Lodi dynasty: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(New article layout.)
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{For|the earlier Lodi dynasty that ruled the Emirate of Multan|Lodi dynasty of Multan}}
{{For|the earlier Lodi dynasty that ruled the Emirate of Multan|Lodi dynasty of Multan}}


{{Use dmy dates}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2017}}
{{Infobox Former Country
{{Infobox Former Country
| native_name            =  
| native_name            =  
Line 42: Line 42:
| currency              =  
| currency              =  
}}
}}
The '''Lodi dynasty''' ({{lang-fa|سلسله لودی}}) was a dynasty that ruled the [[Delhi Sultanate]] from 1451 to 1526.{{sfn|Bosworth|1996|p=304}} It was the fifth and final dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, and was founded by [[Bahlul Khan Lodi]] when he replaced the [[Sayyid dynasty]].<ref name="sen2">{{Cite book |last=Sen |first=Sailendra |title=A Textbook of Medieval Indian History |publisher=Primus Books |year=2013 |isbn=978-9-38060-734-4 |pages=122–125}}</ref>
The '''Lodi dynasty''' ({{lang-fa|سلسله لودی}}, {{lang-hi|लोदी राजवंश}}) was a dynasty that ruled the [[Delhi Sultanate]] from 1451 C.E. to 1526 C.E.{{sfn|Bosworth|1996|p=304}} It was the fifth and final dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, and was founded by [[Bahlul Khan Lodi]] when he replaced the [[Sayyid dynasty]].<ref name="sen2">{{Cite book |last=Sen |first=Sailendra |title=A Textbook of Medieval Indian History |publisher=Primus Books |year=2013 |isbn=978-9-38060-734-4 |pages=122–125}}</ref>


==Bahlul Lodi==
==Bahlul Lodi==
Line 48: Line 48:
Following the reign of the Sayyids, the [[Pashtun people|Afghan]]{{sfn|Bosworth|1996|p=304}} or Turco-Afghan{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=9}}{{efn|Herbert Hartel calls the Lodi sultans Turco-Afghan: ''"The Turco-Afghan sultans of the Lodi Dynasty..."''.{{sfn|Hartel|1997|p=261}}}} Lodi dynasty gained the sultanate. Bahlul Khan Lodi ({{reign|1451|1489}}) was the nephew and son-in-law of Malik Sultan Shah Lodi, the governor of [[Sirhind]] in ([[Punjab region|Punjab]]), India and succeeded him as the governor of Sirhind during the reign of Sayyid dynasty ruler [[Muhammad Shah (Sayyid dynasty)|Muhammad Shah]]. Muhammad Shah raised him to the status of a Tarun-Bin-Sultan. He was the most powerful of the Punjab chiefs and a vigorous leader, holding together a loose confederacy of Afghan and Turkish chiefs with his strong personality. He reduced the turbulent chiefs of the provinces to submission and infused some vigour into the government.
Following the reign of the Sayyids, the [[Pashtun people|Afghan]]{{sfn|Bosworth|1996|p=304}} or Turco-Afghan{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=9}}{{efn|Herbert Hartel calls the Lodi sultans Turco-Afghan: ''"The Turco-Afghan sultans of the Lodi Dynasty..."''.{{sfn|Hartel|1997|p=261}}}} Lodi dynasty gained the sultanate. Bahlul Khan Lodi ({{reign|1451|1489}}) was the nephew and son-in-law of Malik Sultan Shah Lodi, the governor of [[Sirhind]] in ([[Punjab region|Punjab]]), India and succeeded him as the governor of Sirhind during the reign of Sayyid dynasty ruler [[Muhammad Shah (Sayyid dynasty)|Muhammad Shah]]. Muhammad Shah raised him to the status of a Tarun-Bin-Sultan. He was the most powerful of the Punjab chiefs and a vigorous leader, holding together a loose confederacy of Afghan and Turkish chiefs with his strong personality. He reduced the turbulent chiefs of the provinces to submission and infused some vigour into the government.


After the last Sayyid ruler of [[Delhi]], [[Alam Shah|Alauddin Alam Shah]] voluntarily abdicated in favour of him, Bahlul Khan Lodi ascended the throne of the Delhi sultanate on 19 April 1451.<ref>Mahajan, V.D. (1991, reprint 2007). ''History of Medieval India'', Part I, New Delhi: S. Chand, {{ISBN|81-219-0364-5}}, p. 244</ref> The most important event of his reign was the conquest of the [[Jaunpur Sultanate]]. Bahlul spent most of his time in fighting against the [[Sharqi dynasty]] of the Jaunpur Sultanate and ultimately annexed it. He placed his eldest surviving son Barbak on the throne of [[Jaunpur Sultanate|Jaunpur]] in 1486. The Sharqis remained in control of Bihar, from which they re-occupied Jaunpur, but were again repulsed to Bihar.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=jNSNDwAAQBAJ&dq=sharqi+reoccupied+jaunpur&pg=PT173 |title= The Sultanate of Delhi (1206–1526) |author= Aniruddha Ray |isbn= 9781000007299 |access-date= 10 February 2023 |archive-date= 19 March 2023 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230319093909/https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Sultanate_of_Delhi_1206_1526/jNSNDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=sharqi+reoccupied+jaunpur&pg=PT173&printsec=frontcover |url-status= live }}</ref>
After the last Sayyid ruler of [[Delhi]], [[Alam Shah|Alauddin Alam Shah]] voluntarily abdicated in favour of him, Bahlul Khan Lodi ascended the throne of the Delhi sultanate on 19 April 1451.<ref>Mahajan, V.D. (1991, reprint 2007). ''History of Medieval India'', Part I, New Delhi: S. Chand, {{ISBN|81-219-0364-5}}, p. 244</ref> The most important event of his reign was the conquest of the [[Jaunpur Sultanate]]. Bahlul spent most of his time in fighting against the [[Sharqi dynasty]] of the Jaunpur Sultanate and ultimately annexed it. He placed his eldest surviving son Barbak on the throne of [[Jaunpur Sultanate|Jaunpur]] in 1486. The Sharqis remained in control of Bihar, from which they re-occupied Jaunpur, but were again repulsed to Bihar.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=jNSNDwAAQBAJ&dq=sharqi+reoccupied+jaunpur&pg=PT173 |title= The Sultanate of Delhi (1206–1526) |author= Aniruddha Ray |date= 2019 |isbn= 9781000007299 |access-date= 10 February 2023 |archive-date= 19 March 2023 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230319093909/https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Sultanate_of_Delhi_1206_1526/jNSNDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=sharqi+reoccupied+jaunpur&pg=PT173&printsec=frontcover |url-status= live }}</ref>


==Sikandar Khan Lodi==
==Sikandar Khan Lodi==
Line 63: Line 63:
[[File:Sikandar_Lodi's_tomb_sunset.JPG|thumb|upright=1.5|The [[Tomb of Sikandar Lodi]].]]
[[File:Sikandar_Lodi's_tomb_sunset.JPG|thumb|upright=1.5|The [[Tomb of Sikandar Lodi]].]]
Sikandar Khan Lodi ({{reign|1489|1517}}) (born Nizam Khan), the second son of Bahlul, succeeded him after his death on 17 July 1489 and took up the title ''Sikandar Shah''.
Sikandar Khan Lodi ({{reign|1489|1517}}) (born Nizam Khan), the second son of Bahlul, succeeded him after his death on 17 July 1489 and took up the title ''Sikandar Shah''.
His father nominated him as his successor and he was crowned sultan on 15 July 1489. He founded [[Agra]] in 1504 and built mosques. He shifted the capital from Delhi to Agra.<ref>Mahajan, V.D. (1991, reprint 2007). ''History of Medieval India'', Part I, New Delhi: S. Chand, {{ISBN|81-219-0364-5}}, p.256</ref> He patronized trade and commerce. He was a reputed poet, composing under Guru's pen name.{{what|Guru's pen name?}} He was also a patron of learning and ordered translations of [[Sanskrit]] works in medicine into Persian.<ref>Prof K.Ali  (1950, reprint 2006)"A new history of Indo-Pakistan" Part 1, p.311</ref> He curbed the individualistic tendencies of his Pashtun nobles and compelled them to submit their accounts to a state audit. He was thus able to infuse vigour and discipline in the administration. His greatest achievement was the conquest and annexation of [[Bihar]] from the Sharqis.<ref>Srivastava, A.L (1966). The Sultanate of Delhi (711 - 1526 A.D), Agra: Shiva Lal Agarwala and Company, p. 245</ref>
His father nominated him as his successor and he was crowned sultan on 15 July 1489. He founded [[Agra]] in 1504 and built mosques. He shifted the capital from Delhi to Agra.<ref>Mahajan, V.D. (1991, reprint 2007). ''History of Medieval India'', Part I, New Delhi: S. Chand, {{ISBN|81-219-0364-5}}, p.256</ref> He patronized trade and commerce. He was a reputed poet, composing under Guru's pen name.{{what|Guru's pen name?|date=January 2023}} He was also a patron of learning and ordered translations of [[Sanskrit]] works in medicine into Persian.<ref>Prof K.Ali  (1950, reprint 2006)"A new history of Indo-Pakistan" Part 1, p.311</ref> He curbed the individualistic tendencies of his Pashtun nobles and compelled them to submit their accounts to a state audit. He was thus able to infuse vigour and discipline in the administration. His greatest achievement was the conquest and annexation of [[Bihar]] from the Sharqis.<ref>Srivastava, A.L (1966). The Sultanate of Delhi (711 - 1526 A.D), Agra: Shiva Lal Agarwala and Company, p. 245</ref>


During conflict and peace, Sikandar felt the urge to destroy temples.{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}} He also forbade the yearly procession of the famed Muslim martyr Masud Salar's spear,{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}}  while forbidding Muslim women from venerating mausoleums of Muslim saints.{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}} Sikander allowed the execution of a [[Brahman]], who had held the equal accuracy of his faith compared to Islam.{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}}
During conflict and peace, Sikandar felt the urge to destroy temples.{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}} He also forbade the yearly procession of the famed Muslim martyr Masud Salar's spear,{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}}  while forbidding Muslim women from venerating mausoleums of Muslim saints.{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}} Sikander allowed the execution of a [[Brahman]], who had held the equal accuracy of his faith compared to Islam.{{sfn|Grewal|1990|p=10}}
Line 70: Line 70:
[[File:Malwa Sultanate coinage of Mahmud Shah II (1510-1531 CE) in the name of Ibrahim Shah Lodi Sultan of Dehli, dated AH 927 (1520-1 CE).jpg|thumb|Coinage of Mahmud Shah II (1510-1531 CE) of the [[Malwa Sultanate]], in the name of Ibrahim Lodi, Sultan of Dehli, dated 1520-1 CE.]]
[[File:Malwa Sultanate coinage of Mahmud Shah II (1510-1531 CE) in the name of Ibrahim Shah Lodi Sultan of Dehli, dated AH 927 (1520-1 CE).jpg|thumb|Coinage of Mahmud Shah II (1510-1531 CE) of the [[Malwa Sultanate]], in the name of Ibrahim Lodi, Sultan of Dehli, dated 1520-1 CE.]]
{{Main|Ibrahim Lodi}}
{{Main|Ibrahim Lodi}}
Ibrahim Khan Lodi ({{reign|1517|1526}}), the eldest son of Sikandar, was the last Lodi Sultan of Delhi.<ref name="sardesai146">{{cite book |first=D. R. |last=SarDesai |title=India The Definitive History |publisher=Westview Press |year=2008 |page=146 |isbn=978-0-81334-352-5}}</ref> He had the qualities of an excellent warrior, but he was rash and impolitic in his decisions and actions. His attempt at royal absolutism was premature and his policy of sheer repression unaccompanied by measures to strengthen the administration and increase the military resources was sure to prove a failure.{{citation needed}}  
Ibrahim Khan Lodi ({{reign|1517|1526}}), the eldest son of Sikandar, was the last Lodi Sultan of Delhi.<ref name="sardesai146">{{cite book |first=D. R. |last=SarDesai |title=India The Definitive History |publisher=Westview Press |year=2008 |page=146 |isbn=978-0-81334-352-5}}</ref> He had the qualities of an excellent warrior, but he was rash and impolitic in his decisions and actions. His attempt at royal absolutism was premature and his policy of sheer repression unaccompanied by measures to strengthen the administration and increase the military resources was sure to prove a failure.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}}  


Ibrahim faced numerous rebellions and kept out the opposition for almost a decade. He was engaged in warfare with the Afghans and the [[Timurid Empire]] for most of his reign and died trying to keep the Lodi dynasty from annihilation. Ibrahim was defeated in 1526 at the [[Battle of Panipat (1526)|Battle of Panipat]].<ref name="sardesai146"/> This marked the end of the Lodi dynasty and the rise of the Mughal Empire in India led by [[Babur]] ({{reign|1526|1530}}).<ref name="sardesai162">{{cite book |first=D. R. |last=SarDesai |title=India The Definitive History |publisher=Westview Press |year=2008 |page=162 |isbn=978-0-81334-352-5}}</ref>
Ibrahim faced numerous rebellions and kept out the opposition for almost a decade. He was engaged in warfare with the Afghans and the [[Timurid Empire]] for most of his reign and died trying to keep the Lodi dynasty from annihilation. Ibrahim was defeated in 1526 at the [[Battle of Panipat (1526)|Battle of Panipat]].<ref name="sardesai146"/> This marked the end of the Lodi dynasty and the rise of the Mughal Empire in India led by [[Babur]] ({{reign|1526|1530}}).<ref name="sardesai162">{{cite book |first=D. R. |last=SarDesai |title=India The Definitive History |publisher=Westview Press |year=2008 |page=162 |isbn=978-0-81334-352-5}}</ref>
Line 76: Line 76:
==Fall of the empire==
==Fall of the empire==
{{South Asia in 1525 CE||Location of the Delhi Sultante and neighbouring polities, circa 1525 CE, on the eve of the establishment of the [[Mughal Empire]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Schwartzberg |first1=Joseph E. |title=A Historical atlas of South Asia |date=1978 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |page=39, 147 |isbn=0226742210 |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=076 |access-date=21 April 2022 |archive-date=6 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220206065341/https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=076 |url-status=live }}</ref>}}
{{South Asia in 1525 CE||Location of the Delhi Sultante and neighbouring polities, circa 1525 CE, on the eve of the establishment of the [[Mughal Empire]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Schwartzberg |first1=Joseph E. |title=A Historical atlas of South Asia |date=1978 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |page=39, 147 |isbn=0226742210 |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=076 |access-date=21 April 2022 |archive-date=6 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220206065341/https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=076 |url-status=live }}</ref>}}
By the time Ibrahim ascended the throne, the political structure in the Lodi dynasty had dissolved due to abandoned trade routes and the depleted treasury. The [[Deccan]] was a coastal trade route, but in the late fifteenth century the supply lines had collapsed. The decline and eventual failure of this specific trade route resulted in cutting off supplies from the coast to the interior, where the Lodi empire resided. The Lodi dynasty was not able to protect itself if warfare were to break out on the trade route roads; therefore, they didn't use those trade routes, thus their trade declined and so did their treasury leaving them vulnerable to internal political problems.<ref name="richards">{{cite journal |last=Richards |first=John F. |author-link=John F. Richards |title=The Economic History of the Lodi Period: 1451-1526 |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=47–67 |jstor=3596342 |doi=10.1163/156852065X00020 }}</ref>  
By the time Ibrahim ascended the throne, the political structure in the Lodi dynasty had dissolved due to abandoned trade routes and the depleted treasury. The [[Deccan]] was a coastal trade route, but in the late fifteenth century the supply lines had collapsed. The decline and eventual failure of this specific trade route resulted in cutting off supplies from the coast to the interior, where the Lodi empire resided. The Lodi dynasty was not able to protect itself if warfare were to break out on the trade route roads; therefore, they didn't use those trade routes, thus their trade declined and so did their treasury leaving them vulnerable to internal political problems.<ref name="richards">{{cite journal |last=Richards |first=John F. |author-link=John F. Richards |title=The Economic History of the Lodi Period: 1451-1526 |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=47–67 |date=August 1965 |jstor=3596342 |doi=10.1163/156852065X00020 }}</ref>  


In order to take revenge of the insults done by Ibrahim, the governor of Lahore, [[Daulat Khan Lodi]] asked the [[Timurid Empire|Timurid]] ruler of [[Kabul]], [[Babur]] to invade his kingdom.{{sfn|Hartel|1997|p=261}} Ibrahim Lodi was thereafter killed in a battle with Babur, at the [[Battle of Panipat (1526)]]. With the death of Ibrahim Lodi, the Lodi dynasty also came to an end, leading to the establishment of the [[Mughal Empire]] in the subcontinent.{{sfn|Hartel|1997|p=261}}
In order to take revenge of the insults done by Ibrahim, the governor of Lahore, [[Daulat Khan Lodi]] asked the [[Timurid Empire|Timurid]] ruler of [[Kabul]], [[Babur]] to invade his kingdom.{{sfn|Hartel|1997|p=261}} Ibrahim Lodi was thereafter killed in a battle with Babur, at the [[Battle of Panipat (1526)]]. With the death of Ibrahim Lodi, the Lodi dynasty also came to an end, leading to the establishment of the [[Mughal Empire]] in the subcontinent.{{sfn|Hartel|1997|p=261}}
Line 92: Line 92:
{{Main|Battle of Panipat (1526)}}
{{Main|Battle of Panipat (1526)}}
[[File:The battle of Panipat and the death of Sultan Ibrāhīm, the last of the Lōdī Sultans of Delhi.jpg|thumb|The [[First Battle of Panipat|Battle of Panipat]] and the death of Sultan [[Ibrahim Lodhi|Ibrāhīm]].]]
[[File:The battle of Panipat and the death of Sultan Ibrāhīm, the last of the Lōdī Sultans of Delhi.jpg|thumb|The [[First Battle of Panipat|Battle of Panipat]] and the death of Sultan [[Ibrahim Lodhi|Ibrāhīm]].]]
After being assured of the cooperation of Alam Khan and [[Daulat Khan]], Governor of the Punjab, Babur gathered his army. Upon entering the Punjab plains, Babur's chief allies, namely Langar Khan Niazi advised Babur to engage the powerful Janjua Rajputs to join his conquest. The tribe's rebellious stance to the throne of Delhi was well known. Upon meeting their chiefs, Malik Hast (Asad) and Raja Sanghar Khan, Babur made mention of the Janjua's popularity as traditional rulers of their kingdom and their ancestral support for his patriarch Emir Timur during his conquest of Hind. Babur aided them in defeating their enemies, the Gakhars in 1521, thus cementing their alliance. Babur employed them as Generals in his campaign for Delhi, the conquest of Rana Sanga and the conquest of India.{{citation needed}}
After being assured of the cooperation of Alam Khan and [[Daulat Khan]], Governor of the Punjab, Babur gathered his army. Upon entering the Punjab plains, Babur's chief allies, namely Langar Khan Niazi advised Babur to engage the powerful Janjua Rajputs to join his conquest. The tribe's rebellious stance to the throne of Delhi was well known. Upon meeting their chiefs, Malik Hast (Asad) and Raja Sanghar Khan, Babur made mention of the Janjua's popularity as traditional rulers of their kingdom and their ancestral support for his patriarch Emir Timur during his conquest of Hind. Babur aided them in defeating their enemies, the Gakhars in 1521, thus cementing their alliance. Babur employed them as Generals in his campaign for Delhi, the conquest of Rana Sanga and the conquest of India.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}}


The new usage of guns allowed small armies to make large gains on enemy territory. Small parties of skirmishers who had been dispatched simply to test enemy positions and tactics, were making inroads into India. Babur, however, had survived two revolts, one in [[Kandahar]] and another in [[Kabul]], and was careful to pacify the local population after victories, following local traditions and aiding widows and orphans.{{citation needed}}
The new usage of guns allowed small armies to make large gains on enemy territory. Small parties of skirmishers who had been dispatched simply to test enemy positions and tactics, were making inroads into India. Babur, however, had survived two revolts, one in [[Kandahar]] and another in [[Kabul]], and was careful to pacify the local population after victories, following local traditions and aiding widows and orphans.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}}


Despite both being [[Sunni Muslim]]s, Babur wanted Ibrahim's power and territory.<ref name="sardesai162"/> Babur and his army of 24,000 men marched to the battlefield at Panipat armed with muskets and artillery. Ibrahim prepared for battle by gathering 100,000 man (well-armed but with no guns) and 1,000 elephants. Ibrahim was at a disadvantage because of his outmoded infantry and internecine rivalries. Even though he had more men, he had never fought in a war against gunpowder weapons and he did not know what to do strategically. Babur pressed his advantage from the start and Ibrahim perished on the battlefield in April 1526, along with 20,000 of his men.<ref name="sardesai146"/>
Despite both being [[Sunni Muslim]]s, Babur wanted Ibrahim's power and territory.<ref name="sardesai162"/> Babur and his army of 24,000 men marched to the battlefield at Panipat armed with muskets and artillery. Ibrahim prepared for battle by gathering 100,000 man (well-armed but with no guns) and 1,000 elephants. Ibrahim was at a disadvantage because of his outmoded infantry and internecine rivalries. Even though he had more men, he had never fought in a war against gunpowder weapons and he did not know what to do strategically. Babur pressed his advantage from the start and Ibrahim perished on the battlefield in April 1526, along with 20,000 of his men.<ref name="sardesai146"/>
Line 115: Line 115:
<gallery widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
<gallery widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
File:Shish_Gumbad,_Lodhi_Gardens,_Delhi.JPG|The [[Shish Gumbad]], a [[tomb]] from the [[Lodhi dynasty]] built between 1489 and 1517 [[Common Era|CE]].<ref name="Unknown Tomb">{{cite news|title=Unknown Tomb|publisher=competentauthoritydelhi.co.in|access-date=15 October 2015|url=http://competentauthoritydelhi.co.in/MonumentViewer.aspx?ID=16|archive-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325154320/http://www.competentauthoritydelhi.co.in/MonumentViewer.aspx?ID=16|url-status=live}}</ref>
File:Shish_Gumbad,_Lodhi_Gardens,_Delhi.JPG|The [[Shish Gumbad]], a [[tomb]] from the [[Lodhi dynasty]] built between 1489 and 1517 [[Common Era|CE]].<ref name="Unknown Tomb">{{cite news|title=Unknown Tomb|publisher=competentauthoritydelhi.co.in|access-date=15 October 2015|url=http://competentauthoritydelhi.co.in/MonumentViewer.aspx?ID=16|archive-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325154320/http://www.competentauthoritydelhi.co.in/MonumentViewer.aspx?ID=16|url-status=live}}</ref>
File:Rajon_ki_Baoli's_baoli.jpg|right|The [[Rajon ki Baoli]] stepwell was built by [[Sikandar Lodi]] in 1516.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sahai |first1=Surendra |title=Indian Architecture: Islamic Period, 1192-1857 |publisher=Prakash Books, India |isbn=978-81-7234-057-5 |page=37 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pUnqAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA37 |language=en |quote="Rajon ki baoli ( 1516 ) is one of the major public welfare projects of Sikandar Lodi ." |access-date=14 May 2022 |archive-date=19 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230319093909/https://books.google.com/books?id=pUnqAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA37 |url-status=live }}</ref>
File:Rajon_ki_Baoli's_baoli.jpg|right|The [[Rajon ki Baoli]] stepwell was built by [[Sikandar Lodi]] in 1516.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sahai |first1=Surendra |title=Indian Architecture: Islamic Period, 1192-1857 |date=2004 |publisher=Prakash Books, India |isbn=978-81-7234-057-5 |page=37 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pUnqAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA37 |language=en |quote="Rajon ki baoli ( 1516 ) is one of the major public welfare projects of Sikandar Lodi ." |access-date=14 May 2022 |archive-date=19 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230319093909/https://books.google.com/books?id=pUnqAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA37 |url-status=live }}</ref>
File:Lodhi Gardens Tombs 111.jpg|[[Lodhi Gardens]] tombs
File:Lodhi Gardens Tombs 111.jpg|[[Lodhi Gardens]] tombs
File:Another view of tomb.jpg|[[Tomb of Ibrahim Lodi]], last ruler of the Lodi dynasty.
File:Another view of tomb.jpg|[[Tomb of Ibrahim Lodi]], last ruler of the Lodi dynasty.
Line 133: Line 133:
==Sources==
==Sources==
*{{cite book |title=The New Islamic Dynasties |first=Clifford Edmund |last=Bosworth |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=1996 }}
*{{cite book |title=The New Islamic Dynasties |first=Clifford Edmund |last=Bosworth |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=1996 }}
*{{cite book |last1=Dale |first1=Stephen Frederic |author1-link=Stephen Dale |editor1-last=Peacock |editor1-first=A.C.S. |editor2-last=McClary |editor2-first=Richard Piran |editor1-link=A. C. S. Peacock |title=Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections |publisher=Brill |page=74-75 |chapter=Turks, Turks and türk Turks: Anatolia, Iran and India in Comparative Perspective|quote=Persian became, ipso facto, the language of his [Babur's] administration, if for no other reason than that the Lodi Afghans had used it – and definitely not Pushtu – for their revenue records.}}
*{{cite book |last1=Dale |first1=Stephen Frederic |author1-link=Stephen Dale |editor1-last=Peacock |editor1-first=A.C.S. |editor2-last=McClary |editor2-first=Richard Piran |editor1-link=A. C. S. Peacock |title=Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections |date=2020 |publisher=Brill |page=74-75 |chapter=Turks, Turks and türk Turks: Anatolia, Iran and India in Comparative Perspective|quote=Persian became, ipso facto, the language of his [Babur's] administration, if for no other reason than that the Lodi Afghans had used it – and definitely not Pushtu – for their revenue records.}}
*{{cite journal |last=Desoulieres |first=Alain |title=Mughal Diplomacy in Gujarat (1533–1534) in Correia's 'Lendas da India' |journal=Modern Asian Studies |volume=22 |issue=3 |page=454 |jstor=312590  |doi=10.1017/s0026749x00009616|year=1988 |s2cid=145789251 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Desoulieres |first=Alain |title=Mughal Diplomacy in Gujarat (1533–1534) in Correia's 'Lendas da India' |journal=Modern Asian Studies |volume=22 |issue=3 |page=454 |jstor=312590  |doi=10.1017/s0026749x00009616|year=1988 |s2cid=145789251 }}
*{{cite book |title=The New Cambridge History of India |volume=II. 3: The Sikhs of the Punjab |first=J. S. |last=Grewal |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990  }}
*{{cite book |title=The New Cambridge History of India |volume=II. 3: The Sikhs of the Punjab |first=J. S. |last=Grewal |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990  }}
*{{cite journal |last=Haider |first=Najaf |title=Precious Metal Flows and Currency Circulation in the Mughal Empire |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=39 |issue=3 |year=1996 |pages=298–364 |jstor=3632649  |doi=10.1163/1568520962601180}}
*{{cite journal |last=Haider |first=Najaf |title=Precious Metal Flows and Currency Circulation in the Mughal Empire |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=39 |issue=3 |year=1996 |pages=298–364 |jstor=3632649  |doi=10.1163/1568520962601180}}
*{{cite book |chapter=India under the Moghol Empire |first=Herbert |last=Hartel |title=The Last Great Muslim Empires |editor-first1=H. J. |editor-last1=Kissling |editor-first2=N. |editor-last2=Barbour |editor-first3=Bertold |editor-last3=Spuler |editor-first4=J. S. |editor-last4=Trimingham |editor-first5=F. R. C. |editor-last5=Bagley |year=1997|publisher=Brill |isbn=90-04-02104-3|pages=262–263|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-AznJs58wtkC&pg=PA262|access-date=20 July 2011}}
*{{cite book |chapter=India under the Moghol Empire |first=Herbert |last=Hartel |title=The Last Great Muslim Empires |editor-first1=H. J. |editor-last1=Kissling |editor-first2=N. |editor-last2=Barbour |editor-first3=Bertold |editor-last3=Spuler |editor-first4=J. S. |editor-last4=Trimingham |editor-first5=F. R. C. |editor-last5=Bagley |year=1997|publisher=Brill |isbn=90-04-02104-3|pages=262–263|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-AznJs58wtkC&pg=PA262|access-date=20 July 2011}}
* {{Cite book|first=Gopinath |last=Sharma|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jIs9AAAAMAAJ|title=Mewar & the Mughal Emperors (1526-1707 A.D.)|publisher=S.L. Agarwala|language=en}}
* {{Cite book|first=Gopinath |last=Sharma|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jIs9AAAAMAAJ|title=Mewar & the Mughal Emperors (1526-1707 A.D.)|date=1954|publisher=S.L. Agarwala|language=en}}
*{{cite journal |last=Subrahmanyam |first=Sanjay |title=A Note on the Rise of Surat in the Sixteenth Century |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=43 |issue=1 |year=2000 |pages=23–33 |jstor=3632771  |doi=10.1163/156852000511222}}
*{{cite journal |last=Subrahmanyam |first=Sanjay |title=A Note on the Rise of Surat in the Sixteenth Century |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=43 |issue=1 |year=2000 |pages=23–33 |jstor=3632771  |doi=10.1163/156852000511222}}
*{{cite journal |last=Ud-Din |first=Hameed |title=Historians of Afghan Rule in India |journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society |volume=82 |issue=1 |pages=44–51 |jstor=595978  |doi=10.2307/595978 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Ud-Din |first=Hameed |title=Historians of Afghan Rule in India |journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society |volume=82 |issue=1 |date=January–March 1962 |pages=44–51 |jstor=595978  |doi=10.2307/595978 }}
*{{cite book |chapter=Sorting out Babel: Literature and Its Changing Language |first1=Stephen |last1=Owen |first2=Sheldon |last2=Pollock |title=What China and India Once Were: The Pasts That May Shape the Global Future |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2018 |editor-first1=Benjamin |editor-last1=Elman |editor-first2=Sheldon |editor-last2=Pollock |quote=In the case of the Lodi dynasty that preceded the Mughals, the semi-official language was called Hindavi, an early form of today’s Hindi. Persian too was in many ways an elite idiom in its Indian embodiment. Despite pervading much of everyday language in north India at the level of vocabulary (by a process still unclear to scholars; the penetration of the bureaucracy has been suggested), its use was essentially literary, as a code of courtiers and religious professionals; Persian was hardly more of an everyday language than Sanskrit. }}
*{{cite book |chapter=Sorting out Babel: Literature and Its Changing Language |first1=Stephen |last1=Owen |first2=Sheldon |last2=Pollock |title=What China and India Once Were: The Pasts That May Shape the Global Future |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2018 |editor-first1=Benjamin |editor-last1=Elman |editor-first2=Sheldon |editor-last2=Pollock |quote=In the case of the Lodi dynasty that preceded the Mughals, the semi-official language was called Hindavi, an early form of today’s Hindi. Persian too was in many ways an elite idiom in its Indian embodiment. Despite pervading much of everyday language in north India at the level of vocabulary (by a process still unclear to scholars; the penetration of the bureaucracy has been suggested), its use was essentially literary, as a code of courtiers and religious professionals; Persian was hardly more of an everyday language than Sanskrit. }}


==External links==
==External links==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20141027035001/http://persian.packhum.org/persian/search?q=Lodhi A History of Sind, Volume II, Translated from Persian Books by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg, chpt. 68]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20141027035001/http://persian.packhum.org/persian/search?q=Lodhi A History of Sind, Volume II, Translated from Persian Books by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg, chpt. 68]
*[http://www.zeno.ru/showgallery.php?cat=6709 Coin Gallery - Lodhi dynasty]
*[http://www.zeno.ru/showgallery.php?cat=6709 Coin Gallery - Lodhi dynasty]


{{Pashtun}}
{{Pashtun}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Lodi dynasty}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Lodi dynasty}}
1,632

edits