Template:ArbComOpenTasks/line: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<includeonly>|- {{#switch:{{{mode|}}} <!---------------------------------------------------------------!> <! REQUESTS FOR NEW ARBITRATION CASES !> <!----------------------------------------------------------------> |request |caserequest= {{!}}''}}}|{{{name|}}}'' {{!}}{{#if:{{{motion|}}}|'''Motions'''| }} {{!}}{{{date|<span class="error"...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<!----------------------------------------------------------------> | <!----------------------------------------------------------------> | ||
|review= | |review= | ||
{{!}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|''[[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}/Review| | {{!}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|''[[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}/Review|Bharatpedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}/Review}}|{{{name}}} (Review)]]''|<span class="error"><small>No case name given</small></span>}} | ||
{{!}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|<small>([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}| | {{!}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|<small>([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}/Review|Bharatpedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}/Review}}|t]]) ([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}}}/Review/Evidence|ev]] / [[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpediatalk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}}}/Review/Evidence|t]]) ([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}}}/Review/Proposed decision|pd]] / [[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}}}/Review/Proposed decision|t]]) ([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{name}}}|Bharatpedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{name}}}}}|orig]].)</small>}} | ||
{{!}}{{{evidence|<span class="error"><small>No evidence deadline given</small></span>}}} | {{!}}{{{evidence|<span class="error"><small>No evidence deadline given</small></span>}}} | ||
{{!}}{{{decision|<span class="error"><small>No proposed decision deadline given</small></span>}}} | {{!}}{{{decision|<span class="error"><small>No proposed decision deadline given</small></span>}}} | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
{{!}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|[[Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#{{{name}}}|{{{name}}}]]|<span class="error"><small>No request name given</small></span>}} | {{!}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|[[Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#{{{name}}}|{{{name}}}]]|<span class="error"><small>No request name given</small></span>}} | ||
{{!}}{{#if:{{{motion|}}}|'''[[Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#{{{motion}}}|Motion{{{motionplural|}}}]]'''|<small>{{smallcaps|none}}</small>}} | {{!}}{{#if:{{{motion|}}}|'''[[Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#{{{motion}}}|Motion{{{motionplural|}}}]]'''|<small>{{smallcaps|none}}</small>}} | ||
{{!}}{{#if:{{{link|}}}|([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{link}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{link}}}| | {{!}}{{#if:{{{link|}}}|([[{{#ifexist:Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{link}}}|Bharatpedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{link}}}|Bharatpedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{link}}}}}|orig. case]])|{{#if:{{{nolink|}}}|{{{nolink}}}|<small>{{smallcaps|none}}</small>}}}} | ||
{{!}}{{{date|<span class="error"><small>No date given</small></span>}}} | {{!}}{{{date|<span class="error"><small>No date given</small></span>}}} | ||
<!---------------------------------------------------------------!> | <!---------------------------------------------------------------!> |
Latest revision as of 15:00, 28 October 2024
The line
sub-template displays information about a current arbitration proceeding, be it a request for a new case, clarification or amendment of a previous case, an open case (or review), or motions of an arbitrator. For different types of proceedings (declared using the |mode=
parameter), this template will return different output. If a case is suspended, set the parameter |suspended=true
at the beginning of the suspension.
mode value
|
name
|
link
|
date
|
motion
|
---|---|---|---|---|
request or caserequest | The name of the request as it's posted on RFAR | The URL-encoded version of the request name, if the link provided doesn't work. Defaults to name
|
The date the request was posted | Name of the section in which motions have been posted for this request |
case or review | The name of the case (or case being reviewed) | — | — | Name of the section in which motions have been posted for this request |
closed or closedcase | Name of the closed case | — | Date on which case was closed | — |
clarification or amendment | The name of the request section for the link | The name of the case being clarified/amended | The date the request was posted | Name of the section in which motions have been posted for this request. Piped text is motion. Declare |motionplural=s to display motions.
|
motion | The name of motion section | The URL-encoded version of the request name, if the link provided doesn't work. Defaults to name
|
The date the motions were posted | — |
Notes
For almost any proceedings (except case requests), some previous decision needs to be cited. Ordinarily, the previous decision will be an arbitration case; by declaring the |case=
parameter, the template will automatically link to an Arbitration/Requests/Case or Requests for arbitration page with the same sub-page name.
Alternatively, the |nolink=
parameter can be used to link to the relevant previous decision. This should only be used if the decision was made outwith a case final decision. See this change for an example of this parameter being used. In that example, the amendment request related to the terms of unblock set down by the Ban Appeals Subcommittee for an un-banned user; the |nolink=
parameter was used to link to the diff in which a BASC member published the original terms to the unbanned user's talk page. This parameter requires you to surround the link with (brackets), so that the format is consistent with the automatic link.