Subsidiary alliance: Difference between revisions

What links here Related changes Page information Get shortened URL
Created by Nunabas
Last edited September 22, 2026
VisualWikitext
>Nunabas
m Reverted 2 edits by 2401:4900:3B2F:2CA:16D8:8534:E08F:43DC (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Being Ruder 007.
 
update article
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Subsidiary alliance''' is a system developed by the [[East India Company]]. mainly by Lord Wellesley. It solved the problem of ruling a nation which is under the rule of a king.  
[[File:Dupleix Jean Francois estampe.jpeg|thumb|Lithograph of [[Joseph François Dupleix]], who pioneered the system of subsidiary alliances.]]


Some of the rules of the subsidiary alliance were:
A '''subsidiary alliance''', in [[History of South Asia|South Asian history]], was a [[Tribute|tributary]] alliance between an [[Princely state|Indian state]] and a European [[East India Company]], most notably the [[British East India Company]].
* An Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British had to accept British forces in his  territory and also agreed to pay for their maintenance.
*
* Such a ruler would not form an alliance with any  other power, nor would he declare war against any power without the permission of the British.
* The ruler would not employ any Europeans other than the British, and if he were already doing so, he would dismiss them.
* In case of a conflict with any other state, the British would decide what to do, and he would accept their solution.
* The ruler would acknowledge the [[East India Company]] as the power in India.
* In return for the ruler accepting its conditions, the Company undertook to protect the state from external dangers and internal disorders.
* If the Indian rulers failed to make the payments required by the alliance, then part of their territory was to be taken away as a penalty.
Under this doctrine, Indian rulers under British protection surrendered the control of their foreign affairs to the British. Most disbanded their native armies, instead maintaining British troops within their states to protect them from attack. As British power grew, in most parts of India this became increasingly unlikely. The system also allowed the British to maintain their army at the expense of local rulers.


Under this system, an Indian ruler who formed an agreement with the company concerned was provided with protection against external attacks. In return, the ruler was required to:
* Maintain the Company's army at or near the capital of the state;
* Accept the British as the supreme power in matters of external affairs;
* Provide money or territory to the Company for the maintenance of the troops;
* Expel all other Europeans from the state and refrain from employing them in military or civil services;
* Maintain a British official, known as a ''Resident'', at the capital, who supervised diplomatic relations and correspondence with other states, thereby preventing the ruler from conducting foreign relations without British approval.<ref>{{cite web |title=Subsidiary Alliance System |publisher=[[Indian Administrative Service|IAS]] |url=http://www.careerlauncher.com/upsc/subsidiary-alliance-system |access-date=1 August 2022 |archive-date=3 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210803095458/https://www.careerlauncher.com/upsc/subsidiary-alliance-system/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
The ruler was also forbidden from maintaining an independent standing army. Although internal administration formally remained with the ruler, agents of the East India Company increasingly interfered in the internal affairs of allied states, including succession disputes and governance.
== Development ==
The system of subsidiary alliances was first pioneered in the [[Carnatic region]] by [[Joseph François Dupleix]].<ref name="Carton2012">{{cite book |author=Adrian Carton |title=Mixed-Race and Modernity in Colonial India: Changing Concepts of Hybridity Across Empires |publisher=Routledge |date=6 August 2012 |isbn=978-1-136-32502-1 |pages=47–49}}</ref> It was later adopted and expanded by the [[British East India Company]].
Following the British victory at the [[Battle of Plassey]] (1757), [[Robert Clive]] imposed alliance conditions on [[Mir Jafar]]. These arrangements were further consolidated after the British victory at the [[Battle of Buxar]] (1764) and formalised by the [[Treaty of Allahabad]] (1765).
The policy reached its most systematic form under [[Richard Wellesley, 1st Marquess Wellesley|Richard Wellesley]], Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. In a dispatch dated February 1801 to the East India Company Resident at Hyderabad, Wellesley outlined the strategic objectives of subsidiary alliances:<ref name="Tupper1883">{{cite book |author=Charles Lewis Tupper |title=Our Indian Protectorate |publisher=Longmans, Green and Co. |date=1893 |pages=36–41}}</ref>
<blockquote>
"His Excellency the Governor-General's policy in establishing subsidiary alliances with the principal states of India is to place those states in such a degree of dependence on the British power as may deprive them of the means of forming any confederacy hazardous to the security of the British empire, and may enable us to preserve the tranquillity of India by exercising a general control over those states..."
<br />— '''Richard Wellesley, 4 February 1801'''
</blockquote>
By the late 18th century, the decline of the [[Maratha Empire]] had left the [[Indian subcontinent]] fragmented into numerous states, many of them militarily weak. Several rulers accepted subsidiary alliances as a means of protection against regional rivals.<ref name="Carton2012"/>
The [[Nizam of Hyderabad]] was the first ruler to accept a well-defined subsidiary alliance in 1798. [[Tipu Sultan]] of the [[Kingdom of Mysore]] initially resisted the system, but following British victory in the [[Fourth Anglo-Mysore War]] (1799), Mysore was reduced to a subsidiary state before later coming under direct [[Company rule in India|Company rule]].<ref>Swan, Orient Black. ''Inspired History – Class 8''. Orient BlackSwan, 2020.</ref>
After the [[Third Anglo-Maratha War]] (1817–1819), the Maratha ruler [[Baji Rao II]] also accepted a subsidiary alliance.<ref>{{cite book |last=Mahetā |first=Alakā |title=A New Look at Modern Indian History from 1707 to the Modern Times |publisher=S. Chand |date=2018 |edition=32nd |pages=95}}</ref>
Other states that entered into subsidiary alliances included Tanjore (1799), [[Awadh]] (1801), the [[Peshwa]] (1802), the [[Bhonsle]] kingdom (1803), [[Scindia]] (1804), [[Singrauli]] (1814), and the Rajput states of [[Jaipur State|Jaipur]] and [[Jodhpur State|Jodhpur]] (1818).<ref>{{cite book |last=Mahetā |first=Alakā |title=A New Look at Modern Indian History from 1707 to the Modern Times |publisher=S. Chand |date=2018}}</ref>
The [[Holkar]] State of [[Indore]] was the last major member of the Maratha Confederacy to accept a subsidiary alliance, doing so in 1818.<ref>{{cite book |last=Ahir |first=Rajiv |title=A Brief History of Modern India |publisher=Spectrum Books |year=2019 |pages=122}}</ref>
== Reference ==
{{Reflist}}


[[Category:British Empire]]
[[Category:British Empire]]
[[Category:History of India]]
[[Category:History of India]]

Latest revision as of 14:34, 22 September 2026

Lithograph of Joseph François Dupleix, who pioneered the system of subsidiary alliances.

A subsidiary alliance, in South Asian history, was a tributary alliance between an Indian state and a European East India Company, most notably the British East India Company.

Under this system, an Indian ruler who formed an agreement with the company concerned was provided with protection against external attacks. In return, the ruler was required to:

  • Maintain the Company's army at or near the capital of the state;
  • Accept the British as the supreme power in matters of external affairs;
  • Provide money or territory to the Company for the maintenance of the troops;
  • Expel all other Europeans from the state and refrain from employing them in military or civil services;
  • Maintain a British official, known as a Resident, at the capital, who supervised diplomatic relations and correspondence with other states, thereby preventing the ruler from conducting foreign relations without British approval.[1]

The ruler was also forbidden from maintaining an independent standing army. Although internal administration formally remained with the ruler, agents of the East India Company increasingly interfered in the internal affairs of allied states, including succession disputes and governance.

Development[edit | edit source]

The system of subsidiary alliances was first pioneered in the Carnatic region by Joseph François Dupleix.[2] It was later adopted and expanded by the British East India Company.

Following the British victory at the Battle of Plassey (1757), Robert Clive imposed alliance conditions on Mir Jafar. These arrangements were further consolidated after the British victory at the Battle of Buxar (1764) and formalised by the Treaty of Allahabad (1765).

The policy reached its most systematic form under Richard Wellesley, Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. In a dispatch dated February 1801 to the East India Company Resident at Hyderabad, Wellesley outlined the strategic objectives of subsidiary alliances:[3]

"His Excellency the Governor-General's policy in establishing subsidiary alliances with the principal states of India is to place those states in such a degree of dependence on the British power as may deprive them of the means of forming any confederacy hazardous to the security of the British empire, and may enable us to preserve the tranquillity of India by exercising a general control over those states..."
— Richard Wellesley, 4 February 1801

By the late 18th century, the decline of the Maratha Empire had left the Indian subcontinent fragmented into numerous states, many of them militarily weak. Several rulers accepted subsidiary alliances as a means of protection against regional rivals.[2]

The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first ruler to accept a well-defined subsidiary alliance in 1798. Tipu Sultan of the Kingdom of Mysore initially resisted the system, but following British victory in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799), Mysore was reduced to a subsidiary state before later coming under direct Company rule.[4]

After the Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817–1819), the Maratha ruler Baji Rao II also accepted a subsidiary alliance.[5]

Other states that entered into subsidiary alliances included Tanjore (1799), Awadh (1801), the Peshwa (1802), the Bhonsle kingdom (1803), Scindia (1804), Singrauli (1814), and the Rajput states of Jaipur and Jodhpur (1818).[6]

The Holkar State of Indore was the last major member of the Maratha Confederacy to accept a subsidiary alliance, doing so in 1818.[7]

Reference[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ "Subsidiary Alliance System". IAS. Archived from the original on 3 August 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2022.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Adrian Carton (6 August 2012). Mixed-Race and Modernity in Colonial India: Changing Concepts of Hybridity Across Empires. Routledge. pp. 47–49. ISBN 978-1-136-32502-1.
  3. ↑ Charles Lewis Tupper (1893). Our Indian Protectorate. Longmans, Green and Co. pp. 36–41.
  4. ↑ Swan, Orient Black. Inspired History – Class 8. Orient BlackSwan, 2020.
  5. ↑ Mahetā, Alakā (2018). A New Look at Modern Indian History from 1707 to the Modern Times (32nd ed.). S. Chand. p. 95.
  6. ↑ Mahetā, Alakā (2018). A New Look at Modern Indian History from 1707 to the Modern Times. S. Chand.
  7. ↑ Ahir, Rajiv (2019). A Brief History of Modern India. Spectrum Books. p. 122.
Retrieved from "https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subsidiary_alliance&oldid=563198"
Discover more