Battle of Bhatvadi: Difference between revisions

Battle of Bhatvadi (edit)

Revision as of 00:03, 28 June 2025

2,935 bytes added , Saturday at 00:03

→‎Background

Mr.Sanemi

1,487

edits

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 Adil Shah sent an army led by Ikhlas Khan Habshi to pursue Malik Ambar's retreating army, and shortly after, sent a larger army comprising Mughal and Bijapur troops commanded by Muhammad Lari.{{sfn|Shanti Sadiq Ali|1996|p=80}}
+== The battle delayed ==
+Malik Ambar retreated to his own territory, and encamped at a place described as the "fort of Bhatavdi" by the near-contemporary text ''Futuhat-i-Adilshahi''. This place was probably a large fortified complex located in present-day [[Beed district]], near the Bhatvadi village (modern Bhatodi Pargaon) in present-day [[Ahmednagar district]], south-east of the Ahmadnagar city. The Bijapur-Mughal army encamped nearby, with the Keli River (or Kalinadi) separating the two camps.{{sfn|Pushkar Sohoni|2016|pp=16-17}}{{sfn|Shanti Sadiq Ali|1996|p=80}}
+The Ahmadnagar minister Salabat Khan had constructed a dam on the Keli River in 1589.{{sfn|Pushkar Sohoni|2016|p=16}} The records of the [[British Raj|colonial British government]], which repaired this dam in the mid-19th century, suggest that it could store at least 4.22 million cubic meters of water.{{sfn|Pushkar Sohoni|2016|p=17}} The battle was fought during the [[monsoon of South Asia|monsoon season]] in September 1624, when the water level in the dam would have been very high.{{sfn|Pushkar Sohoni|2016|p=19}} (Note: According to the ''[[Jedhe Shakawali|Jedhe Shakavali]]'', the battle was fought in October 1624. ''Basatin-us-Salatin'' variously dates it to the [[Hijri year]]s 1033 and 1034; the change from Hijri year 1033 to 1034 happened on 6–7 October 1624 CE. These sources suggest the battle was fought in October 1624. However, based on circumstantial evidence, scholar B. G. Tamaskar theorizes that the battle was fought in September 1624. Art and architectural historian [[Pushkar Sohoni]] finds Tamaskar's theory "quite convincing".{{sfn|Pushkar Sohoni|2016|p=22}})
+Malik Ambar ordered the dam to breached, and the subsequent flooding prevented the Bijapur-Mughal cavalry from advancing towards his camp. The allied effort was further hindered by heavy rain and quarrels between the Mughal and the Bijapuri commanders.{{sfn|Pushkar Sohoni|2016|p=16}} Adil Shah had sent special robes to honour to his general Ikhlas Khan and a few other Bijapuri nobles, but refused to similarly honour the Mughal generals of the joint army, despite requests from Muhammad Lari to do so. This behaviour of Adil Shah had alienated the Mughal troops.{{sfn|Shanti Sadiq Ali|1996|p=80}}
+For nearly two months, neither side advanced towards the enemy camp.{{sfn|Shanti Sadiq Ali|1996|p=80}} Sijahdar Khan, the commander of the Mughal troops, recommended that the Bijapur-Mughal force leave Bhatvadi and retreat to the Mughal-controlled Ahmadnagar city. The Bijapuri general Ikhlas Khan favoured a negotiation with Malik Ambar before retreating to the Bijapur city. However, his colleague Muhammad Lari refused to leave without engaging in a battle with Malik Ambar. The disagreement led to a verbal argument between the two generals, with Ikhlas Khan blaming Muhammad Lari for the misfortunes of the Bijapur-Mughal force.{{sfn|Shanti Sadiq Ali|1996|p=80}}