geographer 1968, p. 3.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 "Signing with the Red Chinese". Time (magazine). 15 March 1963. Archived from the original on 24 August 2013. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
- ↑ Noorani, A.G. (14 January 2012). "Map fetish". No. Volume 29 - Issue 01. Frontline. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
- ↑ Ahmed, Ishtiaq (1998), State, Nation and Ethnicity in Contemporary South Asia, A&C Black, p. 148, ISBN 978-1-85567-578-0: "As a friendly gesture some territory in the northern areas was surrendered to China and a treaty was signed which stated that there were no border disputes between the two countries."
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Lamb, Alastair (1991). "Kashmir A Disputed Legacy 1846-1990" (2nd Impression). Oxford University Press. pp.40, 51, 70. ISBN 0-19-577424-8.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Trivei, Abishek (8 July 2019). "Why the 1963 Sino-Pakistan Boundary Agreement Is Unlawful in Light of the Recent ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Chagos Archipelago, 2019". www.jurist.org. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "Factbox: India and China border dispute festers". Reuters. 15 November 2006.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Yousafzai, Usman Khan (13 August 2020). 1963 Sino-Pak Treaty: A Legal Study into the Border Delimitation between Pakistan and China. ISBN 979-8675050000.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 "Strategic and security issues: Pakistan-China defense co-operation an enduring relationship". Jane's International Defence Review. 1 February 1993. Archived from the original on 27 January 2013. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
- ↑ Dixit, Jyotindra Nath (2002). India-Pakistan in War & Peace. Routledge. p. 141. ISBN 0-415-30472-5.
- ↑ Mitra, Subrata Kumar; Mike Enskat; Clemens Spiess (2004). Political parties in South Asia. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 157. ISBN 0-275-96832-4.
- ↑ Syed, 93-94.
- ↑ "ROC Chronology: Jan 1911 – Dec 2000". Archived from the original on 29 December 2010. Retrieved 23 April 2009. “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs declares border agreements signed between the Peking regime and Outer Mongolia and Pakistan illegal and not binding on the ROC.“
- ↑ Ondris 2015, p. 89.
- Bibliography
- Ondris, Peter (2015), Sino-Pakistani Relations from 1960 to 1974 (PDF), Department of East Asian Studies, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University.
- The Geographer (15 November 1968), China – Pakistan Boundary (PDF), International Boundary Study, vol. 85, US Office of the Geographer, archived from the original (PDF) on 11 February 2012 – via Florida State University College of Law
Further reading[edit]
- World Press on Sino-Pakistan Agreement. India Ministry of External Affairs. 1963.
- Articles with unsourced statements from May 2022
- 1960s in Jammu and Kashmir
- Kashmir conflict
- Territorial disputes of India
- Territorial disputes of Pakistan
- Territorial disputes of China
- 1963 in Pakistan
- Treaties of the People's Republic of China
- Treaties of Pakistan
- China–Pakistan border
- China–Pakistan relations
- India–Pakistan relations
- Pakistan–United States relations
- Cold War treaties
- Treaties concluded in 1963
- Boundary treaties