→Submission feedback: Reply |
→Submission feedback: Reply |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:{{re|WikiDwarf}} I recommend one final sourcing review to ensure every substantive statement is independently verifiable and that the article clearly establishes the subject's notability through reliable coverage. [[User:Ajay Kumar|Ajay Kumar]] ([[User talk:Ajay Kumar|talk]]) 19:54, 1 July 2026 (IST) | :{{re|WikiDwarf}} I recommend one final sourcing review to ensure every substantive statement is independently verifiable and that the article clearly establishes the subject's notability through reliable coverage. [[User:Ajay Kumar|Ajay Kumar]] ([[User talk:Ajay Kumar|talk]]) 19:54, 1 July 2026 (IST) | ||
::Please Review [[User:Moviemover916|Moviemover916]] ([[User talk:Moviemover916|talk]]) 14:52, 3 July 2026 (IST) | ::Please Review [[User:Moviemover916|Moviemover916]] ([[User talk:Moviemover916|talk]]) 14:52, 3 July 2026 (IST) | ||
:::{{reply|Moviemover916}} Thanks for the update. I noticed that some claims are still sourced to IMDb, which is not a reliable source as it is user-generated. Please replace those citations with reliable, independent sources, or remove the claims if no better sources are available. The subject's notability is still weak, and the draft relies heavily on sources related to the films. | |||
:::{{reply|Ajay Kumar}} Thank you for your help in improving the draft. [[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf|talk]]) 15:44, 3 July 2026 (IST) | |||
Revision as of 15:44, 3 July 2026
Submission feedback
@WikiDwarf: Please review I have updated the draft with additional reliable sources and made the requested improvements. Could you please review the latest version and, if everything looks good, accept/approve the submission Moviemover916 (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2026 (IST)
- @Moviemover916: I reviewed the latest draft and made a number of improvements, including simplifying the prose, removing or trimming content that wasn't directly relevant to the biography, and replacing several references with stronger independent news sources where possible.
- That said, I believe the article still needs additional work before it fully meets Bharatpedia's sourcing and notability standards. There are still a few claims that require better independent sources for verification, and some statements are currently supported only by production credits or database/profile sources rather than reliable news coverage. If stronger independent sources cannot be found for those claims, they should either be reworded or removed.
- @WikiDwarf: I recommend one final sourcing review to ensure every substantive statement is independently verifiable and that the article clearly establishes the subject's notability through reliable coverage. Ajay Kumar (talk) 19:54, 1 July 2026 (IST)
- Please Review Moviemover916 (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2026 (IST)
- @Moviemover916: Thanks for the update. I noticed that some claims are still sourced to IMDb, which is not a reliable source as it is user-generated. Please replace those citations with reliable, independent sources, or remove the claims if no better sources are available. The subject's notability is still weak, and the draft relies heavily on sources related to the films.
- @Ajay Kumar: Thank you for your help in improving the draft. WikiDwarf (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2026 (IST)
- Please Review Moviemover916 (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2026 (IST)