1,326
edits
CleanupBot (talk | contribs) m (→top: robot: remove incorrect protection templates) |
(robot: Creating/updating articles) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Short description|Politician and the founder of Pakistan (1876–1948)}} | ||
{{ | {{Redirect|Jinnah}} | ||
{{Featured article}} | {{Featured article}} | ||
{{Pp-protected|small=yes}} | |||
{{Pp-move-indef}} | |||
{{Use Pakistani English|date=September 2020}} | {{Use Pakistani English|date=September 2020}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date= | {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}} | ||
{{Infobox officeholder | {{Infobox officeholder | ||
| name = Muhammad Ali Jinnah<br />{{nobold|{{lang|ur|{{Nastaliq|محمد علی جناح}}}}}} | | name = Muhammad Ali Jinnah<br />{{nobold|{{lang|ur|{{Nastaliq|محمد علی جناح}}}}}} | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| successor1 = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] | | successor1 = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] | ||
| successor2 = ''Office abolished'' | | successor2 = ''Office abolished'' | ||
| birth_name = Mahomedali Jinnahbhai | | birth_name = Mahomedali Jinnahbhai | ||
| death_date = {{nowrap|{{death date and age|df=yes|1948| | | birth_date = [[Jinnah's Birthday|{{birth date|df=yes|1876|12|25}}]] | ||
| death_place = Karachi, [[Federal Capital Territory (Pakistan)|Federal Capital Territory]], [[Dominion of Pakistan|Pakistan]] | | birth_place = [[Karachi]], [[Bombay Presidency]], [[British Raj|British India]]<br />{{small|(present-day Sindh, Pakistan)}} | ||
| resting_place = [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], Karachi | | death_date = {{nowrap|{{death date and age|df=yes|1948|09|11|1876|12|25}}}} | ||
| nationality = [[British Raj|British Indian]] (1876–1947)<br />[[ | | death_place = [[Karachi]], [[Federal Capital Territory (Pakistan)|Federal Capital Territory]], [[Dominion of Pakistan|Pakistan]] | ||
| spouse = {{marriage|[[Emibai Jinnah]]|1892|1893|end= | | resting_place = [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], Karachi, Sindh | ||
| nationality = [[British Raj|British Indian]] (1876–1947)<br />[[Pakistani people|Pakistani]] (1947–1948) | |||
| spouse = {{marriage|[[Emibai Jinnah]]|1892|1893|end=died}}<br />{{marriage|[[Rattanbai Petit]]|1918|1929|end=died}} | |||
| relations = See [[Jinnah family]] | | relations = See [[Jinnah family]] | ||
| children = [[Dina Wadia]] | | children = [[Dina Wadia]] | ||
| parents = | | parents = {{ubl|Jinnahbhai Poonja (father)|Mithibai Jinnah (mother)}} | ||
| alma_mater = [[ | | alma_mater = [[Lincoln's Inn]] | ||
| profession = {{ | | profession = {{hlist|[[Barrister]]|[[Politician]]}} | ||
}} | |||
| term_start = 14 August 1947 | | term_start = 14 August 1947 | ||
| term_end = 11 September 1948 | | term_end = 11 September 1948 | ||
Line 51: | Line 48: | ||
| term_end2 = 11 September 1948 | | term_end2 = 11 September 1948 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Muhammad Ali Jinnah sidebar}} | {{Muhammad Ali Jinnah sidebar}} | ||
'''Muhammad Ali Jinnah''' (born '''Mahomedali Jinnahbhai'''; 25 December 1876 – 11 September 1948) was a barrister, politician and the [[List of Pakistan Movement activists|founder]] of [[Pakistan]].{{sfn|Ahmed|p=239}} Jinnah served as the leader of the [[All-India Muslim League]] from 1913 until the inception of Pakistan on 14 August 1947, and then as the [[Dominion of Pakistan]]'s first [[Governor-General of Pakistan|governor-general]] until his death. He is revered in Pakistan as the ''Quaid-i-Azam'' ("Great Leader") and ''Baba-i-Qaum'' ("[[Father of the Nation]]"). [[Jinnah's Birthday|His birthday]] is observed as a [[Public holidays in Pakistan|national holiday in Pakistan]]. | '''Muhammad Ali Jinnah''' ({{IPA-ur|moɦəmːəd̪ əliː d͡ʒɪnːɑːɦ}}, {{IPA-gu|məɦ(ə)məd̪ əli d͡ʒʱiɽ̃ɑ}}; born '''Mahomedali Jinnahbhai'''; 25 December 1876 – 11 September 1948) was a barrister, politician and the [[List of Pakistan Movement activists|founder]] of [[Pakistan]].{{sfn|Ahmed|p=239}} Jinnah served as the leader of the [[All-India Muslim League]] from 1913 until the inception of Pakistan on 14 August 1947, and then as the [[Dominion of Pakistan]]'s first [[Governor-General of Pakistan|governor-general]] until his death. He is revered in Pakistan as the ''Quaid-i-Azam'' ("Great Leader") and ''Baba-i-Qaum'' ("[[Father of the Nation]]"). [[Jinnah's Birthday|His birthday]] is observed as a [[Public holidays in Pakistan|national holiday in Pakistan]]. | ||
Born at [[Wazir Mansion]] in [[Karachi]], Jinnah was trained as a [[barrister]] at [[Lincoln's Inn]] in London, England. Upon his return to [[British Raj| | Born at [[Wazir Mansion]] in [[Karachi]], Jinnah was trained as a [[barrister]] at [[Lincoln's Inn]] in [[London]], England. Upon his return to [[British Raj|India]], he enrolled at the [[Bombay High Court]], and took an interest in national politics, which eventually replaced his legal practice. Jinnah rose to prominence in the [[Indian National Congress]] in the first two decades of the 20th century. In these early years of his political career, Jinnah advocated [[Hindu–Muslim unity]], helping to shape the 1916 [[Lucknow Pact]] between the Congress and the All-India Muslim League, in which Jinnah had also become prominent. Jinnah became a key leader in the [[Indian Home Rule movement|All-India Home Rule League]], and proposed a [[Fourteen Points of Jinnah|fourteen-point constitutional reform plan]] to safeguard the political rights of [[Muslims]] in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. In 1920, however, Jinnah resigned from the Congress when it agreed to follow a campaign of ''[[satyagraha]]'', which he regarded as [[Anarchism|political anarchy]]. | ||
By 1940, Jinnah had come to believe that the Muslims of the subcontinent should have their own state to avoid the possible marginalised status they may gain in an independent Hindu–Muslim state. In that year, the Muslim League, led by Jinnah, passed the [[Lahore Resolution]], demanding a separate nation for [[Presidencies and provinces of British India| | By 1940, Jinnah had come to believe that the Muslims of the subcontinent should have their own state to avoid the possible marginalised status they may gain in an independent Hindu–Muslim state. In that year, the Muslim League, led by Jinnah, passed the [[Lahore Resolution]], demanding a separate nation for [[Presidencies and provinces of British India|Indian]] Muslims. During the [[World War II|Second World War]], the League gained strength while leaders of the Congress were imprisoned, and in the [[1946 Indian provincial elections|provincial elections]] held shortly after the war, it won most of the seats reserved for Muslims. Ultimately, the Congress and the Muslim League could not reach a power-sharing formula that would allow the entirety of British India to be united as a single state following independence, leading all parties to agree instead to the independence of a predominantly [[Hindu]] India, and for a Muslim-majority state of Pakistan. | ||
As the first Governor-General of Pakistan, Jinnah worked to establish the new nation's government and policies, and to aid the millions of [[Muhajir (Urdu-speaking people)|Muslim migrants]] who had emigrated from neighbouring [[Dominion of India|India]] to Pakistan after the [[Partition of India|two states' independence]], personally supervising the establishment of refugee camps. Jinnah died at age 71 in September 1948, just over a year after Pakistan gained independence from the United Kingdom. He left a deep and respected legacy in Pakistan. Innumerable streets, roads and localities in the world are named after Jinnah. Several [[List of things named after Muhammad Ali Jinnah|universities and public buildings]] in Pakistan bear Jinnah's name. According to his biographer, [[Stanley Wolpert]], Jinnah remains Pakistan's greatest leader. | As the first Governor-General of Pakistan, Jinnah worked to establish the new nation's government and policies, and to aid the millions of [[Muhajir (Urdu-speaking people)|Muslim migrants]] who had emigrated from neighbouring [[Dominion of India|India]] to Pakistan after the [[Partition of India|two states' independence]], personally supervising the establishment of refugee camps. Jinnah died at age 71 in September 1948, just over a year after Pakistan gained independence from the United Kingdom. He left a deep and respected legacy in Pakistan. Innumerable streets, roads and localities in the world are named after Jinnah. Several [[List of things named after Muhammad Ali Jinnah|universities and public buildings]] in Pakistan bear Jinnah's name. According to his biographer, [[Stanley Wolpert]], Jinnah remains Pakistan's greatest leader. | ||
Line 64: | Line 62: | ||
{{See also|Jinnah family}} | {{See also|Jinnah family}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah Poonjha.jpg|thumb|upright|left|Portrait of Jinnah's father, Jinnahbhai Poonja]] | [[File:Jinnah Poonjha.jpg|thumb|upright|left|Portrait of Jinnah's father, Jinnahbhai Poonja]] | ||
As a boy, Jinnah lived for a time in Bombay with an aunt and may have attended the Gokal Das Tej Primary School there, later on studying at the [[Cathedral and John Connon School]]. In Karachi, he attended the [[Sindh-Madrasa-tul-Islam]] and the [[Church Mission School|Christian Missionary Society High School]].{{sfn|Singh|p=54}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}}<ref name=SharifDawnRest>Sharif, Azizullah. "[http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Karachi: Restoration of Church Mission School ordered]" ([https:// | Jinnah's given name at birth was Mahomedali Jinnahbhai,{{efn|{{lang-gu|મહમદ અલી ઝીણાભાઇ}}}} and he likely was born in 1876,{{efn|While [[Jinnah's birthday]] is celebrated as 25 December 1876, there is reason to doubt that date. Karachi did not then issue birth certificates, no record was kept by his family (birth dates being of little importance to Muslims of the time), and his school records reflect a birth date of 20 October 1875. See {{harvnb|Bolitho|p=3}}.}} to Jinnahbhai Poonja and his wife Mithibai, in a rented apartment on the second floor of [[Wazir Mansion]] near Karachi,<ref name="Moini 20 December 2003" /> now in [[Sindh]], Pakistan but then within the [[Bombay Presidency]] of [[British Raj|British India]]. Jinnah's paternal grandfather was from [[Paneli Moti]] village in [[Gondal, India|Gondal state]] in [[Kathiawar]] peninsula (now in [[Gujarat]], India).<ref name="Guttman2007">{{cite book|author=A. Guttman|title=The Nation of India in Contemporary Indian Literature|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uxqHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA34|date=15 October 2007|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan US|isbn=978-0-230-60693-7|pages=34–}}</ref> He was of a [[Gujarati people|Gujarati]] [[Khoja]] [[Nizari Isma'ilism|Nizari Isma'ili]] [[Shia Islam|Shi’a Muslim]] background, though Jinnah later followed the [[Twelver]] Shi'a teachings.<ref>{{cite book |last=Walsh |first=Judith E. |year=2017 |title=A Brief History of India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iekF9X3OwwMC&pg=PA173 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |page=173 |isbn=978-1-4381-0825-4 |quote=son of a middle-class merchant of the Muslim Khoja community who had migrated to Sind from Gujarat}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml|title=Was Jinnah a Shia or a Sunni?|first=Khaled|last=Ahmed|date=24 December 2010|work=The Friday Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117111449/http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml |archive-date=17 November 2011}}</ref> After his death, his relatives and other witnesses claimed that he had converted in later life to the [[Sunni Islam|Sunni]] sect of [[Islam]]. His sectarian affiliation at the time of his death was disputed in multiple court cases.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4">{{harvnb|Ahmed|p=4}}: "Although born into a Khoja (from ''khwaja'' or 'noble') family who were disciples of the Ismaili Aga Khan, Jinnah moved towards the Sunni sect early in life. There is evidence later, given by his relatives and associates in court, to establish that he was firmly a Sunni Muslim by the end of his life."</ref> Jinnah was from a wealthy merchant background. His father was a merchant and was born to a family of textile weavers in the village of Paneli in the [[princely state]] of [[Gondal State|Gondal]] (Kathiawar, Gujarat); his mother was also of that village. They had moved to Karachi in 1875, having married before their departure. Karachi was then enjoying an economic boom: the opening of the [[Suez Canal]] in 1869 meant it was 200 nautical miles closer to Europe for shipping than [[Mumbai|Bombay]].{{sfn|Singh|pp=30–33}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=3–5}} Jinnah was the second child;<ref name="Anjali Desai" />{{sfn|Ahmed|p=3}} he had three brothers and three sisters, including his younger sister [[Fatima Jinnah]]. The parents were native [[Gujarati language|Gujarati]] speakers, and the children also came to speak [[Kutchi language|Kutchi]] and English.{{sfn|Jinnah, Fatima|pp=48–49}} Jinnah was not fluent in Gujarati, his mother-tongue, nor in Urdu; he was more fluent in English.{{sfn|Swamy|1997|ps=: "The future Mahatma insisted that the speeches be made in Gujarati by the Gujarati-speaking delegates. Jinnah, whose fluency in his mother-tongue of Gujarati was limited, objected to the suggestion."}}{{sfn|Ghosh|1999|ps=: "Jinnah was not as fluent in his mother tongue or for that matter in any other Indian language as in English."}}{{sfn|Malik|2006|ps=: "M.A. Jinnah was more fluent in English than in Urdu or his native Sindhi/Gujarati."}} Except for Fatima, little is known of his siblings, where they settled or if they met with their brother as he advanced in his legal and political careers.{{sfn|Puri|p=34}} He has sometimes been referred to as a [[Muhajir (Pakistan)|Muhajir]] by some writers because of his Gujarati ethnicity.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/949668196 |title=Pakistan at the crossroads : domestic dynamics and external pressures |date=2016 |editor-last=Jaffrelot |editor-first=Christophe |isbn=978-0-231-54025-4 |location=New York |oclc=949668196}}</ref> However, labelling him a "Muhajir" is equivocal due to its official definition referring to Muslim refugees who migrated to Pakistan after the 1947 partition.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pakistan - People {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Pakistan/People |access-date=2023-03-07 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> | ||
As a boy, Jinnah lived for a time in Bombay with an aunt and may have attended the Gokal Das Tej Primary School there, later on studying at the [[Cathedral and John Connon School]]. In Karachi, he attended the [[Sindh-Madrasa-tul-Islam]] and the [[Church Mission School|Christian Missionary Society High School]].{{sfn|Singh|p=54}}{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}}<ref name=SharifDawnRest>Sharif, Azizullah. "[http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Karachi: Restoration of Church Mission School ordered]" ([https://web.archive.org/web/20140526033854/http://www.dawn.com/news/521273/karachi-restoration-of-church-mission-school-ordered Archive]). ''[[Dawn (newspaper)|Dawn]]''. 20 February 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2014. "Taking notice of the highly dilapidated and bad condition of the Church Mission School (CMS) where Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah had studied,[...]"</ref> He gained his matriculation from [[Bombay University]] at the high school. In his later years and especially after his death, a large number of stories about the boyhood of Pakistan's founder were circulated: that he spent all his spare time at the police court, listening to the proceedings, and that he studied his books by the glow of street lights for lack of other illumination. His official biographer, [[Hector Bolitho]], writing in 1954, interviewed surviving boyhood associates, and obtained a tale that the young Jinnah discouraged other children from playing marbles in the dust, urging them to rise up, keep their hands and clothes clean, and play cricket instead.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=5–7}} | |||
=== Education in England === | === Education in England === | ||
Line 87: | Line 86: | ||
At the age of 20, Jinnah began his practice in Bombay, the only Muslim barrister in the city.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=3}} English had become his principal language and would remain so throughout his life. His first three years in the law, from 1897 to 1900, brought him few briefs. His first step towards a brighter career occurred when the acting [[Advocate General]] of Bombay, John Molesworth MacPherson, invited Jinnah to work from his chambers.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=14–17}}{{sfn|Wolpert|p=17}}<!-- The anecdote is in pages numbered nearly identically in both books. --> In 1900, P. H. Dastoor, a [[Bombay Presidency#Administration|Bombay presidency magistrate]], left the post temporarily and Jinnah succeeded in getting the interim position. After his six-month appointment period, Jinnah was offered a permanent position on a 1,500 rupee per month salary. Jinnah politely declined the offer, stating that he planned to earn 1,500 rupees a day—a huge sum at that time—which he eventually did.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=14–17}}{{sfn|Wolpert|p=17}}{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=4–5}} Nevertheless, as [[Governor-General of Pakistan]], he would refuse to accept a large salary, fixing it at 1 [[Pakistani rupee|rupee]] per month.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=212}} | At the age of 20, Jinnah began his practice in Bombay, the only Muslim barrister in the city.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=3}} English had become his principal language and would remain so throughout his life. His first three years in the law, from 1897 to 1900, brought him few briefs. His first step towards a brighter career occurred when the acting [[Advocate General]] of Bombay, John Molesworth MacPherson, invited Jinnah to work from his chambers.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=14–17}}{{sfn|Wolpert|p=17}}<!-- The anecdote is in pages numbered nearly identically in both books. --> In 1900, P. H. Dastoor, a [[Bombay Presidency#Administration|Bombay presidency magistrate]], left the post temporarily and Jinnah succeeded in getting the interim position. After his six-month appointment period, Jinnah was offered a permanent position on a 1,500 rupee per month salary. Jinnah politely declined the offer, stating that he planned to earn 1,500 rupees a day—a huge sum at that time—which he eventually did.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=14–17}}{{sfn|Wolpert|p=17}}{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=4–5}} Nevertheless, as [[Governor-General of Pakistan]], he would refuse to accept a large salary, fixing it at 1 [[Pakistani rupee|rupee]] per month.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=212}} | ||
As a lawyer, Jinnah gained fame for his skilled handling of the 1908 "[[Caucus Case]]". This controversy arose out of Bombay municipal elections, which Indians alleged were rigged by a "caucus" of Europeans to keep Sir [[Pherozeshah Mehta]] out of the council.<ref>{{cite web |title=THE CAUCUS CASE | As a lawyer, Jinnah gained fame for his skilled handling of the 1908 "[[Caucus Case]]". This controversy arose out of Bombay municipal elections, which Indians alleged were rigged by a "caucus" of Europeans to keep Sir [[Pherozeshah Mehta]] out of the council.<ref>{{cite web |title=THE CAUCUS CASE – 1908 |url=https://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/libweb/historicalcases/cases/The_Caucus_Case_-_1908.html |website=bombayhighcourt.nic.in |access-date=13 January 2021}}</ref> Jinnah gained great esteem from leading the case for Sir Pherozeshah, himself a noted barrister. Although Jinnah did not win the Caucus Case, he posted a successful record, becoming well known for his advocacy and legal logic.<ref name="lawyer" />{{sfn|Bolitho|p=20}} In 1908, his factional foe in the [[Indian National Congress]], [[Bal Gangadhar Tilak]], was arrested for sedition. Before Tilak unsuccessfully represented himself at trial, he engaged Jinnah in an attempt to secure his release on bail. Jinnah did not succeed, but obtained an acquittal for Tilak when he was charged with sedition again in 1916.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=29}} | ||
One of Jinnah's fellow barristers from the Bombay High Court remembered that "Jinnah's faith in himself was incredible"; he recalled that on being admonished by a judge with "Mr. Jinnah, remember that you are not addressing a third-class magistrate", Jinnah shot back, "My Lord, allow me to warn you that you are not addressing a third-class pleader."{{sfn|Bolitho|p=17}} Another of his fellow barristers described him, saying: | One of Jinnah's fellow barristers from the Bombay High Court remembered that "Jinnah's faith in himself was incredible"; he recalled that on being admonished by a judge with "Mr. Jinnah, remember that you are not addressing a third-class magistrate", Jinnah shot back, "My Lord, allow me to warn you that you are not addressing a third-class pleader."{{sfn|Bolitho|p=17}} Another of his fellow barristers described him, saying: | ||
Line 96: | Line 95: | ||
=== Trade unionist === | === Trade unionist === | ||
Jinnah was also a supporter of working class causes and an active trade unionist.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com">{{Cite | Jinnah was also a supporter of working class causes and an active trade unionist.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com">{{Cite news |url=https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=04_11_2017_002_008|title='Pakistan's founder worked as a trade union leader' |work=Dawn |date=4 November 2017 |access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> He was elected President of [[All India Postal Staff Union]] in 1925 whose membership was 70,000.<ref name="epaper.dawn.com" /> According to All [[Pakistan Labour Federation]]'s publication ''Productive Role of Trade Unions and Industrial Relations'', being a member of Legislative Assembly, Jinnah pleaded forcefully for rights of workers and struggled for getting a "living wage and fair conditions" for them.<ref name="Quaid backed labour struggle">{{Cite news|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/121891|title=Quaid backed labour struggle|date=27 October 2003|work=Dawn|access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> He also played an important role in enactment of Trade Union act of 1926 which gave trade union movement legal cover to organise themselves.<ref name="Quaid backed labour struggle" /> | ||
=== Rising leader === | === Rising leader === | ||
Line 119: | Line 118: | ||
In 1918, Jinnah married his second wife [[Rattanbai Petit]] ("Ruttie"), 24 years his junior. She was the fashionable young daughter of his friend [[Petit baronets#Petit Baronets, of Petit Hall (1890)|Sir Dinshaw Petit]], and was part of an elite [[Parsi people|Parsi]] family of Bombay.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> There was great opposition to the marriage from Rattanbai's family and the Parsi community, as well as from some Muslim religious leaders. Rattanbai defied her family and nominally [[converted to Islam]], adopting (though never using) the name Maryam Jinnah, resulting in a permanent estrangement from her family and Parsi society. The couple resided at [[South Court|South Court Mansion]] in Bombay, and frequently travelled across India and Europe. The couple's only child, daughter [[Dina Wadia|Dina]], was born on 15 August 1919.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> The couple separated prior to Ruttie's death in 1929, and subsequently Jinnah's sister [[Fatima Jinnah|Fatima]] looked after him and his child.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=11–15}} | In 1918, Jinnah married his second wife [[Rattanbai Petit]] ("Ruttie"), 24 years his junior. She was the fashionable young daughter of his friend [[Petit baronets#Petit Baronets, of Petit Hall (1890)|Sir Dinshaw Petit]], and was part of an elite [[Parsi people|Parsi]] family of Bombay.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> There was great opposition to the marriage from Rattanbai's family and the Parsi community, as well as from some Muslim religious leaders. Rattanbai defied her family and nominally [[converted to Islam]], adopting (though never using) the name Maryam Jinnah, resulting in a permanent estrangement from her family and Parsi society. The couple resided at [[South Court|South Court Mansion]] in Bombay, and frequently travelled across India and Europe. The couple's only child, daughter [[Dina Wadia|Dina]], was born on 15 August 1919.<ref name="Mehmood p725" /> The couple separated prior to Ruttie's death in 1929, and subsequently Jinnah's sister [[Fatima Jinnah|Fatima]] looked after him and his child.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=11–15}} | ||
Relations between Indians and British were strained in 1919 when the Imperial Legislative Council extended emergency wartime restrictions on civil liberties; Jinnah resigned from it when it did. There was unrest across India, which worsened after the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] in [[Amritsar]], in which British troops fired upon a protest meeting, killing hundreds. In the wake of Amritsar, Gandhi, who had returned to India and become a widely respected leader and highly influential in the Congress, called for ''satyagraha'' against the British. Gandhi's proposal gained broad Hindu support, and was also attractive to many Muslims of the [[Khilafat Movement|Khilafat]] faction. These Muslims, supported by Gandhi, sought retention of the [[Ottoman caliphate]], which supplied spiritual leadership to many Muslims. The caliph was the [[Ottoman Emperor]], who would be deprived of both offices following his nation's defeat in the First World War. Gandhi had achieved considerable popularity among Muslims because of his work during the war on behalf of killed or imprisoned Muslims.{{sfn|Singh|pp=90–93}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=61–71}}{{sfn|Mohiuddin|p=61}} Unlike Jinnah and other leaders of the Congress, Gandhi did not wear western-style clothing, did his best to use [[Languages of India|an Indian language]] instead of English, and was deeply rooted in Indian culture. Gandhi's local style of leadership gained great popularity with the Indian people. Jinnah criticised Gandhi's Khilafat advocacy, which he saw as an endorsement of religious zealotry.{{sfn|Jalal|p=8}} Jinnah regarded Gandhi's proposed ''satyagraha'' campaign as political anarchy, and believed that self-government should be secured through constitutional means. He opposed Gandhi, but the tide of Indian opinion was against him. At the 1920 session of the Congress in [[Nagpur]], Jinnah was shouted down by the delegates, who passed Gandhi's proposal, pledging ''satyagraha'' until India was independent. Jinnah did not attend the subsequent League meeting, held in the same city, which passed a similar resolution. Because of the action of the Congress in endorsing Gandhi's campaign, Jinnah resigned from it, leaving all positions except in the Muslim League.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=84–85}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=71–72}} | Relations between Indians and British were strained in 1919 when the Imperial Legislative Council extended emergency wartime restrictions on civil liberties; Jinnah resigned from it when it did. There was unrest across India, which worsened after the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] in [[Amritsar]], in which [[British Indian Army]] troops fired upon a protest meeting, killing hundreds. In the wake of Amritsar, Gandhi, who had returned to India and become a widely respected leader and highly influential in the Congress, called for ''satyagraha'' against the British. Gandhi's proposal gained broad Hindu support, and was also attractive to many Muslims of the [[Khilafat Movement|Khilafat]] faction. These Muslims, supported by Gandhi, sought retention of the [[Ottoman caliphate]], which supplied spiritual leadership to many Muslims. The caliph was the [[Ottoman Emperor]], who would be deprived of both offices following his nation's defeat in the First World War. Gandhi had achieved considerable popularity among Muslims because of his work during the war on behalf of killed or imprisoned Muslims.{{sfn|Singh|pp=90–93}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=61–71}}{{sfn|Mohiuddin|p=61}} Unlike Jinnah and other leaders of the Congress, Gandhi did not wear western-style clothing, did his best to use [[Languages of India|an Indian language]] instead of English, and was deeply rooted in Indian culture. Gandhi's local style of leadership gained great popularity with the Indian people. Jinnah criticised Gandhi's Khilafat advocacy, which he saw as an endorsement of religious zealotry.{{sfn|Jalal|p=8}} Jinnah regarded Gandhi's proposed ''satyagraha'' campaign as political anarchy, and believed that self-government should be secured through constitutional means. He opposed Gandhi, but the tide of Indian opinion was against him. At the 1920 session of the Congress in [[Nagpur]], Jinnah was shouted down by the delegates, who passed Gandhi's proposal, pledging ''satyagraha'' until India was independent. Jinnah did not attend the subsequent League meeting, held in the same city, which passed a similar resolution. Because of the action of the Congress in endorsing Gandhi's campaign, Jinnah resigned from it, leaving all positions except in the Muslim League.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=84–85}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=71–72}} | ||
== Wilderness years; interlude in England == | == Wilderness years; interlude in England == | ||
Line 131: | Line 130: | ||
After Baldwin was defeated at the [[1929 United Kingdom general election|1929 British parliamentary election]], [[Ramsay MacDonald]] of the [[Labour Party (United Kingdom)|Labour Party]] became prime minister. MacDonald desired a conference of Indian and British leaders in London to discuss India's future, a course of action supported by Jinnah. Three [[Round Table Conferences (India)|Round Table Conferences]] followed over as many years, none of which resulted in a settlement. Jinnah was a delegate to the first two conferences, but was not invited to the last.{{sfn|Singh|p=170}} He remained in Britain for most of the period 1930 through 1934, practising as a barrister before the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|Privy Council]], where he dealt with a number of India-related cases. His biographers disagree over why he remained so long in Britain—Wolpert asserts that had Jinnah been made a [[Lord of Appeal in Ordinary|Law Lord]], he would have stayed for life, and that Jinnah alternatively sought a parliamentary seat.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=119–130}} Early biographer [[Hector Bolitho]] denied that Jinnah sought to enter the British Parliament,{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}} while Jaswant Singh deems Jinnah's time in Britain as a break or sabbatical from the Indian struggle.{{sfn|Singh|p=172}} Bolitho called this period "Jinnah's years of order and contemplation, wedged in between the time of early struggle, and the final storm of conquest".{{sfn|Bolitho|p=102}} | After Baldwin was defeated at the [[1929 United Kingdom general election|1929 British parliamentary election]], [[Ramsay MacDonald]] of the [[Labour Party (United Kingdom)|Labour Party]] became prime minister. MacDonald desired a conference of Indian and British leaders in London to discuss India's future, a course of action supported by Jinnah. Three [[Round Table Conferences (India)|Round Table Conferences]] followed over as many years, none of which resulted in a settlement. Jinnah was a delegate to the first two conferences, but was not invited to the last.{{sfn|Singh|p=170}} He remained in Britain for most of the period 1930 through 1934, practising as a barrister before the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|Privy Council]], where he dealt with a number of India-related cases. His biographers disagree over why he remained so long in Britain—Wolpert asserts that had Jinnah been made a [[Lord of Appeal in Ordinary|Law Lord]], he would have stayed for life, and that Jinnah alternatively sought a parliamentary seat.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=119–130}} Early biographer [[Hector Bolitho]] denied that Jinnah sought to enter the British Parliament,{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=99–100}} while Jaswant Singh deems Jinnah's time in Britain as a break or sabbatical from the Indian struggle.{{sfn|Singh|p=172}} Bolitho called this period "Jinnah's years of order and contemplation, wedged in between the time of early struggle, and the final storm of conquest".{{sfn|Bolitho|p=102}} | ||
In 1931, [[Fatima Jinnah]] joined her brother in England. From then on, Muhammad Jinnah would receive personal care and support from her as he aged and began to suffer from the lung ailments which would kill him. She lived and travelled with him, and became a close advisor. Muhammad Jinnah's daughter, Dina, was educated in England and India. Jinnah later became estranged from Dina after she decided to marry a Parsi, [[Neville Wadia]] from a prominent [[Parsi]] business family. Wadia is the son Sir Ness Wadia and | In 1931, [[Fatima Jinnah]] joined her brother in England. From then on, Muhammad Jinnah would receive personal care and support from her as he aged and began to suffer from the lung ailments which would kill him. She lived and travelled with him, and became a close advisor. Muhammad Jinnah's daughter, Dina, was educated in England and India. Jinnah later became estranged from Dina after she decided to marry a Parsi, [[Neville Wadia]] from a prominent [[Parsi]] business family. Wadia is the son Sir Ness Wadia and Dr. Homi Wadia.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Singh|first=Kuldip|title=Obituary: Neville Wadia|journal=The Independent|date=6 August 1996|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituaryneville-wadia-1308408.html}}</ref> When Jinnah urged Dina to marry a Muslim, she reminded him that he had married a woman not raised in his faith. Jinnah continued to correspond cordially with his daughter, but their personal relationship was strained, and she did not come to Pakistan in his lifetime, but only for his funeral.{{sfn|Bolitho|pp=101–102}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=370–371}} | ||
== Return to politics == | == Return to politics == | ||
Line 143: | Line 142: | ||
According to [[Jaswant Singh]], "the events of 1937 had a tremendous, almost a traumatic effect upon Jinnah".{{sfn|Singh|p=188}} Despite his beliefs of twenty years that Muslims could protect their rights in a united India through separate electorates, provincial boundaries drawn to preserve Muslim majorities, and by other protections of minority rights, Muslim voters had failed to unite, with the issues Jinnah hoped to bring forward lost amid factional fighting.{{sfn|Singh|p=188}}{{sfn|Jalal|p=35}} Singh notes the effect of the 1937 elections on Muslim political opinion, "when the Congress formed a government with almost all of the Muslim [[Member of the Legislative Assembly (India)|MLAs]] sitting on the Opposition benches, non-Congress Muslims were suddenly faced with this stark reality of near-total political powerlessness. It was brought home to them, like a bolt of lightning, that even if the Congress did not win a single Muslim seat ... as long as it won an absolute majority in the House, on the strength of the general seats, it could and would form a government entirely on its own ..."{{sfn|Singh|p=198}} | According to [[Jaswant Singh]], "the events of 1937 had a tremendous, almost a traumatic effect upon Jinnah".{{sfn|Singh|p=188}} Despite his beliefs of twenty years that Muslims could protect their rights in a united India through separate electorates, provincial boundaries drawn to preserve Muslim majorities, and by other protections of minority rights, Muslim voters had failed to unite, with the issues Jinnah hoped to bring forward lost amid factional fighting.{{sfn|Singh|p=188}}{{sfn|Jalal|p=35}} Singh notes the effect of the 1937 elections on Muslim political opinion, "when the Congress formed a government with almost all of the Muslim [[Member of the Legislative Assembly (India)|MLAs]] sitting on the Opposition benches, non-Congress Muslims were suddenly faced with this stark reality of near-total political powerlessness. It was brought home to them, like a bolt of lightning, that even if the Congress did not win a single Muslim seat ... as long as it won an absolute majority in the House, on the strength of the general seats, it could and would form a government entirely on its own ..."{{sfn|Singh|p=198}} | ||
In the next two years, Jinnah worked to build support among Muslims for the League. He secured the right to speak for the Muslim-led Bengali and [[Punjab (British India)|Punjabi]] provincial governments in the central government in New Delhi ("the centre"). He worked to expand the League, reducing the cost of membership to two [[Indian anna|annas]] ( | In the next two years, Jinnah worked to build support among Muslims for the League. He secured the right to speak for the Muslim-led Bengali and [[Punjab (British India)|Punjabi]] provincial governments in the central government in New Delhi ("the centre"). He worked to expand the League, reducing the cost of membership to two [[Indian anna|annas]] ({{frac|1|8}} of a rupee), half of what it cost to join the Congress. He restructured the League along the lines of the Congress, putting most power in a Working Committee, which he appointed.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=39–41}} By December 1939, Liaquat estimated that the League had three million two-anna members.{{sfn|Moore|p=548}} | ||
== Struggle for Pakistan == | == Struggle for Pakistan == | ||
{{ | {{Main|Pakistan Movement}} | ||
=== Background to independence === | === Background to independence === | ||
Line 154: | Line 153: | ||
Although many leaders of the Congress sought a strong central government for an Indian state, some Muslim politicians, including Jinnah, were unwilling to accept this without powerful protections for their community.{{sfn|Moore|p=532}} Other Muslims supported the Congress, which officially advocated a secular state upon independence, though the traditionalist wing (including politicians such as [[Madan Mohan Malaviya]] and [[Vallabhbhai Patel]]) believed that an independent India should enact laws such as banning the killing of cows and making [[Hindi]] a national language. The failure of the Congress leadership to disavow Hindu [[Communalism (South Asia)|communalists]] worried Congress-supporting Muslims. Nevertheless, the Congress enjoyed considerable Muslim support up to about 1937.{{sfn|Hibbard|pp=121–124}} | Although many leaders of the Congress sought a strong central government for an Indian state, some Muslim politicians, including Jinnah, were unwilling to accept this without powerful protections for their community.{{sfn|Moore|p=532}} Other Muslims supported the Congress, which officially advocated a secular state upon independence, though the traditionalist wing (including politicians such as [[Madan Mohan Malaviya]] and [[Vallabhbhai Patel]]) believed that an independent India should enact laws such as banning the killing of cows and making [[Hindi]] a national language. The failure of the Congress leadership to disavow Hindu [[Communalism (South Asia)|communalists]] worried Congress-supporting Muslims. Nevertheless, the Congress enjoyed considerable Muslim support up to about 1937.{{sfn|Hibbard|pp=121–124}} | ||
Events which separated the communities included the failed attempt to form a coalition government including the Congress and the League in the United Provinces following the 1937 election.{{sfn|Hibbard|p=124}} According to historian Ian Talbot, "The provincial Congress governments made no effort to understand and respect their Muslim populations' cultural and religious sensibilities. The Muslim League's claims that it alone could safeguard Muslim interests thus received a major boost. Significantly it was only after this period of Congress rule that it [the League] took up the demand for a Pakistan state ..."<ref name = "HistoryToday" /> | Events which separated the communities included the failed attempt to form a coalition government including the Congress and the League in the United Provinces following the 1937 election.{{sfn|Hibbard|p=124}} According to historian Ian Talbot, "The provincial Congress governments made no effort to understand and respect their Muslim populations' cultural and religious sensibilities. The Muslim League's claims that it alone could safeguard Muslim interests thus received a major boost. Significantly it was only after this period of Congress rule that it [the League] took up the demand for a Pakistan state ..."<ref name="HistoryToday" /> | ||
Balraj Puri in his journal article about Jinnah suggests that the Muslim League president, after the 1937 vote, turned to the idea of partition in "sheer desperation".{{sfn|Puri|p=35}} Historian [[Akbar S. Ahmed]] suggests that Jinnah abandoned hope of reconciliation with the Congress as he "rediscover[ed] his own Islamic roots, his own sense of identity, of culture and history, which would come increasingly to the fore in the final years of his life".{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}} Jinnah also increasingly adopted Muslim dress in the late 1930s.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=8}} In the wake of the 1937 balloting, Jinnah demanded that the question of power sharing be settled on an all-India basis, and that he, as president of the League, be accepted as the sole spokesman for the Muslim community.{{sfn|Singh|p=200}} | Balraj Puri in his journal article about Jinnah suggests that the Muslim League president, after the 1937 vote, turned to the idea of partition in "sheer desperation".{{sfn|Puri|p=35}} Historian [[Akbar S. Ahmed]] suggests that Jinnah abandoned hope of reconciliation with the Congress as he "rediscover[ed] his own Islamic roots, his own sense of identity, of culture and history, which would come increasingly to the fore in the final years of his life".{{sfn|Ahmed|p=26}} Jinnah also increasingly adopted Muslim dress in the late 1930s.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=8}} In the wake of the 1937 balloting, Jinnah demanded that the question of power sharing be settled on an all-India basis, and that he, as president of the League, be accepted as the sole spokesman for the Muslim community.{{sfn|Singh|p=200}} | ||
Line 163: | Line 162: | ||
| source = [[Muhammad Iqbal]], 1938<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allamaiqbal.com/person/movement/move_main.htm |title=Iqbal and Pakistan Movement |publisher=Allamaiqbal.com |access-date=31 October 2017}}</ref>}} | | source = [[Muhammad Iqbal]], 1938<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allamaiqbal.com/person/movement/move_main.htm |title=Iqbal and Pakistan Movement |publisher=Allamaiqbal.com |access-date=31 October 2017}}</ref>}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah with Iqbal.jpg|thumb|Jinnah seated with Iqbal at the round table conference]] | [[File:Jinnah with Iqbal.jpg|thumb|Jinnah seated with Iqbal at the round table conference]] | ||
The well documented influence of Iqbal on Jinnah, with regard to taking the lead in creating Pakistan, has been described as "significant", "powerful" and even "unquestionable" by scholars.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Paul |first1=T. |year=2014 |title=The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYBeAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 |pages=37–38 |isbn=978-0-19-932223-7 |quote=Iqbal wrote several letters to Jinnah in 1937 persuading him to take the lead in creating Pakistan... These correspondences would change the way Jinnah would look at the issue of a separate homeland for Muslims.}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Kenworthy|first1=Leonard|year=1968|title=Leaders of New Nations|url=https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw/page/230 230]|quote=Iqbal's influence was perhaps the most powerful in Jinnah's decision to support the partition|publisher=Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Iqbal|first1=Khurshid|year=2009|title=The Right to Development in International Law: The Case of Pakistan|series=Routledge Research in Human Rights Law|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SDx9AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT220|isbn=978-1-134-01998-4|quote=Jinnah's views were significantly influenced by the ideas of Muhammad Iqbal}}<br />{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V |issue=2|page=151|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf|quote=Iqbal's influence on Jinnah is unquestionable}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Shah|first1=Mujawar|title=Religion and Politics in Pakistan: 1972–88|date=1996|page=35|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qRbXAAAAMAAJ&q=iqbal+influence|isbn=9789698329013|quote=Iqbal's correspondence with Jinnah also played an important role in formulating his course of action}}<br />{{cite journal|title=The Concept|journal=Pakistani Periodicals|year=2006|volume=26|issue=1–6|page=21|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j-NtAAAAMAAJ&q=influenced+|quote=Certainly these views influenced Mr Jinnah to declare urgently a solid solution to the Indian constitutional problem by projecting Muslims as a separate body}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Naik|first1=Vasant|year=1947|title=Mr. Jinnah: A Political Study|page=55|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4b9fS1kA4aMC&q=jinnah+iqbal+influence|quote=the biographer of Jinnah admits 'that these letters of Iqbal exercised influence on the mind of Mohamed Ali Jinnah.'}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Saleena Karim|title=Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What the Nation Doesn't Know|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MGiuSgAACAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Checkpoint Press|isbn=978-1-906628-22-2|page=25}}</ref> Iqbal has also been cited as an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London and re-enter the politics of India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ziring |first1=Lawrence |year=1980 |title=Pakistan: The Enigma of Political Development |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jgSOAAAAMAAJ&q=%22it+was+Iqbal+who+encouraged+Jinnah+to+return+to+India.%22 |page=67 |isbn=978-0-7129-0954-9 |quote=It was Iqbal who encouraged Jinnah to return to India}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Aziz|first1=Qutubuddin|year=2001|title=Jinnah and Pakistan|page=98|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1wluAAAAMAAJ|quote=Iqbal's persuasive letter to Jinnah in London to return to India and undertake the leadership of the Muslim League....undoubtedly contributed to Jinnah's eventual decision to return to India permanently}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Singh|first1=Iqbal|year=1951|title=The Ardent Pilgrim: An Introduction to the Life and Work of Mohammed Iqbal|page=153|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L_pjAAAAMAAJ|isbn=978-0-19-563979-7|quote=Iqbal was indirectly responsible for Jinnah's return to India from London}}<br />{{cite encyclopedia |title=Global Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophy |year=2010 |publisher=Global Vision Publishing House |pages=342 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U7xOAQAAIAAJ|isbn=9788182202948 |quote=Iqbal was an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London.}}</ref> Initially, however, Iqbal and Jinnah were opponents, as Iqbal believed Jinnah did not care about the crises confronting the Muslim community during the British Raj. According to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], this began to change during Iqbal's final years prior to his death in 1938. Iqbal gradually succeeded in converting Jinnah over to his view, who eventually accepted Iqbal as his ''"mentor"''. Ahmed comments that in his annotations to Iqbal's letters, Jinnah expressed solidarity with Iqbal's view: that Indian Muslims required a separate homeland.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=62–73}} | The well documented influence of Iqbal on Jinnah, with regard to taking the lead in creating Pakistan, has been described as "significant", "powerful" and even "unquestionable" by scholars.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Paul |first1=T. |year=2014 |title=The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYBeAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 |pages=37–38 |isbn=978-0-19-932223-7 |quote=Iqbal wrote several letters to Jinnah in 1937 persuading him to take the lead in creating Pakistan... These correspondences would change the way Jinnah would look at the issue of a separate homeland for Muslims.}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Kenworthy|first1=Leonard|year=1968|title=Leaders of New Nations|url=https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw|url-access=registration|page=[https://archive.org/details/leadersofnewnati00kenw/page/230 230]|quote=Iqbal's influence was perhaps the most powerful in Jinnah's decision to support the partition|publisher=Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Iqbal|first1=Khurshid|year=2009|title=The Right to Development in International Law: The Case of Pakistan|series=Routledge Research in Human Rights Law|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SDx9AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT220|isbn=978-1-134-01998-4|quote=Jinnah's views were significantly influenced by the ideas of Muhammad Iqbal}}<br />{{cite journal|last1=Khan|first1=Zamir|date=30 June 2010|title=Iqbal and Quaid's Vision of Pakistan|journal=The Dialogue|volume=V |issue=2|page=151|url=http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/The%20Dialogue/5_2/Dialogue_April_June2010_136-164.pdf|quote=Iqbal's influence on Jinnah is unquestionable}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Shah|first1=Mujawar|title=Religion and Politics in Pakistan: 1972–88|date=1996|page=35|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qRbXAAAAMAAJ&q=iqbal+influence|isbn=9789698329013|quote=Iqbal's correspondence with Jinnah also played an important role in formulating his course of action}}<br />{{cite journal|title=The Concept|journal=Pakistani Periodicals|year=2006|volume=26|issue=1–6|page=21|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j-NtAAAAMAAJ&q=influenced+|quote=Certainly these views influenced Mr Jinnah to declare urgently a solid solution to the Indian constitutional problem by projecting Muslims as a separate body}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Naik|first1=Vasant|year=1947|title=Mr. Jinnah: A Political Study|page=55|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4b9fS1kA4aMC&q=jinnah+iqbal+influence|quote=the biographer of Jinnah admits 'that these letters of Iqbal exercised influence on the mind of Mohamed Ali Jinnah.'}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Saleena Karim|title=Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What the Nation Doesn't Know|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MGiuSgAACAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Checkpoint Press|isbn=978-1-906628-22-2|page=25}}</ref> Iqbal has also been cited as an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London and re-enter the politics of India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ziring |first1=Lawrence |year=1980 |title=Pakistan: The Enigma of Political Development |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jgSOAAAAMAAJ&q=%22it+was+Iqbal+who+encouraged+Jinnah+to+return+to+India.%22 |page=67 |isbn=978-0-7129-0954-9 |quote=It was Iqbal who encouraged Jinnah to return to India}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Aziz|first1=Qutubuddin|year=2001|title=Jinnah and Pakistan|page=98|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1wluAAAAMAAJ|quote=Iqbal's persuasive letter to Jinnah in London to return to India and undertake the leadership of the Muslim League....undoubtedly contributed to Jinnah's eventual decision to return to India permanently}}<br />{{cite book|last1=Singh|first1=Iqbal|year=1951|title=The Ardent Pilgrim: An Introduction to the Life and Work of Mohammed Iqbal|page=153|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L_pjAAAAMAAJ|isbn=978-0-19-563979-7|quote=Iqbal was indirectly responsible for Jinnah's return to India from London}}<br />{{cite encyclopedia |title=Global Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophy |year=2010 |publisher=Global Vision Publishing House |pages=342 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U7xOAQAAIAAJ|isbn=9788182202948 |quote=Iqbal was an influential force in convincing Jinnah to end his self-imposed exile in London.}}</ref> Initially, however, Iqbal and Jinnah were opponents, as Iqbal believed Jinnah did not care about the crises confronting the Muslim community during the British Raj. According to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], this began to change during Iqbal's final years prior to his death in 1938. Iqbal gradually succeeded in converting Jinnah over to his view, who eventually accepted Iqbal as his ''"mentor"''. Ahmed comments that in his annotations to Iqbal's letters, Jinnah expressed solidarity with Iqbal's view: that Indian Muslims required a separate homeland.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=62–73}} | ||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
=== Second World War and Lahore Resolution === | === Second World War and Lahore Resolution === | ||
{{ | {{Main|Lahore Resolution}} | ||
[[File:Muslim League leaders after a dinner party, 1940 (Photo 429-6).jpg|thumb|right|The leaders of the Muslim League, 1940. Jinnah is seated at centre.]] | |||
On 3 September 1939, British Prime Minister [[Neville Chamberlain]] announced the commencement of war with [[Nazi Germany]].{{sfn|Bolitho|p=123}} The following day, the Viceroy, [[Victor Hope, 2nd Marquess of Linlithgow|Lord Linlithgow]], without consulting Indian political leaders, announced that India had entered the war along with Britain. There were widespread protests in India. After meeting with Jinnah and with Gandhi, Linlithgow announced that negotiations on self-government were suspended for the duration of the war.{{sfn|Singh|p=223}} The Congress on 14 September demanded immediate independence with a constituent assembly to decide a constitution; when this was refused, its eight provincial governments resigned on 10 November and governors in those provinces thereafter ruled by decree for the remainder of the war. Jinnah, on the other hand, was more willing to accommodate the British, and they in turn increasingly recognised him and the League as the representatives of India's Muslims.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=47–49}} Jinnah later stated, "after the war began, ... I was treated on the same basis as Mr Gandhi. I was wonderstruck why I was promoted and given a place side by side with Mr Gandhi."{{sfn|Singh|pp=225–226}} Although the League did not actively support the British war effort, neither did they try to obstruct it.{{sfn|Singh|p=225}} | On 3 September 1939, British Prime Minister [[Neville Chamberlain]] announced the commencement of war with [[Nazi Germany]].{{sfn|Bolitho|p=123}} The following day, the Viceroy, [[Victor Hope, 2nd Marquess of Linlithgow|Lord Linlithgow]], without consulting Indian political leaders, announced that India had entered the war along with Britain. There were widespread protests in India. After meeting with Jinnah and with Gandhi, Linlithgow announced that negotiations on self-government were suspended for the duration of the war.{{sfn|Singh|p=223}} The Congress on 14 September demanded immediate independence with a constituent assembly to decide a constitution; when this was refused, its eight provincial governments resigned on 10 November and governors in those provinces thereafter ruled by decree for the remainder of the war. Jinnah, on the other hand, was more willing to accommodate the British, and they in turn increasingly recognised him and the League as the representatives of India's Muslims.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=47–49}} Jinnah later stated, "after the war began, ... I was treated on the same basis as Mr Gandhi. I was wonderstruck why I was promoted and given a place side by side with Mr Gandhi."{{sfn|Singh|pp=225–226}} Although the League did not actively support the British war effort, neither did they try to obstruct it.{{sfn|Singh|p=225}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah and Gandhi.jpg|thumb|left|Jinnah and Gandhi arguing in 1939]] | [[File:Jinnah and Gandhi.jpg|thumb|left|Jinnah and Gandhi arguing in 1939]] | ||
With the British and Muslims to some extent co-operating, the Viceroy asked Jinnah for an expression of the Muslim League's position on self-government, confident that it would differ greatly from that of the Congress. To come up with such a position, the League's Working Committee met for four days in February 1940 to set out terms of reference to a constitutional sub-committee. The Working Committee asked that the sub-committee return with a proposal that would result in "independent dominions in direct relationship with Great Britain" where Muslims were dominant.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=51–55}} On 6 February, Jinnah informed the Viceroy that the Muslim League would be demanding partition instead of the federation contemplated in the 1935 Act. The [[Lahore Resolution]] (sometimes called the "Pakistan Resolution", although it does not contain that name), based on the sub-committee's work, embraced the [[Two-Nation Theory]] and called for a union of the Muslim-majority provinces in the northwest of British India, with complete autonomy. Similar rights were to be granted to the Muslim-majority areas in the east, and unspecified protections given to Muslim minorities in other provinces. The resolution was passed by the League session in [[Lahore]] on 23 March 1940.{{sfn|Singh|pp=232–233}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=54–58}} | With the British and Muslims to some extent co-operating, the Viceroy asked Jinnah for an expression of the Muslim League's position on self-government, confident that it would differ greatly from that of the Congress. To come up with such a position, the League's Working Committee met for four days in February 1940 to set out terms of reference to a constitutional sub-committee. The Working Committee asked that the sub-committee return with a proposal that would result in "independent dominions in direct relationship with Great Britain" where Muslims were dominant.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=51–55}} On 6 February, Jinnah informed the Viceroy that the Muslim League would be demanding partition instead of the federation contemplated in the 1935 Act. The [[Lahore Resolution]] (sometimes called the "Pakistan Resolution", although it does not contain that name), based on the sub-committee's work, embraced the [[Two-Nation Theory]] and called for a union of the Muslim-majority provinces in the northwest of British India, with complete autonomy. Similar rights were to be granted to the Muslim-majority areas in the east, and unspecified protections given to Muslim minorities in other provinces. The resolution was passed by the League session in [[Lahore]] on 23 March 1940.{{sfn|Singh|pp=232–233}}{{sfn|Jalal|pp=54–58}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah addresses the delegates to the Moslem Political Convention held in New Delhi during 1943 (Photo 429-8).jpg|thumb|left|Jinnah makes a speech in New Delhi, 1943]] | [[File:Jinnah addresses the delegates to the Moslem Political Convention held in New Delhi during 1943 (Photo 429-8).jpg|thumb|left|Jinnah makes a speech in New Delhi, 1943]] | ||
Gandhi's reaction to the Lahore Resolution was muted; he called it "baffling", but told his disciples that Muslims, in common with other people of India, had the right to self-determination. Leaders of the Congress were more vocal; [[Jawaharlal Nehru]] referred to Lahore as "Jinnah's fantastic proposals" while [[Chakravarti Rajagopalachari]] deemed Jinnah's views on partition "a sign of a diseased mentality".{{sfn|Wolpert|p=185}} Linlithgow met with Jinnah in June 1940,{{sfn|Wolpert|p=189}} soon after [[Winston Churchill]] became the British prime minister, and in August offered both the Congress and the League a deal whereby in exchange for full support for the war, Linlithgow would allow Indian representation on his major war councils. The Viceroy promised a representative body after the war to determine India's future, and that no future settlement would be imposed over the objections of a large part of the population. This was satisfactory to neither the Congress nor the League, though Jinnah was pleased that the British had moved towards recognising Jinnah as the representative of the Muslim community's interests.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=62–63}} Jinnah was reluctant to make specific proposals as to the boundaries of Pakistan, or its relationships with Britain and with the rest of the subcontinent, fearing that any precise plan would divide the League.{{sfn|Moore|p=551}} | Gandhi's reaction to the Lahore Resolution was muted; he called it "baffling", but told his disciples that Muslims, in common with other people of India, had the right to self-determination. Leaders of the Congress were more vocal; [[Jawaharlal Nehru]] referred to Lahore as "Jinnah's fantastic proposals" while [[Chakravarti Rajagopalachari]] deemed Jinnah's views on partition "a sign of a diseased mentality".{{sfn|Wolpert|p=185}} Linlithgow met with Jinnah in June 1940,{{sfn|Wolpert|p=189}} soon after [[Winston Churchill]] became the British prime minister, and in August offered both the Congress and the League a deal whereby in exchange for full support for the war, Linlithgow would allow Indian representation on his major war councils. The Viceroy promised a representative body after the war to determine India's future, and that no future settlement would be imposed over the objections of a large part of the population. This was satisfactory to neither the Congress nor the League, though Jinnah was pleased that the British had moved towards recognising Jinnah as the representative of the Muslim community's interests.{{sfn|Jalal|pp=62–63}} Jinnah was reluctant to make specific proposals as to the boundaries of Pakistan, or its relationships with Britain and with the rest of the subcontinent, fearing that any precise plan would divide the League.{{sfn|Moore|p=551}} | ||
Line 206: | Line 208: | ||
=== Mountbatten and independence === | === Mountbatten and independence === | ||
[[File:Mountbatten Jinnah.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma|Lord Louis Mountbatten]] and his wife [[Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma|Edwina Mountbatten]] with Jinnah in 1947]] | [[File:Mountbatten Jinnah.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma|Lord Louis Mountbatten]] and his wife [[Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma|Edwina Mountbatten]] with Jinnah in 1947]] | ||
{{ | {{Main|Partition of India}} | ||
On 20 February 1947, Attlee announced Mountbatten's appointment, and that Britain would transfer power in India not later than June 1948.{{sfn|Jalal|p=237}} Mountbatten took office as Viceroy on 24 March 1947, two days after his arrival in India.{{sfn|Khan|p=87}} By then, the Congress had come around to the idea of partition. Nehru stated in 1960, "the truth is that we were tired men and we were getting on in years ... The plan for partition offered a way out and we took it."{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–87}} Leaders of the Congress decided that having loosely tied Muslim-majority provinces as part of a future India was not worth the loss of the powerful government at the centre which they desired.{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–86}} However, the Congress insisted that if Pakistan were to become independent, Bengal and Punjab would have to be divided.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=312}} | On 20 February 1947, Attlee announced Mountbatten's appointment, and that Britain would transfer power in India not later than June 1948.{{sfn|Jalal|p=237}} Mountbatten took office as Viceroy on 24 March 1947, two days after his arrival in India.{{sfn|Khan|p=87}} By then, the Congress had come around to the idea of partition. Nehru stated in 1960, "the truth is that we were tired men and we were getting on in years ... The plan for partition offered a way out and we took it."{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–87}} Leaders of the Congress decided that having loosely tied Muslim-majority provinces as part of a future India was not worth the loss of the powerful government at the centre which they desired.{{sfn|Khan|pp=85–86}} However, the Congress insisted that if Pakistan were to become independent, Bengal and Punjab would have to be divided.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=312}} | ||
Line 222: | Line 224: | ||
The [[Radcliffe Commission]], dividing Bengal and Punjab, completed its work and reported to Mountbatten on 12 August; the last Viceroy held the maps until the 17th, not wanting to spoil the independence celebrations in both nations. There had already been ethnically charged violence and movement of populations; publication of the [[Radcliffe Line]] dividing the new nations sparked mass migration, murder, and [[ethnic cleansing]]. Many on the "wrong side" of the lines fled or were murdered, or murdered others, hoping to make facts on the ground which would reverse the commission's verdict. Radcliffe wrote in his report that he knew that neither side would be happy with his award; he declined his fee for the work.{{sfn|Khan|pp=124–127}} Christopher Beaumont, Radcliffe's private secretary, later wrote that Mountbatten "must take the blame—though not the sole blame—for the massacres in the Punjab in which between 500,000 to a million men, women and children perished".<ref name="lawson" /> As many as 14,500,000 people relocated between India and Pakistan during and after partition.<ref name="lawson" /> Jinnah did what he could for the eight million people who migrated to Pakistan; although by now over 70 and frail from lung ailments, he travelled across [[West Pakistan]] and personally supervised the provision of aid.{{sfn|Malik|p=131}} According to Ahmed, "What Pakistan needed desperately in those early months was a symbol of the state, one that would unify people and give them the courage and resolve to succeed."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=145}} | The [[Radcliffe Commission]], dividing Bengal and Punjab, completed its work and reported to Mountbatten on 12 August; the last Viceroy held the maps until the 17th, not wanting to spoil the independence celebrations in both nations. There had already been ethnically charged violence and movement of populations; publication of the [[Radcliffe Line]] dividing the new nations sparked mass migration, murder, and [[ethnic cleansing]]. Many on the "wrong side" of the lines fled or were murdered, or murdered others, hoping to make facts on the ground which would reverse the commission's verdict. Radcliffe wrote in his report that he knew that neither side would be happy with his award; he declined his fee for the work.{{sfn|Khan|pp=124–127}} Christopher Beaumont, Radcliffe's private secretary, later wrote that Mountbatten "must take the blame—though not the sole blame—for the massacres in the Punjab in which between 500,000 to a million men, women and children perished".<ref name="lawson" /> As many as 14,500,000 people relocated between India and Pakistan during and after partition.<ref name="lawson" /> Jinnah did what he could for the eight million people who migrated to Pakistan; although by now over 70 and frail from lung ailments, he travelled across [[West Pakistan]] and personally supervised the provision of aid.{{sfn|Malik|p=131}} According to Ahmed, "What Pakistan needed desperately in those early months was a symbol of the state, one that would unify people and give them the courage and resolve to succeed."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=145}} | ||
Among the restive regions of the new nation was the North-West Frontier Province. The referendum there in July 1947 had been tainted by low turnout as less than 10 per cent of the population were allowed to vote.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jeffrey J. Roberts|year=2003|title=The Origins of Conflict in Afghanistan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pj8DIT_bva0C&pg=PA108|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn= | Among the restive regions of the new nation was the North-West Frontier Province. The referendum there in July 1947 had been tainted by low turnout as less than 10 per cent of the population were allowed to vote.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jeffrey J. Roberts|year=2003|title=The Origins of Conflict in Afghanistan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pj8DIT_bva0C&pg=PA108|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-275-97878-5|pages=108–109}}</ref> On 22 August 1947, just after a week of becoming governor general, Jinnah dissolved the elected government of Dr. [[Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lubpak.com/archives/222082|title=This too was Pakistan (1947–71): A response to Nadeem Paracha's "Also Pakistan"|date=29 July 2012|access-date=28 October 2017|first=Abdul|last=Nishapuri|work=Let Us Build Pakistan|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414074638/https://lubpak.com/archives/222082|archive-date=14 April 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Later on, [[Abdul Qayyum Khan]] was put in place by Jinnah in the [[Pashtuns|Pashtun]]-dominated province despite him being a Kashmiri.<ref>M.S. Korejo (1993). ''The Frontier Gandhi: His Place in History''. Karachi: Oxford University Press.</ref> On 12 August 1948 the [[Babrra massacre]] in [[Charsadda]] occurred resulting in the death of 400 people aligned with the [[Khudai Khidmatgar]] movement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/pashto/interactivity/2013/08/130815_ss-nawed-babrra-massacre.shtml|title=پښتونخوا کالم: زه ''بابړه'' يم|first=نورالبشر نويد|last=پېښور|date=15 August 2013|publisher=BBC Pashto}}</ref> | ||
Along with Liaquat and [[Abdur Rab Nishtar]], Jinnah represented Pakistan's interests in the Division Council to appropriately divide public assets between India and Pakistan.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=416}} Pakistan was supposed to receive one-sixth of the pre-independence government's assets, carefully divided by agreement, even specifying how many sheets of paper each side would receive. The new Indian state, however, was slow to deliver, hoping for the collapse of the nascent Pakistani government, and reunion. Few members of the [[Indian Civil Service]] and the [[Indian Police Service]] had chosen Pakistan, resulting in staff shortages. Partition meant that for some farmers, the markets to sell their crops were on the other side of an international border. There were shortages of machinery, not all of which was made in Pakistan. In addition to the massive refugee problem, the new government sought to save abandoned crops, establish security in a chaotic situation, and provide basic services. According to economist Yasmeen Niaz Mohiuddin in her study of Pakistan, "although Pakistan was born in bloodshed and turmoil, it survived in the initial and difficult months after partition only because of the tremendous sacrifices made by its people and the selfless efforts of its great leader."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=78–79}} | Along with Liaquat and [[Abdur Rab Nishtar]], Jinnah represented Pakistan's interests in the Division Council to appropriately divide public assets between India and Pakistan.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=416}} Pakistan was supposed to receive one-sixth of the pre-independence government's assets, carefully divided by agreement, even specifying how many sheets of paper each side would receive. The new Indian state, however, was slow to deliver, hoping for the collapse of the nascent Pakistani government, and reunion. Few members of the [[Indian Civil Service]] and the [[Indian Police Service]] had chosen Pakistan, resulting in staff shortages. Partition meant that for some farmers, the markets to sell their crops were on the other side of an international border. There were shortages of machinery, not all of which was made in Pakistan. In addition to the massive refugee problem, the new government sought to save abandoned crops, establish security in a chaotic situation, and provide basic services. According to economist Yasmeen Niaz Mohiuddin in her study of Pakistan, "although Pakistan was born in bloodshed and turmoil, it survived in the initial and difficult months after partition only because of the tremendous sacrifices made by its people and the selfless efforts of its great leader."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=78–79}} | ||
Line 230: | Line 232: | ||
The most contentious of the disputes was, and continues to be, that over the [[Kashmir and Jammu (princely state)|princely state of Kashmir]]. It had a Muslim-majority population and a Hindu [[maharaja]], Sir [[Hari Singh]], who stalled his decision on which nation to join. With the population in revolt in October 1947, aided by Pakistani irregulars, the maharaja [[Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)|acceded to India]]; Indian troops were airlifted in. Jinnah objected to this action, and ordered that Pakistani troops move into Kashmir. The [[Pakistani Army]] was still commanded by British officers, and the commanding officer, General Sir [[Douglas Gracey]], refused the order, stating that he would not move into what he considered the territory of another nation without approval from higher authority, which was not forthcoming. Jinnah withdrew the order. This did not stop the violence there, which broke into [[Indo-Pakistani War of 1947]].{{sfn|Malik|pp=131–132}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=347–351}} | The most contentious of the disputes was, and continues to be, that over the [[Kashmir and Jammu (princely state)|princely state of Kashmir]]. It had a Muslim-majority population and a Hindu [[maharaja]], Sir [[Hari Singh]], who stalled his decision on which nation to join. With the population in revolt in October 1947, aided by Pakistani irregulars, the maharaja [[Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)|acceded to India]]; Indian troops were airlifted in. Jinnah objected to this action, and ordered that Pakistani troops move into Kashmir. The [[Pakistani Army]] was still commanded by British officers, and the commanding officer, General Sir [[Douglas Gracey]], refused the order, stating that he would not move into what he considered the territory of another nation without approval from higher authority, which was not forthcoming. Jinnah withdrew the order. This did not stop the violence there, which broke into [[Indo-Pakistani War of 1947]].{{sfn|Malik|pp=131–132}}{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=347–351}} | ||
Some historians allege that Jinnah's courting the rulers of Hindu-majority states and his gambit with Junagadh are evidence of ill-intent towards India, as Jinnah had promoted separation by religion, yet tried to gain the accession of Hindu-majority states.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=435}} In his book ''Patel: A Life'', [[Rajmohan Gandhi]] asserts that Jinnah hoped for a plebiscite in Junagadh, knowing Pakistan would lose, in the hope the principle would be established for Kashmir.{{sfn|RGandhi|pp=435–436}} However, when Mountbatten proposed to Jinnah that, in all the princely States where the ruler did not accede to a Dominion corresponding to the majority population (which would have included [[Junagadh]], [[Hyderabad State|Hyderabad]] and Kashmir), the accession should be decided by an 'impartial reference to the will of the people', Jinnah rejected the offer.<ref>{{citation |last=Noorani |first=A. G. |author-link=A. G. Noorani |title=The Kashmir Dispute, 1947–2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdGkoAEACAAJ |year=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-940018-8 |orig-year=first published in 2013 by [[Tulika Books]] |pages=13–14}}</ref><ref>A. G. Noorani, [http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1820/18200780.htm Jinnah and Junagadh], Frontline, 29 September 2001.</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Raghavan |first=Srinath |title=War and Peace in Modern India | Some historians allege that Jinnah's courting the rulers of Hindu-majority states and his gambit with Junagadh are evidence of ill-intent towards India, as Jinnah had promoted separation by religion, yet tried to gain the accession of Hindu-majority states.{{sfn|RGandhi|p=435}} In his book ''Patel: A Life'', [[Rajmohan Gandhi]] asserts that Jinnah hoped for a plebiscite in Junagadh, knowing Pakistan would lose, in the hope the principle would be established for Kashmir.{{sfn|RGandhi|pp=435–436}} However, when Mountbatten proposed to Jinnah that, in all the princely States where the ruler did not accede to a Dominion corresponding to the majority population (which would have included [[Junagadh]], [[Hyderabad State|Hyderabad]] and Kashmir), the accession should be decided by an 'impartial reference to the will of the people', Jinnah rejected the offer.<ref>{{citation |last=Noorani |first=A. G. |author-link=A. G. Noorani |title=The Kashmir Dispute, 1947–2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdGkoAEACAAJ |year=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-940018-8 |orig-year=first published in 2013 by [[Tulika Books]] |pages=13–14}}</ref><ref>A. G. Noorani, [http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1820/18200780.htm Jinnah and Junagadh], Frontline, 29 September 2001.</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Raghavan |first=Srinath |title=War and Peace in Modern India |year=2010 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-137-00737-7 |page=111 }}</ref> | ||
Despite the [[ | Despite the [[s:United Nations Security Council Resolution 47|United Nations Security Council Resolution 47]], issued at India's request for a plebiscite in Kashmir after the withdrawal of Pakistani forces, this has never occurred.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=347–351}} | ||
In January 1948, the Indian government finally agreed to pay Pakistan its share of British India's assets. They were impelled by Gandhi, who threatened a fast until death. Only days later, on 30 January, [[Assassination of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi|Gandhi was assassinated]] by [[Nathuram Godse]], a Hindu nationalist, who believed that Gandhi was pro-Muslim. After hearing about Gandhi's murder on the following day, Jinnah publicly made a brief statement of condolence, calling Gandhi "one of the greatest men produced by the Hindu community".{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=357–358}} | In January 1948, the Indian government finally agreed to pay Pakistan its share of British India's assets. They were impelled by Gandhi, who threatened a fast until death. Only days later, on 30 January, [[Assassination of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi|Gandhi was assassinated]] by [[Nathuram Godse]], a Hindu nationalist, who believed that Gandhi was pro-Muslim. After hearing about Gandhi's murder on the following day, Jinnah publicly made a brief statement of condolence, calling Gandhi "one of the greatest men produced by the Hindu community".{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=357–358}} | ||
Line 247: | Line 249: | ||
In June 1948, he and Fatima flew to [[Quetta]], in the mountains of Balochistan, where the weather was cooler than in Karachi. He could not completely rest there, addressing the officers at the [[Pakistan Command and Staff College|Command and Staff College]] saying, "you, along with the other Forces of Pakistan, are the custodians of the life, property and honour of the people of Pakistan."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=361}} He returned to Karachi for the 1 July opening ceremony for the [[State Bank of Pakistan]], at which he spoke. A reception by the Canadian trade commissioner that evening in honour of [[Canada Day|Dominion Day]] was the last public event he attended.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=361–362}} | In June 1948, he and Fatima flew to [[Quetta]], in the mountains of Balochistan, where the weather was cooler than in Karachi. He could not completely rest there, addressing the officers at the [[Pakistan Command and Staff College|Command and Staff College]] saying, "you, along with the other Forces of Pakistan, are the custodians of the life, property and honour of the people of Pakistan."{{sfn|Wolpert|p=361}} He returned to Karachi for the 1 July opening ceremony for the [[State Bank of Pakistan]], at which he spoke. A reception by the Canadian trade commissioner that evening in honour of [[Canada Day|Dominion Day]] was the last public event he attended.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=361–362}} | ||
[[File:Muhammad Ali Jinnah with sister Fatima Jinnah.JPG|thumb|250px|left|Jinnah and his sister Fatima | [[File:Muhammad Ali Jinnah with sister Fatima Jinnah.JPG|thumb|250px|left|Jinnah and his sister Fatima. Wax statues at the museum in the [[Pakistan Monument]], Islamabad]] | ||
On 6 July 1948, Jinnah returned to Quetta, but at the advice of doctors, soon journeyed to [[Quaid-e-Azam Residency|an even higher retreat]] at [[Ziarat]]. Jinnah had always been reluctant to undergo medical treatment but realising his condition was getting worse, the Pakistani government sent the best doctors it could find to treat him. Tests confirmed tuberculosis, and also showed evidence of advanced lung cancer. He was treated with the new "miracle drug" of [[streptomycin]], but it did not help. Jinnah's condition continued to deteriorate despite the [[Eid prayer]]s of his people. He was moved to the lower altitude of Quetta on 13 August, the eve of [[Independence Day (Pakistan)|Independence Day]], for which a ghost-written statement for him was released. Despite an increase in appetite (he then weighed just over {{convert|36|kg|lb|abbr=off|disp=or}}), it was clear to his doctors that if he was to return to Karachi in life, he would have to do so very soon. Jinnah, however, was reluctant to go, not wishing his aides to see him as an invalid on a stretcher.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=366–368}} | On 6 July 1948, Jinnah returned to Quetta, but at the advice of doctors, soon journeyed to [[Quaid-e-Azam Residency|an even higher retreat]] at [[Ziarat]]. Jinnah had always been reluctant to undergo medical treatment but realising his condition was getting worse, the Pakistani government sent the best doctors it could find to treat him. Tests confirmed tuberculosis, and also showed evidence of advanced lung cancer. He was treated with the new "miracle drug" of [[streptomycin]], but it did not help. Jinnah's condition continued to deteriorate despite the [[Eid prayer]]s of his people. He was moved to the lower altitude of Quetta on 13 August, the eve of [[Independence Day (Pakistan)|Independence Day]], for which a ghost-written statement for him was released. Despite an increase in appetite (he then weighed just over {{convert|36|kg|lb|abbr=off|disp=or}}), it was clear to his doctors that if he was to return to Karachi in life, he would have to do so very soon. Jinnah, however, was reluctant to go, not wishing his aides to see him as an invalid on a stretcher.{{sfn|Wolpert|pp=366–368}} | ||
Line 261: | Line 263: | ||
After Jinnah died, his sister Fatima asked the court to execute Jinnah's will under [[Shia]] Islamic law.<ref name="secularm" /> This subsequently became part of the argument in Pakistan about Jinnah's religious affiliation. [[Vali Nasr]] says Jinnah "was an Ismaili by birth and a [[Twelver Shia]] by confession, though not a religiously observant man."<ref name="shi3a" /> In a 1970 legal challenge, Hussain Ali Ganji Walji claimed Jinnah had converted to Sunni Islam. Witness Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada stated in court that Jinnah converted to Sunni Islam in 1901 when his sisters married Sunnis. In 1970, Liaquat Ali Khan and Fatima Jinnah's joint affidavit that Jinnah was Shia was rejected. But in 1976 the court rejected Walji's claim that Jinnah was Sunni; effectively accepting him as a [[Shia]]. In 1984 a high court bench reversed the 1976 verdict and maintained that "the ''Quaid'' was definitely not a Shia", which suggested that Jinnah was Sunni.<ref name="Sunni" /> According to the journalist Khaled Ahmed, Jinnah publicly had a non-sectarian stance and "was at pains to gather the Muslims of India under the banner of a general Muslim faith and not under a divisive sectarian identity." Liaquat H. Merchant, Jinnah's grandnephew, writes that "the Quaid was not a Shia; he was also not a Sunni, he was simply a Muslim".<ref name="secularm" /> An eminent lawyer who practised in the Bombay High Court until 1940 testified that Jinnah used to pray as an orthodox Sunni.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} According to [[Akbar Ahmed]], Jinnah became a firm Sunni Muslim by the end of his life.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4" /> | After Jinnah died, his sister Fatima asked the court to execute Jinnah's will under [[Shia]] Islamic law.<ref name="secularm" /> This subsequently became part of the argument in Pakistan about Jinnah's religious affiliation. [[Vali Nasr]] says Jinnah "was an Ismaili by birth and a [[Twelver Shia]] by confession, though not a religiously observant man."<ref name="shi3a" /> In a 1970 legal challenge, Hussain Ali Ganji Walji claimed Jinnah had converted to Sunni Islam. Witness Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada stated in court that Jinnah converted to Sunni Islam in 1901 when his sisters married Sunnis. In 1970, Liaquat Ali Khan and Fatima Jinnah's joint affidavit that Jinnah was Shia was rejected. But in 1976 the court rejected Walji's claim that Jinnah was Sunni; effectively accepting him as a [[Shia]]. In 1984 a high court bench reversed the 1976 verdict and maintained that "the ''Quaid'' was definitely not a Shia", which suggested that Jinnah was Sunni.<ref name="Sunni" /> According to the journalist Khaled Ahmed, Jinnah publicly had a non-sectarian stance and "was at pains to gather the Muslims of India under the banner of a general Muslim faith and not under a divisive sectarian identity." Liaquat H. Merchant, Jinnah's grandnephew, writes that "the Quaid was not a Shia; he was also not a Sunni, he was simply a Muslim".<ref name="secularm" /> An eminent lawyer who practised in the Bombay High Court until 1940 testified that Jinnah used to pray as an orthodox Sunni.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} According to [[Akbar Ahmed]], Jinnah became a firm Sunni Muslim by the end of his life.<ref name="Ahmed2005p4" /> | ||
== Legacy == | == Legacy == | ||
Line 271: | Line 268: | ||
[[File:Tomb Jinnah.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Mazar-e-Quaid|Tomb of Muhammad Ali Jinnah]] in Karachi]] | [[File:Tomb Jinnah.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Mazar-e-Quaid|Tomb of Muhammad Ali Jinnah]] in Karachi]] | ||
Jinnah's legacy is Pakistan. According to Mohiuddin, "He was and continues to be as highly honored<!-- spelling as in original --> in Pakistan as [first US president] [[George Washington]] is in the United States ... Pakistan owes its very existence to his drive, tenacity, and judgment ... Jinnah's importance in the creation of Pakistan was monumental and immeasurable."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=74–75}} [[Stanley Wolpert]], giving a speech in honour of Jinnah in 1998, deemed him Pakistan's greatest leader.<ref name = "greatest" /> | Jinnah's legacy is Pakistan. According to Mohiuddin, "He was and continues to be as highly honored<!-- spelling as in original --> in Pakistan as [first US president] [[George Washington]] is in the United States ... Pakistan owes its very existence to his drive, tenacity, and judgment ... Jinnah's importance in the creation of Pakistan was monumental and immeasurable."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=74–75}} [[Stanley Wolpert]], giving a speech in honour of Jinnah in 1998, deemed him Pakistan's greatest leader.<ref name="greatest" /> | ||
According to Jaswant Singh, "With Jinnah's death Pakistan lost its moorings. In India there will not easily arrive another Gandhi, nor in Pakistan another Jinnah."{{sfn|Singh|p=406}} Malik writes, "As long as Jinnah was alive, he could persuade and even pressure regional leaders toward greater mutual accommodation, but after his death, the lack of consensus on the distribution of political power and economic resources often turned controversial."{{sfn|Malik|p=134}} According to Mohiuddin, "Jinnah's death deprived Pakistan of a leader who could have enhanced stability and democratic governance ... The rocky road to democracy in Pakistan and the relatively smooth one in India can in some measure be ascribed to Pakistan's tragedy of losing an incorruptible and highly revered leader so soon after independence."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=81–82}} | According to Jaswant Singh, "With Jinnah's death Pakistan lost its moorings. In India there will not easily arrive another Gandhi, nor in Pakistan another Jinnah."{{sfn|Singh|p=406}} Malik writes, "As long as Jinnah was alive, he could persuade and even pressure regional leaders toward greater mutual accommodation, but after his death, the lack of consensus on the distribution of political power and economic resources often turned controversial."{{sfn|Malik|p=134}} According to Mohiuddin, "Jinnah's death deprived Pakistan of a leader who could have enhanced stability and democratic governance ... The rocky road to democracy in Pakistan and the relatively smooth one in India can in some measure be ascribed to Pakistan's tragedy of losing an incorruptible and highly revered leader so soon after independence."{{sfn|Mohiuddin|pp=81–82}} | ||
{{anchor|Quaid-e-Azam Day}}<!-- [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]] redirects here. --> | {{anchor|Quaid-e-Azam Day}}<!-- [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]] redirects here. --> | ||
[[File:Yorkstatue.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Statue of Jinnah at [[York University]] in Toronto]] | [[File:Yorkstatue.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Statue of Jinnah at [[York University]] in Toronto]] | ||
His birthday is observed as a [[Holidays in Pakistan|national holiday]], [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]], in Pakistan.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.officeholidays.com/countries/pakistan/index.php |title=National public holidays of Pakistan in 2013 |publisher=Office Holidays |access-date=3 February 2016 |archive-url=https:// | His birthday is observed as a [[Holidays in Pakistan|national holiday]], [[Quaid-e-Azam Day]], in Pakistan.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.officeholidays.com/countries/pakistan/index.php |title=National public holidays of Pakistan in 2013 |publisher=Office Holidays |access-date=3 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130518031433/http://www.officeholidays.com/countries/pakistan/index.php |archive-date=18 May 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/12/25/news/national/nation-celebrates-quaid-e-azams-137th-birthday/ |title=Nation celebrates Quaid-e-Azam's birthday |work=Pakistan Today |date=25 December 2012 |access-date=3 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130417111046/http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/12/25/news/national/nation-celebrates-quaid-e-azams-137th-birthday/ |archive-date=17 April 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="ggb">{{cite book |last=Desai |first=Meghnad |year=2009 |title=The Rediscovery of India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fhovRowWr1gC&pg=PA240 |publisher=Penguin Books India |page=240|isbn=978-0-670-08300-8}}</ref> Jinnah earned the title ''Quaid-e-Azam'' (meaning "Great Leader"). His other title is ''Baba-i-Qaum'' ([[Father of the Nation]]). The former title was reportedly given to Jinnah at first by Mian Ferozuddin Ahmed. It became an official title by effect of a resolution passed on 11 August 1947 by [[Liaquat Ali Khan]] in the Pakistan Constituent Assembly. There are some sources which endorse that [[Mahatma Gandhi|Gandhi]] gave him that title.<ref name="mil">{{cite news|url=http://www.milligazette.com/news/1281-was-quaid-e-azam-jinnah-the-only-founder-of-pakistan|title=Was Quaid-e Azam Jinnah the only founder of Pakistan?|work=The Milli Gazette|date=8 May 2011|access-date=3 February 2016}}</ref> Within a few days of Pakistan's creation Jinnah's name was read in the khutba at mosques as Amir-ul-Millat, a traditional title of Muslim rulers.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} | ||
The [[Civil decorations of Pakistan|civil awards of Pakistan]] includes an 'Order of Quaid-i-Azam'. The Jinnah Society also confers the 'Jinnah Award' annually to a person that renders outstanding and meritorious services to Pakistan and its people.<ref>{{cite web|title=Projects of The Jinnah Society|url=http://jinnahsociety.org.pk/TheJinnahAwards.html|publisher=jinnahsociety.org.pk|access-date=7 September 2017}}</ref> Jinnah is depicted on all [[Pakistani rupee]] currency, and is the [[namesake]] of many Pakistani public institutions. The former Quaid-i-Azam International Airport in Karachi, now called the [[Jinnah International Airport]], is Pakistan's busiest. One of the largest streets in the Turkish capital Ankara, [[Cinnah Caddesi]], is named after him, as is the [[Mohammad Ali Jenah Expressway]] in Tehran, Iran. The [[Pahlavi dynasty|royalist]] government of Iran also released a stamp commemorating the centennial of Jinnah's birth in 1976. In Chicago, a portion of [[Devon Avenue]] was named "Mohammed Ali Jinnah Way". A section of [[Coney Island Avenue]] in [[Brooklyn]], New York was also named 'Muhammad Ali Jinnah Way' in honour of the founder of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite | The [[Civil decorations of Pakistan|civil awards of Pakistan]] includes an 'Order of Quaid-i-Azam'. The Jinnah Society also confers the 'Jinnah Award' annually to a person that renders outstanding and meritorious services to Pakistan and its people.<ref>{{cite web|title=Projects of The Jinnah Society|url=http://jinnahsociety.org.pk/TheJinnahAwards.html|publisher=jinnahsociety.org.pk|access-date=7 September 2017}}</ref> Jinnah is depicted on all [[Pakistani rupee]] currency, and is the [[namesake]] of many Pakistani public institutions. The former Quaid-i-Azam International Airport in Karachi, now called the [[Jinnah International Airport]], is Pakistan's busiest. One of the largest streets in the Turkish capital Ankara, [[Cinnah Caddesi]], is named after him, as is the [[Mohammad Ali Jenah Expressway]] in Tehran, Iran. The [[Pahlavi dynasty|royalist]] government of Iran also released a stamp commemorating the centennial of Jinnah's birth in 1976. In Chicago, a portion of [[Devon Avenue]] was named "Mohammed Ali Jinnah Way". A section of [[Coney Island Avenue]] in [[Brooklyn]], New York was also named 'Muhammad Ali Jinnah Way' in honour of the founder of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://tribune.com.pk/story/1906998/1-muhammad-ali-jinnah-way-unveiled-new-york-honour-pakistans-founder/|title='Muhammad Ali Jinnah Way' unveiled in New York to honour Pakistan's founder|work=[[The Express Tribune]]|date=9 February 2019|access-date=9 February 2019}}</ref> The [[Mazar-e-Quaid]], Jinnah's [[mausoleum]], is among Karachi's landmarks.<ref name="Mehmood p869" /> The "[[Jinnah Tower]]" in [[Guntur]], Andhra Pradesh, India, was built to commemorate Jinnah.<ref name="HinduOnNet" /> | ||
[[File:Jinnah blue plaque.JPG|thumb|right|250px|[[Blue Plaque]] in London dedicated to Jinnah]] | [[File:Jinnah blue plaque.JPG|thumb|right|250px|[[Blue Plaque]] in London dedicated to Jinnah]] | ||
There is a considerable amount of scholarship on Jinnah which stems from Pakistan; according to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], it is not widely read outside the country and usually avoids even the slightest criticism of Jinnah.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=31}} According to Ahmed, some books published about Jinnah outside Pakistan mention that he consumed alcohol, but this is omitted from books published inside Pakistan. Ahmed suggests that depicting the ''Quaid'' drinking would weaken Jinnah's Islamic identity, and by extension, Pakistan's. Some sources allege he gave up alcohol near the end of his life.<ref name="HistoryToday" />{{sfn|Ahmed|p=200}} Yahya Bakhtiar, who observed Jinnah at close quarters, concluded that Jinnah was a "very sincere, deeply committed and dedicated Mussalman."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} | There is a considerable amount of scholarship on Jinnah which stems from Pakistan; according to [[Akbar S. Ahmed]], it is not widely read outside the country and usually avoids even the slightest criticism of Jinnah.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=31}} According to Ahmed, some books published about Jinnah outside Pakistan mention that he consumed alcohol, but this is omitted from books published inside Pakistan. Ahmed suggests that depicting the ''Quaid'' drinking would weaken Jinnah's Islamic identity, and by extension, Pakistan's. Some sources allege he gave up alcohol near the end of his life.<ref name="HistoryToday" />{{sfn|Ahmed|p=200}} The professor Maya Tudor | ||
concluded that "Jinnah could not be described as a practicing Muslim" | |||
given his consumption of pork, use of alcohol, and usage of | |||
[[interest]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tudor |first1=Maya |title=The Promise of Power: The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan | |||
|date=14 March 2013 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | |||
|isbn=978-1-107-32873-0 |page=95 | |||
|url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Promise_of_Power/ITohAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Jinnah+drank+freely+and+ate+pork.+There+is+evidence+that+Jinnah+lived+off+of+interest+income,+thereby+violating+Islam%27s+prohibition+against+charging+interest%22&pg=PA95&printsec=frontcover | |||
|language=en |quote=Whether it was by dress, by prayer, by habits, or customs, Jinnah could not be described as a practicing Muslim. Jinnah drank freely and ate pork. There is evidence that Jinnah lived off of interest income, thereby violating Islam's prohibition against charging interest.}}</ref> On the other hand, Yahya Bakhtiar, who observed Jinnah at close quarters, concluded that Jinnah was a "very sincere, deeply committed and dedicated Mussalman."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=195}} | |||
According to historian [[Ayesha Jalal]], while there is a tendency towards [[hagiography]] in the Pakistani view of Jinnah, in India he is viewed negatively.{{sfn|Jalal|p=221}} Ahmed deems Jinnah "the most maligned person in recent Indian history ... In India, many see him as the demon who divided the land."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=27}} Even many Indian Muslims see Jinnah negatively, blaming him for their woes as a minority in that state.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=28}} Some historians such as Jalal and [[H. M. Seervai]] assert that Jinnah never wanted the partition of India—it was the outcome of the Congress leaders being unwilling to share power with the Muslim League. They contend that Jinnah only used the Pakistan demand in an attempt to mobilise support to obtain significant political rights for Muslims.<ref name="Seervai p127" /> [[Francis Mudie]], the last British [[Governor of Sindh]], in Jinnah's honour once said: | According to historian [[Ayesha Jalal]], while there is a tendency towards [[hagiography]] in the Pakistani view of Jinnah, in India he is viewed negatively.{{sfn|Jalal|p=221}} Ahmed deems Jinnah "the most maligned person in recent Indian history ... In India, many see him as the demon who divided the land."{{sfn|Ahmed|p=27}} Even many Indian Muslims see Jinnah negatively, blaming him for their woes as a minority in that state.{{sfn|Ahmed|p=28}} Some historians such as Jalal and [[H. M. Seervai]] assert that Jinnah never wanted the partition of India—it was the outcome of the Congress leaders being unwilling to share power with the Muslim League. They contend that Jinnah only used the Pakistan demand in an attempt to mobilise support to obtain significant political rights for Muslims.<ref name="Seervai p127" /> [[Francis Mudie]], the last British [[Governor of Sindh]], in Jinnah's honour once said: | ||
Line 299: | Line 303: | ||
| footer = Jinnah's portraits on the stamps of Turkmenistan and Iran | | footer = Jinnah's portraits on the stamps of Turkmenistan and Iran | ||
}} | }} | ||
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, according to Yasser Latif Hamdani and Eamon Murphy, is associated with his call for [[Direct Action Day]], which resulted in bloodshed and communal violence that culminated in the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan.<ref name="Hamdani2020">{{cite book |last1=Hamdani |first1=Yasser Latif |title=Jinnah: A Life |date=23 June 2020 |publisher=[[Macmillan Publishers]] |isbn=978-93-89109-64-1 |language=en |quote=Speaking at a Students Brotherhood event, which he presided over in July in 1922, Jinnah spoke of direct action, something that would become synonymous with him in the Indian mind, owing to his famous direct action day call in 1946 - direct action meant bloodshed and independence would mean bloodshed.}}</ref> This incident and Jinnah's role, according to these authors, is viewed with contempt especially in India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Murphy |first1=Eamon |title=The Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of Extremism |date=2013 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-0-415-56526-4 |page=37 |language=en |quote=After negotiations between Congress, the British and Jinnah got bogged down over the future of the subcontinent, on 16 August 1946, Jinnah called for a Direct Action Day, involving protests and meetings in support of Pakistan. This led to savage communal violence in Calcutta, which quickly spread to other parts of India.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Siddique |first1=Salma |title=Evacuee Cinema: Bombay and Lahore in Partition Transit, 1940–1960 |date=16 February 2023 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-1-009-15120-7 |page=88 |language=en |quote=According to Dyal, in ''Ghaddar'' 'the policy of Muslim League is discussed threadbare and Jinnah is held responsible for the holocaust that preceded and followed partition'.}}</ref> | |||
Jinnah has gained the admiration of Indian nationalist politicians such as [[Lal Krishna Advani]], whose comments praising Jinnah caused an uproar in his [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP).<ref name="advani" /> Indian politician [[Jaswant Singh]]'s book ''[[Jinnah: India, Partition, Independence]]'' (2009) caused controversy in India.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8211038.stm|title=India state bans book on Jinnah |date=20 August 2009|publisher=[[BBC]]|access-date=20 August 2009}}</ref> The book was based on Jinnah's ideology and alleged that Nehru's desire for a powerful centre led to Partition.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://jaibihar.com/nehru-patel-conceded-pakistan-to-jinnah-jaswant/11301/ |title=Nehru not Jinnah's polity led to partition |publisher=Jai Bihar |access-date=19 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822004045/http://jaibihar.com/nehru-patel-conceded-pakistan-to-jinnah-jaswant/11301/ |archive-date=22 August 2009 }}</ref> Upon the book release, Singh was expelled from his membership of Bharatiya Janata Party, to which he responded that BJP is "narrow-minded" and has "limited thoughts".<ref name="LiveMint">{{cite news|url=http://www.livemint.com/2009/08/19224542/BJP-expels-Jaswant-Singh-over.html|title=BJP expels Jaswant Singh over praise for Jinnah in his book|last=Joy|first=Santosh|date=19 August 2009|work=LiveMint |access-date=20 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215224018/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/SErCZ0ewVhfPabjq7ie2MK/BJP-expels-Jaswant-Singh-over-praise-for-Jinnah-in-his-book.html |archive-date=15 December 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://jaibihar.com/jaswant-singh-expelled-over-jinnah-remarks/11454/ |title=Jaswant Singh expelled over Jinnah remarks |date=19 August 2009 |publisher=Jai Bihar|access-date=19 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090821162128/http://jaibihar.com/jaswant-singh-expelled-over-jinnah-remarks/11454/ |archive-date=21 August 2009 }}</ref> | Jinnah has gained the admiration of Indian nationalist politicians such as [[Lal Krishna Advani]], whose comments praising Jinnah caused an uproar in his [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP).<ref name="advani" /> Indian politician [[Jaswant Singh]]'s book ''[[Jinnah: India, Partition, Independence]]'' (2009) caused controversy in India.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8211038.stm|title=India state bans book on Jinnah |date=20 August 2009|publisher=[[BBC]]|access-date=20 August 2009}}</ref> The book was based on Jinnah's ideology and alleged that Nehru's desire for a powerful centre led to Partition.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://jaibihar.com/nehru-patel-conceded-pakistan-to-jinnah-jaswant/11301/ |title=Nehru not Jinnah's polity led to partition |publisher=Jai Bihar |access-date=19 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822004045/http://jaibihar.com/nehru-patel-conceded-pakistan-to-jinnah-jaswant/11301/ |archive-date=22 August 2009 }}</ref> Upon the book release, Singh was expelled from his membership of Bharatiya Janata Party, to which he responded that BJP is "narrow-minded" and has "limited thoughts".<ref name="LiveMint">{{cite news|url=http://www.livemint.com/2009/08/19224542/BJP-expels-Jaswant-Singh-over.html|title=BJP expels Jaswant Singh over praise for Jinnah in his book|last=Joy|first=Santosh|date=19 August 2009|work=LiveMint |access-date=20 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215224018/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/SErCZ0ewVhfPabjq7ie2MK/BJP-expels-Jaswant-Singh-over-praise-for-Jinnah-in-his-book.html |archive-date=15 December 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://jaibihar.com/jaswant-singh-expelled-over-jinnah-remarks/11454/ |title=Jaswant Singh expelled over Jinnah remarks |date=19 August 2009 |publisher=Jai Bihar|access-date=19 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090821162128/http://jaibihar.com/jaswant-singh-expelled-over-jinnah-remarks/11454/ |archive-date=21 August 2009 }}</ref> | ||
Jinnah was the central figure of the 1998 film ''[[Jinnah (film)|Jinnah]]'', which was based on Jinnah's life and his struggle for the creation of Pakistan. [[Christopher Lee]], who portrayed Jinnah, called his performance the best of his career.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3733894.stm | title=Christopher Lee on the making of legends | publisher=BBC | date=11 October 2004 | access-date=5 November 2011 | author=Lindrea, Victoria}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE_1ofnBFos | archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211114/CE_1ofnBFos| archive-date=2021 | Jinnah was the central figure of the 1998 film ''[[Jinnah (film)|Jinnah]]'', which was based on Jinnah's life and his struggle for the creation of Pakistan. [[Christopher Lee]], who portrayed Jinnah, called his performance the best of his career.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3733894.stm | title=Christopher Lee on the making of legends | publisher=BBC | date=11 October 2004 | access-date=5 November 2011 | author=Lindrea, Victoria}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE_1ofnBFos | archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211114/CE_1ofnBFos| archive-date=14 November 2021 | url-status=live|title=Christopher Lee talks about his favorite role |via=YouTube |date=21 March 2002 |access-date=5 August 2009}}{{cbignore}}</ref> The 1954 [[Hector Bolitho]]'s book ''Jinnah: Creator of Pakistan'' prompted Fatima Jinnah to release a book, titled ''[[My Brother (book)|My Brother]]'' (1987), as she thought that Bolitho's book had failed to express the political aspects of Jinnah. The book received positive reception in Pakistan. ''[[Jinnah of Pakistan]]'' (1984) by Stanley Wolpert is regarded as one of the best biographical books on Jinnah.<ref name="dailytimes2011">{{cite news |url=http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011\story_9-7-2011_pg3_6 |title=Book Review: The nation was orphaned, forever —by Dr Irfan Zafar |work=Daily Times |access-date=8 February 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131018024943/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C07%5C09%5Cstory_9-7-2011_pg3_6 |archive-date=18 October 2013 }}</ref> | ||
The view of Jinnah in the West has been shaped to some extent by his portrayal in Sir [[Richard Attenborough]]'s 1982 film, ''[[Gandhi (film)|Gandhi]]''. The film was dedicated to Nehru and Mountbatten and was given considerable support by Nehru's daughter, the Indian prime minister, [[Indira Gandhi]]. It portrays Jinnah (played by [[Alyque Padamsee]]) in an unflattering light, who seems to act out of jealousy of Gandhi. Padamsee later stated that his portrayal was not historically accurate.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=28–29}} In a journal article on Pakistan's first governor-general, historian R. J. Moore wrote that Jinnah is universally recognised as central to the creation of Pakistan.{{sfn|Moore|pp=529–569}} [[Stanley Wolpert]] summarises the profound effect that Jinnah had on the world: | The view of Jinnah in the West has been shaped to some extent by his portrayal in Sir [[Richard Attenborough]]'s 1982 film, ''[[Gandhi (film)|Gandhi]]''. The film was dedicated to Nehru and Mountbatten and was given considerable support by Nehru's daughter, the Indian prime minister, [[Indira Gandhi]]. It portrays Jinnah (played by [[Alyque Padamsee]]) in an unflattering light, who seems to act out of jealousy of Gandhi. Padamsee later stated that his portrayal was not historically accurate.{{sfn|Ahmed|pp=28–29}} In a journal article on Pakistan's first governor-general, historian R. J. Moore wrote that Jinnah is universally recognised as central to the creation of Pakistan.{{sfn|Moore|pp=529–569}} [[Stanley Wolpert]] summarises the profound effect that Jinnah had on the world: | ||
Line 308: | Line 315: | ||
| Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation-state. Mohammad<!-- That's how he spells it! --> Ali Jinnah did all three.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=vii}} | | Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation-state. Mohammad<!-- That's how he spells it! --> Ali Jinnah did all three.{{sfn|Wolpert|p=vii}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[List of peace activists]] | *[[List of peace activists]] | ||
*[[List of civil rights leaders]] | *[[List of civil rights leaders]] | ||
{{clear}} | |||
== | == References and notes == | ||
=== | === Explanatory notes === | ||
{{notes}} | {{notes}} | ||
=== | === Citations === | ||
{{reflist | {{reflist | ||
| colwidth = 20em | | colwidth = 20em | ||
| refs = | | refs = | ||
<ref name=Gauba> | |||
{{cite book | <!-- Not in use | ||
<ref name=Gauba>{{cite book | |||
| first = K.L. | | first = K.L. | ||
| last = Gauba | | last = Gauba | ||
Line 334: | Line 341: | ||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Ktpwb-vReWMC | | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Ktpwb-vReWMC | ||
| page = 155 | | page = 155 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | Not in use--> | ||
<ref name=Chagla> | <!-- Not in use | ||
{{cite book | <ref name=Chagla>{{cite book | ||
| first = M. C. | | first = M. C. | ||
| last = Chagla | | last = Chagla | ||
Line 347: | Line 354: | ||
| year = 2011 | | year = 2011 | ||
| isbn = 9788172764470 | | isbn = 9788172764470 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | Not in use--> | ||
<ref name="Moini 20 December 2003"> | <ref name="Moini 20 December 2003">Qasim Abdallah Moini (20 December 2003). {{cite news |url=http://www.dawn.com/weekly/yworld/archive/031220/yworld3.htm |title=Remembering the Quaid |work=Dawn |access-date=3 July 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081007170324/http://www.dawn.com/weekly/yworld/archive/031220/yworld3.htm |archive-date=7 October 2008}}. "[I]t has been alleged in sections of the press that the Quaid was born not in this quarter of Karachi but in [[Jhirk]], located in Thatta district. But most historians and biographers go along with the official line ..."</ref> | ||
Qasim Abdallah Moini (20 December 2003). {{cite | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Anjali Desai"> | <ref name="Anjali Desai">{{cite book | ||
{{cite book | |||
| last = Desai | | last = Desai | ||
| first = Anjali | | first = Anjali | ||
Line 364: | Line 368: | ||
| isbn = 978-0-9789517-0-2 | | isbn = 978-0-9789517-0-2 | ||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=gZRLGZNZEoEC&pg=PA24 | | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=gZRLGZNZEoEC&pg=PA24 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Mehmood p725"> | <ref name="Mehmood p725">Syed Qasim Mehmood (1998). ''Encyclopedia Pakistanica'', p. 725. Qadir Printers, Karachi.</ref> | ||
Syed Qasim Mehmood (1998). ''Encyclopedia Pakistanica'', p. 725. Qadir Printers, Karachi. | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="lawyer"> | <ref name="lawyer">{{cite web | ||
{{cite web | |||
| title = The Lawyer: Bombay (1896–1910) | | title = The Lawyer: Bombay (1896–1910) | ||
| first = Government of Pakistan | | first = Government of Pakistan | ||
Line 380: | Line 380: | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060127232421/http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/Quaid/lawyer3.htm | | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060127232421/http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/Quaid/lawyer3.htm | ||
| archive-date = 27 January 2006 | | archive-date = 27 January 2006 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="statesman"> | <ref name="statesman">{{cite web | ||
{{cite web | |||
| title = The Statesman: Jinnah's differences with the Congress | | title = The Statesman: Jinnah's differences with the Congress | ||
| first = Government of Pakistan | | first = Government of Pakistan | ||
Line 392: | Line 390: | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060127234847/http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/Quaid/politician7.htm | | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060127234847/http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/Quaid/politician7.htm | ||
| archive-date = 27 January 2006 | | archive-date = 27 January 2006 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="HistoryToday"> | <ref name="HistoryToday">{{cite journal | ||
{{cite journal | |||
| last = Talbot | | last = Talbot | ||
| first = Ian | | first = Ian | ||
Line 404: | Line 400: | ||
| url = http://www.historytoday.com/ian-talbot/jinnah-and-making-pakistan | | url = http://www.historytoday.com/ian-talbot/jinnah-and-making-pakistan | ||
| access-date = 26 October 2012 | | access-date = 26 October 2012 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="lawson"> | <ref name="lawson">{{cite news | ||
{{cite | |||
| last = Lawson | | last = Lawson | ||
| first = Alastair | | first = Alastair | ||
Line 415: | Line 409: | ||
|publisher=BBC News| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6926464.stm | |publisher=BBC News| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6926464.stm | ||
| access-date = 15 August 2012 | | access-date = 15 August 2012 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Fatima Jinnah Official website"> | <ref name="Fatima Jinnah Official website">{{cite web | ||
{{cite web | |||
|title = Profile of Fatima Jinnah | |title = Profile of Fatima Jinnah | ||
|publisher = Fatima Jinnah Official website | |publisher = Fatima Jinnah Official website | ||
Line 426: | Line 418: | ||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130311105035/http://www.fatimajinnah.com/index.php?page=profile | |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130311105035/http://www.fatimajinnah.com/index.php?page=profile | ||
|archive-date = 11 March 2013 | |archive-date = 11 March 2013 | ||
|df = dmy-all | |||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Dawn"> | <ref name="Dawn">{{cite news | ||
{{cite | |||
| title = Dina seeks Jinnah House's possession | | title = Dina seeks Jinnah House's possession | ||
| date = 25 May 2005 | | date = 25 May 2005 | ||
Line 438: | Line 428: | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101029083102/http://www.dawn.com/2005/05/25/top14.htm | | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101029083102/http://www.dawn.com/2005/05/25/top14.htm | ||
| archive-date = 29 October 2010 | | archive-date = 29 October 2010 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Sitapati 2008"> | <ref name="Sitapati 2008">{{cite news | ||
{{cite news | |||
| last = Sitapati | | last = Sitapati | ||
| first = Vinay | | first = Vinay | ||
Line 450: | Line 438: | ||
| work = The Indian Express | | work = The Indian Express | ||
| access-date = 22 April 2010 | | access-date = 22 April 2010 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="secularm"> | <ref name="secularm">{{cite news | ||
{{cite | |||
|first = Khaled | |first = Khaled | ||
|last = Ahmed | |last = Ahmed | ||
|date = 23 May 1998 | |date = 23 May 1998 | ||
|title = The secular Mussalman | |||
|work = The Indian Express | |work = The Indian Express | ||
|url = http://www.financialexpress.com/old/ie/daily/19980523/14350814.html | |url = http://www.financialexpress.com/old/ie/daily/19980523/14350814.html | ||
|access-date = 4 May 2012 | |access-date = 4 May 2012 | ||
|url-status = dead | |||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130515043103/http://www.financialexpress.com/old/ie/daily/19980523/14350814.html | |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130515043103/http://www.financialexpress.com/old/ie/daily/19980523/14350814.html | ||
|archive-date = 15 May 2013 | |archive-date = 15 May 2013 | ||
|df = dmy-all | |||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="shi3a"> | <ref name="shi3a">{{cite book | ||
{{cite book | |||
|last = Nasr | |last = Nasr | ||
|first = Vali | |first = Vali | ||
Line 481: | Line 465: | ||
| url = http://faroutliers.wordpress.com/2006/10/13/pakistans-transition-from-shia-to-sunni-leadership | | url = http://faroutliers.wordpress.com/2006/10/13/pakistans-transition-from-shia-to-sunni-leadership | ||
| access-date = 15 November 2012 | | access-date = 15 November 2012 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Sunni"> | <ref name="Sunni">{{cite news | ||
{{cite news | |||
|title = Was Jinnah a Shia or Sunni? | |title = Was Jinnah a Shia or Sunni? | ||
|date = 9 May 1998 | |date = 9 May 1998 | ||
Line 491: | Line 473: | ||
|publisher = [[United News of India]] via rediff.com | |publisher = [[United News of India]] via rediff.com | ||
|access-date = 15 November 2012 | |access-date = 15 November 2012 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="greatest">{{cite web | <ref name="greatest">{{cite web | ||
Line 507: | Line 488: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
<ref name="Mehmood p869"> | <ref name="Mehmood p869">{{cite book | ||
{{cite book | |||
| first = Syed Qasim | | first = Syed Qasim | ||
| last = Mehmood | | last = Mehmood | ||
Line 516: | Line 496: | ||
| publisher = Qadir Printers | | publisher = Qadir Printers | ||
| location = Karachi | | location = Karachi | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="HinduOnNet"> | <ref name="HinduOnNet">{{cite news | ||
{{cite news | |||
| last = Sekhar | | last = Sekhar | ||
| first = A. Saye | | first = A. Saye | ||
Line 531: | Line 509: | ||
| work = [[The Hindu]] | | work = [[The Hindu]] | ||
| access-date = 28 October 2017 | | access-date = 28 October 2017 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Seervai p127"> | <ref name="Seervai p127">{{cite book | ||
{{cite book | |||
| last = Seervai | | last = Seervai | ||
| first = H. M. | | first = H. M. | ||
Line 543: | Line 519: | ||
| publisher = Oxford University Press | | publisher = Oxford University Press | ||
| isbn = 978-0-19-597719-6 | | isbn = 978-0-19-597719-6 | ||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="advani"> | <ref name="advani">{{cite news | ||
{{cite | |||
|title=Pakistan expresses shock over Advani's resignation as BJP chief | |title=Pakistan expresses shock over Advani's resignation as BJP chief | ||
|work=Hindustan Times | |work=Hindustan Times | ||
|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1391007,001300270001.htm | |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1391007,001300270001.htm | ||
|access-date=20 April 2006 | |access-date=20 April 2006 | ||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050609004505/http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1391007%2C001300270001.htm | |||
|archive-date=9 June 2005 | |archive-date=9 June 2005 | ||
|url-status=dead | |||
}} | }}</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=ShivaRao> | <!-- Not in use | ||
{{cite book|first=B.|last=Shiva Rao|title=India's Freedom Movement: Some Notable Figures|year=1972|publisher=Associated Faculty Press|isbn= | <ref name=ShivaRao>{{cite book|first=B.|last=Shiva Rao|title=India's Freedom Movement: Some Notable Figures|year=1972|publisher=Associated Faculty Press|isbn=978-0-8046-8824-6|page=125}}</ref> | ||
</ref> | Not in use--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== | === General and cited references === | ||
{{refbegin|30em}} | {{refbegin|30em}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Ahmed |first=Akbar S. |author-link=Akbar Ahmed |year=2005 |orig-year=First published 1997 |title=Jinnah, Pakistan, and Islamic Identity: The Search for Saladin |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=978-1-134-75022-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RqyniTHXFxUC&pg=PT33 |ref={{SfnRef|Ahmed}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Bolith |first=Hector |year=1954 |title=Jinnah: Creator of Pakistan |url=https://archive.org/details/jinnahcreatorofp0000boli |url-access=registration |publisher=John Murray |location=London |oclc=1001456192 |ref={{SfnRef|Bolitho}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Cohen |first=Stephen Philip |year=2004 |title=The Idea of Pakistan |url=https://archive.org/details/ideaofpakistan00cohe |url-access=registration |publisher=Brookings Institution Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-0-8157-1503-0 |ref={{SfnRef|Cohen}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Gandhi |first=Rajmohan |author-link=Rajmohan Gandhi |year=1990 |title=Patel: A Life |publisher=Navajivan |location=[[Ahmedabad]] |asin=B0006EYQ0A |ref={{SfnRef|RGandhi}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Hibbard |first=Scott |year=1994 |title=Religious Politics and Secular States: Egypt, India, and the United States |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ndxzxaXIvH0C |location=Baltimore |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |isbn=978-0-8018-9669-9 |ref={{SfnRef|Hibbard}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Jalal |first=Ayesha |author-link=Ayesha Jalal |year=1994 |title=The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D63KMRN1SJ8C |edition=paperback |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-45850-4 |ref={{SfnRef|Jalal}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Jinnah |first=Fatima |author-link=Fatima Jinnah |year=1987 |title=My Brother |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hwNuAAAAMAAJ |publisher=Quaid-i-Azam Academy |isbn=978-9694130361 |ref={{SfnRef|Jinnah, Fatima}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Khan |first=Yasmin |year=2008 |orig-year=2007 |edition=paperback |title=The Great Partition: The Making of India and Pakistan |location=New Haven, Conn. |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-12078-3 |ref={{SfnRef|Khan}} |url=https://archive.org/details/greatpartitionma00khan}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Malik |first=Iftikar H. |year=2008 |series=The Greenwood Histories of the Modern Nations |title=The History of Pakistan |location=Westport, Conn. |publisher=Greenwood Press |isbn=978-0-313-34137-3 |ref={{SfnRef|Malik}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Mohiuddin |first=Yasmeen Niaz |year=2007 |title=Pakistan: A Global Studies Handbook |location=Santa Barbara, California |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-85109-801-9 |ref={{SfnRef|Mohiuddin}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite journal |last=Moore |first=R. J. |year=1983 |title=Jinnah and the Pakistan Demand |journal=Modern Asian Studies |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=529–561 |jstor=312235 |doi=10.1017/S0026749X00011069 |s2cid=144125491 |ref={{sfnRef|Moore}} }} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite journal |last=Puri |first=Balraj |date=7 March 2008 |title =Clues to understanding Jinnah |journal=Economic and Political Weekly |volume=43 |issue=9 |pages=33–35 |publisher=Sameeksha Trust |location=Bombay |jstor=40277204 |ref={{sfnRef|Puri}}}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book |last=Read |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Read |year=1997 |title=The Proudest Day: India's Long Road to Independence |location=New York |publisher=W.W. Norton & Co. |isbn=978-0-393-04594-9 |ref={{SfnRef|Read}} |url=https://archive.org/details/proudestdayindia00read}} | ||
* {{Cite book |last=Singh |first=Jaswant |author-link=Jaswant Singh |year=2009 |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/611042665 |title=Jinnah: India-Partition and Independence |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-547927-0 |oclc=611042665 |ref={{SfnRef|Singh}}}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wolpert |first=Stanley |author-link=Stanley Wolpert |year=1984 |title=Jinnah of Pakistan |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-503412-7 |ref={{SfnRef|Wolpert}}}} | |||
{{refend|}} | {{refend|}} | ||
== Further reading == | |||
{{refbegin|33em}} | {{refbegin|33em}} | ||
* {{citation |author=K. R. N. Swamy|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=h4RHAAAAMAAJ|title=Mughals, maharajas, and the Mahatma|date=1 December 1997|publisher=HarperCollins Publishers India|page=71|isbn= 978-8-17-223280-1|ref={{sfnref|Swamy|1997}}}} | * {{citation |author=K. R. N. Swamy|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=h4RHAAAAMAAJ|title=Mughals, maharajas, and the Mahatma|date=1 December 1997|publisher=HarperCollins Publishers India|page=71|isbn= 978-8-17-223280-1|ref={{sfnref|Swamy|1997}}}} | ||
* {{citation |author=Partha Sarathy Ghosh|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sy-KAAAAMAAJ|title=BJP and the Evolution of Hindu Nationalism: From Periphery to Centre|date=1 January 1999|publisher=Manohar Publishers & Distributors|page=60|isbn=978-8-17-304253-9|ref={{sfnref|Ghosh|1999}}}} | * {{citation |author=Partha Sarathy Ghosh|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sy-KAAAAMAAJ|title=BJP and the Evolution of Hindu Nationalism: From Periphery to Centre|date=1 January 1999|publisher=Manohar Publishers & Distributors|page=60|isbn=978-8-17-304253-9|ref={{sfnref|Ghosh|1999}}}} | ||
* {{citation |author=Iftikhar Haider Malik|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GQTABKAGaVgC&pg=PA61|title=Culture and Customs of Pakistan|year=2006|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|page=61|isbn=978-0- | * {{citation |author=Iftikhar Haider Malik|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GQTABKAGaVgC&pg=PA61|title=Culture and Customs of Pakistan|year=2006|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|page=61|isbn=978-0-313-33126-8|ref={{sfnref|Malik|2006}}}} | ||
* {{citation |author=Ludwig W. Adamec|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zHCIDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA231|title=Historical Dictionary of Islam|date=14 December 2016|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|page=231|isbn=978-1- | * {{citation |author=Ludwig W. Adamec|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zHCIDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA231|title=Historical Dictionary of Islam|date=14 December 2016|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|page=231|isbn=978-1-4422-7724-3|ref={{sfnref|Adamec|2016}}}} | ||
*{{cite news |title=Special report: The Legacy of Mr Jinnah | *{{cite news |title=Special report: The Legacy of Mr Jinnah 1876–1948 |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1302511 |work=Dawn}} | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Line 649: | Line 593: | ||
{{s-aft | after = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] }} | {{s-aft | after = [[Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan]] }} | ||
{{s-end}} | {{s-end}} | ||
{{Muhammad Ali Jinnah}} | |||
{{Muhammad Ali Jinnah}} | {{Navboxes|list1={{Pakistan Movement}} | ||
{{Governors-General of Pakistan}} | {{Governors-General of Pakistan}} | ||
{{Presidents of Pakistan}} | {{Presidents of Pakistan}} | ||
{{Speaker National Assembly Pakistan}} | {{Speaker National Assembly Pakistan}} | ||
{{National symbols of Pakistan}} | {{National symbols of Pakistan}} | ||
{{Indian Independence Movement}}|title=Articles related to Jinnah}}{{Authority control}} | {{Indian Independence Movement}}|title=Articles related to Jinnah}} | ||
{{Portal bar|Biography|Pakistan|Islam|Politics}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Jinnah, Muhammad Ali}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Jinnah, Muhammad Ali}} | ||
Line 661: | Line 607: | ||
[[Category:1876 births]] | [[Category:1876 births]] | ||
[[Category:1948 deaths]] | [[Category:1948 deaths]] | ||
[[Category:20th-century deaths from tuberculosis]] | [[Category:20th-century deaths from tuberculosis]] | ||
[[Category:All India Muslim League members]] | [[Category:All India Muslim League members]] | ||
Line 670: | Line 612: | ||
[[Category:Cathedral and John Connon School alumni]] | [[Category:Cathedral and John Connon School alumni]] | ||
[[Category:Church Mission School alumni]] | [[Category:Church Mission School alumni]] | ||
[[Category:Converts to Sunni Islam from Shia Islam]] | |||
[[Category:Governors-General of Pakistan]] | [[Category:Governors-General of Pakistan]] | ||
[[Category:Indian National Congress politicians]] | [[Category:Indian National Congress politicians]] | ||
[[Category:Indian newspaper founders]] | [[Category:Indian newspaper founders]] | ||
[[Category:Infectious disease deaths in Sindh]] | |||
[[Category:Jinnah family|Muhammad Ali]] | [[Category:Jinnah family|Muhammad Ali]] | ||
[[Category:Lawyers from Karachi]] | [[Category:Lawyers from Karachi]] | ||
[[Category:Members of Central Legislative Assembly of India]] | [[Category:Members of the Central Legislative Assembly of India]] | ||
[[Category:Members of Lincoln's Inn]] | [[Category:Members of Lincoln's Inn]] | ||
[[Category:Members of the Fabian Society]] | [[Category:Members of the Fabian Society]] | ||
Line 683: | Line 627: | ||
[[Category:Pakistani barristers]] | [[Category:Pakistani barristers]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani expatriates in England]] | [[Category:Pakistani expatriates in England]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani former Shia Muslims]] | |||
[[Category:Pakistani MNAs 1947–1954]] | [[Category:Pakistani MNAs 1947–1954]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani Muslims]] | |||
[[Category:Pakistani newspaper founders]] | [[Category:Pakistani newspaper founders]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani people of Gujarati descent]] | [[Category:Pakistani people of Gujarati descent]] | ||
[[Category:Pakistani Sunni Muslims]] | |||
[[Category:Partition of India]] | [[Category:Partition of India]] | ||
[[Category:Politicians from Karachi]] | |||
[[Category:Presidents of Pakistan]] | [[Category:Presidents of Pakistan]] | ||
[[Category:Sindh Madressatul Islam University alumni]] | [[Category:Sindh Madressatul Islam University alumni]] | ||
[[Category:Tuberculosis deaths in Pakistan]] | [[Category:Tuberculosis deaths in Pakistan]] | ||
[[Category:University of Mumbai alumni]] | [[Category:University of Mumbai alumni]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Muhajir people]] |