->JJMC89 bot III: Moving :Category:Forced disappearances to :Category:Enforced disappearances per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy

2022-01-06T08:53:30Z

Moving Category:Forced disappearances to Category:Enforced disappearances per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy

New page

{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2021}}
{{cleanup rewrite|date=April 2015}}
The '''Tata Nano Singur controversy''' was a controversy generated by land acquisition of a proposed [[Tata Motors]] automobile factory at [[Singur]] in [[Hooghly district]], [[West Bengal]], India. The factory would have been used to build the compact car [[Tata Nano]].

Tata Motors started constructing a factory to manufacture a car, Tata Nano which was estimated to cost $2,500 at Singur. The small car was scheduled to roll out of the factory by 2008.

The state government of West Bengal created the controversy by citing the 1894 land acquisition act rule to conduct an [[eminent domain]] takeover of {{convert|997|acre|km2}} of farmland on which Tata Motors was supposed to build its factory.<ref name="economist">[[The Economist]] 30 August 2008 edition. U.S. Edition. "[http://www.economist.com/node/12010079 Nano wars]". Page 63.</ref> The rule is meant for public improvement projects, and the West Bengal government wanted Tata to build in its state. The project was opposed by activists and opposition parties in Bengal.

==Small car manufacturing facility==

Singur was chosen by the company among six sites offered by the state government. The project faced massive opposition from displaced farmers. The unwilling farmers were given political support by West Bengal's then opposition leader [[Mamata Banerjee]]. Banerjee's "Save Farmland" movement was supported by environmental activists like [[Medha Patkar]], Anuradha Talwar and [[Arundhati Roy]]. Banerjee's movement against displacement of farmers was also supported by several Kolkata based intellectuals like Aparna Sen, Kaushik Sen, Shaonli Mitra and Suvaprasanna. Leftist activists also shared the platform with Banerjee's [[All India Trinamool Congress|Trinamool Congress]]. The Tatas finally decided to move out of Singur on 3 October 2008. [[Ratan Tata]] blamed agitation by Banerjee and her supporters for the pullout decision. On 7 October 2008, the Tatas announced that they would be setting up the Tata Nano plant in Sanand, Gujarat.

==Background==

The rapid rise in the population of [[West Bengal]] has not been accompanied by significant economic growth. Key indicators such as unemployment rates, poverty rates, infant mortality rates, job growth rates, per capita income, mobile phone penetration rates lag the more industrialized states of India. Local politicians gained power by promising agricultural land to landless farmers, but given West Bengal's population density, the land-holdings are small and the yields are insufficient to sustain poor families. While the shift from agriculture to industrial jobs requires re-training, given India's economic growth, it provides an opportunity for earning higher income.

Several other states had offered land to [[Tata Motors]] for the project.

The people staying in the proposed land were forced to evacuate by the government. The compensation given was considered inadequate and the new housing facilities offered were delayed. This led to the protest of the peasants backed by opposition political parties.

The company had made substantial promises. According to their claims, Singur would become a mini-auto city and approximately 70 vendors would set up shop along with the factory. The total investment planned is to the tune of Rs 1,000 crore.<ref>[http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2006/12/13/stories/2006121305020100.htm The Hindu Business Line, 13 December 2006]. Thehindubusinessline.com (13 December 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref> The project had, however, generated controversy right from the start, particularly on the question of state acquisition of fertile agricultural land for private enterprise.

=== The land acquisition controversy ===

On 23 September 2008, Tatas decided to leave Singur in West Bengal, the decision is reported to have been made by the Tata management and the Bengal government had been informed. On 3 October it became official that TATA will leave Singur (WB) when Ratan Tata announced it in a press conference in Kolkata.

While the ruling party has gone all out<ref>[http://www.telegraphindia.com/1061014/asp/bengal/story_6870254.asp CPM supports CM and Sen on Singur]. Telegraphindia.com (14 October 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>
for acquisition of {{convert|997|acre|km2}}<ref name="economist"/> of multi-crop land required for the car factory, questions have been raised about the party forcible acquisition which was made under the colonial Land Acquisition Act of 1894.<ref name="economist"/> Others say the provisions of this act were allegedly not been met.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://archive.today/20070630031937/http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage_c.php?leftnm=10&autono=287336|title = 30% of Singur farmers reject compensation}}</ref>

The law has provisions for state taking over privately held land for public purposes but not for developing private businesses. The illegality of the acquisition has been substantially conceded by the Kolkata High Court.

The Tata Motors site is the most fertile one in the whole of the Singur, and the Singur block, in turn, is among the most highly fertile in West Bengal. Consequently, almost the entire local population depends on agriculture with approximately 15000 making their livelihood directly from it. With the number of direct jobs to be created no more than about 1,000, many of which are expected to go to outsiders, the local populace felt threatened for their livelihood.<ref>[http://www.tehelka.com/story_main27.asp?filename=Ne030307Bengal_CS.asp&id=2 Cover Story]. Tehelka.com (3 March 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref> Environmental degradation is also feared.

Chief protesters include the opposition parties spearheaded by the Trinamool Congress under [[Mamata Banerjee]] and [[Socialist Unity Centre of India]]. The movement has received widespread support from civil rights and human rights groups, legal bodies, social activists like [[Medha Patkar]] and Anuradha Talwar, [[Booker prize]]-winning author [[Arundhati Roy]] and [[Magsaysay]] and [[Jnanpith Award]]-winning author [[Mahasweta Devi]].<ref>[http://www.doccentre.net/Tod/singur-final-report.php THE PUBLIC HEARING AND FURTHER INVESTIGATION ON THE STRUGGLE BY THE PEOPLE OF SINGUR. THE FINAL REPORT] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202191551/http://www.doccentre.net/Tod/singur-final-report.php |date=2 December 2008 }}. Doccentre.net. 27 October 2006. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.</ref> Other intellectuals, writers like the poet Ruchit Shah, artists like [[Subhaprasanna]], theatre and film personalities like [[Shaoli Mitra]], [[Aparna Sen]] etc. have pitched in. The state police force has been used to restrict their access to the area.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20121024161735/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2006-12-08/india/27814630_1_medha-patkar-singur-cpm Do you need a visa to enter Bengal?]. Timesofindia.indiatimes.com (8 December 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref> The [[Nobel Laureate]] [[Amartya Sen]] supported the idea of factory but he however opposed forcible acquisition of land.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - Nation |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070215/nation.htm#2 |access-date=4 September 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080726030921/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070215/nation.htm#2 |archive-date=26 July 2008 |url-status=live }}</ref>

Preliminary surveys by officials of the state and Tata Motors faced protests, and manhandling on one occasion, from the villagers organized under the Save Singur Farmland Committee with Trinamool Congress forming its chief component.<ref>[http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=217799 The Indian Express 15 January 2007]. Cities.expressindia.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070123011919/http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=217799 |date=23 January 2007 }}</ref> It is reported that Naxalite elements hold sway over the direction the agitation takes and the Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee takes no decisions without consulting them.<ref>[http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Naxals-NGOs-now-lead-Mamata-agitation-She-wont-act-without-our-OK/355813/ Banerjee doesn't take decisions without Naxal elements' OK]. Expressindia.com (1 September 2008). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

The state government imposed the prohibitory [[Section 144]] of the Indian Penal Code for initially a month and then extended it indefinitely. The imposition has been declared illegal by the Kolkata High Court <ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20121024161821/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2007-02-15/india/27875032_1_prohibitory-orders-land-acquisition-singur Sec 144 in Singur illegal: HC]. Timesofindia.indiatimes.com (15 February 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

While landless peasants and sharecroppers fear losing out entirely, sections of the locals, particularly those owing allegiance to the CPI(M) have welcomed the factory. These count chiefly among the owners of bigger portions of the land even as discrimination in the compensation has been alleged.<ref>[http://www.telegraphindia.com/1061210/asp/insight/story_7118722.asp Fields of foment – 'We should get a picture of Ratan Tata and do his puja every day']. Telegraphindia.com (10 December 2006). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

A section of those promised jobs at the factory have boycotted classes while training in protest against the alleged going back on the promise.<ref>[http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070623/asp/bengal/story_7962811.asp Job cry from Tata trainees]. Telegraphindia.com (23 June 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

In the 2011 state assembly elections, while the sitting Trinamool Congress MLA, Rabindranath Bhattacharya retained the [[Singur (Vidhan Sabha constituency)|Singur]] seat, [[Becharam Manna]], the convener of Krishi Jami Raksha Samiti, won the adjoining [[Haripal (Vidhan Sabha constituency)|Haripal]] seat.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS25196.htm|title = Haripal|work = Assembly Elections May 2011 Results| publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 19 May 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS25188.htm|title = Singur|work = Assembly Elections May 2011 Results| publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 19 May 2011 }}</ref>

===Fencing off the land===

The land earmarked for the project was taken control of by the state administration amidst protests and fencing off commenced on 1 December 2006. Mamata Banerjee, who was prevented from entering Singur by the state police, called a statewide [[bandh]] in protest while legislators belonging to her party turned violent in the legislative assembly causing damage to furniture. [https://web.archive.org/web/20070929115823/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=1&id=166070] Later, she went on a 26-day [[hunger strike]] [http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/dec/29mamta.htm]. During this period she presented affidavits of farmers apparently unwilling to part with their land.<ref>[http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?date=2006-12-23&clid=1&id=168248 The Statesman 23 December 2006] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929123413/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?date=2006-12-23&clid=1&id=168248 |date=29 September 2007 }}</ref> On 4 December, Banerjee began the historic 26-day hunger strike in Kolkata protesting the forcible acquisition of farmland by the government. The then-President [[A. P. J. Abdul Kalam]], who was concerned about her health, spoke to the then-Prime Minister [[Manmohan Singh]] to resolve the issue. Kalam also appealed to Ms Banerjee to withdraw her fast as "life is precious". A letter from Manmohan Singh was faxed to [[Gopalkrishna Gandhi]], the then-Governor of West Bengal, and then it was immediately delivered to Mamata. After receiving the letter Mamata finally broke her fast at midnight on 29 December.<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 December 2006|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/mamata-ends-25-day-hunger-strike/story-s7gIzBR4FvivAKFuYozrLM.html|title=Mamata ends 25-day hunger strike|website=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=4 December 2020|url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/farmers-agitation-mamata-reminds-people-of-her-26-day-hunger-strike-179907|title=Mamata Banerjee dials protesting farmers, assures TMC's support|website=The Tribune}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=4 December 2020|url=https://www.sentinelassam.com/national-news/west-bengal-cm-mamata-banerjee-reminds-people-of-her-26-day-hunger-strike-514753|title=West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee reminds people of her 26-day hunger strike|website=The Sentinel}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=4 December 2020|url=https://www.thestatesman.com/bengal/mamata-banerjee-remembers-singur-hunger-strike-context-ongoing-farmers-protest-1502938968.html|title=Mamata Banerjee remembers Singur hunger strike in context of ongoing farmers protest|website=The Statesman}}</ref>

The fenced off area has been regularly guarded, besides large contingents of policemen, by cadres of the CPI(M) party. They were accused of the multiple rape followed by burning to death of teenage villager [[Tapasi Malik]] who was active in the protests, on 18 December 2006.<ref>[http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=1&id=167862 The Statesman 19 December 2007] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929102749/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=1&id=167862 |date=29 September 2007 }}</ref> Negligence and political interference in the probe into her death have been alleged.<ref>[http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=23&id=171772 The Statesman 22 January 2007] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929115729/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=23&id=171772 |date=29 September 2007 }}</ref> Later, CPI(M) activist [[Debu Malik]] and based on his statement, CPI(M) zonal committee secretary [[Suhrid Dutta]] were arrested by the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] in connection with the crime.<ref>[http://www.indianexpress.com/story/203224.html CPM local boss arrested for Singur girl's murder]. Indianexpress.com (29 June 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=29 June 2007|title=CPI(M) man confesses to raping Singur girl|url=https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-cpim-man-confesses-to-raping-singur-girl-1106845|work=DNA India|access-date=30 November 2021}}</ref>

Intermittent attacks by villagers have since continued on the fence. However, continuing agitations against the project appeared to have proved ineffective and a farmer who lost land committed suicide<ref>[http://www.indianexpress.com/story/31930.html Land lost, Singur farmer said no to compensation, commits suicide]. Indianexpress.com (26 May 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

On the other hand, the pro-factory villagers siding with the CPI(M) have made accusations against the Naxalite faction of the 'Save Singur Farmland Committee' of threats and violence against them.<ref>[http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1076208 DNA – India – 'Save Singur' turns sour – Daily News & Analysis]. Dnaindia.com (24 January 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

===Construction of plant===
[[Tatas]] ceremonially initiated the construction of the plant on 21 January 2007.<ref>[http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070122/asp/frontpage/story_7294279.asp The Telegraph 22 January 2007]. Telegraphindia.com (22 January 2007). Retrieved on 2011-10-09. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930060544/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070122/asp/frontpage/story_7294279.asp |date=30 September 2007 }}</ref> The Tata Group announced on 3 October 2008 that they are pulling out of Singur due to the political unrest and agitation.

===Procedural lacunae===

Other aspects of the process of setting up the factory that had come under severe criticism are the government's secrecy on the details of the deal and the chief minister's furnishing of false information, including in the legislative assembly [[Vidhan Sabha]]. In particular, the concessions being given to Tata Motors have not been publicly revealed. The falsehoods of the chief minister chiefly pertain to claims made by him of having acquired {{convert|912|acre|km2}} <ref>[http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=210657 The Indian Express November 24, 2006]. cities.expressindia.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011. {{dead link|date=October 2011}}</ref> through voluntary consent of the owners without the use of force.

The [[Kolkata High Court]] declared the acquisition ''[[prima facie]]'' illegal.<ref>[http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/15789.asp Calcutta High Court says Singur land acquisition appears illegal -all eyes now on communists in West Bengal] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100201012053/http://indiadaily.com/editorial/15789.asp |date=1 February 2010 }}. Indiadaily.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.</ref>
The air seemed to have cleared somewhat when the High Court ordered the state government to submit correct figures following which an [[affidavit]] but was not satisfied with the result.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://archive.today/20070505115756/http://content.msn.co.in/News/National/NationalPTI_020507_1718.htm|title = MSN INDIA - Singur: HC asks Bengal Govt to file fresh affidavit}}</ref> In an affidavit filed later in June 2007, the government admitted to 30 per cent of the land was acquired from farmers without consent.<ref>[http://in.news.yahoo.com/070610/211/6gult.html IBN 10 June 2007: 30 pc Singur farmers not compensated] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070715125228/http://in.news.yahoo.com/070610/211/6gult.html |date=15 July 2007 }}</ref> The affidavit remains unclear on whether the lack of consent is based on insufficiency of the compensation or refusal to sell altogether.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20121024161848/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2007-06-08/kolkata/27977543_1_affidavit-acres-compensation State files Singur affidavit]. timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved on 9 October 2011.</ref>

==Tata pulls out==
On 3 October 2008, after a brief meeting with the Chief Minister, Ratan Tata declared his decision to move the Nano Project out of West Bengal. Tata mentioned his frustration with the opposition movement at Singur Project led by [[Trinamool Congress]] chief Ms. Mamata Banerjee. Ms Banerjee responded by referring to actions by Tatas and the state government.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Tata-pulls-out-of-Singur-blames-Trinamool-stir/369241/|title=Tata pulls out of Singur, blames Trinamool stir – The Financial Express|date=4 October 2008|publisher=www.financialexpress.com|access-date=10 March 2009}}</ref><ref>
{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/28/stories/2008092859731000.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080930005825/http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/28/stories/2008092859731000.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=30 September 2008|title=If Tata pulls out, Trinamool will be solely responsible: CM
|access-date=10 March 2009|location=Chennai, India|work=[[The Hindu]]|date=28 September 2008}}</ref>

The CM of [[Gujarat]], [[Narendra Modi]] then sent an SMS to Mr. Ratan Tata, which simply said "Suswagatham", to persuade him to relocate the Nano factory to Gujarat.<ref name="intoday1">[http://businesstoday.intoday.in/bt/story/gujarat-is-indias-new-factory-hub/1/11918.html Supersize Gujarat – Business Today – Business News]. Businesstoday.intoday.in (23 January 2011). Retrieved on 2011-10-09.</ref>

It took 14 months to build a new factory in [[Sanand]], Gujarat compared with 28 months for the Singur factory.<ref name="intoday1"/>

==Land return==
In 2016, the Supreme Court quashed the West Bengal government's acquisition of 997 acres of agricultural land for Tata Motors and ordered its return to 9,117 landowners.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Return-Singur-land-to-farmers-SC-orders-West-Bengal-govt./article14600055.ece | title = Return land to Farmers: SC orders West Bengal govt.| first= Krishnadas |last = Rajagopal| newspaper = The Hindu| date = 31 August 2016| access-date = 8 June 2017 | publisher = The Hindu, 31 August 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bengal-to-return-singur-land-to-farmers-on-sept-14/article9100087.ece | title = Bengal to return Singur land to farmers on Sept 14 | access-date = 8 June 2017 | publisher = The Hindu Business Line, 12 September 2016}}</ref>

==See also==
* [[Tata Motors]]
* [[Tata Group]]

==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}

{{Hooghly topics}}

[[Category:21st-century conflicts]]
[[Category:21st century in India]]
[[Category:Hooghly district]]
[[Category:Economy of West Bengal]]
[[Category:Politics of West Bengal]]
[[Category:2008 in India]]
[[Category:Controversies in India]]
[[Category:2000s in West Bengal]]
[[Category:Political history of West Bengal]]
[[Category:Controversies surrounding the Tata Group]]
[[Category:Conflicts in 2008]]
[[Category:Economic history of India (1947–present)]]
[[Category:History of West Bengal (1947–present)]]
[[Category:Human rights abuses]]
[[Category:Human rights abuses in India]]
[[Category:Communist Party of India (Marxist)]]
[[Category:Land rights movements]]
[[Category:Far-left terrorism]]
[[Category:Enforced disappearances]]
[[Category:Politics of India]]
[[Category:Protest-related deaths]]
[[Category:Protests in India]]
[[Category:Political repression]]
[[Category:Police brutality in India]]
[[Category:Police misconduct in India]]
[[Category:Discrimination in India]]
[[Category:Crimes against humanity]]
[[Category:Torture]]
[[Category:Special economic zones]]
[[Category:Communist repression]]
[[Category:Communist terrorism]]
[[Category:2008 in Indian politics]]
[[Category:2009 in Indian politics]]
[[Category:2000s conflicts]]
[[Category:2008 protests]]
[[Category:2009 protests]]
[[Category:2008 in Indian economy]]

Tata Nano Singur controversy - Revision history

BrittScotto5: basic correct page for accuracy further and added references

->JJMC89 bot III: Moving :Category:Forced disappearances to :Category:Enforced disappearances per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy