Bots, trusted
7,437
edits
Gudumba221 (talk | contribs) (New content.) |
WikiDwarfBOT (talk | contribs) (Cleanup: Source modification.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Indian empire (185 BCE–73 BCE)}} | {{Short description|Indian empire (185 BCE–73 BCE)}} | ||
{{redirect|Sunga}} | {{redirect|Sunga}} | ||
{{Use Indian English}} | {{Use Indian English|date=October 2019}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}} | ||
{{Infobox Former Country | {{Infobox Former Country | ||
| native_name = | | native_name = | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|caption= | |caption= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| image_map_caption = {{center|Territory of the Shungas {{Circa|150 BCE}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Schwartzberg |first1=Joseph E. |title=A Historical atlas of South Asia |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |page=145, map XIV.1 (c)|isbn=0226742210 |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=182}}</ref>}} | | image_map_caption = {{center|Territory of the Shungas {{Circa|150 BCE}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Schwartzberg |first1=Joseph E. |title=A Historical atlas of South Asia |date=1978 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |page=145, map XIV.1 (c)|isbn=0226742210 |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=182}}</ref>}} | ||
| capital = {{plainlist| | | capital = {{plainlist| | ||
*[[Pataliputra]] | *[[Pataliputra]] | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| leader3 = [[Devabhuti]] (last) | | leader3 = [[Devabhuti]] (last) | ||
| year_leader3 = {{Circa|83}}–73 BCE | | year_leader3 = {{Circa|83}}–73 BCE | ||
| title_leader = [[List of Magadha monarchs#House of Shunga| | | title_leader = [[List of Magadha monarchs#House of Shunga|Emperor]] | ||
| today = {{plainlist| | | today = {{plainlist| | ||
*[[India]] | *[[India]] | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Shunga dynasty''' ([[IAST]]: ''{{IAST|Śuṅga}}'') was the seventh ruling dynasty of [[Magadha]] and controlled most of the northern [[Indian subcontinent]] from around 185 to 73 BCE. The dynasty was established by [[Pushyamitra Shunga|Pushyamitra]], after taking the throne of Magadha from the [[Mauryas]]. The Shunga Empire's capital was [[Pataliputra]], but later emperors such as [[Bhagabhadra]] also held court at Besnagar (modern [[Vidisha]]) in eastern [[Malwa]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Stadtner |first=Donald |title=A Śuṅga Capital from Vidiśā |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=37 |issue=1/2 |pages=101–104 |doi=10.2307/3250214 |jstor=3250214}}</ref> | The '''Shunga dynasty''' ([[IAST]]: ''{{IAST|Śuṅga}}'') was the seventh ruling dynasty of [[Magadha]] and controlled most of the northern [[Indian subcontinent]] from around 185 to 73 BCE. The dynasty was established by [[Pushyamitra Shunga|Pushyamitra]], after taking the throne of Magadha from the [[Mauryas]]. The Shunga Empire's capital was [[Pataliputra]], but later emperors such as [[Bhagabhadra]] also held court at Besnagar (modern [[Vidisha]]) in eastern [[Malwa]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Stadtner |first=Donald |date=1975 |title=A Śuṅga Capital from Vidiśā |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=37 |issue=1/2 |pages=101–104 |doi=10.2307/3250214 |jstor=3250214}}</ref> | ||
Pushyamitra ruled for 36 years and was succeeded by his son [[Agnimitra]]. There were ten Shunga rulers. However, after the death of Agnimitra, the second king of the dynasty, the empire rapidly disintegrated:<ref name="books.google.com">K.A. Nilkantha Shastri (1970), [https://books.google.com/books?id=E3tDAAAAYAAJ ''A Comprehensive History of India: Volume 2''], p.108: "Soon after Agnimitra there was no 'Sunga empire'."</ref> inscriptions and coins indicate that much of northern and central India consisted of small kingdoms and city-states that were independent of any Shunga [[hegemony]].<ref name="Bhandare, Shailendra 2006 p.96">Bhandare, Shailendra. "Numismatics and History: The Maurya-Gupta Interlude in the Gangetic Plain". in [https://books.google.com/books?id=efaOR_-YsIcC ''Between the Empires: Society in India, 300 to 400''], ed. Patrick Olivelle (2006), p.96</ref> The dynasty is noted for its numerous wars with both foreign and indigenous powers. They fought the [[Kalinga (historical kingdom)|Kalinga]], the [[Satavahana dynasty]], the [[Indo-Greek Kingdom]] and possibly the [[Panchala]]s and [[Mitra dynasty (Mathura)|Mitras of Mathura]]. | Pushyamitra ruled for 36 years and was succeeded by his son [[Agnimitra]]. There were ten Shunga rulers. However, after the death of Agnimitra, the second king of the dynasty, the empire rapidly disintegrated:<ref name="books.google.com">K.A. Nilkantha Shastri (1970), [https://books.google.com/books?id=E3tDAAAAYAAJ ''A Comprehensive History of India: Volume 2''], p.108: "Soon after Agnimitra there was no 'Sunga empire'."</ref> inscriptions and coins indicate that much of northern and central India consisted of small kingdoms and city-states that were independent of any Shunga [[hegemony]].<ref name="Bhandare, Shailendra 2006 p.96">Bhandare, Shailendra. "Numismatics and History: The Maurya-Gupta Interlude in the Gangetic Plain". in [https://books.google.com/books?id=efaOR_-YsIcC ''Between the Empires: Society in India, 300 to 400''], ed. Patrick Olivelle (2006), p.96</ref> The dynasty is noted for its numerous wars with both foreign and indigenous powers. They fought the [[Kalinga (historical kingdom)|Kalinga]], the [[Satavahana dynasty]], the [[Indo-Greek Kingdom]] and possibly the [[Panchala]]s and [[Mitra dynasty (Mathura)|Mitras of Mathura]]. | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==Name== | ==Name== | ||
The name "Shunga" has only been used for convenience to designate the historical polity now generally described as "Shunga Empire", or the historical period known as the "Shunga period", which follows the fall of the [[Maurya Empire]].<ref name="RSS"/> The term comes from a single epigraphic inscription in [[Bharhut]], in which a dedication to the [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] Bharhut [[stupa]] is said to have been made "at the time of the Suga kings" (''Suganam raje''), with no indication as to whom these "Suga kings" might be.<ref name="RSS">{{cite book |last1=Salomon |first1=Richard |title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-535666-3 |pages=141–142 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC&pg=PA141 |language=en}}</ref> Other broadly contemporary inscriptions, such as the [[Heliodorus pillar|Heliodorus pillar inscription]], are only assumed to relate to Shunga rulers.<ref name="RSS"/> The [[Ayodhya Inscription of Dhana]] mentions a ruler named [[Pushyamitra]], but does not mention the name "Shunga". | The name "Shunga" has only been used for convenience to designate the historical polity now generally described as "Shunga Empire", or the historical period known as the "Shunga period", which follows the fall of the [[Maurya Empire]].<ref name="RSS"/> The term comes from a single epigraphic inscription in [[Bharhut]], in which a dedication to the [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] Bharhut [[stupa]] is said to have been made "at the time of the Suga kings" (''Suganam raje''), with no indication as to whom these "Suga kings" might be.<ref name="RSS">{{cite book |last1=Salomon |first1=Richard |title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages |date=10 December 1998 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-535666-3 |pages=141–142 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC&pg=PA141 |language=en}}</ref> Other broadly contemporary inscriptions, such as the [[Heliodorus pillar|Heliodorus pillar inscription]], are only assumed to relate to Shunga rulers.<ref name="RSS"/> The [[Ayodhya Inscription of Dhana]] mentions a ruler named [[Pushyamitra]], but does not mention the name "Shunga". | ||
The Bharut epigraph appears on a pillar of the gateway of the stupa, and mentions its erection "during the rule of the ''Sugas'', by [[Dhanabhuti|Vatsiputra Dhanabhuti]]".<ref name="About INC-ICOM">{{cite web |title=Bharhut Gallery |url=http://www.inc-icom.org/newgal_bharut.html |website=INC-ICOM Galleries |publisher=Indian National Committee of the International Council of Museums |access-date=29 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235552/http://www.inc-icom.org/newgal_bharut.html |archive-date=3 March 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="academia.edu">{{cite journal |last1=Kumar |first1=Ajit |title=Bharhut Sculptures and their untenable Sunga Association |journal=Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology |volume=2 |page=230 |url=https://www.academia.edu/10237709 |language=en}}</ref> The expression used (''Suganam raje'', [[Brahmi script]]: 𑀲𑀼𑀕𑀦𑀁 𑀭𑀚𑁂), may mean "during the rule of the Shungas", although not without ambiguity as it could also be "during the rule of the [[Srughna|Sughana]]s", a northern Buddhist kingdom.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Olivelle |first1=Patrick |title=Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-977507-1 |page=58 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=efaOR_-YsIcC&pg=PA58 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="academia.edu"/> There is no other instance of the name "Shunga" in the [[epigraphy|epigraphical]] record of India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Salomon |first1=Richard |title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-535666-3 |page=141 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC&pg=PA141 |language=en}}</ref> The unique inscription reads: | The Bharut epigraph appears on a pillar of the gateway of the stupa, and mentions its erection "during the rule of the ''Sugas'', by [[Dhanabhuti|Vatsiputra Dhanabhuti]]".<ref name="About INC-ICOM">{{cite web |title=Bharhut Gallery |url=http://www.inc-icom.org/newgal_bharut.html |website=INC-ICOM Galleries |publisher=Indian National Committee of the International Council of Museums |access-date=29 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235552/http://www.inc-icom.org/newgal_bharut.html |archive-date=3 March 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="academia.edu">{{cite journal |last1=Kumar |first1=Ajit |title=Bharhut Sculptures and their untenable Sunga Association |journal=Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology |date=2014 |volume=2 |page=230 |url=https://www.academia.edu/10237709 |language=en}}</ref> The expression used (''Suganam raje'', [[Brahmi script]]: 𑀲𑀼𑀕𑀦𑀁 𑀭𑀚𑁂), may mean "during the rule of the Shungas", although not without ambiguity as it could also be "during the rule of the [[Srughna|Sughana]]s", a northern Buddhist kingdom.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Olivelle |first1=Patrick |title=Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE |date=13 July 2006 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-977507-1 |page=58 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=efaOR_-YsIcC&pg=PA58 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="academia.edu"/> There is no other instance of the name "Shunga" in the [[epigraphy|epigraphical]] record of India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Salomon |first1=Richard |title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages |date=1998 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-535666-3 |page=141 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC&pg=PA141 |language=en}}</ref> The unique inscription reads: | ||
{{multiple image|perrow=2|total_width=450|caption_align=center | {{multiple image|perrow=2|total_width=450|caption_align=center | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Dhanabhuti]] was making a major dedication to a Buddhist monument, [[Bharhut]], whereas the historical "Shungas" are known to have been [[Hindu]] monarchs, which would suggest that Dhanabhuti himself may not have been a member of the Shunga dynasty.<ref name="SRQ">{{cite book |last1=Quintanilla |first1=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE - 100 CE |publisher=BRILL |isbn=9789004155374 |pages=8–9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC&pg=PA8 |language=en}}</ref> Neither is he known from "Shunga" regnal lists.<ref name="SRQ"/><ref name="SRQ13"/> The mention "in the reign of the Shungas" also suggests that he was not himself a Shunga ruler, only that he may have been a tributary of the Shungas, or a ruler in a neighbouring territory, such as [[Kosala]] or [[Panchala]].<ref name="SRQ13">{{cite book |last1=Quintanilla |first1=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE - 100 CE |publisher=BRILL |isbn=9789004155374 |page=13 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC&pg=PA13 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="SRQ"/> | [[Dhanabhuti]] was making a major dedication to a Buddhist monument, [[Bharhut]], whereas the historical "Shungas" are known to have been [[Hindu]] monarchs, which would suggest that Dhanabhuti himself may not have been a member of the Shunga dynasty.<ref name="SRQ">{{cite book |last1=Quintanilla |first1=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE - 100 CE |date=2007 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=9789004155374 |pages=8–9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC&pg=PA8 |language=en}}</ref> Neither is he known from "Shunga" regnal lists.<ref name="SRQ"/><ref name="SRQ13"/> The mention "in the reign of the Shungas" also suggests that he was not himself a Shunga ruler, only that he may have been a tributary of the Shungas, or a ruler in a neighbouring territory, such as [[Kosala]] or [[Panchala]].<ref name="SRQ13">{{cite book |last1=Quintanilla |first1=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE - 100 CE |date=2007 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=9789004155374 |page=13 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC&pg=PA13 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="SRQ"/> | ||
The name "Sunga" or "Shunga" is also used in the ''[[Vishnu Purana]]'', the date of which is contested, to designate the dynasty of kings starting with [[Pushyamitra]] {{Circa|185 BCE}}, and ending with [[Devabhuti]] circa 75 BCE. According to the [[Vishnu Purana]]:<ref name="RSS"/><ref>{{cite book |title=A Comprehensive History Of Ancient India (3 Vol. Set) |publisher=Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd |isbn=978-81-207-2503-4 |page=93 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gE7udqBkACwC&pg=PA93 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Indian History |publisher=Allied Publishers |isbn=978-81-8424-568-4 |page=254 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MazdaWXQFuQC&pg=PA254 |language=en}}</ref> | The name "Sunga" or "Shunga" is also used in the ''[[Vishnu Purana]]'', the date of which is contested, to designate the dynasty of kings starting with [[Pushyamitra]] {{Circa|185 BCE}}, and ending with [[Devabhuti]] circa 75 BCE. According to the [[Vishnu Purana]]:<ref name="RSS"/><ref>{{cite book |title=A Comprehensive History Of Ancient India (3 Vol. Set) |date=1 December 2003 |publisher=Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd |isbn=978-81-207-2503-4 |page=93 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gE7udqBkACwC&pg=PA93 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Indian History |publisher=Allied Publishers |isbn=978-81-8424-568-4 |page=254 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MazdaWXQFuQC&pg=PA254 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
{{quote|''Ten Maurya kings will reign for one hundred and thirty-seven years. After them the Śuṅgas will rule the earth. The general Puṣpamitra will kill his sovereign and usurp the kingdom. His son will be Agnimitra. His son will be Sujyeṣṭha. His son will be Vasumitra. His son will be Ārdraka. His son will be Pulindaka. His son will be Ghoṣavasu. His son will be Vajramitra. His son will be Bhāgavata. His son will be Devabhūti. These ten Śuṅgas will rule the earth for one hundred and twelve years.''|Vishnu Purana, Book Four: The Royal Dynasties.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=McComas |title=The Royal Dynasties |journal=The Visnu Purana |date=2021 |page=330 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1sjwpmj.10 |publisher=ANU Press|doi=10.2307/j.ctv1sjwpmj.10 |jstor=j.ctv1sjwpmj.10 |s2cid=244448788 }}</ref>}} | {{quote|''Ten Maurya kings will reign for one hundred and thirty-seven years. After them the Śuṅgas will rule the earth. The general Puṣpamitra will kill his sovereign and usurp the kingdom. His son will be Agnimitra. His son will be Sujyeṣṭha. His son will be Vasumitra. His son will be Ārdraka. His son will be Pulindaka. His son will be Ghoṣavasu. His son will be Vajramitra. His son will be Bhāgavata. His son will be Devabhūti. These ten Śuṅgas will rule the earth for one hundred and twelve years.''|Vishnu Purana, Book Four: The Royal Dynasties.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=McComas |title=The Royal Dynasties |journal=The Visnu Purana |date=2021 |page=330 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1sjwpmj.10 |publisher=ANU Press|doi=10.2307/j.ctv1sjwpmj.10 |jstor=j.ctv1sjwpmj.10 |s2cid=244448788 }}</ref>}} | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
Later Shunga emperors were seen as amenable to Buddhism and as having contributed to the building of the stupa at [[Bharhut]].<ref>Akira Hirakawa, Paul Groner, "A History of Indian Buddhism: From Sakyamuni to Early Mahayana", Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1996, {{ISBN|81-208-0955-6}} pg 223</ref> During his reign the Buddhist monuments of Bharhut and [[Sanchi]] were renovated and further improved. There is enough evidence to show that [[Pushyamitra]] patronised buddhist art.<ref>Sir john Marshall, "[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.278482 A Guide to Sanchi]", 1918</ref> However, given the rather decentralised and fragmentary nature of the Shunga state, with many cities actually issuing their own coinage, as well as the relative dislike of the Shungas for the Buddhist religion, some authors argue that the constructions of that period in Sanchi for example cannot really be called "Shunga". They were not the result of royal sponsorship, in contrast with what happened during the Mauryas, and most of the dedications at Sanchi were private or collective, rather than the result of royal patronage.<ref>Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, c. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD Julia Shaw, Routledge, 2016 [https://books.google.com/books?id=IUbUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR58 p.58]</ref> | Later Shunga emperors were seen as amenable to Buddhism and as having contributed to the building of the stupa at [[Bharhut]].<ref>Akira Hirakawa, Paul Groner, "A History of Indian Buddhism: From Sakyamuni to Early Mahayana", Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1996, {{ISBN|81-208-0955-6}} pg 223</ref> During his reign the Buddhist monuments of Bharhut and [[Sanchi]] were renovated and further improved. There is enough evidence to show that [[Pushyamitra]] patronised buddhist art.<ref>Sir john Marshall, "[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.278482 A Guide to Sanchi]", 1918</ref> However, given the rather decentralised and fragmentary nature of the Shunga state, with many cities actually issuing their own coinage, as well as the relative dislike of the Shungas for the Buddhist religion, some authors argue that the constructions of that period in Sanchi for example cannot really be called "Shunga". They were not the result of royal sponsorship, in contrast with what happened during the Mauryas, and most of the dedications at Sanchi were private or collective, rather than the result of royal patronage.<ref>Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, c. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD Julia Shaw, Routledge, 2016 [https://books.google.com/books?id=IUbUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR58 p.58]</ref> | ||
Some writers believe that Brahmanism competed in political and spiritual realm with Buddhism<!-- <ref name="ashok"/ > --><ref name="Sarvastivada"/> in the [[Gangetic plains]]. Buddhism flourished in the realms of the Bactrian kings. {{Citation needed}} | Some writers believe that Brahmanism competed in political and spiritual realm with Buddhism<!-- <ref name="ashok"/ > --><ref name="Sarvastivada"/> in the [[Gangetic plains]]. Buddhism flourished in the realms of the Bactrian kings. {{Citation needed|date=December 2011}} | ||
Some Indian scholars are of the opinion that the orthodox Shunga emperors were not intolerant towards Buddhism and that Buddhism prospered during the time of the Shunga emperors. The existence of Buddhism in Bengal in the Shunga period can also be inferred from a terracotta tablet that was found at [[Tamralipti]] and is on exhibit at the [[Asutosh Museum of Indian Art|Asutosh Museum]] in Kolkata. | Some Indian scholars are of the opinion that the orthodox Shunga emperors were not intolerant towards Buddhism and that Buddhism prospered during the time of the Shunga emperors. The existence of Buddhism in Bengal in the Shunga period can also be inferred from a terracotta tablet that was found at [[Tamralipti]] and is on exhibit at the [[Asutosh Museum of Indian Art|Asutosh Museum]] in Kolkata. | ||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
On the basis of [[Ashokavadana]], it is presumed that the stupa may have been vandalised at one point sometime in the 2nd century BCE, an event some have related to the rise of the Shunga emperor Pushyamitra who overtook the Mauryan Empire as an army general. It has been suggested that Pushyamitra may have destroyed the original stupa, and his son [[Agnimitra]] rebuilt it.<ref>"Who was responsible for the wanton destruction of the original brick stupa of [[Ashoka]] and when precisely the great work of reconstruction was carried out is not known, but it seems probable that the author of the former was [[Pushyamitra Shunga|Pushyamitra]], the first of the Shunga kings (184-148 BC), who was notorious for his hostility to Buddhism, and that the restoration was affected by [[Agnimitra]] or his immediate successor." in John Marshall, ''A Guide to Sanchi,'' p. 38. Calcutta: Superintendent, Government Printing (1918).</ref> The original brick stupa was covered with stone during the Shunga period. | On the basis of [[Ashokavadana]], it is presumed that the stupa may have been vandalised at one point sometime in the 2nd century BCE, an event some have related to the rise of the Shunga emperor Pushyamitra who overtook the Mauryan Empire as an army general. It has been suggested that Pushyamitra may have destroyed the original stupa, and his son [[Agnimitra]] rebuilt it.<ref>"Who was responsible for the wanton destruction of the original brick stupa of [[Ashoka]] and when precisely the great work of reconstruction was carried out is not known, but it seems probable that the author of the former was [[Pushyamitra Shunga|Pushyamitra]], the first of the Shunga kings (184-148 BC), who was notorious for his hostility to Buddhism, and that the restoration was affected by [[Agnimitra]] or his immediate successor." in John Marshall, ''A Guide to Sanchi,'' p. 38. Calcutta: Superintendent, Government Printing (1918).</ref> The original brick stupa was covered with stone during the Shunga period. | ||
According to historian Julia Shaw, the post-Mauryan constructions at Sanchi cannot be described as "Sunga" as sponsorship for the construction of the stupas, as attested by the numerous donative inscriptions, was not royal but collective, and the Sungas were known for their opposition to Buddhism.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=Julia |title=Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, c. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-43263-2 |page=58 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IUbUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR58 |language=en|quote="It is inaccurate to refer to the post-Mauryan monuments at Sanchi as Sunga. Not only was Pusyamitra reputedly animical to Buddhism, but most of the donative inscriptions during this period attest to predominantly collective and nonroyal modes of sponsorship."}}</ref> | According to historian Julia Shaw, the post-Mauryan constructions at Sanchi cannot be described as "Sunga" as sponsorship for the construction of the stupas, as attested by the numerous donative inscriptions, was not royal but collective, and the Sungas were known for their opposition to Buddhism.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=Julia |title=Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, c. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD |date=12 August 2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-43263-2 |page=58 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IUbUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR58 |language=en|quote="It is inaccurate to refer to the post-Mauryan monuments at Sanchi as Sunga. Not only was Pusyamitra reputedly animical to Buddhism, but most of the donative inscriptions during this period attest to predominantly collective and nonroyal modes of sponsorship."}}</ref> | ||
====Great Stupa (No 1)==== | ====Great Stupa (No 1)==== | ||
Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
==Wars of the Shungas== | ==Wars of the Shungas== | ||
{{Continental Asia in 100 BCE}} | {{Continental Asia in 100 BCE}} | ||
War and conflict characterised the Shunga period. They are known to have warred with the [[Kalinga (historical kingdom)|Kalingas]], [[Satavahana]]s, the [[Indo-Greeks]], and possibly the [[Panchalas]] and [[Mathura]]s.{{citation needed}} | War and conflict characterised the Shunga period. They are known to have warred with the [[Kalinga (historical kingdom)|Kalingas]], [[Satavahana]]s, the [[Indo-Greeks]], and possibly the [[Panchalas]] and [[Mathura]]s.{{citation needed|date=September 2017}} | ||
The Shunga Empire's wars with the Indo-Greek Kingdom figure greatly in the history of this period. From around 180 BCE the [[Greco-Bactrian]] ruler [[Demetrius I of Bactria|Demetrius]] conquered the Kabul Valley and is theorised to have advanced into the trans-Indus to confront the Shungas.<ref name="books.google.fr"/> The Indo-Greek [[Menander I]] is credited with either joining or leading a campaign to [[Pataliputra]] with other Indian rulers; however, very little is known about the exact nature and success of the campaign. The net result of these wars remains uncertain.{{citation needed}} | The Shunga Empire's wars with the Indo-Greek Kingdom figure greatly in the history of this period. From around 180 BCE the [[Greco-Bactrian]] ruler [[Demetrius I of Bactria|Demetrius]] conquered the Kabul Valley and is theorised to have advanced into the trans-Indus to confront the Shungas.<ref name="books.google.fr"/> The Indo-Greek [[Menander I]] is credited with either joining or leading a campaign to [[Pataliputra]] with other Indian rulers; however, very little is known about the exact nature and success of the campaign. The net result of these wars remains uncertain.{{citation needed|date=September 2017}} | ||
[[File:Bharhut Yavana.jpg|thumb|upright|Vedika pillar with "[[Yavana]]" [[Indo-Greeks|Greek warrior]]. Bharhut, Madhya Pradesh, Shunga Period, {{Circa|100}}-80 BC. Reddish brown sandstone.<ref>D.N. Jha,"Early India: A Concise History"p.150, plate 17</ref> [[Indian Museum]], [[Calcutta]].]] | [[File:Bharhut Yavana.jpg|thumb|upright|Vedika pillar with "[[Yavana]]" [[Indo-Greeks|Greek warrior]]. Bharhut, Madhya Pradesh, Shunga Period, {{Circa|100}}-80 BC. Reddish brown sandstone.<ref>D.N. Jha,"Early India: A Concise History"p.150, plate 17</ref> [[Indian Museum]], [[Calcutta]].]] | ||
Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
After the death of Agnimitra, the second king of the dynasty, the empire rapidly disintegrated:<ref name="books.google.com"/> inscriptions and coins indicate that much of northern and central India consisted of small kingdoms and city-states that were independent of any Shunga hegemony.<ref name="Bhandare, Shailendra 2006 p.96"/> [[File:East-Hem 100bc.jpg|thumb|The Sunga territory circa 100 BCE, greatly reduced to the region of [[Magadha]] only, with many independent, petty kingdoms such as such as [[Mathura]] and [[Panchala#Post-Maruyan period|Panchala]] ]] | After the death of Agnimitra, the second king of the dynasty, the empire rapidly disintegrated:<ref name="books.google.com"/> inscriptions and coins indicate that much of northern and central India consisted of small kingdoms and city-states that were independent of any Shunga hegemony.<ref name="Bhandare, Shailendra 2006 p.96"/> [[File:East-Hem 100bc.jpg|thumb|The Sunga territory circa 100 BCE, greatly reduced to the region of [[Magadha]] only, with many independent, petty kingdoms such as such as [[Mathura]] and [[Panchala#Post-Maruyan period|Panchala]] ]] | ||
The last king of Sungas, [[Devabhuti]] was assassinated by his minister [[Vasudeva Kanva]], who then established [[Kanva dynasty]].{{sfn|Thapar|2013|p=296}} According to the Puranas: "The [[Satavahanas|Andhra]] [[Simuka]] will assail the [[Kanva dynasty|Kanvayanas]] and Susarman, and destroy the remains of the Sungas' power and will obtain this earth."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Raychaudhuri |first1=Hem Channdra |title=Political history of ancient India, from the accession of Parikshit to the extinction of the Gupta dynasty |publisher=Calcutta, Univ. of Calcutta |page=[https://archive.org/details/politicalhistory00raycuoft/page/216 216] |url=https://archive.org/details/politicalhistory00raycuoft}}</ref> The [[Satavahanas|Andhras]] did indeed destroy the last remains of the Sunga state in central India somewhere around Vidisha,<ref>{{cite book |title=Ancient Indian History and Civilization |first=Sailendra Nath |last=Sen |publisher=New Age International, 1999 |year=1999 |isbn=978-8-12241-198-0 |page=170 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wk4_ICH_g1EC&pg=PA170}}</ref> probably as a feeble rump state. | The last king of Sungas, [[Devabhuti]] was assassinated by his minister [[Vasudeva Kanva]], who then established [[Kanva dynasty]].{{sfn|Thapar|2013|p=296}} According to the Puranas: "The [[Satavahanas|Andhra]] [[Simuka]] will assail the [[Kanva dynasty|Kanvayanas]] and Susarman, and destroy the remains of the Sungas' power and will obtain this earth."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Raychaudhuri |first1=Hem Channdra |title=Political history of ancient India, from the accession of Parikshit to the extinction of the Gupta dynasty |date=1923 |publisher=Calcutta, Univ. of Calcutta |page=[https://archive.org/details/politicalhistory00raycuoft/page/216 216] |url=https://archive.org/details/politicalhistory00raycuoft}}</ref> The [[Satavahanas|Andhras]] did indeed destroy the last remains of the Sunga state in central India somewhere around Vidisha,<ref>{{cite book |title=Ancient Indian History and Civilization |first=Sailendra Nath |last=Sen |publisher=New Age International, 1999 |year=1999 |isbn=978-8-12241-198-0 |page=170 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wk4_ICH_g1EC&pg=PA170}}</ref> probably as a feeble rump state. | ||
==Art== | ==Art== | ||
The Shunga art style differed somewhat from imperial [[Mauryan art]], which was influenced by [[Persian art]]. In both, continuing elements of folk art and cults of the [[Mother goddess]] appear in popular art, but are now produced with more skill in more monumental forms. The Shunga style was thus seen as 'more Indian' and is often described as the more indigenous.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RoW9GuFJ9GIC&q=shunga+vidisha&pg=PA73|title=A History of India|last1=Kulke|first1=Hermann|last2=Rothermund|first2=Dietmar|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=9780415329200|language=en}}</ref> | The Shunga art style differed somewhat from imperial [[Mauryan art]], which was influenced by [[Persian art]]. In both, continuing elements of folk art and cults of the [[Mother goddess]] appear in popular art, but are now produced with more skill in more monumental forms. The Shunga style was thus seen as 'more Indian' and is often described as the more indigenous.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RoW9GuFJ9GIC&q=shunga+vidisha&pg=PA73|title=A History of India|last1=Kulke|first1=Hermann|last2=Rothermund|first2=Dietmar|date=2004|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=9780415329200|language=en}}</ref> | ||
Art, education, philosophy, and other learning flowered during this period. Most notably, Patanjali's Yoga Sutras and Mahabhashya were composed in this period. It is also noted for its subsequent mention in the Malavikaagnimitra. This work was composed by Kalidasa in the later Gupta period, and romanticised the love of Malavika and King Agnimitra, with a background of court intrigue. | Art, education, philosophy, and other learning flowered during this period. Most notably, Patanjali's Yoga Sutras and Mahabhashya were composed in this period. It is also noted for its subsequent mention in the Malavikaagnimitra. This work was composed by Kalidasa in the later Gupta period, and romanticised the love of Malavika and King Agnimitra, with a background of court intrigue. | ||
Line 346: | Line 346: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20051120174324/http://ignca.nic.in/asp/showbig.asp?projid=rar26 Medallions from Barhut] | * [https://web.archive.org/web/20051120174324/http://ignca.nic.in/asp/showbig.asp?projid=rar26 Medallions from Barhut] | ||
* [http://www.arthistory.upenn.edu/104/caves.html Shunga art in North India (Bharhut and Bodgaya)] | * [http://www.arthistory.upenn.edu/104/caves.html Shunga art in North India (Bharhut and Bodgaya)] |