Booth capturing: Difference between revisions
>Cewbot m (Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): More citations needed) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Use Indian English|date=March 2019}} | {{Use Indian English|date=March 2019}} | ||
'''Booth capturing or booth looting''' is | '''Booth capturing''', or '''booth looting''', is [[electoral fraud]] in which party loyalists or hired criminals "capture" a [[polling station|polling booth]] and vote in place of legitimate voters to ensure that a particular candidate wins. It is a form of [[voter suppression]]. | ||
== | == India == | ||
It is a general rule in Indian elections that agents of every contesting candidates need to be present at the booth.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}} | It is a general rule in Indian elections that agents of every contesting candidates need to be present at the booth.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}} However, they are in many areas threatened or assaulted and so leave the polling premises. The [[Election Commission of India]] has a general abbreviation that a section or half of onr of Central Para Military Forces is enough to prevent incidents.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}} | ||
The first instance of booth capturing in India was recorded in the [[1957 Indian general election|1957 General Elections]] in Rachiyahi, in [[Begusarai District]]'s [[Matihani (Vidhan Sabha constituency)|Matihani assembly seat]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Where-booth-capturing-was-born/articleshow/1020435.cms|title=Where booth capturing was born}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/In-central-Bihar-development-runs-into-caste-wall/articleshow/49038630.cms|title=In central Bihar, development runs into caste wall}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1151010/jsp/bihar/story_47122.jsp#.VhikSeyqqko|title=Empty words in legend's forgotten village}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ibnlive.com/news/politics/the-myth-of-historys-first-booth-capturing-taking-place-in-begusarais-rachiyahi-1150034.html|title=The myth of history's first booth capturing taking place in Begusarai's Rachiyahi}}</ref> The word came into prominent use in the media during the late 1970s and 1980s when the number of parties and candidates multiplied. This resulted in some Parties using underhand methods including booth capturing, especially in the rural India. | The first instance of booth capturing in India was recorded in the [[1957 Indian general election|1957 General Elections]] in Rachiyahi, in [[Begusarai District]]'s [[Matihani (Vidhan Sabha constituency)|Matihani assembly seat]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Where-booth-capturing-was-born/articleshow/1020435.cms|title=Where booth capturing was born}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/In-central-Bihar-development-runs-into-caste-wall/articleshow/49038630.cms|title=In central Bihar, development runs into caste wall}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1151010/jsp/bihar/story_47122.jsp#.VhikSeyqqko|title=Empty words in legend's forgotten village}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ibnlive.com/news/politics/the-myth-of-historys-first-booth-capturing-taking-place-in-begusarais-rachiyahi-1150034.html|title=The myth of history's first booth capturing taking place in Begusarai's Rachiyahi}}</ref> The word came into prominent use in the media during the late 1970s and 1980s when the number of parties and candidates multiplied. This resulted in some Parties using underhand methods including booth capturing, especially in the rural India. | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
In 1989 the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was modified to include booth capturing as an offense punishable by law and countermanding or adjourning any poll that was booth captured.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indiankanoon.org/doc/320017/|title=The Representation of the People Act, 1951|website=indiankanoon.org|access-date=2018-05-19}}</ref> The development of the [[Indian voting machines|Electronic Voting Machine]] (EVM) was also intended to make it harder for booth capturers to stuff the ballot boxes with their votes by enabling a five-minute delay between each vote entered as against hundreds of votes in the same time using ballot papers (stamped by a group of 3–4).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/booth-capturing-is-history-now-thanks-to-evms-109082503018_1.html|title=Booth capturing is history now, thanks to EVMs|agency=Press Trust of India|date=2009-08-25|work=Business Standard India|access-date=2018-05-19}}</ref> The [[Electronic Voting Machine|EVMs]] also possess a "close" button which can be used by the polling officer to deactivate the machines. Despite this, booth capturing continues to happen, albeit at a much reduced rate.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}} | In 1989 the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was modified to include booth capturing as an offense punishable by law and countermanding or adjourning any poll that was booth captured.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indiankanoon.org/doc/320017/|title=The Representation of the People Act, 1951|website=indiankanoon.org|access-date=2018-05-19}}</ref> The development of the [[Indian voting machines|Electronic Voting Machine]] (EVM) was also intended to make it harder for booth capturers to stuff the ballot boxes with their votes by enabling a five-minute delay between each vote entered as against hundreds of votes in the same time using ballot papers (stamped by a group of 3–4).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/booth-capturing-is-history-now-thanks-to-evms-109082503018_1.html|title=Booth capturing is history now, thanks to EVMs|agency=Press Trust of India|date=2009-08-25|work=Business Standard India|access-date=2018-05-19}}</ref> The [[Electronic Voting Machine|EVMs]] also possess a "close" button which can be used by the polling officer to deactivate the machines. Despite this, booth capturing continues to happen, albeit at a much reduced rate.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}} | ||
== | == Nepal == | ||
Booth capturing was prevalent in [[1st Nepalese Constituent Assembly]]. | Booth capturing was prevalent in the [[1st Nepalese Constituent Assembly]]. Another election was required in 106 polling stations because of electoral fraud, which included booth capturing.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Nepal|first=Dev Raj|date=August 2010|title=Elections and Conflict in Nepal|url=https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/07722.pdf|journal=Friedrich Ebert Stiftung|pages=20}}</ref> Political parties have accused each other of booth capturing and demanded another election as recently as 2017.<ref>{{Cite web|title=NC alleges ‘booth capture’|url=https://kathmandupost.com/national/2017/06/30/nc-alleges-booth-capture|access-date=2021-08-05|website=kathmandupost.com|language=English}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Latest revision as of 01:49, 1 March 2022
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2017) |
Booth capturing, or booth looting, is electoral fraud in which party loyalists or hired criminals "capture" a polling booth and vote in place of legitimate voters to ensure that a particular candidate wins. It is a form of voter suppression.
India[edit]
It is a general rule in Indian elections that agents of every contesting candidates need to be present at the booth.[citation needed] However, they are in many areas threatened or assaulted and so leave the polling premises. The Election Commission of India has a general abbreviation that a section or half of onr of Central Para Military Forces is enough to prevent incidents.[citation needed]
The first instance of booth capturing in India was recorded in the 1957 General Elections in Rachiyahi, in Begusarai District's Matihani assembly seat.[1][2][3][4] The word came into prominent use in the media during the late 1970s and 1980s when the number of parties and candidates multiplied. This resulted in some Parties using underhand methods including booth capturing, especially in the rural India.
In 1989 the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was modified to include booth capturing as an offense punishable by law and countermanding or adjourning any poll that was booth captured.[5] The development of the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) was also intended to make it harder for booth capturers to stuff the ballot boxes with their votes by enabling a five-minute delay between each vote entered as against hundreds of votes in the same time using ballot papers (stamped by a group of 3–4).[6] The EVMs also possess a "close" button which can be used by the polling officer to deactivate the machines. Despite this, booth capturing continues to happen, albeit at a much reduced rate.[citation needed]
Nepal[edit]
Booth capturing was prevalent in the 1st Nepalese Constituent Assembly. Another election was required in 106 polling stations because of electoral fraud, which included booth capturing.[7] Political parties have accused each other of booth capturing and demanded another election as recently as 2017.[8]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ↑ "Where booth capturing was born".
- ↑ "In central Bihar, development runs into caste wall".
- ↑ "Empty words in legend's forgotten village".
- ↑ "The myth of history's first booth capturing taking place in Begusarai's Rachiyahi".
- ↑ "The Representation of the People Act, 1951". indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 19 May 2018.
- ↑ "Booth capturing is history now, thanks to EVMs". Business Standard India. Press Trust of India. 25 August 2009. Retrieved 19 May 2018.
- ↑ Nepal, Dev Raj (August 2010). "Elections and Conflict in Nepal" (PDF). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung: 20.
- ↑ "NC alleges 'booth capture'". kathmandupost.com. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
Bibliography[edit]
- Nedumpara, Jose (2004). Political Economy and Class Contradictions: A Study. New Delhi: Anmol.
- Omvedt, Gail (1993). Reinventing Revolution: New Social Movements and the Socialist Tradition in India. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
- (2005). "Poll Booth Rerun Infamy in Churulia." The Statesman (India). 29 September.
- Shakder, S. L. (1992). The Law and Practice of Elections in India. Mumbai: National Publishing House.
- Singh, Bhim (2002). Murder of Democracy in Jammu and Kashmir. New Delhi: Amand Niketan.
Further reading[edit]
- Vaishnav, Milan (2017). When Crime Pays: Money and Muscle in Indian Politics. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300224740.