6
edits
m
robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)
>Gotitbro (+Category:20th-century Indian books; +Category:Jesus in Islam; +Category:Indian religious texts using HotCat) |
m (robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Other authors have suggested that the resemblance between Buddhist and Christian teachings and between the lives of Jesus and Buddha as recorded in their respective scriptures indicate that Buddhist teachings must have reached [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] been incorporated by Jesus into his own teaching, or that he must have travelled to India pre-crucifixion.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.tombofjesus.com/2007/core/founders/notovitch/index.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=19 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090105224748/http://www.tombofjesus.com/2007/core/founders/notovitch/index.html |archive-date=5 January 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Ghulam Ahmad, however, asserts that Jesus reached India only after the crucifixion and that Buddhists later reproduced elements of the Gospels in their scriptures. He argues that Jesus also preached to Buddhist monks, some of whom were originally Jews, who accepted him as a manifestation of the Buddha, the 'promised teacher', and mingled his teachings with Buddha’s. | Other authors have suggested that the resemblance between Buddhist and Christian teachings and between the lives of Jesus and Buddha as recorded in their respective scriptures indicate that Buddhist teachings must have reached [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] been incorporated by Jesus into his own teaching, or that he must have travelled to India pre-crucifixion.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.tombofjesus.com/2007/core/founders/notovitch/index.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=19 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090105224748/http://www.tombofjesus.com/2007/core/founders/notovitch/index.html |archive-date=5 January 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Ghulam Ahmad, however, asserts that Jesus reached India only after the crucifixion and that Buddhists later reproduced elements of the Gospels in their scriptures. He argues that Jesus also preached to Buddhist monks, some of whom were originally Jews, who accepted him as a manifestation of the Buddha, the 'promised teacher', and mingled his teachings with Buddha’s. | ||
''Jesus in India'' also contains claims on the whereabouts of the Lost Tribes of Israel, suggesting that these tribes were scattered throughout Afghanistan, Kashmir, and | ''Jesus in India'' also contains claims on the whereabouts of the Lost Tribes of Israel, suggesting that these tribes were scattered throughout Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Tibet.<ref>http://www.alislam.org/sunrise/sunrise2003-4.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> It also provides a list of tribes of these regions seeking to trace their [[Theory of Pashtun descent from Israelites|Israelite roots]].{{dubious|date=May 2015}} | ||
==Alleged discovery== | ==Alleged discovery== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Modern reception== | ==Modern reception== | ||
The claims of the book regarding a journey of Jesus to India are rejected or ignored by most scholars. The documents used by Ahmad were reviewed by the German indologist [[Günter Grönbold]] in ''[[Jesus in Indien. Das Ende einer Legende]]'' (Munich, 1985), with Grönbold concluding that Ahmad had misidentified material from the [[Barlaam and Josaphat]] texts relating to a Christianized version of the life of [[Siddhartha Gautama]], not of Jesus.<ref>Historia animae utilis de Barlaam et Ioasaph (spuria): Einführung 2009 3110210991 "...Jahrhunderts, in dem auf die Barlaam-Parabel vom König und seinem weisen Ratgeber (Kitāb Bilawhar wa Būdāsf, übers. ... Ghulām Ahmad aber scheint ganz selbständig eine Manipulation von Yūdāsafzu Yūzāsaf vorgenommen zu haben, und sie ist für ihn höchst wichtig: Das Grab in Srinagar ... 99 101 sein Buch überarbeitet104, Grönbold und Klatt sogar ins Literaturverzeichnis aufgenommen, 156 "</ref> Another German scholar [[Norbert Klatt]] in ''Lebte Jesus in Indien?'' (1988) examined the same Muslim and Christian source texts and came to the same conclusions as Grönbold.{{ | The claims of the book regarding a journey of Jesus to India are rejected or ignored by most scholars. The documents used by Ahmad were reviewed by the German indologist [[Günter Grönbold]] in ''[[Jesus in Indien. Das Ende einer Legende]]'' (Munich, 1985), with Grönbold concluding that Ahmad had misidentified material from the [[Barlaam and Josaphat]] texts relating to a Christianized version of the life of [[Siddhartha Gautama]], not of Jesus.<ref>Historia animae utilis de Barlaam et Ioasaph (spuria): Einführung 2009 3110210991 "...Jahrhunderts, in dem auf die Barlaam-Parabel vom König und seinem weisen Ratgeber (Kitāb Bilawhar wa Būdāsf, übers. ... Ghulām Ahmad aber scheint ganz selbständig eine Manipulation von Yūdāsafzu Yūzāsaf vorgenommen zu haben, und sie ist für ihn höchst wichtig: Das Grab in Srinagar ... 99 101 sein Buch überarbeitet104, Grönbold und Klatt sogar ins Literaturverzeichnis aufgenommen, 156 "</ref> Another German scholar [[Norbert Klatt]] in ''Lebte Jesus in Indien?'' (1988) examined the same Muslim and Christian source texts and came to the same conclusions as Grönbold.{{citation needed|date=April 2020}} | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||