Created by Buidhe
Last edited April 28, 2025
>Buidhe
m Disambiguating links to Subaltern (link changed to Subaltern (military)) using DisamAssist.
 
m Article updated with improved flow
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|British historian (1924–1981)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}
'''Eric Thomas Stokes''' (1924–1981) was a historian of [[South Asia]], especially [[early-modern]] and [[colonial India]], and of the [[British Empire]].  Stokes was the second holder of [[Smuts Professor of Commonwealth History|Smuts Professorship of the History of the British Commonwealth]] at the [[University of Cambridge]].
'''Eric Thomas Stokes''' (1924–1981) was a historian of [[South Asia]], especially [[early-modern]] and [[colonial India]], and of the [[British Empire]].  Stokes was the second holder of [[Smuts Professor of Commonwealth History|Smuts Professorship of the History of the British Commonwealth]] at the [[University of Cambridge]].


Line 4: Line 6:


==The Peasant Armed==
==The Peasant Armed==
''The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857'', as per note of editor [[Christopher Bayly]], represented a major historical revision typical of British historians of the 1960-1970s, and were to be studies in the Lower [[Doab]], Indian agrarian tracts covered by Chief Commissioner of [[Oudh]], the Commissioner of [[Benares]] and Western [[Bihar]] in mid nineteenth century. The detailed treatment of the social origins of the revolt would have extended to all regions where mutiny was complemented by civil rebellion in 1857 - 59. Stokes however had not begun to write his conclusion at the time of his death in 1981.
''The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857'', as per note of editor [[Christopher Bayly]], represented a major historical revision typical of British historians of the 1960-1970s, and were to be studies in the Lower [[Doab]], Indian agrarian tracts covered by Chief Commissioner of [[Oudh]], the Commissioner of [[Benares]] and Western [[Bihar]] in mid nineteenth century. The detailed treatment of the social origins of the revolt would have extended to all regions where mutiny was complemented by civil rebellion in 1857–59. Stokes however had not begun to write his conclusion at the time of his death in 1981.


As per Bayly, "in Stokes [[hierarchy]] of conditions for historical events of [[Indian Mutiny of 1857]], [[ecology]] was the [[longue durée]] of Indian agrarian history in [[Colony|colonial]] period. Above this clustered a whole range of social and economic forces which determined the propensity to revolt and it was the specific decisions of British officers and Indian leaders which helped translate these propensities into historical action." "Stokes felt that history was generally a 'harmless pursuit' from which few general conclusions could emerge. His own view of political and social priorities derived not from historical [[theory]] but from a [[notion (philosophy)|notion]] of [[natural law]] and from [[revealed religion]].
As per Bayly, "in Stokes [[hierarchy]] of conditions for historical events of [[Indian Mutiny of 1857]], [[ecology]] was the [[longue durée]] of Indian agrarian history in [[Colony|colonial]] period. Above this clustered a whole range of social and economic forces which determined the propensity to revolt and it was the specific decisions of British officers and Indian leaders which helped translate these propensities into historical action." "Stokes felt that history was generally a 'harmless pursuit' from which few general conclusions could emerge. His own view of political and social priorities derived not from historical [[theory]] but from a [[notion (philosophy)|notion]] of [[natural law]] and from [[revealed religion]].


The book chapters discuss the [[Military]] dimension of [[United Kingdom|British]] strategy and tactics, as well of Sepoy Rebels, the Peasant World and British Administration. Stokes own passion for the links between sepoy mutiny and civil rebellion in 1857, are explored in detail, with reference to [[Delhi]] region, [[Haryana]] countryside, [[Meerut]] District, [[Muzaffarnagar]] District and [[Saharanpur]] district.
The book chapters discuss the [[Military]] dimension of [[United Kingdom|British]] strategy and tactics, as well of Sepoy Rebels, the Peasant World and British Administration. Stokes' own passion for the links between sepoy mutiny and civil rebellion in 1857, are explored in detail, with reference to [[Delhi]] region, [[Haryana]] countryside, [[Meerut]] District, [[Muzaffarnagar]] District and [[Saharanpur]] district.


==The India Connection==
==The India Connection==
Line 18: Line 20:
==Selected bibliography==
==Selected bibliography==
*{{Citation| last=Stokes| first=Eric | year=1980 | title=The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India| publisher=Cambridge University Press| pages=316| isbn = 978-0-521-29770-7}}.
*{{Citation| last=Stokes| first=Eric | year=1980 | title=The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India| publisher=Cambridge University Press| pages=316| isbn = 978-0-521-29770-7}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Stokes| first1=Eric | last2 = Bayly |first2 = C.A. (ed.)| year = 1986 | title = The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857 | place=Oxford| publisher=Clarendon | pages=280 | isbn = 978-0-19-821570-7}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Stokes| first1=Eric | last2 = Bayly |first2 = C.A.| year = 1986 | title = The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857 | place=Oxford| publisher=Clarendon | pages=280 | isbn = 978-0-19-821570-7}}.
*{{Citation|last=Stokes|first=Eric|title=The English Utilitarians and India|year=1990|publisher=New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 372|isbn=978-0-19-562355-0}}
*{{Citation|last=Stokes|first=Eric|title=The English Utilitarians and India|year=1990|publisher=New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 372|isbn=978-0-19-562355-0}}


Line 37: Line 39:


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stokes, Eric}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stokes, Eric}}
[[Category:Historians of South Asia]]
[[Category:Historians of South Asia]]
Line 42: Line 45:
[[Category:Alumni of Christ's College, Cambridge]]
[[Category:Alumni of Christ's College, Cambridge]]
[[Category:1924 births]]
[[Category:1924 births]]
[[Category:Academics of the University of Cambridge]]
[[Category:Smuts Professors of Commonwealth History]]
[[Category:20th-century historians]]
[[Category:20th-century English historians]]
[[Category:Fellows of the British Academy]]

Latest revision as of 19:26, 28 April 2025


Eric Thomas Stokes (1924–1981) was a historian of South Asia, especially early-modern and colonial India, and of the British Empire. Stokes was the second holder of Smuts Professorship of the History of the British Commonwealth at the University of Cambridge.

He was the author of The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India and The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857.

The Peasant Armed[edit | edit source]

The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857, as per note of editor Christopher Bayly, represented a major historical revision typical of British historians of the 1960-1970s, and were to be studies in the Lower Doab, Indian agrarian tracts covered by Chief Commissioner of Oudh, the Commissioner of Benares and Western Bihar in mid nineteenth century. The detailed treatment of the social origins of the revolt would have extended to all regions where mutiny was complemented by civil rebellion in 1857–59. Stokes however had not begun to write his conclusion at the time of his death in 1981.

As per Bayly, "in Stokes hierarchy of conditions for historical events of Indian Mutiny of 1857, ecology was the longue durée of Indian agrarian history in colonial period. Above this clustered a whole range of social and economic forces which determined the propensity to revolt and it was the specific decisions of British officers and Indian leaders which helped translate these propensities into historical action." "Stokes felt that history was generally a 'harmless pursuit' from which few general conclusions could emerge. His own view of political and social priorities derived not from historical theory but from a notion of natural law and from revealed religion.

The book chapters discuss the Military dimension of British strategy and tactics, as well of Sepoy Rebels, the Peasant World and British Administration. Stokes' own passion for the links between sepoy mutiny and civil rebellion in 1857, are explored in detail, with reference to Delhi region, Haryana countryside, Meerut District, Muzaffarnagar District and Saharanpur district.

The India Connection[edit | edit source]

Bayly notes that, "Stokes returned again and again to the peasant world of India, by whose color and vitality he had been enthralled when serving as a subaltern in the Indian Mounted Artillery during the War. He completed detailed work on the Delhi area after visiting India in 1975-6. This visit seemed to prove to him the vacuousness of the broad caste categories."

Stokes and Caste as Category of Analysis[edit | edit source]

Bayly mentions that the chapters in "The Peasant Armed", demonstrate a slow modification of the notion that caste was the key category of revolt or, in any simple sense, the basic unit of Indian rural society. Anthropologists in Britain and America were themselves moving away from the monolithic view of caste.[1]

Selected bibliography[edit | edit source]

  • Stokes, Eric (1980), The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India, Cambridge University Press, p. 316, ISBN 978-0-521-29770-7.
  • Stokes, Eric; Bayly, C.A. (1986), The Peasant Armed: The Indian Revolt of 1857, Oxford: Clarendon, p. 280, ISBN 978-0-19-821570-7.
  • Stokes, Eric (1990), The English Utilitarians and India, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 372, ISBN 978-0-19-562355-0

Other references[edit | edit source]

  1. Page 228 - 229, The Peasant Armed, Editor's Concluding Note

See also[edit | edit source]

Academic offices
Preceded by
Philip Nicholas Seton Mansergh
Smuts Professor of Commonwealth History Cambridge University
1970 - 1981
Succeeded by
Anthony Low