Template:Uw-point - Revision history

WikiDwarfBOT: /* top */clean up, replaced: Wikipedia → Bharatpedia

2021-06-10T05:53:23Z

top: clean up, replaced: Wikipedia → Bharatpedia

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 10 June 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{{icon\|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to ~~Wikipedia~~ are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1\|}}}\|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],\|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}\|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[BP:POINT\|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Bharatpedia:Reasonability_Rule\|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Bharatpedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[BP:BLOCK\|block]] or [[BP:BAN\|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[BP:DISPUTE\|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-point --><noinclude>		{{{icon\|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to Bharatpedia are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1\|}}}\|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],\|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}\|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[BP:POINT\|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Bharatpedia:Reasonability_Rule\|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Bharatpedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[BP:BLOCK\|block]] or [[BP:BAN\|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[BP:DISPUTE\|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-point --><noinclude>

	{{single notice}}		{{single notice}}
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>

WikiDwarfBOT: /* top */clean up, replaced: WP: → BP: (4)

2021-06-01T06:03:46Z

top: clean up, replaced: WP: → BP: (4)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 1 June 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{{icon\|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1\|}}}\|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],\|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}\|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[WP:POINT\|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Bharatpedia:Reasonability_Rule\|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Bharatpedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[WP:BLOCK\|block]] or [[WP:BAN\|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[WP:DISPUTE\|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-point --><noinclude>		{{{icon\|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1\|}}}\|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],\|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}\|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[BP:POINT\|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Bharatpedia:Reasonability_Rule\|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Bharatpedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[BP:BLOCK\|block]] or [[BP:BAN\|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[BP:DISPUTE\|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-point --><noinclude>

	{{single notice}}		{{single notice}}
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>

WikiDwarfBOT: /* top */clean up, replaced: Wikipedia: → Bharatpedia: (2)

2021-05-31T14:10:42Z

top: clean up, replaced: Wikipedia: → Bharatpedia: (2)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 31 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{{icon\|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1\|}}}\|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],\|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}\|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[WP:POINT\|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[~~Wikipedia~~:Reasonability_Rule\|unpopular]] way, are highly [[~~Wikipedia~~:Disruptive editing\|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[WP:BLOCK\|block]] or [[WP:BAN\|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[WP:DISPUTE\|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-point --><noinclude>		{{{icon\|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1\|}}}\|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],\|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}\|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[WP:POINT\|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Bharatpedia:Reasonability_Rule\|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Bharatpedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[WP:BLOCK\|block]] or [[WP:BAN\|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[WP:DISPUTE\|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2\|}}}\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-point --><noinclude>

	{{single notice}}		{{single notice}}
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>

WikiDwarf: 1 revision imported

2021-04-24T19:54:26Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:24, 25 April 2021
(No difference)

>CommonsDelinker: Replacing Ambox_warning.svg with File:Ambox_warning_pn.svg (by CommonsDelinker because: file renamed, redirect linked from other project).

2020-06-17T01:21:41Z

Replacing Ambox_warning.svg with File:Ambox_warning_pn.svg (by CommonsDelinker because: file renamed, redirect linked from other project).

New page

{{{icon|[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]]}}} Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|recent edits, such as those to [[:{{{1}}}]],|[[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}|recent edits]]}} appear to be [[WP:POINT|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Wikipedia:Reasonability_Rule|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]] or [[WP:BAN|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<noinclude>

{{single notice}}
</noinclude>