Deepak Kumar (historian): Difference between revisions

m
reviewd->reviewed - Fix a typo in one click
imported>Chip.berlet
(Add more details)
->Lirablock
m (reviewd->reviewed - Fix a typo in one click)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
Kumar argues that [[British colonialism]] in India played a major role in how [[Europe]]an scientific fields developed. One of his major works is ''Science and the Raj: A study of British India'' is in the field of history of [[science in India]].  
Kumar argues that [[British colonialism]] in India played a major role in how [[Europe]]an scientific fields developed. One of his major works is ''Science and the Raj: A study of British India'' is in the field of history of [[science in India]].  


A recent work is ''The Trishanku Nation'' reviewd in Sage Publications https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2230807516686431
A recent work is ''The Trishanku Nation'' reviewed in Sage Publications https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2230807516686431


In describing medical encounters in colonial India, Kumar argues that Western medical discourse occupied an important place in the process of colonization and it worked towards a scientific hegemony. "Indigenous systems were so marginalised that their practitioners often sought survival in resistance rather than collaboration."  
In describing medical encounters in colonial India, Kumar argues that Western medical discourse occupied an important place in the process of colonization and it worked towards a scientific hegemony. "Indigenous systems were so marginalised that their practitioners often sought survival in resistance rather than collaboration."  
Anonymous user