Bots, trusted
7,437
edits
m (Removing protection template from an unprotected page) |
WikiDwarfBOT (talk | contribs) (Cleanup: Spelling fix. Source modification.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description| | {{Short description|Founder and 1st Governor-General of Pakistan (1876–1948)}} | ||
{{Redirect|Jinnah}} | {{Redirect|Jinnah}} | ||
{{Featured article}} | {{Featured article}} | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{Use Pakistani English|date=September 2020}} | {{Use Pakistani English|date=September 2020}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date= | {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2023}} | ||
{{Infobox officeholder | {{Infobox officeholder | ||
| name = Muhammad Ali Jinnah<br />{{nobold|{{lang|ur|{{Nastaliq|محمد علی جناح}}}}}} | | name = Muhammad Ali Jinnah<br />{{nobold|{{lang|ur|{{Nastaliq|محمد علی جناح}}}}}} | ||
| office = 1st [[Governor-General of Pakistan]] | | office = 1st [[Governor-General of Pakistan]] | ||
| image = Jinnah1945c.jpg | | image = Jinnah1945c.jpg | ||
| caption = Jinnah in 1945 | | caption = Jinnah in 1945 | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
| successor = [[Khawaja Nazimuddin]] | | successor = [[Khawaja Nazimuddin]] | ||
| signature = Jinnah signature.svg | | signature = Jinnah signature.svg | ||
| party = [[Muslim League (Pakistan)|Muslim League]] (1947–1948) | | party = [[Muslim League (Pakistan)|Muslim League]] (1947–1948) | ||
| otherparty = [[Indian National Congress]] (1906–1920)<br />[[All-India Muslim League]] (1913–1947) | | otherparty = [[Indian National Congress]] (1906–1920)<br />[[All-India Muslim League]] (1913–1947) | ||
| deputy1 = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] | | deputy1 = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] | ||
| office1 = [[Speaker of the National Assembly of Pakistan|Speaker of the Constituent Assembly | | office1 = 1st [[Speaker of the National Assembly of Pakistan|Speaker of the Constituent Assembly]] | ||
| predecessor1 = ''Position established'' | | predecessor1 = ''Position established'' | ||
| successor1 = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] | | successor1 = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] | ||
| birth_name = Mahomedali Jinnahbhai | | birth_name = Mahomedali Jinnahbhai | ||
| birth_date = [[Jinnah's Birthday|{{birth date|df=yes|1876|12|25}}]] | | birth_date = [[Jinnah's Birthday|{{birth date|df=yes|1876|12|25}}]] | ||
Line 33: | Line 28: | ||
| death_date = {{nowrap|{{death date and age|df=yes|1948|09|11|1876|12|25}}}} | | death_date = {{nowrap|{{death date and age|df=yes|1948|09|11|1876|12|25}}}} | ||
| death_place = [[Karachi]], [[Federal Capital Territory (Pakistan)|Federal Capital Territory]], [[Dominion of Pakistan|Pakistan]] | | death_place = [[Karachi]], [[Federal Capital Territory (Pakistan)|Federal Capital Territory]], [[Dominion of Pakistan|Pakistan]] | ||
| resting_place = [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], Karachi | | resting_place = [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], Karachi | ||
| nationality = [[British Raj|British Indian]] (1876–1947)<br />[[Pakistani people|Pakistani]] (1947–1948) | | nationality = [[British Raj|British Indian]] (1876–1947)<br />[[Pakistani people|Pakistani]] (1947–1948) | ||
| spouse = {{marriage|[[Emibai Jinnah]]|1892|1893|end=died}}<br />{{marriage|[[Rattanbai Petit]]|1918|1929|end=died}} | | spouse = {{marriage|[[Emibai Jinnah]]|1892|1893|end=died}}<br />{{marriage|[[Rattanbai Petit]]|1918|1929|end=died}} | ||
| relations = See [[Jinnah family]] | | relations = See [[Jinnah family]] | ||
| children = [[Dina Wadia]] | | children = [[Dina Wadia]] | ||
| alma_mater = [[Lincoln's Inn]] | | alma_mater = [[Lincoln's Inn]] | ||
| profession = {{hlist|[[Barrister]]|[[ | | profession = {{hlist|[[Barrister]]|[[politician]]}} | ||
| term_start = 14 August 1947 | | term_start = 14 August 1947 | ||
| term_end = 11 September 1948 | | term_end = 11 September 1948 | ||
| term_start1 = 11 August 1947 | | term_start1 = 11 August 1947 | ||
| term_end1 = 11 September 1948 | | term_end1 = 11 September 1948 | ||
| | | honorific_prefix = ''Baba-e-Qaum''<br>''Quaid-e-Azam'' | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Muhammad Ali Jinnah sidebar}} | {{Muhammad Ali Jinnah sidebar}} | ||
'''Muhammad Ali Jinnah''' | '''Muhammad Ali Jinnah'''{{efn|{{lang|ur|{{Nastaliq|محمد علی جناح}}}}; {{IPA-ur|moɦəmːəd̪ əliː d͡ʒɪnːɑːɦ}}, {{IPA-gu|məɦ(ə)məd̪ əli d͡ʒʱiɽ̃ɑ}}}} (born '''Mahomedali Jinnahbhai'''; 25 December 1876{{Snd}}11 September 1948) was a barrister, politician and the [[List of Pakistan Movement activists|founder]] of [[Pakistan]]. Jinnah served as the leader of the [[All-India Muslim League]] from 1913 until the inception of Pakistan on 14 August 1947, and then as the [[Dominion of Pakistan]]'s first [[Governor-General of Pakistan|governor-general]] until his death. | ||
Born at [[Wazir Mansion]] in [[Karachi]], Jinnah was trained as a [[barrister]] at [[Lincoln's Inn]] in [[London]], England. Upon his return to [[British Raj|India]], he enrolled at the [[Bombay High Court]], and took an interest in national politics, which eventually replaced his legal practice. Jinnah rose to prominence in the [[Indian National Congress]] in the first two decades of the 20th century. In these early years of his political career, Jinnah advocated [[Hindu–Muslim unity]], helping to shape the 1916 [[Lucknow Pact]] between the Congress and the All-India Muslim League, in which Jinnah had also become prominent. Jinnah became a key leader in the [[Indian Home Rule movement|All-India Home Rule League]], and proposed a [[Fourteen Points of Jinnah|fourteen-point constitutional reform plan]] to safeguard the political rights of [[Muslims]] in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. In 1920, however, Jinnah resigned from the Congress when it agreed to follow a campaign of ''[[satyagraha]]'', which he regarded as [[Anarchism|political anarchy]]. | Born at [[Wazir Mansion]] in [[Karachi]], Jinnah was trained as a [[barrister]] at [[Lincoln's Inn]] in [[London]], England. Upon his return to [[British Raj|India]], he enrolled at the [[Bombay High Court]], and took an interest in national politics, which eventually replaced his legal practice. Jinnah rose to prominence in the [[Indian National Congress]] in the first two decades of the 20th century. In these early years of his political career, Jinnah advocated [[Hindu–Muslim unity]], helping to shape the 1916 [[Lucknow Pact]] between the Congress and the All-India Muslim League, in which Jinnah had also become prominent. Jinnah became a key leader in the [[Indian Home Rule movement|All-India Home Rule League]], and proposed a [[Fourteen Points of Jinnah|fourteen-point constitutional reform plan]] to safeguard the political rights of [[Muslims]] in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. In 1920, however, Jinnah resigned from the Congress when it agreed to follow a campaign of ''[[satyagraha]]'', which he regarded as [[Anarchism|political anarchy]]. | ||
Line 56: | Line 49: | ||
By 1940, Jinnah had come to believe that the Muslims of the subcontinent should have their own state to avoid the possible marginalised status they may gain in an independent Hindu–Muslim state. In that year, the Muslim League, led by Jinnah, passed the [[Lahore Resolution]], demanding a separate nation for [[Presidencies and provinces of British India|Indian]] Muslims. During the [[World War II|Second World War]], the League gained strength while leaders of the Congress were imprisoned, and in the [[1946 Indian provincial elections|provincial elections]] held shortly after the war, it won most of the seats reserved for Muslims. Ultimately, the Congress and the Muslim League could not reach a power-sharing formula that would allow the entirety of British India to be united as a single state following independence, leading all parties to agree instead to the independence of a predominantly [[Hindu]] India, and for a Muslim-majority state of Pakistan. | By 1940, Jinnah had come to believe that the Muslims of the subcontinent should have their own state to avoid the possible marginalised status they may gain in an independent Hindu–Muslim state. In that year, the Muslim League, led by Jinnah, passed the [[Lahore Resolution]], demanding a separate nation for [[Presidencies and provinces of British India|Indian]] Muslims. During the [[World War II|Second World War]], the League gained strength while leaders of the Congress were imprisoned, and in the [[1946 Indian provincial elections|provincial elections]] held shortly after the war, it won most of the seats reserved for Muslims. Ultimately, the Congress and the Muslim League could not reach a power-sharing formula that would allow the entirety of British India to be united as a single state following independence, leading all parties to agree instead to the independence of a predominantly [[Hindu]] India, and for a Muslim-majority state of Pakistan. | ||
As the first | As the first governor-general of Pakistan, Jinnah worked to establish the new nation's government and policies, and to aid the millions of [[Muhajir (Pakistan)|Muslim migrants]] who had emigrated from neighbouring [[Dominion of India|India]] to Pakistan after the [[Partition of India|two states' independence]], personally supervising the establishment of refugee camps. Jinnah died at age 71 in September 1948, just over a year after Pakistan gained independence from the United Kingdom. He left a deep and respected legacy in Pakistan. Innumerable streets, roads and localities in the world are named after Jinnah. Several [[List of things named after Muhammad Ali Jinnah|universities and public buildings]] in Pakistan bear Jinnah's name. He is revered in Pakistan as the ''Quaid-e-Azam'' ("Great Leader") and ''Baba-e-Qaum'' ("[[Father of the Nation]]"). [[Jinnah's Birthday|His birthday]] is observed as a [[Public holidays in Pakistan|national holiday]] in Pakistan. According to his biographer, [[Stanley Wolpert]], Jinnah remains Pakistan's greatest leader. | ||
== Early years == | == Early years == | ||
Line 63: | Line 56: | ||
[[File:Jinnah Poonjha.jpg|thumb|upright|left|Portrait of Jinnah's father, Jinnahbhai Poonja]] | [[File:Jinnah Poonjha.jpg|thumb|upright|left|Portrait of Jinnah's father, Jinnahbhai Poonja]] | ||
Jinnah's given name at birth was Mahomedali Jinnahbhai,{{efn|{{lang-gu|મહમદ અલી ઝીણાભાઇ}}}} and he likely was born in 1876,{{efn|While [[Jinnah's birthday]] is celebrated as 25 December 1876, there is reason to doubt that date. Karachi did not then issue birth certificates, no record was kept by his family (birth dates being of little importance to Muslims of the time), and his school records reflect a birth date of 20 October 1875. See {{harvnb|Bolitho|p=3}}.}} to Jinnahbhai Poonja and his wife Mithibai, in a rented apartment on the second floor of [[Wazir Mansion]] near Karachi,<ref name="Moini 20 December 2003" /> now in [[Sindh]], Pakistan but then within the [[Bombay Presidency]] of [[British Raj|British India]]. Jinnah's paternal grandfather was from [[Paneli Moti]] village in [[Gondal, India|Gondal state]] in [[Kathiawar]] peninsula (now in [[Gujarat]], India).<ref name="Guttman2007">{{cite book|author=A. Guttman|title=The Nation of India in Contemporary Indian Literature|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uxqHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA34|date=15 October 2007|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan US|isbn=978-0-230-60693-7|pages=34–}}</ref> He was of a [[Gujarati people|Gujarati]] [[Khoja]] [[Nizari Isma'ilism|Nizari Isma'ili]] [[Shia Islam|Shi’a Muslim]] background, though Jinnah later followed the [[Twelver]] Shi'a teachings.<ref>{{cite book |last=Walsh |first=Judith E. |year=2017 |title=A Brief History of India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iekF9X3OwwMC&pg=PA173 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |page=173 |isbn=978-1-4381-0825-4 |quote=son of a middle-class merchant of the Muslim Khoja community who had migrated to Sind from Gujarat}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml|title=Was Jinnah a Shia or a Sunni?|first=Khaled|last=Ahmed|date=24 December 2010|work=The Friday Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117111449/http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml |archive-date=17 November 2011}}</ref> After his death, his relatives and other witnesses claimed that he had converted in later life to the [[Sunni Islam|Sunni]] sect of [[Islam]]. His sectarian affiliation at the time of his death was disputed in multiple court cases.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4">{{harvnb|Ahmed|p=4}}: "Although born into a Khoja (from ''khwaja'' or 'noble') family who were disciples of the Ismaili Aga Khan, Jinnah moved towards the Sunni sect early in life. There is evidence later, given by his relatives and associates in court, to establish that he was firmly a Sunni Muslim by the end of his life."</ref> Jinnah was from a wealthy merchant background. His father was a merchant and was born to a family of textile weavers in the village of Paneli in the [[princely state]] of [[Gondal State|Gondal]] (Kathiawar, Gujarat); his mother was also of that village. They had moved to Karachi in 1875, having married before their departure. Karachi was then enjoying an economic boom: the opening of the [[Suez Canal]] in 1869 meant it was 200 nautical miles closer to Europe for shipping than [[Mumbai|Bombay]].{{sfn|Singh|pp=30–33}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=3–5}} Jinnah was the second child;<ref name="Anjali Desai" />{{sfn|Ahmed|p=3}} he had three brothers and three sisters, including his younger sister [[Fatima Jinnah]] | Jinnah's given name at birth was Mahomedali Jinnahbhai,{{efn|{{lang-gu|મહમદ અલી ઝીણાભાઇ}}}} and he likely was born in 1876,{{efn|While [[Jinnah's birthday]] is celebrated as 25 December 1876, there is reason to doubt that date. Karachi did not then issue birth certificates, no record was kept by his family (birth dates being of little importance to Muslims of the time), and his school records reflect a birth date of 20 October 1875. See {{harvnb|Bolitho|p=3}}.}} to Jinnahbhai Poonja and his wife Mithibai, in a rented apartment on the second floor of [[Wazir Mansion]] near Karachi,<ref name="Moini 20 December 2003" /> now in [[Sindh]], Pakistan but then within the [[Bombay Presidency]] of [[British Raj|British India]]. Jinnah's paternal grandfather was from [[Paneli Moti]] village in [[Gondal, India|Gondal state]] in [[Kathiawar]] peninsula (now in [[Gujarat]], India).<ref name="Guttman2007">{{cite book|author=A. Guttman|title=The Nation of India in Contemporary Indian Literature|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uxqHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA34|date=15 October 2007|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan US|isbn=978-0-230-60693-7|pages=34–}}</ref> He was of a [[Gujarati people|Gujarati]] [[Khoja]] [[Nizari Isma'ilism|Nizari Isma'ili]] [[Shia Islam|Shi’a Muslim]] background, though Jinnah later followed the [[Twelver]] Shi'a teachings.<ref>{{cite book |last=Walsh |first=Judith E. |year=2017 |title=A Brief History of India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iekF9X3OwwMC&pg=PA173 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |page=173 |isbn=978-1-4381-0825-4 |quote=son of a middle-class merchant of the Muslim Khoja community who had migrated to Sind from Gujarat}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml|title=Was Jinnah a Shia or a Sunni?|first=Khaled|last=Ahmed|date=24 December 2010|work=The Friday Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117111449/http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml |archive-date=17 November 2011}}</ref> After his death, his relatives and other witnesses claimed that he had converted in later life to the [[Sunni Islam|Sunni]] sect of [[Islam]]. His sectarian affiliation at the time of his death was disputed in multiple court cases.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4">{{harvnb|Ahmed|p=4}}: "Although born into a Khoja (from ''khwaja'' or 'noble') family who were disciples of the Ismaili Aga Khan, Jinnah moved towards the Sunni sect early in life. There is evidence later, given by his relatives and associates in court, to establish that he was firmly a Sunni Muslim by the end of his life."</ref> Jinnah was from a wealthy merchant background. His father was a merchant and was born to a family of textile weavers in the village of Paneli in the [[princely state]] of [[Gondal State|Gondal]] (Kathiawar, Gujarat); his mother was also of that village. They had moved to Karachi in 1875, having married before their departure. Karachi was then enjoying an economic boom: the opening of the [[Suez Canal]] in 1869 meant it was 200 nautical miles closer to Europe for shipping than [[Mumbai|Bombay]].{{sfn|Singh|pp=30–33}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=3–5}} Jinnah was the second child;<ref name="Anjali Desai" />{{sfn|Ahmed|p=3}} he had three brothers and three sisters, including his younger sister [[Fatima Jinnah]].{{sfn|Jinnah, Fatima|pp=48–49}} Jinnah was not fluent in Gujarati, his mother-tongue, nor in Urdu; he was more fluent in English.{{sfn|Swamy|1997|ps=: "The future Mahatma insisted that the speeches be made in Gujarati by the Gujarati-speaking delegates. Jinnah, whose fluency in his mother-tongue of Gujarati was limited, objected to the suggestion."}}{{sfn|Ghosh|1999|ps=: "Jinnah was not as fluent in his mother tongue or for that matter in any other Indian language as in English."}}{{sfn|Malik|2006|ps=: "M.A. Jinnah was more fluent in English than in Urdu or his native Sindhi/Gujarati."}} Except for Fatima, little is known of his siblings, where they settled or if they met with their brother as he advanced in his legal and political careers.{{sfn|Puri|p=34}} He has sometimes been referred to as a [[Muhajir (Pakistan)|Muhajir]] by some writers because of his Gujarati ethnicity.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/949668196 |title=Pakistan at the crossroads : domestic dynamics and external pressures |date=2016 |editor-last=Jaffrelot |editor-first=Christophe |isbn=978-0-231-54025-4 |location=New York |oclc=949668196}}</ref> However, the use of term "Muhajir", meaning “immigrant“, in reference to his early life, is considered anachronistic by others as this term came into use after partition in 1947, referring to Muslim refugees who migrated to Pakistan, and was used in the 1951 census with that meaning.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pakistan - People {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Pakistan/People |access-date=7 March 2023 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> | ||
As a boy, Jinnah lived for a time in Bombay with an aunt and may have attended the Gokal Das Tej Primary School there, later on studying at the [[Cathedral and John Connon School]]. In Karachi, he attended the [[Sindh-Madrasa-tul-Islam]] and the [[Church Mission School|Christian Missionary Society High School]].{{sfn|Singh|p=54}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}}<ref name=SharifDawnRest>Sharif, Azizullah. "[http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Karachi: Restoration of Church Mission School ordered]" ([https://web.archive.org/web/20140526033854/http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Archive]). ''[[Dawn (newspaper)|Dawn]]''. 20 February 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2014. "Taking notice of the highly dilapidated and bad condition of the Church Mission School (CMS) where Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah had studied,[...]"</ref> He gained his matriculation from [[Bombay University]] at the high school. In his later years and especially after his death, a large number of stories about the boyhood of Pakistan's founder were circulated: that he spent all his spare time at the police court, listening to the proceedings, and that he studied his books by the glow of street lights for lack of other illumination. His official biographer, [[Hector Bolitho]], writing in 1954, interviewed surviving boyhood associates, and obtained a tale that the young Jinnah discouraged other children from playing marbles in the dust, urging them to rise up, keep their hands and clothes clean, and play cricket instead.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=5–7}} | As a boy, Jinnah lived for a time in Bombay with an aunt and may have attended the Gokal Das Tej Primary School there, later on studying at the [[Cathedral and John Connon School]]. In Karachi, he attended the [[Sindh-Madrasa-tul-Islam]] and the [[Church Mission School|Christian Missionary Society High School]].{{sfn|Singh|p=54}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}}<ref name=SharifDawnRest>Sharif, Azizullah. "[http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Karachi: Restoration of Church Mission School ordered]" ([https://web.archive.org/web/20140526033854/http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Archive]). ''[[Dawn (newspaper)|Dawn]]''. 20 February 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2014. "Taking notice of the highly dilapidated and bad condition of the Church Mission School (CMS) where Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah had studied,[...]"</ref> He gained his matriculation from [[Bombay University]] at the high school. In his later years and especially after his death, a large number of stories about the boyhood of Pakistan's founder were circulated: that he spent all his spare time at the police court, listening to the proceedings, and that he studied his books by the glow of street lights for lack of other illumination. His official biographer, [[Hector Bolitho]], writing in 1954, interviewed surviving boyhood associates, and obtained a tale that the young Jinnah discouraged other children from playing marbles in the dust, urging them to rise up, keep their hands and clothes clean, and play cricket instead.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=5–7}} | ||
Line 75: | Line 68: | ||
During his student years in England, Jinnah was influenced by 19th-century British [[classical liberalism|liberalism]], like many other future Indian independence leaders. His main intellectual references were peoples like [[Jeremy Bentham|Bentham]], [[John Stuart Mill|Mill]], [[Herbert Spencer|Spencer]], and [[Auguste Comte|Comte]].<ref>Asghar Ali Engineer, ''They Too Fought for India's Freedom: The Role of Minorities'', Hope India Publications, 2006, p. 72</ref><ref>Anil Chandra Banerjee, ''Two Nations: The Philosophy of Muslim Nationalism'', Concept Publishing Company, 1981, p. 219</ref> This political education included exposure to the idea of the democratic nation, and progressive politics.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> He became an admirer of the [[Parsi]] British Indian political leaders [[Dadabhai Naoroji]] and [[Sir Pherozeshah Mehta]]. Naoroji had become the first British Member of Parliament of Indian extraction shortly before Jinnah's arrival, triumphing with a majority of three votes in [[Finsbury Central (UK Parliament constituency)|Finsbury Central]]. Jinnah listened to Naoroji's [[maiden speech]] in the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] from the visitor's gallery.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=10–12}}{{sfn|Singh|p=55}} | During his student years in England, Jinnah was influenced by 19th-century British [[classical liberalism|liberalism]], like many other future Indian independence leaders. His main intellectual references were peoples like [[Jeremy Bentham|Bentham]], [[John Stuart Mill|Mill]], [[Herbert Spencer|Spencer]], and [[Auguste Comte|Comte]].<ref>Asghar Ali Engineer, ''They Too Fought for India's Freedom: The Role of Minorities'', Hope India Publications, 2006, p. 72</ref><ref>Anil Chandra Banerjee, ''Two Nations: The Philosophy of Muslim Nationalism'', Concept Publishing Company, 1981, p. 219</ref> This political education included exposure to the idea of the democratic nation, and progressive politics.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> He became an admirer of the [[Parsi]] British Indian political leaders [[Dadabhai Naoroji]] and [[Sir Pherozeshah Mehta]]. Naoroji had become the first British Member of Parliament of Indian extraction shortly before Jinnah's arrival, triumphing with a majority of three votes in [[Finsbury Central (UK Parliament constituency)|Finsbury Central]]. Jinnah listened to Naoroji's [[maiden speech]] in the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] from the visitor's gallery.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=10–12}}{{sfn|Singh|p=55}} | ||
[[File:Mohammed Ali Jinnah smoking.jpg|thumb |Jinnah wearing a suit and smoking a cigarette]] | |||
The Western world not only inspired Jinnah in his political life, but also greatly influenced his personal preferences, particularly when it came to dress. Jinnah abandoned local garb for Western-style clothing, and throughout his life he was always impeccably dressed in public. His suits were designed by [[Savile Row]] tailor [[Henry Poole & Co]].<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Ghafoor|first1=Usman|url=https://gulfnews.com/entertainment/pakistani-cinema/shahzad-noor-is-fashion-worlds-latest-show-stopper-1.62296707|title=Shahzad Noor is fashion world's latest show-stopper|work=Gulf News|date=25 February 2019|access-date=13 August 2020}}</ref> He came to own over 200 suits, which he wore with heavily starched shirts with detachable collars, and as a barrister took pride in never wearing the same silk tie twice.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=9}} Even when he was dying, he insisted on being formally dressed, "I will not travel in my pyjamas."{{sfn|Puri|p=34}} In his later years he was usually seen wearing a [[Karakul (hat)|Karakul hat]] which subsequently came to be known as the "Jinnah cap".{{sfn|Ahmed|p=85}} | The Western world not only inspired Jinnah in his political life, but also greatly influenced his personal preferences, particularly when it came to dress. Jinnah abandoned local garb for Western-style clothing, and throughout his life he was always impeccably dressed in public. His suits were designed by [[Savile Row]] tailor [[Henry Poole & Co]].<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Ghafoor|first1=Usman|url=https://gulfnews.com/entertainment/pakistani-cinema/shahzad-noor-is-fashion-worlds-latest-show-stopper-1.62296707|title=Shahzad Noor is fashion world's latest show-stopper|work=Gulf News|date=25 February 2019|access-date=13 August 2020}}</ref> He came to own over 200 suits, which he wore with heavily starched shirts with detachable collars, and as a barrister took pride in never wearing the same silk tie twice.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=9}} Even when he was dying, he insisted on being formally dressed, "I will not travel in my pyjamas."{{sfn|Puri|p=34}} In his later years he was usually seen wearing a [[Karakul (hat)|Karakul hat]] which subsequently came to be known as the "Jinnah cap".{{sfn|Ahmed|p=85}} | ||
Line 95: | Line 90: | ||
=== Trade unionist === | === Trade unionist === | ||
Jinnah was also a supporter of working class causes and an active trade unionist.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com">{{Cite news |url=https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=04_11_2017_002_008|title='Pakistan's founder worked as a trade union leader' |work=Dawn |date=4 November 2017 |access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> He was elected President of [[All India Postal Staff Union]] in 1925 whose membership was 70,000.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com" /> According to All [[Pakistan Labour Federation]]'s publication ''Productive Role of Trade Unions and Industrial Relations'', being a member of Legislative Assembly, Jinnah pleaded forcefully for rights of workers and struggled for getting a "living wage and fair conditions" for them.<ref name="Quaid backed labour struggle">{{Cite news|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/121891|title=Quaid backed labour struggle|date=27 October 2003|work=Dawn|access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> He also played an important role in enactment of Trade Union | Jinnah was also a supporter of working class causes and an active trade unionist.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com">{{Cite news |url=https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=04_11_2017_002_008|title='Pakistan's founder worked as a trade union leader' |work=Dawn |date=4 November 2017 |access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> He was elected President of [[All India Postal Staff Union]] in 1925 whose membership was 70,000.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com" /> According to All [[Pakistan Labour Federation]]'s publication ''Productive Role of Trade Unions and Industrial Relations'', being a member of Legislative Assembly, Jinnah pleaded forcefully for rights of workers and struggled for getting a "living wage and fair conditions" for them.<ref name="Quaid backed labour struggle">{{Cite news|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/121891|title=Quaid backed labour struggle|date=27 October 2003|work=Dawn|access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> He also played an important role in enactment of Trade Union Act of 1926 which gave trade union movement legal cover to organise themselves.<ref name="Quaid backed labour struggle" /> | ||
=== Rising leader === | === Rising leader === | ||
Line 118: | Line 113: | ||
In 1918, Jinnah married his second wife [[Rattanbai Petit]] ("Ruttie"), 24 years his junior. She was the fashionable young daughter of his friend [[Petit baronets#Petit Baronets, of Petit Hall (1890)|Sir Dinshaw Petit]], and was part of an elite [[Parsi people|Parsi]] family of Bombay.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> There was great opposition to the marriage from Rattanbai's family and the Parsi community, as well as from some Muslim religious leaders. Rattanbai defied her family and nominally [[converted to Islam]], adopting (though never using) the name Maryam Jinnah, resulting in a permanent estrangement from her family and Parsi society. The couple resided at [[South Court|South Court Mansion]] in Bombay, and frequently travelled across India and Europe. The couple's only child, daughter [[Dina Wadia|Dina]], was born on 15 August 1919.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> The couple separated prior to Ruttie's death in 1929, and subsequently Jinnah's sister [[Fatima Jinnah|Fatima]] looked after him and his child.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=11–15}} | In 1918, Jinnah married his second wife [[Rattanbai Petit]] ("Ruttie"), 24 years his junior. She was the fashionable young daughter of his friend [[Petit baronets#Petit Baronets, of Petit Hall (1890)|Sir Dinshaw Petit]], and was part of an elite [[Parsi people|Parsi]] family of Bombay.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> There was great opposition to the marriage from Rattanbai's family and the Parsi community, as well as from some Muslim religious leaders. Rattanbai defied her family and nominally [[converted to Islam]], adopting (though never using) the name Maryam Jinnah, resulting in a permanent estrangement from her family and Parsi society. The couple resided at [[South Court|South Court Mansion]] in Bombay, and frequently travelled across India and Europe. The couple's only child, daughter [[Dina Wadia|Dina]], was born on 15 August 1919.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> The couple separated prior to Ruttie's death in 1929, and subsequently Jinnah's sister [[Fatima Jinnah|Fatima]] looked after him and his child.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=11–15}} | ||
Relations between Indians and British were strained in 1919 when the Imperial Legislative Council extended emergency wartime restrictions on civil liberties; Jinnah resigned from it when it did. There was unrest across India, which worsened after the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] in [[Amritsar]], in which [[British Indian Army]] troops fired upon a protest meeting, killing hundreds. | Relations between Indians and British were strained in 1919 when the Imperial Legislative Council extended emergency wartime restrictions on civil liberties; Jinnah resigned from it when it did. There was unrest across India, which worsened after the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] in [[Amritsar]], in which [[British Indian Army]] troops fired upon a protest meeting, killing hundreds. In the wake of Amritsar, Gandhi, who had returned to India and become a widely respected leader and highly influential in the Congress, called for ''satyagraha'' against the British. Gandhi's proposal gained broad Hindu support, and was also attractive to many Muslims of the [[Khilafat Movement|Khilafat]] faction. These Muslims, supported by Gandhi, sought retention of the [[Ottoman caliphate]], which supplied spiritual leadership to many Muslims. The caliph was the [[Ottoman Emperor]], who would be deprived of both offices following his nation's defeat in the First World War. Gandhi had achieved considerable popularity among Muslims because of his work during the war on behalf of killed or imprisoned Muslims.{{sfn|Singh|pp=90–93}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=61–71}}{{sfn|Mohiuddin|p=61}} Unlike Jinnah and other leaders of the Congress, Gandhi did not wear western-style clothing, did his best to use [[Languages of India|an Indian language]] instead of English, and was deeply rooted in Indian culture. Gandhi's local style of leadership gained great popularity with the Indian people. Jinnah criticised Gandhi's Khilafat advocacy, which he saw as an endorsement of religious zealotry.{{sfn|Jalal|p=8}} Jinnah regarded Gandhi's proposed ''satyagraha'' campaign as political anarchy, and believed that self-government should be secured through constitutional means. He opposed Gandhi, but the tide of Indian opinion was against him. At the 1920 session of the Congress in [[Nagpur]], Jinnah was shouted down by the delegates, who passed Gandhi's proposal, pledging ''satyagraha'' until India was independent. Jinnah did not attend the subsequent League meeting, held in the same city, which passed a similar resolution. Because of the action of the Congress in endorsing Gandhi's campaign, Jinnah resigned from it, leaving all positions except in the Muslim League.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=84–85}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=71–72}} | ||
== Wilderness years; interlude in England == | == Wilderness years; interlude in England == | ||
Line 130: | Line 125: | ||
After Baldwin was defeated at the [[1929 United Kingdom general election|1929 British parliamentary election]], [[Ramsay MacDonald]] of the [[Labour Party (United Kingdom)|Labour Party]] became prime minister. MacDonald desired a conference of Indian and British leaders in London to discuss India's future, a course of action supported by Jinnah. Three [[Round Table Conferences (India)|Round Table Conferences]] followed over as many years, none of which resulted in a settlement. Jinnah was a delegate to the first two conferences, but was not invited to the last.{{sfn|Singh|p=170}} He remained in Britain for most of the period 1930 through 1934, practising as a barrister before the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|Privy Council]], where he dealt with a number of India-related cases. His biographers disagree over why he remained so long in Britain—Wolpert asserts that had Jinnah been made a [[Lord of Appeal in Ordinary|Law Lord]], he would have stayed for life, and that Jinnah alternatively sought a parliamentary seat.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=119–130}} Early biographer [[Hector Bolitho]] denied that Jinnah sought to enter the British Parliament,{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}} while Jaswant Singh deems Jinnah's time in Britain as a break or sabbatical from the Indian struggle.{{sfn|Singh|p=172}} Bolitho called this period "Jinnah's years of order and contemplation, wedged in between the time of early struggle, and the final storm of conquest".{{sfn|Bolitho|p=102}} | After Baldwin was defeated at the [[1929 United Kingdom general election|1929 British parliamentary election]], [[Ramsay MacDonald]] of the [[Labour Party (United Kingdom)|Labour Party]] became prime minister. MacDonald desired a conference of Indian and British leaders in London to discuss India's future, a course of action supported by Jinnah. Three [[Round Table Conferences (India)|Round Table Conferences]] followed over as many years, none of which resulted in a settlement. Jinnah was a delegate to the first two conferences, but was not invited to the last.{{sfn|Singh|p=170}} He remained in Britain for most of the period 1930 through 1934, practising as a barrister before the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|Privy Council]], where he dealt with a number of India-related cases. His biographers disagree over why he remained so long in Britain—Wolpert asserts that had Jinnah been made a [[Lord of Appeal in Ordinary|Law Lord]], he would have stayed for life, and that Jinnah alternatively sought a parliamentary seat.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=119–130}} Early biographer [[Hector Bolitho]] denied that Jinnah sought to enter the British Parliament,{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}} while Jaswant Singh deems Jinnah's time in Britain as a break or sabbatical from the Indian struggle.{{sfn|Singh|p=172}} Bolitho called this period "Jinnah's years of order and contemplation, wedged in between the time of early struggle, and the final storm of conquest".{{sfn|Bolitho|p=102}} | ||
In 1931, [[Fatima Jinnah]] joined her brother in England. From then on, Muhammad Jinnah would receive personal care and support from her as he aged and began to suffer from the lung ailments which would kill him. She lived and travelled with him, and became a close advisor. Muhammad Jinnah's daughter, Dina, was educated in England and India. Jinnah later became estranged from Dina after she decided to marry a Parsi, [[Neville Wadia]] from a prominent [[Parsi]] business family. Wadia is the son Sir Ness Wadia and Dr. Homi Wadia.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Singh|first=Kuldip|title=Obituary: Neville Wadia|journal=The Independent|date=6 August 1996|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituaryneville-wadia-1308408.html}}</ref> When Jinnah urged Dina to marry a Muslim, she reminded him that he had married a woman not raised in his faith. Jinnah continued to correspond cordially with his daughter, but their personal relationship was strained, and she did not come to Pakistan in his lifetime, but only for his funeral.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=101–102}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=370–371}} | In 1931, [[Fatima Jinnah]] joined her brother in England. From then on, Muhammad Jinnah would receive personal care and support from her as he aged and began to suffer from the lung ailments which would eventually kill him. She lived and travelled with him, and became a close advisor. Muhammad Jinnah's daughter, Dina, was educated in England and India. Jinnah later became estranged from Dina after she decided to marry a Parsi, [[Neville Wadia]] from a prominent [[Parsi]] business family. Wadia is the son Sir Ness Wadia and Dr. Homi Wadia.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Singh|first=Kuldip|title=Obituary: Neville Wadia|journal=The Independent|date=6 August 1996|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituaryneville-wadia-1308408.html}}</ref> When Jinnah urged Dina to marry a Muslim, she reminded him that he had married a woman not raised in his faith. Jinnah continued to correspond cordially with his daughter, but their personal relationship was strained, and she did not come to Pakistan in his lifetime, but only for his funeral.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=101–102}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=370–371}} | ||
== Return to politics == | == Return to politics == | ||
Line 155: | Line 150: | ||
Events which separated the communities included the failed attempt to form a coalition government including the Congress and the League in the United Provinces following the 1937 election.{{sfn|Hibbard|p=124}} According to historian Ian Talbot, "The provincial Congress governments made no effort to understand and respect their Muslim populations' cultural and religious sensibilities. The Muslim League's claims that it alone could safeguard Muslim interests thus received a major boost. Significantly it was only after this period of Congress rule that it [the League] took up the demand for a Pakistan state ..."<ref name="HistoryToday" /> | Events which separated the communities included the failed attempt to form a coalition government including the Congress and the League in the United Provinces following the 1937 election.{{sfn|Hibbard|p=124}} According to historian Ian Talbot, "The provincial Congress governments made no effort to understand and respect their Muslim populations' cultural and religious sensibilities. The Muslim League's claims that it alone could safeguard Muslim interests thus received a major boost. Significantly it was only after this period of Congress rule that it [the League] took up the demand for a Pakistan state ..."<ref name="HistoryToday" /> | ||
Balraj Puri in his journal article about Jinnah suggests that the Muslim League president, after the 1937 vote, turned to the idea of partition in "sheer desperation".{{sfn|Puri|p=35}} Historian [[Akbar S. Ahmed]] suggests that Jinnah abandoned hope of reconciliation with the Congress as he "rediscover[ed] his own Islamic roots, his own sense of identity, of culture and history, which would come increasingly to the fore in the final years of his life".{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}} Jinnah also increasingly adopted Muslim dress in the late 1930s.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=8}} In the wake of the 1937 balloting, Jinnah demanded that the question of power sharing be settled on an all-India basis, and that he, as president of the League, be accepted as the sole spokesman for the Muslim community.{{sfn|Singh|p=200}} | [[Balraj Puri]] in his journal article about Jinnah suggests that the Muslim League president, after the 1937 vote, turned to the idea of partition in "sheer desperation".{{sfn|Puri|p=35}} Historian [[Akbar S. Ahmed]] suggests that Jinnah abandoned hope of reconciliation with the Congress as he "rediscover[ed] his own Islamic roots, his own sense of identity, of culture and history, which would come increasingly to the fore in the final years of his life".{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}} Jinnah also increasingly adopted Muslim dress in the late 1930s.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=8}} In the wake of the 1937 balloting, Jinnah demanded that the question of power sharing be settled on an all-India basis, and that he, as president of the League, be accepted as the sole spokesman for the Muslim community.{{sfn|Singh|p=200}} | ||
=== Iqbal's influence on Jinnah === | === Iqbal's influence on Jinnah === | ||
Line 165: | Line 160: | ||
The well documented influence of Iqbal on Jinnah, with regard to taking the lead in creating Pakistan, has been described as "significant", "powerful" and even "unquestionable" by scholars.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Paul |first1=T. |year=2014 |title=The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYBeAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 |pages=37–38 |isbn=978-0-19-932223-7 |quote=Iqbal wrote several letters to Jinnah in 1937 persuading him to take the lead in creating Pakistan... These correspondences would change the way Jinnah would look at the issue of a separate homeland for Muslims.}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Kenworthy|first1=Leonard|year=1968|title=Leaders of New Nations|url=https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw/page/230 230]|quote=Iqbal's influence was perhaps the most powerful in Jinnah's decision to support the partition|publisher=Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Iqbal|first1=Khurshid|year=2009|title=The Right to Development in International Law: The Case of Pakistan|series=Routledge Research in Human Rights Law|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SDx9AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT220|isbn=978-1-134-01998-4|quote=Jinnah's views were significantly influenced by the ideas of Muhammad Iqbal}}<br />{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V |issue=2|page=151|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf|quote=Iqbal's influence on Jinnah is unquestionable}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Shah|first1=Mujawar|title=Religion and Politics in Pakistan: 1972–88|date=1996|page=35|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qRbXAAAAMAAJ&q=iqbal+influence|isbn=9789698329013|quote=Iqbal's correspondence with Jinnah also played an important role in formulating his course of action}}<br />{{cite journal|title=The Concept|journal=Pakistani Periodicals|year=2006|volume=26|issue=1–6|page=21|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j-NtAAAAMAAJ&q=influenced+|quote=Certainly these views influenced Mr Jinnah to declare urgently a solid solution to the Indian constitutional problem by projecting Muslims as a separate body}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Naik|first1=Vasant|year=1947|title=Mr. Jinnah: A Political Study|page=55|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4b9fS1kA4aMC&q=jinnah+iqbal+influence|quote=the biographer of Jinnah admits 'that these letters of Iqbal exercised influence on the mind of Mohamed Ali Jinnah.'}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Saleena Karim|title=Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What the Nation Doesn't Know|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MGiuSgAACAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Checkpoint Press|isbn=978-1-906628-22-2|page=25}}</ref> Iqbal has also been cited as an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London and re-enter the politics of India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ziring |first1=Lawrence |year=1980 |title=Pakistan: The Enigma of Political Development |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jgSOAAAAMAAJ&q=%22it+was+Iqbal+who+encouraged+Jinnah+to+return+to+India.%22 |page=67 |isbn=978-0-7129-0954-9 |quote=It was Iqbal who encouraged Jinnah to return to India}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Aziz|first1=Qutubuddin|year=2001|title=Jinnah and Pakistan|page=98|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1wluAAAAMAAJ|quote=Iqbal's persuasive letter to Jinnah in London to return to India and undertake the leadership of the Muslim League....undoubtedly contributed to Jinnah's eventual decision to return to India permanently}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Singh|first1=Iqbal|year=1951|title=The Ardent Pilgrim: An Introduction to the Life and Work of Mohammed Iqbal|page=153|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L_pjAAAAMAAJ|isbn=978-0-19-563979-7|quote=Iqbal was indirectly responsible for Jinnah's return to India from London}}<br />{{cite encyclopedia |title=Global Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophy |year=2010 |publisher=Global Vision Publishing House |pages=342 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U7xOAQAAIAAJ|isbn=9788182202948 |quote=Iqbal was an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London.}}</ref> Initially, however, Iqbal and Jinnah were opponents, as Iqbal believed Jinnah did not care about the crises confronting the Muslim community during the British Raj. According to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], this began to change during Iqbal's final years prior to his death in 1938. Iqbal gradually succeeded in converting Jinnah over to his view, who eventually accepted Iqbal as his ''"mentor"''. Ahmed comments that in his annotations to Iqbal's letters, Jinnah expressed solidarity with Iqbal's view: that Indian Muslims required a separate homeland.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=62–73}} | The well documented influence of Iqbal on Jinnah, with regard to taking the lead in creating Pakistan, has been described as "significant", "powerful" and even "unquestionable" by scholars.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Paul |first1=T. |year=2014 |title=The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYBeAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 |pages=37–38 |isbn=978-0-19-932223-7 |quote=Iqbal wrote several letters to Jinnah in 1937 persuading him to take the lead in creating Pakistan... These correspondences would change the way Jinnah would look at the issue of a separate homeland for Muslims.}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Kenworthy|first1=Leonard|year=1968|title=Leaders of New Nations|url=https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw/page/230 230]|quote=Iqbal's influence was perhaps the most powerful in Jinnah's decision to support the partition|publisher=Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Iqbal|first1=Khurshid|year=2009|title=The Right to Development in International Law: The Case of Pakistan|series=Routledge Research in Human Rights Law|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SDx9AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT220|isbn=978-1-134-01998-4|quote=Jinnah's views were significantly influenced by the ideas of Muhammad Iqbal}}<br />{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V |issue=2|page=151|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf|quote=Iqbal's influence on Jinnah is unquestionable}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Shah|first1=Mujawar|title=Religion and Politics in Pakistan: 1972–88|date=1996|page=35|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qRbXAAAAMAAJ&q=iqbal+influence|isbn=9789698329013|quote=Iqbal's correspondence with Jinnah also played an important role in formulating his course of action}}<br />{{cite journal|title=The Concept|journal=Pakistani Periodicals|year=2006|volume=26|issue=1–6|page=21|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j-NtAAAAMAAJ&q=influenced+|quote=Certainly these views influenced Mr Jinnah to declare urgently a solid solution to the Indian constitutional problem by projecting Muslims as a separate body}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Naik|first1=Vasant|year=1947|title=Mr. Jinnah: A Political Study|page=55|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4b9fS1kA4aMC&q=jinnah+iqbal+influence|quote=the biographer of Jinnah admits 'that these letters of Iqbal exercised influence on the mind of Mohamed Ali Jinnah.'}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Saleena Karim|title=Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What the Nation Doesn't Know|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MGiuSgAACAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Checkpoint Press|isbn=978-1-906628-22-2|page=25}}</ref> Iqbal has also been cited as an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London and re-enter the politics of India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ziring |first1=Lawrence |year=1980 |title=Pakistan: The Enigma of Political Development |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jgSOAAAAMAAJ&q=%22it+was+Iqbal+who+encouraged+Jinnah+to+return+to+India.%22 |page=67 |isbn=978-0-7129-0954-9 |quote=It was Iqbal who encouraged Jinnah to return to India}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Aziz|first1=Qutubuddin|year=2001|title=Jinnah and Pakistan|page=98|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1wluAAAAMAAJ|quote=Iqbal's persuasive letter to Jinnah in London to return to India and undertake the leadership of the Muslim League....undoubtedly contributed to Jinnah's eventual decision to return to India permanently}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Singh|first1=Iqbal|year=1951|title=The Ardent Pilgrim: An Introduction to the Life and Work of Mohammed Iqbal|page=153|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L_pjAAAAMAAJ|isbn=978-0-19-563979-7|quote=Iqbal was indirectly responsible for Jinnah's return to India from London}}<br />{{cite encyclopedia |title=Global Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophy |year=2010 |publisher=Global Vision Publishing House |pages=342 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U7xOAQAAIAAJ|isbn=9788182202948 |quote=Iqbal was an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London.}}</ref> Initially, however, Iqbal and Jinnah were opponents, as Iqbal believed Jinnah did not care about the crises confronting the Muslim community during the British Raj. According to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], this began to change during Iqbal's final years prior to his death in 1938. Iqbal gradually succeeded in converting Jinnah over to his view, who eventually accepted Iqbal as his ''"mentor"''. Ahmed comments that in his annotations to Iqbal's letters, Jinnah expressed solidarity with Iqbal's view: that Indian Muslims required a separate homeland.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=62–73}} | ||
Iqbal's influence also gave Jinnah a deeper appreciation for Muslim identity.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Kazimi|first1=M.|year=2005|title=M.A. Jinnah Views and Reviews|publisher=Oxford University Press |page=114|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZgVuAAAAMAAJ&q=influence |isbn=978-0-19-597979-4 |quote= Iqbal's influence led Jinnah to a deeper appreciation of Muslim identity}}</ref> The evidence of this influence began to be revealed from 1937 onwards. Jinnah not only began to echo Iqbal in his speeches, he started using Islamic symbolism and began directing his addresses to the underprivileged. Ahmed noted a change in Jinnah's words: while he still advocated freedom of religion and protection of the minorities, the model he was now aspiring to was that of the Prophet Muhammad, rather than that of a secular politician. Ahmed further avers that those scholars who have painted the later Jinnah as secular have misread his speeches which, he argues, must be read in the context of Islamic history and culture. Accordingly, Jinnah's imagery of the Pakistan began to become clear that it was to have an Islamic nature. This change has been seen to last for the rest of Jinnah's life. He continued to borrow ideas "directly from Iqbal—including his thoughts on Muslim unity, on Islamic ideals of liberty, justice and equality, on economics, and even on practices such as prayers".<ref>{{cite book|author=Saleena Karim|title=Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What the Nation Doesn't Know|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MGiuSgAACAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Checkpoint Press|isbn=978-1-906628-22-2| page=26 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V|issue=2|page=151|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf}}</ref> | Iqbal's influence also gave Jinnah a deeper appreciation for Muslim identity.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Kazimi|first1=M.|year=2005|title=M.A. Jinnah Views and Reviews|publisher=Oxford University Press |page=114|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZgVuAAAAMAAJ&q=influence |isbn=978-0-19-597979-4 |quote= Iqbal's influence led Jinnah to a deeper appreciation of Muslim identity}}</ref> The evidence of this influence began to be revealed from 1937 onwards. Jinnah not only began to echo Iqbal in his speeches, he started using Islamic symbolism and began directing his addresses to the underprivileged. Ahmed noted a change in Jinnah's words: while he still advocated freedom of religion and protection of the minorities, the model he was now aspiring to was that of the Prophet [[Muhammad]], rather than that of a secular politician. Ahmed further avers that those scholars who have painted the later Jinnah as secular have misread his speeches which, he argues, must be read in the context of Islamic history and culture. Accordingly, Jinnah's imagery of the Pakistan began to become clear that it was to have an Islamic nature. This change has been seen to last for the rest of Jinnah's life. He continued to borrow ideas "directly from Iqbal—including his thoughts on Muslim unity, on Islamic ideals of liberty, justice and equality, on economics, and even on practices such as prayers".<ref>{{cite book|author=Saleena Karim|title=Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What the Nation Doesn't Know|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MGiuSgAACAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Checkpoint Press|isbn=978-1-906628-22-2| page=26 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V|issue=2|page=151|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf}}</ref> | ||
In a speech in 1940, two years after the death of Iqbal, Jinnah expressed his preference for implementing Iqbal's vision for an Islamic Pakistan even if it meant he himself would never lead a nation. Jinnah stated, "If I live to see the ideal of a Muslim state being achieved in India, and I was then offered to make a choice between the works of Iqbal and the rulership of the Muslim state, I would prefer the former."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V|issue=2|page=152|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf}}</ref> | In a speech in 1940, two years after the death of Iqbal, Jinnah expressed his preference for implementing Iqbal's vision for an Islamic Pakistan even if it meant he himself would never lead a nation. Jinnah stated, "If I live to see the ideal of a Muslim state being achieved in India, and I was then offered to make a choice between the works of Iqbal and the rulership of the Muslim state, I would prefer the former."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V|issue=2|page=152|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf}}</ref> | ||
Line 183: | Line 178: | ||
Gandhi's reaction to the Lahore Resolution was muted; he called it "baffling", but told his disciples that Muslims, in common with other people of India, had the right to self-determination. Leaders of the Congress were more vocal; [[Jawaharlal Nehru]] referred to Lahore as "Jinnah's fantastic proposals" while [[Chakravarti Rajagopalachari]] deemed Jinnah's views on partition "a sign of a diseased mentality".{{sfn|Wolpert|p=185}} Linlithgow met with Jinnah in June 1940,{{sfn|Wolpert|p=189}} soon after [[Winston Churchill]] became the British prime minister, and in August offered both the Congress and the League a deal whereby in exchange for full support for the war, Linlithgow would allow Indian representation on his major war councils. The Viceroy promised a representative body after the war to determine India's future, and that no future settlement would be imposed over the objections of a large part of the population. This was satisfactory to neither the Congress nor the League, though Jinnah was pleased that the British had moved towards recognising Jinnah as the representative of the Muslim community's interests.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=62–63}} Jinnah was reluctant to make specific proposals as to the boundaries of Pakistan, or its relationships with Britain and with the rest of the subcontinent, fearing that any precise plan would divide the League.{{sfn|Moore|p=551}} | Gandhi's reaction to the Lahore Resolution was muted; he called it "baffling", but told his disciples that Muslims, in common with other people of India, had the right to self-determination. Leaders of the Congress were more vocal; [[Jawaharlal Nehru]] referred to Lahore as "Jinnah's fantastic proposals" while [[Chakravarti Rajagopalachari]] deemed Jinnah's views on partition "a sign of a diseased mentality".{{sfn|Wolpert|p=185}} Linlithgow met with Jinnah in June 1940,{{sfn|Wolpert|p=189}} soon after [[Winston Churchill]] became the British prime minister, and in August offered both the Congress and the League a deal whereby in exchange for full support for the war, Linlithgow would allow Indian representation on his major war councils. The Viceroy promised a representative body after the war to determine India's future, and that no future settlement would be imposed over the objections of a large part of the population. This was satisfactory to neither the Congress nor the League, though Jinnah was pleased that the British had moved towards recognising Jinnah as the representative of the Muslim community's interests.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=62–63}} Jinnah was reluctant to make specific proposals as to the boundaries of Pakistan, or its relationships with Britain and with the rest of the subcontinent, fearing that any precise plan would divide the League.{{sfn|Moore|p=551}} | ||
The Japanese [[attack on Pearl Harbor]] in December 1941 brought the United States into the war. In the following months, the Japanese advanced in Southeast Asia, and the British Cabinet sent [[Cripps' mission|a mission]] led by Sir [[Stafford Cripps]] to try to conciliate the Indians and cause them to fully back the war. Cripps proposed giving some provinces what was dubbed the "local option" to remain outside of an Indian central government either for a period of time or permanently, to become dominions on their own or be part of another confederation. The Muslim League was far from certain of winning the legislative votes that would be required for mixed provinces such as Bengal and Punjab to secede, and Jinnah rejected the proposals as not sufficiently recognising Pakistan's right to exist. | The Japanese [[attack on Pearl Harbor]] in December 1941 brought the United States into the war. In the following months, the Japanese advanced in Southeast Asia, and the British Cabinet sent [[Cripps' mission|a mission]] led by Sir [[Stafford Cripps]] to try to conciliate the Indians and cause them to fully back the war. Cripps proposed giving some provinces what was dubbed the "local option" to remain outside of an Indian central government either for a period of time or permanently, to become dominions on their own or be part of another confederation. The Muslim League was far from certain of winning the legislative votes that would be required for mixed provinces such as Bengal and Punjab to secede, and Jinnah rejected the proposals as not sufficiently recognising Pakistan's right to exist. The Congress also rejected the Cripps plan, demanding immediate concessions which Cripps was not prepared to give.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=71–81}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=196–201}} Despite the rejection, Jinnah and the League saw the Cripps proposal as recognising Pakistan in principle.{{sfn|Moore|p=553}} | ||
[[File:Photograph of Jinnah with Gandhi in 1944 (Photo 429-17).jpg|thumb|right|Jinnah with [[Mahatma Gandhi]] in Bombay, 1944]] | [[File:Photograph of Jinnah with Gandhi in 1944 (Photo 429-17).jpg|thumb|right|Jinnah with [[Mahatma Gandhi]] in Bombay, 1944]] | ||
The Congress followed the failed Cripps mission by demanding, in August 1942, that the British immediately "[[Quit India]]", proclaiming a mass campaign of ''satyagraha'' until they did. The British promptly arrested most major leaders of the Congress and imprisoned them for the remainder of the war. Gandhi, however, was placed on house arrest in one of the Aga Khan's palaces prior to his release for health reasons in 1944. With the Congress leaders absent from the political scene, Jinnah warned against the threat of Hindu domination and maintained his Pakistan demand without going into great detail about what that would entail. | The Congress followed the failed Cripps mission by demanding, in August 1942, that the British immediately "[[Quit India]]", proclaiming a mass campaign of ''satyagraha'' until they did. The British promptly arrested most major leaders of the Congress and imprisoned them for the remainder of the war. Gandhi, however, was placed on house arrest in one of the Aga Khan's palaces prior to his release for health reasons in 1944. With the Congress leaders absent from the political scene, Jinnah warned against the threat of Hindu domination and maintained his Pakistan demand without going into great detail about what that would entail. Jinnah also worked to increase the League's political control at the provincial level.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=82–84}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=208, 229}} He helped to found the newspaper ''[[Dawn (newspaper)|Dawn]]'' in the early 1940s in Delhi; it helped to spread the League's message and eventually became the major English-language newspaper of Pakistan.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=107}} | ||
In September 1944, Jinnah hosted Gandhi, recently released from confinement, at his home on [[Malabar Hill]] in Bombay. Two weeks of talks between them followed, which resulted in no agreement. Jinnah insisted on Pakistan being conceded prior to the British departure and to come into being immediately, while Gandhi proposed that plebiscites on partition occur sometime after a united India gained its independence.{{sfn|Singh|pp=266–280}} In early 1945, Liaquat and the Congress leader [[Bhulabhai Desai]] met, with Jinnah's approval, and agreed that after the war, the Congress and the League should form an interim government with the members of the Executive Council of the Viceroy to be nominated by the Congress and the League in equal numbers. When the Congress leadership were released from prison in June 1945, they repudiated the agreement and censured Desai for acting without proper authority.{{sfn|Singh|pp=280–283}} | In September 1944, Jinnah hosted Gandhi, recently released from confinement, at his home on [[Malabar Hill]] in Bombay. Two weeks of talks between them followed, which resulted in no agreement. Jinnah insisted on Pakistan being conceded prior to the British departure and to come into being immediately, while Gandhi proposed that plebiscites on partition occur sometime after a united India gained its independence.{{sfn|Singh|pp=266–280}} In early 1945, Liaquat and the Congress leader [[Bhulabhai Desai]] met, with Jinnah's approval, and agreed that after the war, the Congress and the League should form an interim government with the members of the Executive Council of the Viceroy to be nominated by the Congress and the League in equal numbers. When the Congress leadership were released from prison in June 1945, they repudiated the agreement and censured Desai for acting without proper authority.{{sfn|Singh|pp=280–283}} | ||
=== Postwar === | === Postwar === | ||
[[Archibald Wavell, 1st Earl Wavell|Field Marshal Viscount Wavell]] succeeded Linlithgow as Viceroy in 1943. In June 1945, following the release of the Congress leaders, Wavell called for [[Simla Conference|a conference]], and invited the leading figures from the various communities to meet with him at [[Shimla|Simla]]. | [[File:Nehrujinnah.jpg|thumb|right|Nehru (left) and Jinnah walk together at Simla, 1946]] | ||
[[Archibald Wavell, 1st Earl Wavell|Field Marshal Viscount Wavell]] succeeded Linlithgow as Viceroy in 1943. In June 1945, following the release of the Congress leaders, Wavell called for [[Simla Conference|a conference]], and invited the leading figures from the various communities to meet with him at [[Shimla|Simla]]. He proposed a temporary government along the lines which Liaquat and Desai had agreed. However, Wavell was unwilling to guarantee that only the League's candidates would be placed in the seats reserved for Muslims. All other invited groups submitted lists of candidates to the Viceroy. Wavell cut the conference short in mid-July without further seeking an agreement; with a [[1945 United Kingdom general election|British general election]] imminent, Churchill's government did not feel it could proceed.{{sfn|Singh|pp=289–297}} | |||
British voters returned [[Clement Attlee]] and his Labour Party [[Attlee ministry|to government]] later in July. Attlee and his Secretary of State for India, Lord [[Frederick Pethick-Lawrence]], immediately ordered a review of the Indian situation.{{sfn|Jalal|p=132}} Jinnah had no comment on the change of government, but called a meeting of his Working Committee and issued a statement calling for new elections in India. The League held influence at the provincial level in the Muslim-majority states mostly by alliance, and Jinnah believed that, given the opportunity, the League would improve its electoral standing and lend added support to his claim to be the sole spokesman for the Muslims. Wavell returned to India in September after consultation with his new masters in London; elections, both for the centre and for the provinces, were announced soon after. The British indicated that formation of a constitution-making body would follow the votes.{{sfn|Singh|pp=301–302}} | British voters returned [[Clement Attlee]] and his Labour Party [[Attlee ministry|to government]] later in July. Attlee and his Secretary of State for India, Lord [[Frederick Pethick-Lawrence]], immediately ordered a review of the Indian situation.{{sfn|Jalal|p=132}} Jinnah had no comment on the change of government, but called a meeting of his Working Committee and issued a statement calling for new elections in India. The League held influence at the provincial level in the Muslim-majority states mostly by alliance, and Jinnah believed that, given the opportunity, the League would improve its electoral standing and lend added support to his claim to be the sole spokesman for the Muslims. Wavell returned to India in September after consultation with his new masters in London; elections, both for the centre and for the provinces, were announced soon after. The British indicated that formation of a constitution-making body would follow the votes.{{sfn|Singh|pp=301–302}} | ||
The Muslim League declared that they would campaign on a single issue: Pakistan.{{sfn|Singh|p=302}} | [[File:Muslim League leaders.jpg|thumb|Jinnah with Muslim League leaders in the corridor of the [[Central Legislative Assembly]] in [[New Delhi]] in 1946.]] | ||
The Muslim League declared that they would campaign on a single issue: Pakistan.{{sfn|Singh|p=302}} Speaking in [[Ahmedabad]], Jinnah echoed this, "Pakistan is a matter of life or death for us."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=251}} In the [[1945 Indian general election|December 1945 elections]] for the [[Constituent Assembly of India]], the League won every seat reserved for Muslims. In the [[1946 Indian provincial elections|provincial elections]] in January 1946, the League took 75% of the Muslim vote, an increase from 4.4% in 1937.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=171–172}} According to his biographer Bolitho, "This was Jinnah's glorious hour: his arduous political campaigns, his robust beliefs and claims, were at last justified."{{sfn|Bolitho|p=158}} Wolpert wrote that the League election showing "appeared to prove the universal appeal of Pakistan among Muslims of the subcontinent".{{sfn|Wolpert|p=254}} The Congress dominated the central assembly nevertheless, though it lost four seats from its previous strength.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=254}} | |||
[[File: | [[File:Jinnah with Stafford Cripps and Lord Pethick Lawrence.jpg|thumb|right|Jinnah with [[Stafford Cripps]] (right) and [[Frederick Pethick-Lawrence, 1st Baron Pethick-Lawrence|Pethick-Lawrence]] (left)]] | ||
In February 1946, the British Cabinet resolved to send a delegation to India to negotiate with leaders there. This [[1946 Cabinet Mission to India|Cabinet Mission]] included Cripps and Pethick-Lawrence. | |||
In February 1946, the British Cabinet resolved to send a delegation to India to negotiate with leaders there. This [[1946 Cabinet Mission to India|Cabinet Mission]] included Cripps and Pethick-Lawrence. The highest-level delegation to try to break the deadlock, it arrived in New Delhi in late March. Little negotiation had been done since the previous October because of the elections in India.{{sfn|Singh|pp=302, 303–308}} The British in May released a plan for a united Indian state comprising substantially autonomous provinces, and called for "groups" of provinces formed on the basis of religion. Matters such as defence, external relations and communications would be handled by a central authority. Provinces would have the option of leaving the union entirely, and there would be an interim government with representation from the Congress and the League. Jinnah and his Working Committee accepted this plan in June, but it fell apart over the question of how many members of the interim government the Congress and the League would have, and over the Congress's desire to include a Muslim member in its representation. Before leaving India, the British ministers stated that they intended to inaugurate an interim government even if one of the major groups was unwilling to participate.{{sfn|Singh|pp=308–322}} | |||
The Congress soon joined the new Indian ministry. The League was slower to do so, not entering until October 1946. In agreeing to have the League join the government, Jinnah abandoned his demands for parity with the Congress and a veto on matters concerning Muslims. The new ministry met amid a backdrop of rioting, especially [[Direct Action Day|in Calcutta]].{{sfn|Jalal|pp=221–225}} The Congress wanted the Viceroy to immediately summon the constituent assembly and begin the work of writing a constitution and felt that the League ministers should either join in the request or resign from the government. Wavell attempted to save the situation by flying leaders such as Jinnah, Liaquat, and Jawaharlal Nehru to London in December 1946. At the end of the talks, participants issued a statement that the constitution would not be forced on any unwilling parts of India.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=229–231}} On the way back from London, Jinnah and Liaquat stopped in Cairo for several days of pan-Islamic meetings.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=305}} | The Congress soon joined the new Indian ministry. The League was slower to do so, not entering until October 1946. In agreeing to have the League join the government, Jinnah abandoned his demands for parity with the Congress and a veto on matters concerning Muslims. The new ministry met amid a backdrop of rioting, especially [[Direct Action Day|in Calcutta]].{{sfn|Jalal|pp=221–225}} The Congress wanted the Viceroy to immediately summon the constituent assembly and begin the work of writing a constitution and felt that the League ministers should either join in the request or resign from the government. Wavell attempted to save the situation by flying leaders such as Jinnah, Liaquat, and Jawaharlal Nehru to London in December 1946. At the end of the talks, participants issued a statement that the constitution would not be forced on any unwilling parts of India.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=229–231}} On the way back from London, Jinnah and Liaquat stopped in Cairo for several days of pan-Islamic meetings.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=305}} | ||
Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
On 20 February 1947, Attlee announced Mountbatten's appointment, and that Britain would transfer power in India not later than June 1948.{{sfn|Jalal|p=237}} Mountbatten took office as Viceroy on 24 March 1947, two days after his arrival in India.{{sfn|Khan|p=87}} By then, the Congress had come around to the idea of partition. Nehru stated in 1960, "the truth is that we were tired men and we were getting on in years ... The plan for partition offered a way out and we took it."{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–87}} Leaders of the Congress decided that having loosely tied Muslim-majority provinces as part of a future India was not worth the loss of the powerful government at the centre which they desired.{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–86}} However, the Congress insisted that if Pakistan were to become independent, Bengal and Punjab would have to be divided.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=312}} | On 20 February 1947, Attlee announced Mountbatten's appointment, and that Britain would transfer power in India not later than June 1948.{{sfn|Jalal|p=237}} Mountbatten took office as Viceroy on 24 March 1947, two days after his arrival in India.{{sfn|Khan|p=87}} By then, the Congress had come around to the idea of partition. Nehru stated in 1960, "the truth is that we were tired men and we were getting on in years ... The plan for partition offered a way out and we took it."{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–87}} Leaders of the Congress decided that having loosely tied Muslim-majority provinces as part of a future India was not worth the loss of the powerful government at the centre which they desired.{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–86}} However, the Congress insisted that if Pakistan were to become independent, Bengal and Punjab would have to be divided.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=312}} | ||
Mountbatten had been warned in his briefing papers that Jinnah would be his "toughest customer" who had proved a chronic nuisance because "no one in this country [India] had so far gotten into Jinnah's mind".{{sfn|Jalal|p=250}} The men met over six days beginning on 5 April. | Mountbatten had been warned in his briefing papers that Jinnah would be his "toughest customer" who had proved a chronic nuisance because "no one in this country [India] had so far gotten into Jinnah's mind".{{sfn|Jalal|p=250}} The men met over six days beginning on 5 April. The sessions began lightly when Jinnah, photographed between Louis and [[Edwina Mountbatten]], quipped "A rose between two thorns" which the Viceroy took, perhaps gratuitously, as evidence that the Muslim leader had pre-planned his joke but had expected the vicereine to stand in the middle.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=317}}<!-- justification for "perhaps gratuitously": from source "Was Jinnah's mind perhaps working a bit faster than Mountbatten suspected? --> Mountbatten was not favourably impressed with Jinnah, repeatedly expressing frustration to his staff about Jinnah's insistence on Pakistan in the face of all argument.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=318–319}} | ||
[[File:Lord Mountbatten meets Nehru, Jinnah and other Leaders to plan Partition of India.jpg|thumb|Mountbatten meets Jinnah, Nehru and other leaders to plan the [[Partition of India]]]] | |||
Jinnah feared that at the end of the British presence in the subcontinent, they would turn control over to the Congress-dominated constituent assembly, putting Muslims at a disadvantage in attempting to win autonomy. He demanded that Mountbatten divide [[British Indian Army|the army]] prior to independence, which would take at least a year. Mountbatten had hoped that the post-independence arrangements would include a common defence force, but Jinnah saw it as essential that a sovereign state should have its own forces. Mountbatten met with Liaquat the day of his final session with Jinnah, and concluded, as he told Attlee and the Cabinet in May, that "it had become clear that the Muslim League would resort to arms if Pakistan in some form were not conceded."{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=319–325}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=249–259}} The Viceroy was also influenced by negative Muslim reaction to the constitutional report of the assembly, which envisioned broad powers for the post-independence central government.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=261–262}} | Jinnah feared that at the end of the British presence in the subcontinent, they would turn control over to the Congress-dominated constituent assembly, putting Muslims at a disadvantage in attempting to win autonomy. He demanded that Mountbatten divide [[British Indian Army|the army]] prior to independence, which would take at least a year. Mountbatten had hoped that the post-independence arrangements would include a common defence force, but Jinnah saw it as essential that a sovereign state should have its own forces. Mountbatten met with Liaquat the day of his final session with Jinnah, and concluded, as he told Attlee and the Cabinet in May, that "it had become clear that the Muslim League would resort to arms if Pakistan in some form were not conceded."{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=319–325}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=249–259}} The Viceroy was also influenced by negative Muslim reaction to the constitutional report of the assembly, which envisioned broad powers for the post-independence central government.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=261–262}} | ||
On 2 June, the final plan was given by the Viceroy to Indian leaders: on 15 August, the British would turn over power to two dominions. The provinces would vote on whether to continue in the existing constituent assembly or to have a new one, that is, to join Pakistan. Bengal and Punjab would also vote, both on the question of which assembly to join, and on the partition. A boundary commission would determine the final lines in the partitioned provinces. Plebiscites would take place in the North-West Frontier Province (which did not have a League government despite an overwhelmingly Muslim population), and in the majority-Muslim [[Sylhet Division|Sylhet district]] of [[Assam Province|Assam]], adjacent to eastern Bengal. On 3 June, Mountbatten, Nehru, Jinnah and [[Sikh]] leader [[Baldev Singh]] made the formal announcement by radio.{{sfn|Khan|pp=2–4}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=327–329}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=287–290}} Jinnah concluded his address with "''[[Pakistan Zindabad]] ''" (Long live Pakistan), which was not in the script.{{sfn|Bolitho|p=187}} In the weeks which followed Punjab and Bengal cast the votes which resulted in partition. Sylhet and the N.W.F.P. voted to cast their lots with Pakistan, a decision joined by the assemblies in [[Sind Province (1936–55)|Sind]] and [[Baluchistan (Chief Commissioner's Province)|Baluchistan]].{{sfn|Jalal|pp=287–290}} | On 2 June 1947, the final plan was given by the Viceroy to Indian leaders: on 15 August, the British would turn over power to two dominions. The provinces would vote on whether to continue in the existing constituent assembly or to have a new one, that is, to join Pakistan. Bengal and Punjab would also vote, both on the question of which assembly to join, and on the partition. A boundary commission would determine the final lines in the partitioned provinces. Plebiscites would take place in the North-West Frontier Province (which did not have a League government despite an overwhelmingly Muslim population), and in the majority-Muslim [[Sylhet Division|Sylhet district]] of [[Assam Province|Assam]], adjacent to eastern Bengal. On 3 June, Mountbatten, Nehru, Jinnah and [[Sikh]] leader [[Baldev Singh]] made the formal announcement by radio.{{sfn|Khan|pp=2–4}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=327–329}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=287–290}} Jinnah concluded his address with "''[[Pakistan Zindabad]] ''" (Long live Pakistan), which was not in the script.{{sfn|Bolitho|p=187}} In the weeks which followed Punjab and Bengal cast the votes which resulted in partition. Sylhet and the N.W.F.P. voted to cast their lots with Pakistan, a decision joined by the assemblies in [[Sind Province (1936–55)|Sind]] and [[Baluchistan (Chief Commissioner's Province)|Baluchistan]].{{sfn|Jalal|pp=287–290}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah announces the creation of Pakistan over All India Radio.jpg|thumb|left|Jinnah announcing the creation of Pakistan over [[All India Radio]] on 3 June 1947]] | [[File:Jinnah announces the creation of Pakistan over All India Radio.jpg|thumb|left|Jinnah announcing the creation of Pakistan over [[All India Radio]] on 3 June 1947]] | ||
On 4 July 1947, Liaquat asked Mountbatten on Jinnah's behalf to recommend to the British king, [[George VI of the United Kingdom|George VI]], that Jinnah be appointed Pakistan's first governor-general. This request angered Mountbatten, who had hoped to have that position in both dominions—he would be India's first post-independence governor-general—but Jinnah felt that Mountbatten would be likely to favour the new Hindu-majority state because of his closeness to Nehru. In addition, the governor-general would initially be a powerful figure, and Jinnah did not trust anyone else to take that office. Although the Boundary Commission, led by British lawyer Sir [[Cyril Radcliffe]], had not yet reported, there were already massive movements of populations between the nations-to-be, as well as sectarian violence. Jinnah arranged to sell his house in Bombay and procured a new one in Karachi. On 7 August, Jinnah, with his sister and close staff, flew from Delhi to Karachi in Mountbatten's plane, and as the plane taxied, he was heard to murmur, "That's the end of that."{{sfn|Singh|pp=393–396}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=290–293}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=333–336}} On 11 August, he presided over the new constituent assembly for Pakistan at Karachi, and [[Muhammad Ali Jinnah's 11 August Speech|addressed]] them, "You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship in this State of Pakistan ... You may belong to any religion or caste or creed—that has nothing to do with the business of the State ... I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State."{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=337–339}} On 14 August, Pakistan became independent; Jinnah led the celebrations in Karachi. One observer wrote, "here indeed is Pakistan's King Emperor, Archbishop of Canterbury, Speaker and Prime Minister concentrated into one formidable ''Quaid-e-Azam''."{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=341–342}} | On 4 July 1947, Liaquat asked Mountbatten on Jinnah's behalf to recommend to the British king, [[George VI of the United Kingdom|George VI]], that Jinnah be appointed Pakistan's first governor-general. This request angered Mountbatten, who had hoped to have that position in both dominions—he would be India's first post-independence governor-general—but Jinnah felt that Mountbatten would be likely to favour the new Hindu-majority state because of his closeness to Nehru. In addition, the governor-general would initially be a powerful figure, and Jinnah did not trust anyone else to take that office. Although the Boundary Commission, led by British lawyer Sir [[Cyril Radcliffe]], had not yet reported, there were already massive movements of populations between the nations-to-be, as well as sectarian violence. Jinnah arranged to sell his house in Bombay and procured a new one in Karachi. On 7 August, Jinnah, with his sister and close staff, flew from Delhi to Karachi in Mountbatten's plane, and as the plane taxied, he was heard to murmur, "That's the end of that."{{sfn|Singh|pp=393–396}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=290–293}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=333–336}} On 11 August, he presided over the new [[Constituent Assembly of Pakistan|constituent assembly]] for Pakistan at Karachi, and [[Muhammad Ali Jinnah's 11 August Speech|addressed]] them, "You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship in this State of Pakistan ... You may belong to any religion or caste or creed—that has nothing to do with the business of the State ... I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State."{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=337–339}} On 14 August, Pakistan became independent; Jinnah led the celebrations in Karachi. One observer wrote, "here indeed is Pakistan's King Emperor, Archbishop of Canterbury, Speaker and Prime Minister concentrated into one formidable ''Quaid-e-Azam''."{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=341–342}} | ||
== Governor-General == | == Governor-General == | ||
[[File:Muhammad Ali Jinnah sitting on the Chair of Governer General wearing a Sherwani.jpg|thumb|Jinnah during the oath taking ceremony as Governor General]] | |||
The [[Radcliffe Commission]], dividing Bengal and Punjab, completed its work and reported to Mountbatten on 12 August; the last Viceroy held the maps until the 17th, not wanting to spoil the independence celebrations in both nations. There had already been ethnically charged violence and movement of populations; publication of the [[Radcliffe Line]] dividing the new nations sparked mass migration, murder, and [[ethnic cleansing]]. Many on the "wrong side" of the lines fled or were murdered, or murdered others, hoping to make facts on the ground which would reverse the commission's verdict. Radcliffe wrote in his report that he knew that neither side would be happy with his award; he declined his fee for the work.{{sfn|Khan|pp=124–127}} Christopher Beaumont, Radcliffe's private secretary, later wrote that Mountbatten "must take the blame—though not the sole blame—for the massacres in the Punjab in which between 500,000 to a million men, women and children perished".<ref name="lawson" /> As many as 14.5 million people relocated between India and Pakistan during and after partition.<ref name="lawson" /> Jinnah did what he could for the eight million people who migrated to Pakistan; although by now over 70 and frail from lung ailments, he travelled across [[West Pakistan]] and personally supervised the provision of aid.{{sfn|Malik|p=131}} According to Ahmed, "What Pakistan needed desperately in those early months was a symbol of the state, one that would unify people and give them the courage and resolve to succeed."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=145}} | |||
[[File:Jinnah speaking on 14 August 1947.jpg|thumb|Jinnah speaking at the [[Constituent Assembly of Pakistan]] on 14 August 1947]] | [[File:Jinnah speaking on 14 August 1947.jpg|thumb|Jinnah speaking at the [[Constituent Assembly of Pakistan]] on 14 August 1947]] | ||
Among the restive regions of the new nation was the North-West Frontier Province. The referendum there in July 1947 had been tainted by low turnout as less than 10 per cent of the population were allowed to vote.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jeffrey J. Roberts|year=2003|title=The Origins of Conflict in Afghanistan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pj8DIT_bva0C&pg=PA108|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-275-97878-5|pages=108–109}}</ref> On 22 August 1947, just after a week of becoming governor general, Jinnah dissolved the elected government of Dr. [[Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lubpak.com/archives/222082|title=This too was Pakistan (1947–71): A response to Nadeem Paracha's "Also Pakistan"|date=29 July 2012|access-date=28 October 2017|first=Abdul|last=Nishapuri|work=Let Us Build Pakistan|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414074638/https://lubpak.com/archives/222082|archive-date=14 April 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Later on, [[Abdul Qayyum Khan]] was put in place by Jinnah in the [[Pashtuns|Pashtun]]-dominated province despite him being a Kashmiri.<ref>M.S. Korejo (1993). ''The Frontier Gandhi: His Place in History''. Karachi: Oxford University Press.</ref> On 12 August 1948 the [[Babrra massacre]] in [[Charsadda]] occurred resulting in the death of 400 people aligned with the [[Khudai Khidmatgar]] movement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/pashto/interactivity/2013/08/130815_ss-nawed-babrra-massacre.shtml|title=پښتونخوا کالم: زه ''بابړه'' يم|first=نورالبشر نويد|last=پېښور|date=15 August 2013|publisher=BBC Pashto}}</ref> | Among the restive regions of the new nation was the [[North-West Frontier Province]]. The referendum there in July 1947 had been tainted by low turnout as less than 10 per cent of the population were allowed to vote.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jeffrey J. Roberts|year=2003|title=The Origins of Conflict in Afghanistan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pj8DIT_bva0C&pg=PA108|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-275-97878-5|pages=108–109}}</ref> On 22 August 1947, just after a week of becoming governor general, Jinnah dissolved the elected government of Dr. [[Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lubpak.com/archives/222082|title=This too was Pakistan (1947–71): A response to Nadeem Paracha's "Also Pakistan"|date=29 July 2012|access-date=28 October 2017|first=Abdul|last=Nishapuri|work=Let Us Build Pakistan|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414074638/https://lubpak.com/archives/222082|archive-date=14 April 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Later on, [[Abdul Qayyum Khan]] was put in place by Jinnah in the [[Pashtuns|Pashtun]]-dominated province despite him being a Kashmiri.<ref>M.S. Korejo (1993). ''The Frontier Gandhi: His Place in History''. Karachi: Oxford University Press.</ref> On 12 August 1948 the [[Babrra massacre]] in [[Charsadda]] occurred resulting in the death of 400 people aligned with the [[Khudai Khidmatgar]] movement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/pashto/interactivity/2013/08/130815_ss-nawed-babrra-massacre.shtml|title=پښتونخوا کالم: زه ''بابړه'' يم|first=نورالبشر نويد|last=پېښور|date=15 August 2013|publisher=BBC Pashto}}</ref> | ||
Along with Liaquat and [[Abdur Rab Nishtar]], Jinnah represented Pakistan's interests in the Division Council to appropriately divide public assets between India and Pakistan.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=416}} Pakistan was supposed to receive one-sixth of the pre-independence government's assets, carefully divided by agreement, even specifying how many sheets of paper each side would receive. The new Indian state, however, was slow to deliver, hoping for the collapse of the nascent Pakistani government, and reunion. Few members of the [[Indian Civil Service]] and the [[Indian Police Service]] had chosen Pakistan, resulting in staff shortages. Partition meant that for some farmers, the markets to sell their crops were on the other side of an international border. There were shortages of machinery, not all of which was made in Pakistan. In addition to the massive refugee problem, the new government sought to save abandoned crops, establish security in a chaotic situation, and provide basic services. According to economist Yasmeen Niaz Mohiuddin in her study of Pakistan, "although Pakistan was born in bloodshed and turmoil, it survived in the initial and difficult months after partition only because of the tremendous sacrifices made by its people and the selfless efforts of its great leader."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=78–79}} | Along with Liaquat and [[Abdur Rab Nishtar]], Jinnah represented Pakistan's interests in the Division Council to appropriately divide public assets between India and Pakistan.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=416}} Pakistan was supposed to receive one-sixth of the pre-independence government's assets, carefully divided by agreement, even specifying how many sheets of paper each side would receive. The new Indian state, however, was slow to deliver, hoping for the collapse of the nascent Pakistani government, and reunion. Few members of the [[Indian Civil Service]] and the [[Indian Police Service]] had chosen Pakistan, resulting in staff shortages. Partition meant that for some farmers, the markets to sell their crops were on the other side of an international border. There were shortages of machinery, not all of which was made in Pakistan. In addition to the massive refugee problem, the new government sought to save abandoned crops, establish security in a chaotic situation, and provide basic services. According to economist Yasmeen Niaz Mohiuddin in her study of Pakistan, "although Pakistan was born in bloodshed and turmoil, it survived in the initial and difficult months after partition only because of the tremendous sacrifices made by its people and the selfless efforts of its great leader."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=78–79}} | ||
The [[ | The [[Princely states of India]] were advised by the departing British to choose whether to join Pakistan or India. Most did so prior to independence, but the holdouts contributed to what have become lasting divisions between the two nations.{{sfn|Malik|pp=131–132}} Indian leaders were angered at Jinnah's attempts to convince the princes of [[Kingdom of Marwar|Jodhpur]], [[Udaipur State|Udaipur]], [[Bhopal State|Bhopal]] and [[Indore State|Indore]] to accede to Pakistan—the latter three princely states did not border Pakistan. Jodhpur bordered it and had both a Hindu majority population and a Hindu ruler.{{sfn|RGandhi|pp=407–408}} The coastal princely state of [[Junagadh State|Junagadh]], which had a majority-Hindu population, did accede to Pakistan in September 1947, with its ruler's ''[[dewan]]'', Sir [[Shah Nawaz Bhutto]], personally delivering the accession papers to Jinnah. But the two states that were subject to the suzerainty of Junagadh—[[Mangrol, Gujarat|Mangrol]] and [[Babariawad]]—declared their independence from Junagadh and acceded to India. In response, the [[Nawab of Junagarh]] militarily occupied the two states. Subsequently, the [[Indian Army]] occupied the principality in November,<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Transfer of Power in India|last=Lumby|first=Esmond|publisher=G. Allen and Unwin|year=1954|pages=237–238}}</ref> forcing its former leaders, including Bhutto, to flee to Pakistan, beginning the politically influential [[Bhutto family]].{{sfn|Wolpert|p=347}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah lands at Lahore airport.png|thumb|Jinnah's arrival at Lahore to discuss the Kashmir crisis in 1948]] | [[File:Jinnah lands at Lahore airport.png|thumb|Jinnah's arrival at Lahore to discuss the Kashmir crisis in 1948]] | ||
The most contentious of the disputes was, and continues to be, that over the [[Kashmir and Jammu (princely state)|princely state of Kashmir]]. It had a Muslim-majority population and a Hindu [[maharaja]], Sir [[Hari Singh]], who stalled his decision on which nation to join. | The most contentious of the disputes was, and continues to be, that over the [[Kashmir and Jammu (princely state)|princely state of Kashmir]]. It had a Muslim-majority population and a Hindu [[maharaja]], Sir [[Hari Singh]], who stalled his decision on which nation to join. With the [[1947 Poonch rebellion|population in revolt]] in October 1947, aided by Pakistani irregulars, the maharaja [[Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)|acceded to India]]; Indian troops were airlifted in. Jinnah objected to this action, and ordered that Pakistani troops move into Kashmir. The [[Pakistani Army]] was still commanded by British officers, and the commanding officer, General Sir [[Douglas Gracey]], refused the order, stating that he would not move into what he considered the territory of another nation without approval from higher authority, which was not forthcoming. Jinnah withdrew the order. This did not stop the violence there, which broke into [[Indo-Pakistani War of 1947]].{{sfn|Malik|pp=131–132}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=347–351}} | ||
Some historians allege that Jinnah's courting the rulers of Hindu-majority states and his gambit with Junagadh are evidence of ill-intent towards India, as Jinnah had promoted separation by religion, yet tried to gain the accession of Hindu-majority states.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=435}} In his book ''Patel: A Life'', [[Rajmohan Gandhi]] asserts that Jinnah hoped for a plebiscite in Junagadh, knowing Pakistan would lose, in the hope the principle would be established for Kashmir.{{sfn|RGandhi|pp=435–436}} However, when Mountbatten proposed to Jinnah that, in all the princely States where the ruler did not accede to a Dominion corresponding to the majority population (which would have included | Some historians allege that Jinnah's courting the rulers of Hindu-majority states and his gambit with Junagadh are evidence of ill-intent towards India, as Jinnah had promoted separation by religion, yet tried to gain the accession of Hindu-majority states.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=435}} In his book ''Patel: A Life'', [[Rajmohan Gandhi]] asserts that Jinnah hoped for a plebiscite in Junagadh, knowing Pakistan would lose, in the hope the principle would be established for Kashmir.{{sfn|RGandhi|pp=435–436}} However, when Mountbatten proposed to Jinnah that, in all the princely States where the ruler did not accede to a Dominion corresponding to the majority population (which would have included Junagadh, [[Hyderabad State|Hyderabad]] and Kashmir), the accession should be decided by an 'impartial reference to the will of the people', Jinnah rejected the offer.<ref>{{citation |last=Noorani |first=A. G. |author-link=A. G. Noorani |title=The Kashmir Dispute, 1947–2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdGkoAEACAAJ |year=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-940018-8 |orig-year=first published in 2013 by [[Tulika Books]] |pages=13–14}}</ref><ref>A. G. Noorani, [http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1820/18200780.htm Jinnah and Junagadh], Frontline, 29 September 2001.</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Raghavan |first=Srinath |title=War and Peace in Modern India |year=2010 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-137-00737-7 |page=111 }}</ref> | ||
Despite the [[s:United Nations Security Council Resolution 47|United Nations Security Council Resolution 47]], issued at India's request for a plebiscite in Kashmir after the withdrawal of Pakistani forces, this has never occurred.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=347–351}} | Despite the [[s:United Nations Security Council Resolution 47|United Nations Security Council Resolution 47]], issued at India's request for a plebiscite in Kashmir after the withdrawal of Pakistani forces, this has never occurred.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=347–351}} | ||
Line 244: | Line 248: | ||
== Illness and death == | == Illness and death == | ||
[[File: | [[File:Muhammad Ali Jinnah.jpg|thumb|Jinnah smoking a cigar]] | ||
From the 1930s, Jinnah suffered from [[tuberculosis]]; only his sister and a few others close to him were aware of his condition. Jinnah believed public knowledge of his lung ailments would hurt him politically. In a 1938 letter, he wrote to a supporter that "you must have read in the papers how during my tours ... I suffered, which was not because there was anything wrong with me, but the irregularities [of the schedule] and over-strain told upon my health".{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=158–159, 343}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=9}} Many years later, Mountbatten stated that if he had known Jinnah was so physically ill, he would have stalled, hoping Jinnah's death would avert partition.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=10}} Fatima Jinnah later wrote, "even in his hour of triumph, the ''Quaid-e-Azam'' was gravely ill ... He worked in a frenzy to consolidate Pakistan. And, of course, he totally neglected his health ..."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=343}}<!-- Quoting Fatima Jinnah, ''My Brother'', page number not specified --> Jinnah worked with a tin of [[Craven A|Craven "A"]] cigarettes at his desk, of which he had smoked 50 or more a day for the previous 30 years, as well as a box of Cuban cigars. As his health got worse, he took longer and longer rest breaks in the private wing of [[Governor's House (Karachi)|Government House]] in Karachi, where only he, Fatima and the servants were allowed.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=343, 367}} | From the 1930s, Jinnah suffered from [[tuberculosis]]; only his sister and a few others close to him were aware of his condition. Jinnah believed public knowledge of his lung ailments would hurt him politically. In a 1938 letter, he wrote to a supporter that "you must have read in the papers how during my tours ... I suffered, which was not because there was anything wrong with me, but the irregularities [of the schedule] and over-strain told upon my health".{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=158–159, 343}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=9}} Many years later, Mountbatten stated that if he had known Jinnah was so physically ill, he would have stalled, hoping Jinnah's death would avert partition.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=10}} Fatima Jinnah later wrote, "even in his hour of triumph, the ''Quaid-e-Azam'' was gravely ill ... He worked in a frenzy to consolidate Pakistan. And, of course, he totally neglected his health ..."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=343}}<!-- Quoting Fatima Jinnah, ''My Brother'', page number not specified --> Jinnah worked with a tin of [[Craven A|Craven "A"]] cigarettes at his desk, of which he had smoked 50 or more a day for the previous 30 years, as well as a box of Cuban cigars. As his health got worse, he took longer and longer rest breaks in the private wing of [[Governor's House (Karachi)|Government House]] in Karachi, where only he, Fatima and the servants were allowed.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=343, 367}} | ||
In June 1948, he and Fatima flew to [[Quetta]], in the mountains of Balochistan, where the weather was cooler than in Karachi. He could not completely rest there, addressing the officers at the [[Pakistan Command and Staff College|Command and Staff College]] saying, "you, along with the other Forces of Pakistan, are the custodians of the life, property and honour of the people of Pakistan."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=361}} He returned to Karachi for the 1 July opening ceremony for the [[State Bank of Pakistan]], at which he spoke. A reception by the Canadian trade commissioner that evening in honour of [[Canada Day|Dominion Day]] was the last public event he attended.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=361–362}} | In June 1948, he and Fatima flew to [[Quetta]], in the mountains of Balochistan, where the weather was cooler than in Karachi. He could not completely rest there, addressing the officers at the [[Pakistan Command and Staff College|Command and Staff College]] saying, "you, along with the other Forces of Pakistan, are the custodians of the life, property and honour of the people of Pakistan."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=361}} He returned to Karachi for the 1 July opening ceremony for the [[State Bank of Pakistan]], at which he spoke. A reception by the Canadian trade commissioner that evening in honour of [[Canada Day|Dominion Day]] was the last public event he attended.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=361–362}} | ||
[[File: | [[File:Quaid e Azam Residency, Ziarat,Pakistan.jpg|thumb|Jinnah spent many of the last days of his life at [[Quaid-e-Azam Residency]], [[Ziarat]], Pakistan.]] | ||
On 6 July 1948, Jinnah returned to Quetta, but at the advice of doctors, soon journeyed to [[Quaid-e-Azam Residency|an even higher retreat]] at [[Ziarat]]. Jinnah had always been reluctant to undergo medical treatment but realising his condition was getting worse, the Pakistani government sent the best doctors it could find to treat him. Tests confirmed tuberculosis, and also showed evidence of advanced lung cancer. He was treated with the new "miracle drug" of [[streptomycin]], but it did not help. Jinnah's condition continued to deteriorate despite the [[Eid prayer]]s of his people. He was moved to the lower altitude of Quetta on 13 August, the eve of [[Independence Day (Pakistan)|Independence Day]], for which a ghost-written statement for him was released. Despite an increase in appetite (he then weighed just over {{convert|36|kg|lb|abbr=off|disp=or}}), it was clear to his doctors that if he was to return to Karachi in life, he would have to do so very soon. Jinnah, however, was reluctant to go, not wishing his aides to see him as an invalid on a stretcher.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=366–368}} | |||
By 9 September, Jinnah had also developed pneumonia. Doctors urged him to return to Karachi, where he could receive better care, and with his agreement, he was flown there on the morning of 11 September. Dr Ilahi Bux, his personal physician, believed that Jinnah's change of mind was caused by foreknowledge of death. The plane landed at Karachi that afternoon, to be met by Jinnah's limousine, and an ambulance into which Jinnah's stretcher was placed. The ambulance broke down on the road into town, and the Governor-General and those with him waited for another to arrive; he could not be placed in the car as he could not sit up. They waited by the roadside in oppressive heat as trucks and buses passed by, unsuitable for transporting the dying man and with their occupants not knowing of Jinnah's presence. After an hour, the replacement ambulance came, and transported Jinnah to Government House, arriving there over two hours after the landing. Jinnah died later that night at 10:20 pm at his home in Karachi on 11 September 1948 at the age of 71, just over a year after Pakistan's creation.{{sfn|Singh|pp=402–405}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=369–370}} | |||
[[File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Bidstond in de Kwitang moskee te Jakarta naar aanleiding van het overlijden van Mohammed Ali Jinnah de eerste gouverneur van Pakistan (14 september 1948) TMnr 10001269.jpg|thumb|right|210px|Special services and prayers were held in the Kwitang mosque of [[Jakarta]] ([[Indonesia]]) after the death of Jinnah.]] | [[File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Bidstond in de Kwitang moskee te Jakarta naar aanleiding van het overlijden van Mohammed Ali Jinnah de eerste gouverneur van Pakistan (14 september 1948) TMnr 10001269.jpg|thumb|right|210px|Special services and prayers were held in the Kwitang mosque of [[Jakarta]] ([[Indonesia]]) after the death of Jinnah.]] | ||
Indian prime minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]] stated upon Jinnah's death, "How shall we judge him? I have been very angry with him often during the past years. But now there is no bitterness in my thought of him, only a great sadness for all that has been ... he succeeded in his quest and gained his objective, but at what a cost and with what a difference from what he had imagined."{{sfn|Singh|p=407}} | |||
[[File:Tomb Jinnah.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Mazar-e-Quaid|Tomb of Muhammad Ali Jinnah]] in Karachi]] | |||
Jinnah was buried on 12 September 1948 amid official mourning in both India and Pakistan; a million people gathered for his funeral led by [[Shabbir Ahmad Usmani]].<ref name="From Dawn's Archives: The Father of the Nation laid to rest">{{cite news|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1356979<|author=|title=From Dawn's Archives: The Father of the Nation laid to rest|date=11 September 2017|access-date=18 April 2021}}</ref> Indian governor-general [[C. Rajagopalachari]] cancelled an official reception that day in honour of the late leader. Today, Jinnah rests in a large marble mausoleum, [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], in Karachi.{{sfn|Singh|pp=406–407}}{{sfn|Wolpert|p=370}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=205}} | |||
=== Aftermath === | |||
After Jinnah died, his sister Fatima asked the court to execute Jinnah's will under [[Shia]] Islamic law.<ref name="secularm" /> This subsequently became part of the argument in Pakistan about Jinnah's religious affiliation. [[Vali Nasr]] says Jinnah "was an Ismaili by birth and a [[Twelver Shia]] by confession, though not a religiously observant man."<ref name="shi3a" /> In a 1970 legal challenge, Hussain Ali Ganji Walji claimed Jinnah had converted to Sunni Islam. Witness Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada stated in court that Jinnah converted to Sunni Islam in 1901 when his sisters married Sunnis. In 1970, Liaquat Ali Khan and Fatima Jinnah's joint affidavit that Jinnah was Shia was rejected. But in 1976 the court rejected Walji's claim that Jinnah was Sunni; effectively accepting him as a [[Shia]]. In 1984 a high court bench reversed the 1976 verdict and maintained that "the ''Quaid'' was definitely not a Shia", which suggested that Jinnah was Sunni.<ref name="Sunni" /> According to the journalist Khaled Ahmed, Jinnah publicly had a non-sectarian stance and "was at pains to gather the Muslims of India under the banner of a general Muslim faith and not under a divisive sectarian identity." Liaquat H. Merchant, Jinnah's grandnephew, writes that "the Quaid was not a Shia; he was also not a Sunni, he was simply a Muslim".<ref name="secularm" /> An eminent lawyer who practised in the Bombay High Court until 1940 testified that Jinnah used to pray as an orthodox Sunni.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} According to [[Akbar Ahmed]], Jinnah became a firm Sunni Muslim by the end of his life.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4" /> | After Jinnah died, his sister Fatima asked the court to execute Jinnah's will under [[Shia]] Islamic law.<ref name="secularm" /> This subsequently became part of the argument in Pakistan about Jinnah's religious affiliation. [[Vali Nasr]] says Jinnah "was an Ismaili by birth and a [[Twelver Shia]] by confession, though not a religiously observant man."<ref name="shi3a" /> In a 1970 legal challenge, Hussain Ali Ganji Walji claimed Jinnah had converted to Sunni Islam. Witness Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada stated in court that Jinnah converted to Sunni Islam in 1901 when his sisters married Sunnis. In 1970, Liaquat Ali Khan and Fatima Jinnah's joint affidavit that Jinnah was Shia was rejected. But in 1976 the court rejected Walji's claim that Jinnah was Sunni; effectively accepting him as a [[Shia]]. In 1984 a high court bench reversed the 1976 verdict and maintained that "the ''Quaid'' was definitely not a Shia", which suggested that Jinnah was Sunni.<ref name="Sunni" /> According to the journalist Khaled Ahmed, Jinnah publicly had a non-sectarian stance and "was at pains to gather the Muslims of India under the banner of a general Muslim faith and not under a divisive sectarian identity." Liaquat H. Merchant, Jinnah's grandnephew, writes that "the Quaid was not a Shia; he was also not a Sunni, he was simply a Muslim".<ref name="secularm" /> An eminent lawyer who practised in the Bombay High Court until 1940 testified that Jinnah used to pray as an orthodox Sunni.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} According to [[Akbar Ahmed]], Jinnah became a firm Sunni Muslim by the end of his life.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4" /> | ||
== Legacy == | == Legacy and honors == | ||
{{See also|List of things named after Muhammad Ali Jinnah}} | {{See also|List of things named after Muhammad Ali Jinnah}} | ||
[[File: | [[File:Muhammad Ali Jinnah with sister Fatima Jinnah.JPG|thumb|250px|left|Jinnah and his sister Fatima. Wax statues in the [[Lok Virsa Museum]] at the [[Pakistan Monument]], Islamabad.]] | ||
Jinnah's legacy is Pakistan. According to Mohiuddin, "He was and continues to be as highly honored<!-- spelling as in original --> in Pakistan as [first US president] [[George Washington]] is in the United States ... Pakistan owes its very existence to his drive, tenacity, and judgment ... Jinnah's importance in the creation of Pakistan was monumental and immeasurable."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=74–75}} [[Stanley Wolpert]], giving a speech in honour of Jinnah in 1998, deemed him Pakistan's greatest leader.<ref name="greatest" /> | Jinnah's legacy is Pakistan. According to Mohiuddin, "He was and continues to be as highly honored<!-- spelling as in original --> in Pakistan as [first US president] [[George Washington]] is in the United States ... Pakistan owes its very existence to his drive, tenacity, and judgment ... Jinnah's importance in the creation of Pakistan was monumental and immeasurable."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=74–75}} [[Stanley Wolpert]], giving a speech in honour of Jinnah in 1998, deemed him Pakistan's greatest leader.<ref name="greatest" /> | ||
[[File:Yorkstatue.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Statue of Jinnah at [[York University]] in Toronto]] | |||
According to Jaswant Singh, "With Jinnah's death Pakistan lost its moorings. In India there will not easily arrive another Gandhi, nor in Pakistan another Jinnah."{{sfn|Singh|p=406}} Malik writes, "As long as Jinnah was alive, he could persuade and even pressure regional leaders toward greater mutual accommodation, but after his death, the lack of consensus on the distribution of political power and economic resources often turned controversial."{{sfn|Malik|p=134}} According to Mohiuddin, "Jinnah's death deprived Pakistan of a leader who could have enhanced stability and democratic governance ... The rocky road to democracy in Pakistan and the relatively smooth one in India can in some measure be ascribed to Pakistan's tragedy of losing an incorruptible and highly revered leader so soon after independence."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=81–82}} | According to Jaswant Singh, "With Jinnah's death Pakistan lost its moorings. In India there will not easily arrive another Gandhi, nor in Pakistan another Jinnah."{{sfn|Singh|p=406}} Malik writes, "As long as Jinnah was alive, he could persuade and even pressure regional leaders toward greater mutual accommodation, but after his death, the lack of consensus on the distribution of political power and economic resources often turned controversial."{{sfn|Malik|p=134}} According to Mohiuddin, "Jinnah's death deprived Pakistan of a leader who could have enhanced stability and democratic governance ... The rocky road to democracy in Pakistan and the relatively smooth one in India can in some measure be ascribed to Pakistan's tragedy of losing an incorruptible and highly revered leader so soon after independence."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=81–82}} | ||
{{anchor|Quaid-e-Azam Day}}<!-- [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]] redirects here. --> | {{anchor|Quaid-e-Azam Day}}<!-- [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]] redirects here. --> | ||
[[File: | [[File:Jinnah blue plaque.JPG|thumb|right|250px|[[Blue Plaque]] in London dedicated to Jinnah]] | ||
His birthday is observed as a [[Holidays in Pakistan|national holiday]], [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]], in Pakistan.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.officeholidays.com/countries/pakistan/index.php |title=National public holidays of Pakistan in 2013 |publisher=Office Holidays |access-date=3 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130518031433/http://www.officeholidays.com/countries/pakistan/index.php |archive-date=18 May 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/12/25/news/national/nation-celebrates-quaid-e-azams-137th-birthday/ |title=Nation celebrates Quaid-e-Azam's birthday |work=Pakistan Today |date=25 December 2012 |access-date=3 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130417111046/http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/12/25/news/national/nation-celebrates-quaid-e-azams-137th-birthday/ |archive-date=17 April 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="ggb">{{cite book |last=Desai |first=Meghnad |year=2009 |title=The Rediscovery of India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fhovRowWr1gC&pg=PA240 |publisher=Penguin Books India |page=240|isbn=978-0-670-08300-8}}</ref> Jinnah earned the title ''Quaid-e-Azam'' (meaning "Great Leader"). His other title is ''Baba-i-Qaum'' ([[Father of the Nation]]). The former title was reportedly given to Jinnah at first by Mian Ferozuddin Ahmed. It became an official title by effect of a resolution passed on 11 August 1947 by Liaquat Ali Khan in the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan.<ref name="mil">{{cite news|url=http://www.milligazette.com/news/1281-was-quaid-e-azam-jinnah-the-only-founder-of-pakistan|title=Was Quaid-e Azam Jinnah the only founder of Pakistan?|work=The Milli Gazette|date=8 May 2011|access-date=3 February 2016}}</ref> Within a few days of Pakistan's creation Jinnah's name was read in the khutba at mosques as Amir-ul-Millat, a traditional title of Muslim rulers.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} | |||
[[File: | [[File:75 PKR front.jpg|thumb|75 Pakistani rupee commemorative banknote (front)]] | ||
The [[Civil decorations of Pakistan|civil awards of Pakistan]] includes an 'Order of Quaid-i-Azam'. The Jinnah Society also confers the 'Jinnah Award' annually to a person that renders outstanding and meritorious services to Pakistan and its people.<ref>{{cite web|title=Projects of The Jinnah Society|url=http://jinnahsociety.org.pk/TheJinnahAwards.html|publisher=jinnahsociety.org.pk|access-date=7 September 2017}}</ref> Jinnah is depicted on all [[Pakistani rupee]] currency, and is the [[namesake]] of many Pakistani public institutions. The former Quaid-i-Azam International Airport in Karachi, now called the [[Jinnah International Airport]], is Pakistan's busiest. One of the largest streets in the Turkish capital Ankara, [[Cinnah Caddesi]], is named after him, as is the [[Mohammad Ali Jenah Expressway]] in Tehran, Iran. In Chicago, a portion of [[Devon Avenue]] was named "Mohammed Ali Jinnah Way". A section of [[Coney Island Avenue]] in [[Brooklyn]], New York was also named 'Muhammad Ali Jinnah Way' in honour of the founder of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://tribune.com.pk/story/1906998/1-muhammad-ali-jinnah-way-unveiled-new-york-honour-pakistans-founder/|title='Muhammad Ali Jinnah Way' unveiled in New York to honour Pakistan's founder|work=[[The Express Tribune]]|date=9 February 2019|access-date=9 February 2019}}</ref> The [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], Jinnah's [[mausoleum]], is among Karachi's notable landmarks.<ref name="Mehmood p869" /> The "[[Jinnah Tower]]" in [[Guntur]], Andhra Pradesh, India, was built to commemorate Jinnah.<ref name="HinduOnNet" /> The [[Pahlavi dynasty|royalist]] government of Iran also released a stamp commemorating the centennial of Jinnah's birth in 1976. The [[Jinnah House]] in [[Malabar Hill]], Bombay, is in the possession of the [[Government of India]], but the issue of its ownership has been disputed by the Government of Pakistan.<ref name="Dawn" /> Jinnah had personally requested Prime Minister Nehru to preserve the house, hoping one day he could return to Bombay. There are proposals for the house to be offered to the government of Pakistan to establish a consulate in the city as a goodwill gesture, but Dina Wadia had also staked a claim on the property.<ref name="Dawn" /><ref name="Sitapati 2008" /> | |||
{{multiple image | {{multiple image | ||
| align = right | | align = right | ||
Line 303: | Line 301: | ||
| footer = Jinnah's portraits on the stamps of Turkmenistan and Iran | | footer = Jinnah's portraits on the stamps of Turkmenistan and Iran | ||
}} | }} | ||
There is a considerable amount of scholarship on Jinnah which stems from Pakistan; according to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], it is not widely read outside the country and usually avoids even the slightest criticism of Jinnah.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=31}} According to Ahmed, some books published about Jinnah outside Pakistan mention that he consumed alcohol, but this is omitted from books published inside Pakistan. Ahmed suggests that depicting the ''Quaid'' drinking would weaken Jinnah's Islamic identity, and by extension, Pakistan's. Some sources allege he gave up alcohol near the end of his life.<ref name="HistoryToday" />{{sfn|Ahmed|p=200}} The professor Maya Tudor | |||
concluded that "Jinnah could not be described as a practicing Muslim" | |||
given his consumption of pork, use of alcohol, and usage of | |||
[[interest]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tudor |first1=Maya |title=The Promise of Power: The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan | |||
|date=14 March 2013 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | |||
|isbn=978-1-107-32873-0 |page=95 | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ITohAwAAQBAJ&dq=%22Jinnah+drank+freely+and+ate+pork.+There+is+evidence+that+Jinnah+lived+off+of+interest+income,+thereby+violating+Islam%27s+prohibition+against+charging+interest%22&pg=PA95 | |||
|language=en |quote=Whether it was by dress, by prayer, by habits, or customs, Jinnah could not be described as a practicing Muslim. Jinnah drank freely and ate pork. There is evidence that Jinnah lived off of interest income, thereby violating Islam's prohibition against charging interest.}}</ref> On the other hand, Yahya Bakhtiar, who observed Jinnah at close quarters, concluded that Jinnah was a "very sincere, deeply committed and dedicated Mussalman."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} | |||
According to historian [[Ayesha Jalal]], while there is a tendency towards [[hagiography]] in the Pakistani view of Jinnah, in India he is viewed negatively.{{sfn|Jalal|p=221}} Ahmed deems Jinnah "the most maligned person in recent Indian history ... In India, many see him as the demon who divided the land."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=27}} Even many Indian Muslims see Jinnah negatively, blaming him for their woes as a minority in that state.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=28}} Some historians such as Jalal and [[H. M. Seervai]] assert that Jinnah never wanted the partition of India—it was the outcome of the Congress leaders being unwilling to share power with the Muslim League. They contend that Jinnah only used the Pakistan demand in an attempt to mobilise support to obtain significant political rights for Muslims.<ref name="Seervai p127" /> [[Francis Mudie]], the last British [[Governor of Sindh]], in Jinnah's honour once said: | |||
<blockquote>In judging Jinnah, we must remember what he was up against. He had against him not only the wealth and brains of the Hindus, but also nearly the whole of British officialdom, and most of the Home politicians, who made the great mistake of refusing to take Pakistan seriously. Never was his position really examined.{{sfn|Bolitho|p=208}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=126}}</blockquote> | |||
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, according to Yasser Latif Hamdani and Eamon Murphy, is associated with his call for [[Direct Action Day]], which resulted in bloodshed and communal violence that culminated in the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan.<ref name="Hamdani2020">{{cite book |last1=Hamdani |first1=Yasser Latif |title=Jinnah: A Life |date=23 June 2020 |publisher=[[Macmillan Publishers]] |isbn=978-93-89109-64-1 |language=en |quote=Speaking at a Students Brotherhood event, which he presided over in July in 1922, Jinnah spoke of direct action, something that would become synonymous with him in the Indian mind, owing to his famous direct action day call in 1946 - direct action meant bloodshed and independence would mean bloodshed.}}</ref> This incident and Jinnah's role, according to these authors, is viewed with contempt especially in India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Murphy |first1=Eamon |title=The Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of Extremism |date=2013 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-0-415-56526-4 |page=37 |language=en |quote=After negotiations between Congress, the British and Jinnah got bogged down over the future of the subcontinent, on 16 August 1946, Jinnah called for a Direct Action Day, involving protests and meetings in support of Pakistan. This led to savage communal violence in Calcutta, which quickly spread to other parts of India.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Siddique |first1=Salma |title=Evacuee Cinema: Bombay and Lahore in Partition Transit, 1940–1960 |date=16 February 2023 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-1-009-15120-7 |page=88 |language=en |quote=According to Dyal, in ''Ghaddar'' 'the policy of Muslim League is discussed threadbare and Jinnah is held responsible for the holocaust that preceded and followed partition'.}}</ref> | Muhammad Ali Jinnah, according to Yasser Latif Hamdani and Eamon Murphy, is associated with his call for [[Direct Action Day]], which resulted in bloodshed and communal violence that culminated in the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan.<ref name="Hamdani2020">{{cite book |last1=Hamdani |first1=Yasser Latif |title=Jinnah: A Life |date=23 June 2020 |publisher=[[Macmillan Publishers]] |isbn=978-93-89109-64-1 |language=en |quote=Speaking at a Students Brotherhood event, which he presided over in July in 1922, Jinnah spoke of direct action, something that would become synonymous with him in the Indian mind, owing to his famous direct action day call in 1946 - direct action meant bloodshed and independence would mean bloodshed.}}</ref> This incident and Jinnah's role, according to these authors, is viewed with contempt especially in India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Murphy |first1=Eamon |title=The Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of Extremism |date=2013 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-0-415-56526-4 |page=37 |language=en |quote=After negotiations between Congress, the British and Jinnah got bogged down over the future of the subcontinent, on 16 August 1946, Jinnah called for a Direct Action Day, involving protests and meetings in support of Pakistan. This led to savage communal violence in Calcutta, which quickly spread to other parts of India.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Siddique |first1=Salma |title=Evacuee Cinema: Bombay and Lahore in Partition Transit, 1940–1960 |date=16 February 2023 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-1-009-15120-7 |page=88 |language=en |quote=According to Dyal, in ''Ghaddar'' 'the policy of Muslim League is discussed threadbare and Jinnah is held responsible for the holocaust that preceded and followed partition'.}}</ref> | ||
Line 409: | Line 420: | ||
|publisher=BBC News| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6926464.stm | |publisher=BBC News| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6926464.stm | ||
| access-date = 15 August 2012 | | access-date = 15 August 2012 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Line 609: | Line 610: | ||
[[Category:20th-century deaths from tuberculosis]] | [[Category:20th-century deaths from tuberculosis]] | ||
[[Category:All India Muslim League members]] | [[Category:All India Muslim League members]] | ||
[[Category:Alumni of City, University of London]] | |||
[[Category:Alumni of the Inns of Court School of Law]] | [[Category:Alumni of the Inns of Court School of Law]] | ||
[[Category:Cathedral and John Connon School alumni]] | [[Category:Cathedral and John Connon School alumni]] | ||
[[Category:Church Mission School alumni]] | [[Category:Church Mission School alumni]] | ||
[[Category:Converts to Sunni Islam from Shia Islam]] | [[Category:Converts to Sunni Islam from Shia Islam]] | ||
[[Category:Expatriates from British India in the United Kingdom]] | |||
[[Category:Governors-General of Pakistan]] | [[Category:Governors-General of Pakistan]] | ||
[[Category:Indian National Congress politicians]] | [[Category:Indian National Congress politicians]] | ||
Line 626: | Line 629: | ||
[[Category:National symbols of Pakistan]] | [[Category:National symbols of Pakistan]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani barristers]] | [[Category:Pakistani barristers]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani former Shia Muslims]] | [[Category:Pakistani former Shia Muslims]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani MNAs 1947–1954]] | [[Category:Pakistani MNAs 1947–1954]] |