<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government</id>
	<title>Tibetan dual system of government - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-18T17:52:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government&amp;diff=329456&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>UpdateBot: robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government&amp;diff=329456&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-06-12T11:06:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;robot: Update article (please &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/User_talk:UpdateBot&quot; title=&quot;User talk:UpdateBot&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 16:36, 12 June 2022&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-deleted&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;{{Short description|Dual system of a government in Tibet}}&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{About|the system of government in Tibet|other past and present governments of this kind|Diarchy}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{About|the system of government in Tibet|other past and present governments of this kind|Diarchy}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Lozang Gyatso.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The [[Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, &amp;quot;The Great&amp;quot; 5th Dalai Lama|Fifth Dalai Lama]] implemented the traditional Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) in [[Tibet]].]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Lozang Gyatso.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The [[Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, &amp;quot;The Great&amp;quot; 5th Dalai Lama|Fifth Dalai Lama]] implemented the traditional Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) in [[Tibet]].]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l9&quot;&gt;Line 9:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 10:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Bundesarchiv Bild 135-S-13-11-31, Tibetexpedition, Minister.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The Tibetan [[Kashag]] in 1938–39. From 1751 to 1951, the Kashag replaced the office of Desi in the Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) of [[Tibet]]]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Bundesarchiv Bild 135-S-13-11-31, Tibetexpedition, Minister.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The Tibetan [[Kashag]] in 1938–39. From 1751 to 1951, the Kashag replaced the office of Desi in the Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) of [[Tibet]]]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Since at least the period of the [[Mongol-Tibetan relations in the 13th and 14th centuries|Mongol presence]] in Tibet during the 13th and 14th centuries, [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and [[Bön]] clerics had participated in secular government, having the same rights as laymen to be appointed state officials, both military and civil.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; This system stood in stark contrast with that of [[China]], in which the Buddhist view of politics as a &quot;dismal science&quot; as well as the [[Confucianism|Confucian]] monopoly on the bureaucracy precluded such political activity by the [[Sangha (Buddhism)|Sangha]].&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; By the [[Ming Dynasty]] (founded 1368), the [[Sakya&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;#Feudal lordship over Tibet&lt;/del&gt;|Sakya]] held office above the heads of both components, embodying a government of both &#039;&#039;chos&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;srid&#039;&#039;. As a result, there were two sets of laws and officials, the religious ({{bo|t=ལྷ་སདེ་|w=lha-sde}}) and the temporal ({{bo|t=མི་སྡེ་|w=mi-sde}}), however the branches shared the government and did not operate exclusively of each other.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; This system often operated under Mongol and Chinese overlordship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Whether historical Mongol/Chinese power over Tibet is classified as suzerainty or sovereignty is debated, with views often split along modern political lines.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with the respective emperor above the local Tibetan administration.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Since at least the period of the [[Mongol-Tibetan relations in the 13th and 14th centuries|Mongol presence]] in Tibet during the 13th and 14th centuries, [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and [[Bön]] clerics had participated in secular government, having the same rights as laymen to be appointed state officials, both military and civil.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; This system stood in stark contrast with that of [[China]], in which the Buddhist view of politics as a &quot;dismal science&quot; as well as the [[Confucianism|Confucian]] monopoly on the bureaucracy precluded such political activity by the [[Sangha (Buddhism)|Sangha]].&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; By the [[Ming Dynasty]] (founded 1368), the [[Sakya &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;(tribe)&lt;/ins&gt;|Sakya]] held office above the heads of both components, embodying a government of both &#039;&#039;chos&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;srid&#039;&#039;. As a result, there were two sets of laws and officials, the religious ({{bo|t=ལྷ་སདེ་|w=lha-sde}}) and the temporal ({{bo|t=མི་སྡེ་|w=mi-sde}}), however the branches shared the government and did not operate exclusively of each other.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; This system often operated under Mongol and Chinese overlordship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Whether historical Mongol/Chinese power over Tibet is classified as suzerainty or sovereignty is debated, with views often split along modern political lines.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with the respective emperor above the local Tibetan administration.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Tibetan form of government from 1642 until 1951 was the Cho-sid-nyi.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; The dual system was implemented during a period of consolidation under the [[Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, &amp;quot;The Great&amp;quot; 5th Dalai Lama|Fifth Dalai Lama]] (r. 1642–1682), who unified Tibet religiously and politically after a prolonged civil war. He brought the government of Tibet under the control of the [[Gelug]] school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] after defeating the rival [[Kagyu]] and [[Jonang]] sects and the secular ruler, the [[Tsangpa]] prince. The Tibetan model sought to produce a synthesis of the complementary components of the mundane norm: [[Dharma]] ({{bo|t=ཆོས་ལུགས་|w=chos-lugs}}) and [[Samsara]] ({{bo|t=འཇིག་རྟེན་|w=&amp;#039;jig-rten}}).&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=DWBDict/&amp;gt; One basic assumption of this system is that the temporal lord depended on religion for legitimacy, while the institution of [[state religion]] depended on patronage and protection from the political élite.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Tibetan form of government from 1642 until 1951 was the Cho-sid-nyi.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; The dual system was implemented during a period of consolidation under the [[Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, &amp;quot;The Great&amp;quot; 5th Dalai Lama|Fifth Dalai Lama]] (r. 1642–1682), who unified Tibet religiously and politically after a prolonged civil war. He brought the government of Tibet under the control of the [[Gelug]] school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] after defeating the rival [[Kagyu]] and [[Jonang]] sects and the secular ruler, the [[Tsangpa]] prince. The Tibetan model sought to produce a synthesis of the complementary components of the mundane norm: [[Dharma]] ({{bo|t=ཆོས་ལུགས་|w=chos-lugs}}) and [[Samsara]] ({{bo|t=འཇིག་རྟེན་|w=&amp;#039;jig-rten}}).&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=DWBDict/&amp;gt; One basic assumption of this system is that the temporal lord depended on religion for legitimacy, while the institution of [[state religion]] depended on patronage and protection from the political élite.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l15&quot;&gt;Line 15:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 16:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In 1751, the [[Kelzang Gyatso|Seventh Dalai Lama]] abolished the post of Desi (or Regent), in whom too much power had been placed. The Desi was replaced by the [[Kashag]] (Council) to represent the [[Central Tibetan Administration|civil administration]]. The [[Dalai Lama]] thus became the spiritual and political leader of Tibet.&amp;lt;ref name=Namgyal&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://namgyalmonastery.namgyalarchive.com/dala-lama/7th-dalai-lama/his-holiness-the-seventh-dalai-lama-kelsang-gyatso/ |title=His Holiness the Seventh Dalai Lama, Kelsang Gyatso |work=Namgyal Monastery: Personal Monastery of [[14th Dalai Lama|His Holiness the XIVth Dalai Lama]] |date=2009-12-18 |accessdate=2010-10-18 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714150509/http://namgyalmonastery.namgyalarchive.com/dala-lama/7th-dalai-lama/his-holiness-the-seventh-dalai-lama-kelsang-gyatso/ |archivedate=2011-07-14 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Samphel&amp;gt;{{cite book |last1=Samphel |first1=Thubten |last2=Samphel |first2=Tendar |title=The Dalai Lamas of Tibet |page=[https://archive.org/details/dalailamasoftibe0000thub/page/101 101] |publisher=Roli &amp;amp; Janssen |location=[[New Delhi]] |year=2004 |isbn=81-7436-085-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/dalailamasoftibe0000thub/page/101 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Shakabpa&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Shakabpa |first=Tsepon W. D. |authorlink=Tsepon W. D. Shakabpa |title=Tibet, a Political History |location=[[New Haven]] |publisher=Yale |year=1967 |page=150}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In 1751, the [[Kelzang Gyatso|Seventh Dalai Lama]] abolished the post of Desi (or Regent), in whom too much power had been placed. The Desi was replaced by the [[Kashag]] (Council) to represent the [[Central Tibetan Administration|civil administration]]. The [[Dalai Lama]] thus became the spiritual and political leader of Tibet.&amp;lt;ref name=Namgyal&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://namgyalmonastery.namgyalarchive.com/dala-lama/7th-dalai-lama/his-holiness-the-seventh-dalai-lama-kelsang-gyatso/ |title=His Holiness the Seventh Dalai Lama, Kelsang Gyatso |work=Namgyal Monastery: Personal Monastery of [[14th Dalai Lama|His Holiness the XIVth Dalai Lama]] |date=2009-12-18 |accessdate=2010-10-18 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714150509/http://namgyalmonastery.namgyalarchive.com/dala-lama/7th-dalai-lama/his-holiness-the-seventh-dalai-lama-kelsang-gyatso/ |archivedate=2011-07-14 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Samphel&amp;gt;{{cite book |last1=Samphel |first1=Thubten |last2=Samphel |first2=Tendar |title=The Dalai Lamas of Tibet |page=[https://archive.org/details/dalailamasoftibe0000thub/page/101 101] |publisher=Roli &amp;amp; Janssen |location=[[New Delhi]] |year=2004 |isbn=81-7436-085-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/dalailamasoftibe0000thub/page/101 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Shakabpa&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Shakabpa |first=Tsepon W. D. |authorlink=Tsepon W. D. Shakabpa |title=Tibet, a Political History |location=[[New Haven]] |publisher=Yale |year=1967 |page=150}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[File:Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal.jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal]] instituted the Tibetan Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) in [[Bhutan]]]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[File:Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal.jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Shabdrung&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;]] [[&lt;/ins&gt;Ngawang Namgyal]] instituted the Tibetan Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) in [[Bhutan]]]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[Bhutan]], the Cho-sid-nyi was established by [[Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal]] in the 17th century under the code known as the [[&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Tsa &lt;/del&gt;Yig]]. Having fled sectarian persecution in Tibet, Ngawang Namgyal established the [[Drukpa Lineage]] as the state religion. Under the Bhutanese system, the powers of the government were split between the religious branch headed by the [[Je Khenpo]] of the [[Drukpa Lineage]] and the civil administrative branch headed by the [[Druk Desi]]. Both the Je Khenpo and Druk Desi were under the nominal authority of the [[Shabdrung]], a reincarnation of Ngawang Namgyal. After the death of Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal, Bhutan nominally followed the dual system of government. In practice, the Shabdrung was often a child under the control of the Druk Desi, and regional [[penlop]]s (governors) often administered their districts in defiance of the Druk Desi until the rise of the unified monarchy at the beginning of the 20th century.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[Bhutan]], the Cho-sid-nyi was established by [[Shabdrung&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;]] [[&lt;/ins&gt;Ngawang Namgyal]] in the 17th century &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;(1651) &lt;/ins&gt;under the code known as the [[&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Cha &lt;/ins&gt;Yig]]. Having fled sectarian persecution in Tibet, Ngawang Namgyal established the [[Drukpa Lineage]] as the state religion. Under the Bhutanese system, the powers of the government were split between the religious branch headed by the [[Je Khenpo]] of the [[Drukpa Lineage]] and the civil administrative branch headed by the [[Druk Desi]]. Both the Je Khenpo and Druk Desi were under the nominal authority of the [[Shabdrung]], a reincarnation of Ngawang Namgyal. After the death of Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal, Bhutan nominally followed the dual system of government. In practice, the Shabdrung was often a child under the control of the Druk Desi, and regional [[penlop]]s (governors) often administered their districts in defiance of the Druk Desi until the rise of the unified monarchy at the beginning of the 20th century.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[Ladakh]] and [[Sikkim]], two related [[Chogyal]] dynasties reigned with [[absolute monarchy|absolute control]], punctuated by periods of invasion and colonization by [[Tibet]], [[Bhutan]], [[India]], [[Nepal]], and the [[British Empire]]. The basis of the Chogyal monarchy in both Ladakh and Sikkim was its recognition by Three Lamas, and the title &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chogyal&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ({{bo|t=ཆོས་རྒྱལ་|w=chos-rgyal}}; &amp;quot;Dharma Raja&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Religious King&amp;quot;) itself refers to the dual system of government. [[Namgyal dynasty of Ladakh|Ladakh&amp;#039;s Namgyal dynasty]] lasted from 1470 until 1834. The autonomy of the [[Tibetan people|Tibetan]] élite in Ladakh, as well as their system of government, ended with the campaigns of [[General Zorawar Singh]] and [[Rajput]] [[suzerainty]]. Ladakh became a region within the [[States and territories of India|Indian state]] of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] until 2019, when it was formed into a separate [[union territory]]. The Namgyal dynasty continued in Sikkim from 1542 until 1975, when the kingdom voted by plebiscite to join the union of [[India]].&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[Ladakh]] and [[Sikkim]], two related [[Chogyal]] dynasties reigned with [[absolute monarchy|absolute control]], punctuated by periods of invasion and colonization by [[Tibet]], [[Bhutan]], [[India]], [[Nepal]], and the [[British Empire]]. The basis of the Chogyal monarchy in both Ladakh and Sikkim was its recognition by Three Lamas, and the title &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chogyal&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ({{bo|t=ཆོས་རྒྱལ་|w=chos-rgyal}}; &amp;quot;Dharma Raja&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Religious King&amp;quot;) itself refers to the dual system of government. [[Namgyal dynasty of Ladakh|Ladakh&amp;#039;s Namgyal dynasty]] lasted from 1470 until 1834. The autonomy of the [[Tibetan people|Tibetan]] élite in Ladakh, as well as their system of government, ended with the campaigns of [[General Zorawar Singh]] and [[Rajput]] [[suzerainty]]. Ladakh became a region within the [[States and territories of India|Indian state]] of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] until 2019, when it was formed into a separate [[union territory]]. The Namgyal dynasty continued in Sikkim from 1542 until 1975, when the kingdom voted by plebiscite to join the union of [[India]].&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l27&quot;&gt;Line 27:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 28:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The only modern example of a sovereign government operating under the Cho-sid-nyi is [[Bhutan]], although it exists in a highly modified form. In 1907, in an effort to reform the dysfunctional political system, the [[penlop]]s (governors) of Bhutan orchestrated the establishment of a Bhutanese monarchy with [[Ugyen Wangchuck]], the [[penlop]] of [[Trongsa]] installed as hereditary king, with the support of [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|Britain]] and against the wishes of Tibet. Since the establishment of the [[House of Wangchuck|Wangchuck]] dynasty in 1907, the office of the [[Druk Desi]] has been held by the reigning [[Druk Gyalpo]] (King of Bhutan). Under the monarchy, the relative influence of the [[Je Khenpo]] has diminished. Nonetheless, the position remains a powerful one and the Je Khenpo is typically viewed as the closest and most powerful advisor to the Druk Gyalpo.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The only modern example of a sovereign government operating under the Cho-sid-nyi is [[Bhutan]], although it exists in a highly modified form. In 1907, in an effort to reform the dysfunctional political system, the [[penlop]]s (governors) of Bhutan orchestrated the establishment of a Bhutanese monarchy with [[Ugyen Wangchuck]], the [[penlop]] of [[Trongsa]] installed as hereditary king, with the support of [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|Britain]] and against the wishes of Tibet. Since the establishment of the [[House of Wangchuck|Wangchuck]] dynasty in 1907, the office of the [[Druk Desi]] has been held by the reigning [[Druk Gyalpo]] (King of Bhutan). Under the monarchy, the relative influence of the [[Je Khenpo]] has diminished. Nonetheless, the position remains a powerful one and the Je Khenpo is typically viewed as the closest and most powerful advisor to the Druk Gyalpo.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The office of [[Shabdrung]] has fared less well, and has been subsumed by the office of the [[Druk Gyalpo]]. The royal family suffered from questions of legitimacy in its early years, with the reincarnations of the various Shabdrungs posing a threat. According to one Drukpa source, the Shabdrung&#039;s brother [[Chhoki Gyeltshen]] challenged the 1926 accession of King [[Jigme Wangchuck]]. He was rumored to have met with [[Mahatma Gandhi]] to garner support for the Shabdrung against the King. &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt; &lt;/del&gt;The Seventh Shabdrung, [[Jigme Dorji]] was then &quot;retired&quot; to [[Nalanda bhutan|Talo monastery]] and died in 1931, under rumors of assassination. He was the last Shabdrung recognized by Bhutan; subsequent claimants to the incarnation have not been recognized by the government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |title=The Politics of Bhutan |url=https://archive.org/details/politicsofbhutan00rose |url-access=limited |last=Rose |first=Leo E. |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca |year=1977 |isbn=0-8014-0909-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/politicsofbhutan00rose/page/27 27] }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |author=Rongthong Kunley Dorji |title=My understanding of Shabdrung |work=The Bhutan Today |year=2003 |accessdate=4 March 2009 |url=http://www.bhutandnc.com/aprilmay03_3.htm }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1962, [[Jigme Ngawang Namgyal]], known as &#039;&#039;Shabdrung Rimpoche&#039;&#039; to his followers, fled Bhutan for [[India]] where he spent the remainder of his life.  Until 2002, Bhutanese pilgrims were able to journey to [[Kalimpong]], just south of Bhutan, to visit with the Master. On April 5, 2003, the Shabdrung died. Some of his followers claim he was poisoned, while [[Kuensel]] took pains to explain he died after an extended bout with cancer. In early 2007, reports alleged that the current Shabdrung Pema Namgyel, then a small child, had been held under house arrest in [[Bhutan]] along with his parents since 2005 after being invited to Bhutan from his home in [[India]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Respected Buddhist teacher under house arrest in Bhutan |work=The Buddhist Channel |date=Feb 3, 2007 |accessdate=4 March 2009 |url=http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=40,3674,0,0,1,0 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The office of [[Shabdrung]] has fared less well, and has been subsumed by the office of the [[Druk Gyalpo]]. The royal family suffered from questions of legitimacy in its early years, with the reincarnations of the various Shabdrungs posing a threat. According to one Drukpa source, the Shabdrung&#039;s brother [[Chhoki Gyeltshen]] challenged the 1926 accession of King [[Jigme Wangchuck]]. He was rumored to have met with [[Mahatma Gandhi]] to garner support for the Shabdrung against the King. The Seventh Shabdrung, [[&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Jigme Dorji (Shabdrung)|&lt;/ins&gt;Jigme Dorji]] was then &quot;retired&quot; to [[Nalanda bhutan|Talo monastery]] and died in 1931, under rumors of assassination. He was the last Shabdrung recognized by Bhutan; subsequent claimants to the incarnation have not been recognized by the government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |title=The Politics of Bhutan |url=https://archive.org/details/politicsofbhutan00rose |url-access=limited |last=Rose |first=Leo E. |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca |year=1977 |isbn=0-8014-0909-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/politicsofbhutan00rose/page/27 27] }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |author=Rongthong Kunley Dorji |title=My understanding of Shabdrung |work=The Bhutan Today |year=2003 |accessdate=4 March 2009 |url=http://www.bhutandnc.com/aprilmay03_3.htm }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1962, [[Jigme Ngawang Namgyal]], known as &#039;&#039;Shabdrung Rimpoche&#039;&#039; to his followers, fled Bhutan for [[India]] where he spent the remainder of his life.  Until 2002, Bhutanese pilgrims were able to journey to [[Kalimpong]], just south of Bhutan, to visit with the Master. On April 5, 2003, the Shabdrung died. Some of his followers claim he was poisoned, while [[Kuensel]] took pains to explain he died after an extended bout with cancer. In early 2007, reports alleged that the current Shabdrung Pema Namgyel, then a small child, had been held under house arrest in [[Bhutan]] along with his parents since 2005 after being invited to Bhutan from his home in [[India]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Respected Buddhist teacher under house arrest in Bhutan |work=The Buddhist Channel |date=Feb 3, 2007 |accessdate=4 March 2009 |url=http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=40,3674,0,0,1,0 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The [[Constitution of Bhutan]], enacted in 2008, confirms Bhutan&amp;#039;s commitment to the Cho-sid-nyi system. However the title &amp;quot;Druk Desi&amp;quot; never appears in the Constitution, and all administrative powers are vested in the [[Druk Gyalpo]] and civilian offices directly. Furthermore, the Druk Gyalpo appoints the [[Je Khenpo]] on advice of the Five Lopons, and the [[democracy|democratic]] Constitution itself is the supreme law of the land, as opposed to a Shabdrung figurehead.&amp;lt;ref name=CoBE/&amp;gt; In the 2008 Constitution, there is no reference whatsoever to the office of Shabdrung.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The [[Constitution of Bhutan]], enacted in 2008, confirms Bhutan&amp;#039;s commitment to the Cho-sid-nyi system. However the title &amp;quot;Druk Desi&amp;quot; never appears in the Constitution, and all administrative powers are vested in the [[Druk Gyalpo]] and civilian offices directly. Furthermore, the Druk Gyalpo appoints the [[Je Khenpo]] on advice of the Five Lopons, and the [[democracy|democratic]] Constitution itself is the supreme law of the land, as opposed to a Shabdrung figurehead.&amp;lt;ref name=CoBE/&amp;gt; In the 2008 Constitution, there is no reference whatsoever to the office of Shabdrung.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>UpdateBot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government&amp;diff=150253&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Citation bot: Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Amigao | Category:History of Tibet | via #UCB_Category</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tibetan_dual_system_of_government&amp;diff=150253&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2020-09-26T15:42:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Removed parameters. | You can &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/BP:UCB&quot; class=&quot;extiw&quot; title=&quot;wp:UCB&quot;&gt;use this bot&lt;/a&gt; yourself. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/BP:DBUG&quot; class=&quot;extiw&quot; title=&quot;wp:DBUG&quot;&gt;Report bugs here&lt;/a&gt;. | Suggested by Amigao | &lt;a href=&quot;/w/index.php?title=Category:History_of_Tibet&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Category:History of Tibet (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;Category:History of Tibet&lt;/a&gt; | via #UCB_Category&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{About|the system of government in Tibet|other past and present governments of this kind|Diarchy}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lozang Gyatso.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The [[Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, &amp;quot;The Great&amp;quot; 5th Dalai Lama|Fifth Dalai Lama]] implemented the traditional Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) in [[Tibet]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Dual System of Government &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is the traditional [[diarchy|diarchal]] political system of [[Tibetan people]]s whereby the Desi (temporal ruler) coexists with the spiritual authority of the realm, usually unified under a third single ruler. The actual distribution of power between institutions varied over time and location. The Tibetan term Cho-sid-nyi ({{bo|t=ཆོས་སྲིད་གཉིས་|w=chos-srid-gnyis}}; alternate spellings include &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chhos-srid-gnyis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chhoe-sid-nyi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chos-sid-nyi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) literally means &amp;quot;both [[Dharma]] and temporal,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/bot/pdf/bot_05_03_02.pdf |title=Chhos Srid Gnyis Ldan |work=Bulletin of Tibetology, Vol. V, No. 3 |last=Sinha |first=Nirmal C. |date=1968-11-12 |pages=13–27 |accessdate=2010-10-18}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=DWBDict&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.diamondway-buddhism.org/diction/diction.htm |title=Tibetan-English-Dictionary of Buddhist Teaching &amp;amp; Practice |publisher=Rangjung Yeshe Translations &amp;amp; Publications |work=Diamond Way Buddhism Worldwide |year=1996 |accessdate=2010-10-18 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100328014624/http://www.diamondway-buddhism.org/diction/diction.htm |archivedate=2010-03-28 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but may also be translated as &amp;quot;dual system of religion and politics.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=CoBE&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.constitution.bt/TsaThrim%20Eng%20(A5).pdf |title=Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan (English) |publisher=Government of Bhutan |date=2008-07-18 |accessdate=2010-10-13 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706162637/http://www.constitution.bt/TsaThrim%20Eng%20%28A5%29.pdf |archivedate=2011-07-06 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the ultimate ruler is the patron and protector of [[state religion]], some aspects of the dual system of government may be likened to the [[Supreme Governor of the Church of England|Supreme Governance]] of the [[Church of England]], or even to [[theocracy]]. However, other aspects resemble [[secularism]], aiming to separate the doctrines of religion and politics. Under the Cho-sid-nyi, both religious and temporal authorities wield actual political power, albeit within officially separate institutions. Religious and secular officials might work side by side, each responsible to different [[bureaucracy|bureaucracies]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bundesarchiv Bild 135-S-13-11-31, Tibetexpedition, Minister.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The Tibetan [[Kashag]] in 1938–39. From 1751 to 1951, the Kashag replaced the office of Desi in the Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) of [[Tibet]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since at least the period of the [[Mongol-Tibetan relations in the 13th and 14th centuries|Mongol presence]] in Tibet during the 13th and 14th centuries, [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and [[Bön]] clerics had participated in secular government, having the same rights as laymen to be appointed state officials, both military and civil.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; This system stood in stark contrast with that of [[China]], in which the Buddhist view of politics as a &amp;quot;dismal science&amp;quot; as well as the [[Confucianism|Confucian]] monopoly on the bureaucracy precluded such political activity by the [[Sangha (Buddhism)|Sangha]].&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; By the [[Ming Dynasty]] (founded 1368), the [[Sakya#Feudal lordship over Tibet|Sakya]] held office above the heads of both components, embodying a government of both &amp;#039;&amp;#039;chos&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;srid&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. As a result, there were two sets of laws and officials, the religious ({{bo|t=ལྷ་སདེ་|w=lha-sde}}) and the temporal ({{bo|t=མི་སྡེ་|w=mi-sde}}), however the branches shared the government and did not operate exclusively of each other.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; This system often operated under Mongol and Chinese overlordship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Whether historical Mongol/Chinese power over Tibet is classified as suzerainty or sovereignty is debated, with views often split along modern political lines.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with the respective emperor above the local Tibetan administration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tibetan form of government from 1642 until 1951 was the Cho-sid-nyi.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt; The dual system was implemented during a period of consolidation under the [[Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, &amp;quot;The Great&amp;quot; 5th Dalai Lama|Fifth Dalai Lama]] (r. 1642–1682), who unified Tibet religiously and politically after a prolonged civil war. He brought the government of Tibet under the control of the [[Gelug]] school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] after defeating the rival [[Kagyu]] and [[Jonang]] sects and the secular ruler, the [[Tsangpa]] prince. The Tibetan model sought to produce a synthesis of the complementary components of the mundane norm: [[Dharma]] ({{bo|t=ཆོས་ལུགས་|w=chos-lugs}}) and [[Samsara]] ({{bo|t=འཇིག་རྟེན་|w=&amp;#039;jig-rten}}).&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=DWBDict/&amp;gt; One basic assumption of this system is that the temporal lord depended on religion for legitimacy, while the institution of [[state religion]] depended on patronage and protection from the political élite.&amp;lt;ref name=Sinha/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1751, the [[Kelzang Gyatso|Seventh Dalai Lama]] abolished the post of Desi (or Regent), in whom too much power had been placed. The Desi was replaced by the [[Kashag]] (Council) to represent the [[Central Tibetan Administration|civil administration]]. The [[Dalai Lama]] thus became the spiritual and political leader of Tibet.&amp;lt;ref name=Namgyal&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://namgyalmonastery.namgyalarchive.com/dala-lama/7th-dalai-lama/his-holiness-the-seventh-dalai-lama-kelsang-gyatso/ |title=His Holiness the Seventh Dalai Lama, Kelsang Gyatso |work=Namgyal Monastery: Personal Monastery of [[14th Dalai Lama|His Holiness the XIVth Dalai Lama]] |date=2009-12-18 |accessdate=2010-10-18 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714150509/http://namgyalmonastery.namgyalarchive.com/dala-lama/7th-dalai-lama/his-holiness-the-seventh-dalai-lama-kelsang-gyatso/ |archivedate=2011-07-14 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Samphel&amp;gt;{{cite book |last1=Samphel |first1=Thubten |last2=Samphel |first2=Tendar |title=The Dalai Lamas of Tibet |page=[https://archive.org/details/dalailamasoftibe0000thub/page/101 101] |publisher=Roli &amp;amp; Janssen |location=[[New Delhi]] |year=2004 |isbn=81-7436-085-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/dalailamasoftibe0000thub/page/101 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Shakabpa&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Shakabpa |first=Tsepon W. D. |authorlink=Tsepon W. D. Shakabpa |title=Tibet, a Political History |location=[[New Haven]] |publisher=Yale |year=1967 |page=150}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal.jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal]] instituted the Tibetan Cho-sid-nyi (dual system) in [[Bhutan]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Bhutan]], the Cho-sid-nyi was established by [[Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal]] in the 17th century under the code known as the [[Tsa Yig]]. Having fled sectarian persecution in Tibet, Ngawang Namgyal established the [[Drukpa Lineage]] as the state religion. Under the Bhutanese system, the powers of the government were split between the religious branch headed by the [[Je Khenpo]] of the [[Drukpa Lineage]] and the civil administrative branch headed by the [[Druk Desi]]. Both the Je Khenpo and Druk Desi were under the nominal authority of the [[Shabdrung]], a reincarnation of Ngawang Namgyal. After the death of Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal, Bhutan nominally followed the dual system of government. In practice, the Shabdrung was often a child under the control of the Druk Desi, and regional [[penlop]]s (governors) often administered their districts in defiance of the Druk Desi until the rise of the unified monarchy at the beginning of the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ladakh]] and [[Sikkim]], two related [[Chogyal]] dynasties reigned with [[absolute monarchy|absolute control]], punctuated by periods of invasion and colonization by [[Tibet]], [[Bhutan]], [[India]], [[Nepal]], and the [[British Empire]]. The basis of the Chogyal monarchy in both Ladakh and Sikkim was its recognition by Three Lamas, and the title &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chogyal&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ({{bo|t=ཆོས་རྒྱལ་|w=chos-rgyal}}; &amp;quot;Dharma Raja&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Religious King&amp;quot;) itself refers to the dual system of government. [[Namgyal dynasty of Ladakh|Ladakh&amp;#039;s Namgyal dynasty]] lasted from 1470 until 1834. The autonomy of the [[Tibetan people|Tibetan]] élite in Ladakh, as well as their system of government, ended with the campaigns of [[General Zorawar Singh]] and [[Rajput]] [[suzerainty]]. Ladakh became a region within the [[States and territories of India|Indian state]] of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] until 2019, when it was formed into a separate [[union territory]]. The Namgyal dynasty continued in Sikkim from 1542 until 1975, when the kingdom voted by plebiscite to join the union of [[India]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contemporary systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kingdom of Bhutan===&lt;br /&gt;
{{see|Constitution of Bhutan|Druk Gyalpo|Shabdrung}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck (edit).jpg|250px|thumb|right|The Bhutanese [[Druk Gyalpo]] [[Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck]] is the embodiment of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cho-sid-nyi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; under the [[Constitution of Bhutan]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
The only modern example of a sovereign government operating under the Cho-sid-nyi is [[Bhutan]], although it exists in a highly modified form. In 1907, in an effort to reform the dysfunctional political system, the [[penlop]]s (governors) of Bhutan orchestrated the establishment of a Bhutanese monarchy with [[Ugyen Wangchuck]], the [[penlop]] of [[Trongsa]] installed as hereditary king, with the support of [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|Britain]] and against the wishes of Tibet. Since the establishment of the [[House of Wangchuck|Wangchuck]] dynasty in 1907, the office of the [[Druk Desi]] has been held by the reigning [[Druk Gyalpo]] (King of Bhutan). Under the monarchy, the relative influence of the [[Je Khenpo]] has diminished. Nonetheless, the position remains a powerful one and the Je Khenpo is typically viewed as the closest and most powerful advisor to the Druk Gyalpo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The office of [[Shabdrung]] has fared less well, and has been subsumed by the office of the [[Druk Gyalpo]]. The royal family suffered from questions of legitimacy in its early years, with the reincarnations of the various Shabdrungs posing a threat. According to one Drukpa source, the Shabdrung&amp;#039;s brother [[Chhoki Gyeltshen]] challenged the 1926 accession of King [[Jigme Wangchuck]]. He was rumored to have met with [[Mahatma Gandhi]] to garner support for the Shabdrung against the King.  The Seventh Shabdrung, [[Jigme Dorji]] was then &amp;quot;retired&amp;quot; to [[Nalanda bhutan|Talo monastery]] and died in 1931, under rumors of assassination. He was the last Shabdrung recognized by Bhutan; subsequent claimants to the incarnation have not been recognized by the government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |title=The Politics of Bhutan |url=https://archive.org/details/politicsofbhutan00rose |url-access=limited |last=Rose |first=Leo E. |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca |year=1977 |isbn=0-8014-0909-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/politicsofbhutan00rose/page/27 27] }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |author=Rongthong Kunley Dorji |title=My understanding of Shabdrung |work=The Bhutan Today |year=2003 |accessdate=4 March 2009 |url=http://www.bhutandnc.com/aprilmay03_3.htm }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1962, [[Jigme Ngawang Namgyal]], known as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Shabdrung Rimpoche&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to his followers, fled Bhutan for [[India]] where he spent the remainder of his life.  Until 2002, Bhutanese pilgrims were able to journey to [[Kalimpong]], just south of Bhutan, to visit with the Master. On April 5, 2003, the Shabdrung died. Some of his followers claim he was poisoned, while [[Kuensel]] took pains to explain he died after an extended bout with cancer. In early 2007, reports alleged that the current Shabdrung Pema Namgyel, then a small child, had been held under house arrest in [[Bhutan]] along with his parents since 2005 after being invited to Bhutan from his home in [[India]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Respected Buddhist teacher under house arrest in Bhutan |work=The Buddhist Channel |date=Feb 3, 2007 |accessdate=4 March 2009 |url=http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=40,3674,0,0,1,0 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Constitution of Bhutan]], enacted in 2008, confirms Bhutan&amp;#039;s commitment to the Cho-sid-nyi system. However the title &amp;quot;Druk Desi&amp;quot; never appears in the Constitution, and all administrative powers are vested in the [[Druk Gyalpo]] and civilian offices directly. Furthermore, the Druk Gyalpo appoints the [[Je Khenpo]] on advice of the Five Lopons, and the [[democracy|democratic]] Constitution itself is the supreme law of the land, as opposed to a Shabdrung figurehead.&amp;lt;ref name=CoBE/&amp;gt; In the 2008 Constitution, there is no reference whatsoever to the office of Shabdrung.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government of Tibet in exile===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Central Tibetan Administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Parliament of the Central Tibetan Administration|Parliament]] of the [[Central Tibetan Administration|Tibetan government in exile]] consists of 43–46 members including 10 religious delegates (2 members each from the four schools of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and the traditional [[Bön]] school). Aside from seats reserved for religious representatives, offices are generally open to clerics: the [[Kalon Tripa|Prime Minister]] of its [[Parliament of the Central Tibetan Administration|Parliament]] is [[Lobsang Tenzin]], a Buddhist monk. The administration of the government in exile was headed for decades by the [[Dalai Lama]], but in 2011, he ceded his temporal (secular) powers, keeping only his role as spiritual leader.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Politics of Bhutan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[History of Bhutan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[History of Tibet]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[History of Sikkim]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[History of Ladakh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite web |url=http://www.bhutan2008.bt/en/node/305 |title=Establishment of Monastic body |publisher=Bhutan 2008 |year=2008 |accessdate=2010-10-19 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20120312151153/http://www.bhutan2008.bt/en/node/305 |archivedate=2012-03-12 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35839.htm |title=Background Note: Bhutan |date=2010-02-02 |publisher=[[U.S. Department of State]] |accessdate=2010-10-27}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bhutanese society}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{History of Bhutan}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:State religion in Bhutan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics of Bhutan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Buddhism in Bhutan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History of Bhutan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History of Tibet]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History of Sikkim]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religious legal systems]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Buddhism and government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Citation bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>