User talk:2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD: Difference between revisions

Blocked
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
::::As for why this particular article remained in the main namespace for five years, that does not necessarily mean it was determined to meet the notability criteria. It may simply have remained unreviewed due to the backlog, limited availability of volunteers, or other editorial circumstances. [[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf|talk]]) 14:11, 23 September 2026 (IST)
::::As for why this particular article remained in the main namespace for five years, that does not necessarily mean it was determined to meet the notability criteria. It may simply have remained unreviewed due to the backlog, limited availability of volunteers, or other editorial circumstances. [[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf|talk]]) 14:11, 23 September 2026 (IST)
:::::@[[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] I am sorry, but I cannot accept this, because you yourself published this article live, and the complete historical information has been collected. I am sorry, but I cannot accept this, because you yourself published this article live, and the complete historical information has been collected. [[Special:Contributions/2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD|2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD]] ([[User talk:2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD#top|talk]]) 14:17, 23 September 2026 (IST)
:::::@[[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] I am sorry, but I cannot accept this, because you yourself published this article live, and the complete historical information has been collected. I am sorry, but I cannot accept this, because you yourself published this article live, and the complete historical information has been collected. [[Special:Contributions/2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD|2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD]] ([[User talk:2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD#top|talk]]) 14:17, 23 September 2026 (IST)
::::::@[[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] Look, firstly, Bharatpedia is not a prominent organization; it is just a simple website, and the backlinks associated with it aren't particularly significant. This isn't a personal matter; however, the situation is deeply unfortunate and concerning for us, because we too could create a website like that. And this is happening in India too; it’s not just 'Bharatpedia'—there are many other encyclopedias as well. In particular, the article written by this person was ranking on the first page. However, there is no point in telling you this, because it has been proven that you are simply fabricating your own stories. Speaking of your Notability (BHARATPEDIA) —apart from a single paid article in the *Times of India*, you have absolutely no online presence; you ought to be ashamed of yourselves. Anyway, for your information—since we are meeting anyway—the legal notice is ready; we will discuss this in person Face TO Face next time. [[Special:Contributions/2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD|2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD]] ([[User talk:2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD#top|talk]]) 14:27, 23 September 2026 (IST)
:::::::Talk a little maturely... Stop behaving like a child and don't unnecessarily waste your time and effort on this topic. You can call a lawyer, call a judge, or even call American President Donald—no one's father can change the rules. Stop this childish behavior and leave this topic. There are no reliable sources for this.
:::::::Look at this: {{cite web|title=Pranab Kr Nath – Google News search results|url=https://www.google.com/search?q=Pranab+Kr+Nath&tbm=nws|website=Google News|access-date=23 September 2026}}
:::::::Have a look. [[User:Editorial Oversight|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 14:40, 23 September 2026 (IST)
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[BP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''30 days''' for making legal threats or threatening to take legal action.  </div><div style="margin-left:45px">You are not allowed to edit Bharatpedia while any threats to take legal action currently stand.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[BP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf|talk]]) 14:41, 23 September 2026 (IST)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-legalblock -->

Latest revision as of 14:42, 23 September 2026

Legal threats are not welcome[edit source]

Hi, Legal threats are not appropriate or welcome in community discussions, so I have reverted your comment. Bharatpedia is an open, community-based platform where volunteer contributors may have different opinions and interpretations regarding articles and editorial matters. Disagreements should be handled through the appropriate community processes and discussions. If you continue making threats of legal action against other users or contributors, you may be blocked from editing Bharatpedia. Please keep discussions focused on the content and policies rather than making personal or legal threats. Thank you. WikiDwarf (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply

The issue here is not personal—regarding the prominent figure working in films, whose father is a well-known politician and whose films are listed: even if we inadvertently provided some excess updates to their account, that does not mean you should delete the account; you could simply have corrected the information. 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
When we spoke with our lawyer, they advised us that the first step is to inform you of the matter and submit an initial request for its reinstatement; further actions would be considered only after that. Since the article has been live for five years and the subject has several notable films and three or four books to their credit, I am requesting the restoration of the article. https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pranab_Kr_Nath The Name Page Already Exist So Look this matter carefully: https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/Pranab_Kr_Nath 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
If any specific edits or changes are required, you may make them. 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
@WikiDwarf The issue here is not personal—regarding the prominent figure working in films, whose father is a well-known politician and whose films are listed: even if we inadvertently provided some excess updates to their account, that does not mean you should delete the account; you could simply have corrected the information.
When we spoke with our lawyer, they advised us that the first step is to inform you of the matter and submit an initial request for its reinstatement; further actions would be considered only after that. Since the article has been live for five years and the subject has several notable films and three or four books to their credit, I am requesting the restoration of the article. https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pranab_Kr_Nath The Name Page Already Exist So Look this matter carefully: https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/Pranab_Kr_Nath 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
@WikiDwarf I used this before, but I can see that there is no notability for Pranab Kr Nath. It’s totally a waste of time to continue working on this topic. Editorial Oversight(Talk with me) 13:55, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
@WikiDwarf I would like to understand why exactly he is not considered notable for Bharatpedia; if you could clarify this matter for us, we will proceed with the next steps. So, what was it about him that made you like him in the first place, and why have you kept his article live for five years? Please do not overlook this matter, as there are numerous articles on Bharatpedia that lack notability; we therefore intend to escalate this issue to a higher level. Please provide your clarification here. 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 14:00, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
It is Not not personal, When our lawyers inform you that a particular individual does not meet the criteria for notability on your website, what review process do you undertake regarding those individuals who are currently listed as notable? This is because we have collected links to articles that do not fall into the category of 'notability'. 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
Please review Bharatpedia's notability policies at Bharatpedia:Notability for the criteria used to assess whether a subject is notable. The fact that similar articles exist on Bharatpedia does not automatically mean that those subjects meet the notability criteria. If you believe other articles do not meet the local notability requirements, they can also be nominated for deletion so the community can review them.
As for why this particular article remained in the main namespace for five years, that does not necessarily mean it was determined to meet the notability criteria. It may simply have remained unreviewed due to the backlog, limited availability of volunteers, or other editorial circumstances. WikiDwarf (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
@WikiDwarf I am sorry, but I cannot accept this, because you yourself published this article live, and the complete historical information has been collected. I am sorry, but I cannot accept this, because you yourself published this article live, and the complete historical information has been collected. 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
@WikiDwarf Look, firstly, Bharatpedia is not a prominent organization; it is just a simple website, and the backlinks associated with it aren't particularly significant. This isn't a personal matter; however, the situation is deeply unfortunate and concerning for us, because we too could create a website like that. And this is happening in India too; it’s not just 'Bharatpedia'—there are many other encyclopedias as well. In particular, the article written by this person was ranking on the first page. However, there is no point in telling you this, because it has been proven that you are simply fabricating your own stories. Speaking of your Notability (BHARATPEDIA) —apart from a single paid article in the *Times of India*, you have absolutely no online presence; you ought to be ashamed of yourselves. Anyway, for your information—since we are meeting anyway—the legal notice is ready; we will discuss this in person Face TO Face next time. 2401:4900:8FC3:E144:A05C:8AB6:BCE2:4CD (talk) 14:27, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
Talk a little maturely... Stop behaving like a child and don't unnecessarily waste your time and effort on this topic. You can call a lawyer, call a judge, or even call American President Donald—no one's father can change the rules. Stop this childish behavior and leave this topic. There are no reliable sources for this.
Look at this: "Pranab Kr Nath – Google News search results". Google News. Retrieved 23 September 2026.
Have a look. Editorial Oversight(Talk with me) 14:40, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 30 days for making legal threats or threatening to take legal action.
You are not allowed to edit Bharatpedia while any threats to take legal action currently stand.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  WikiDwarf (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2026 (IST)Reply