16,599
edits
(@User talk:Ajay Kumar, Please understand that this was changed by an ip user here before it was well stabled till https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vagbhata&oldid=929705710 here and If possible, please correct wikipedia pages too which was vandalized a little back as I'm not able to do there..) Tags: Undo Reverted |
Ajay Kumar (talk | contribs) (See my comment on talk page -- Undo revision 305796 by 2401:4900:126A:3B6:79A8:C16F:5320:3577 (talk)) Tag: Undo |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}} | ||
{{Use Indian English|date=October 2019}} | {{Use Indian English|date=October 2019}} | ||
'''Vāgbhaṭa''' (वाग्भट) is one of the most influential writers, Scientist, Doctor and advisor of [[ayurveda]]. Several works are associated with his name as author, principally the [[Ashtāṅgasaṅgraha]] (अष्टाङ्गसंग्रह) and the [[Ashtāngahridayasaṃhitā]] (अष्टाङ्गहृदयसंहिता). The best current research, however, argues in detail that these two works cannot be the product of a single author. Indeed, the whole question of the relationship of these two works, and their authorship, is very difficult and still far from solution.<ref name="Meulenbeld">{{cite book|last=Meulenbeld|first=G. Jan|title=History of Indian Medical Literature|date=1999–2002|publisher=Egbert Forsten|location=Groningen |volume=IA}}</ref>{{rp|645}} Both works make frequent reference to the earlier classical works, the [[Charaka Samhita]] and the [[Sushruta Samhita]].<ref name="Meulenbeld"/>{{rp|391–593}} Vāgbhaṭa is said, in the closing verses of the ''Ashtānga sangraha'' to have been the son of Simhagupta and pupil of Avalokita. | '''Vāgbhaṭa''' (वाग्भट) is one of the most influential writers, Scientist, Doctor and advisor of [[ayurveda]]. Several works are associated with his name as author, principally the [[Ashtāṅgasaṅgraha]] (अष्टाङ्गसंग्रह) and the [[Ashtāngahridayasaṃhitā]] (अष्टाङ्गहृदयसंहिता). The best current research, however, argues in detail that these two works cannot be the product of a single author. Indeed, the whole question of the relationship of these two works, and their authorship, is very difficult and still far from solution.<ref name="Meulenbeld">{{cite book|last=Meulenbeld|first=G. Jan|title=History of Indian Medical Literature|date=1999–2002|publisher=Egbert Forsten|location=Groningen |volume=IA}}</ref>{{rp|645}} Both works make frequent reference to the earlier classical works, the [[Charaka Samhita]] and the [[Sushruta Samhita]].<ref name="Meulenbeld"/>{{rp|391–593}} Vāgbhaṭa is said, in the closing verses of the ''Ashtānga sangraha'' to have been the son of Simhagupta and pupil of Avalokita. He was a Buddhist, as is shown by his explicit praise for the Buddha by name at the start of the ''Ashtāngasangraha'', and his praise of the Buddha under the title "Unprecedented Teacher" in the opening verse of the ''Ashtānga hridayasamhitā.'' His work contains syncretic elements. | ||
He was a | |||
A frequently quoted erroneous suggestion is that Vāgbhaṭa was an ethnic [[Kashmiri people|Kashmiri]],<ref>Anna Akasoy & co., ''Islam and Tibet: Interactions Along the Musk Routes'', Ashgate Publishing Limited (2011), p.76</ref> based on a mistaken reading of the following note by the German Indologist Claus Vogel: "..judging by the fact that he expressly defines [[Andhra Pradesh|Andhra]] and [[Dravidian people|Dravida]] as the names of two southern peoples or kingdoms and repeatedly mentions [[Kashmiri language|Kashmirian]] terms for particular plants, he is likely to have been a Northerner and a [[Kashmiri people|native of Kashmir]]...".<ref>[[:de:Claus Vogel|Claus Vogel]], ''Vāgbhaṭa Ashtāngahridayasamhitā. The First Five Chapters of Its Tibetan Version'', Franz Steiner (1965), p.13</ref> Vogel is speaking here not of Vāgbhaṭa, but of the commentator Indu. | A frequently quoted erroneous suggestion is that Vāgbhaṭa was an ethnic [[Kashmiri people|Kashmiri]],<ref>Anna Akasoy & co., ''Islam and Tibet: Interactions Along the Musk Routes'', Ashgate Publishing Limited (2011), p.76</ref> based on a mistaken reading of the following note by the German Indologist Claus Vogel: "..judging by the fact that he expressly defines [[Andhra Pradesh|Andhra]] and [[Dravidian people|Dravida]] as the names of two southern peoples or kingdoms and repeatedly mentions [[Kashmiri language|Kashmirian]] terms for particular plants, he is likely to have been a Northerner and a [[Kashmiri people|native of Kashmir]]...".<ref>[[:de:Claus Vogel|Claus Vogel]], ''Vāgbhaṭa Ashtāngahridayasamhitā. The First Five Chapters of Its Tibetan Version'', Franz Steiner (1965), p.13</ref> Vogel is speaking here not of Vāgbhaṭa, but of the commentator Indu. |