Ajay Kumar: Created a new article

2023-08-12T05:26:10Z

Created a new article

New page

{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2022}}
{{Use Indian English|date=June 2022}}

'''Section 295A of the [[Indian Penal Code]]''' lays down the punishment for the deliberate and malicious acts, that are intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.<ref name="Indian Express 295A">{{cite news |title=Hate speech, IPC Sec 295A, and how courts have read the law |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/hate-speech-ipc-sec-295a-how-courts-have-read-the-law-7972371/ |access-date=29 June 2022 |work=The Indian Express |date=16 June 2022 |language=en}}</ref> It is one of the [[Hate speech laws in India]]. This law prohibits [[blasphemy]] against all religions in India.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/explained-the-need-for-a-distinction-between-blasphemy-and-hate-speech/article65706903.ece | title=Explained | the need for a distinction between blasphemy and hate speech | newspaper=The Hindu | date=31 July 2022 }}</ref>

Section 295A is a cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable offence.<ref name="Nupur Sharma" /> Legal experts consider Section 295A a controversial provision. They believe that there are good legal arguments for the court to revisit and consider overruling the constitution bench judgement in ''Ramji Lal Modi v. State of UP''.<ref name="Nupur Sharma" />

==History==
Section 295(A) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was enacted in 1927<ref name="Insult to religion">{{cite web |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/insult-to-religion-/7214/ | title=Insult to religion}}</ref>

A book, ''[[Rangila Rasul]]'', was published in 1927. The book concerned the [[Muhammad's wives|marriages]] and sex life of [[Prophet Muhammad]]. On the basis of a complaint, the publisher was arrested but later acquitted in April 1929 because there was no law against insult to religion. The publisher was murdered in Court by [[Ilm-ud-din]]. As a result, Ilm-ud-din was honored with the honorifics 'Ghazi' and 'Shaheed'.<ref name="1929 killing of Hindu publisher">{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/12/salmaan-taseer-case-harks-back-to-1929-killing-of-hindu-publisher | title=1929 killing of Hindu publisher| website=[[TheGuardian.com]]| date=12 March 2015}}</ref> As the book did not cause enmity or hatred between different religious communities, it didn't violate Section 153(A). The Indian Muslim community demanded a law against insult to religious feelings. Hence, the British Government enacted Section 295(A). The Select Committee before enactment of the law, stated in its report that the purpose was to punish persons who indulge in wanton vilification or attacks upon other religions or their religious figures. It however added that a writer might insult a religion to facilitate social reform by grabbing attention. Therefore, it recommended that the words ''with deliberate and malicious intention'' be inserted in the Section.<ref name="Insult to religion"/>

==Text==
{{Blockquote|Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs – Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.<ref name="Section 295A">{{cite web |title=Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code — The Centre for Internet and Society |url=https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/resources/section-295a-indian-penal-code |website=cis-india.org |access-date=29 June 2022}}</ref>}}

==Notable cases==
* In 2022, [[Nupur Sharma (politician)|Nupur Sharma]], a spokeswoman of India's ruling party, [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP), made controversial remarks about the Islamic prophet Muhammad, on a [[Times Now]] debate on the [[Gyanvapi Mosque]] dispute. This led to the [[2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy]] after which she was booked under Section 295A, 153, 153A but not arrested.<ref name="Nupur Sharma">{{cite news |title=Nupur Sharma To Munawar Farooqi, Known Faces Booked Under Section 295A For Hurting Religious Sentiment |url=https://www.outlookindia.com/national/nupur-sharma-to-munawar-farooqi-known-faces-booked-under-section-295a-for-hurting-religious-sentiment-news-201055 |access-date=29 June 2022 |date=8 June 2022 |language=en| work=Outlook India}}</ref>
* In July 2022, [[Alt News]], an Indian fact checking site's co-founder [[Mohammed Zubair (journalist)|Mohammed Zubair]] was arrested by [[Delhi Police]] for allegedly "hurting religious sentiments".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-06-27 |title=Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair arrested for 'hurting religious sentiments' |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/alt-news-co-founder-mohammad-zubair-arrested-for-hurting-religious-sentiments-101656340785690.html |access-date=2022-07-02 |website=Hindustan Times |language=en}}</ref> The charges under IPC section 295A and section 67 of the IT Act were pressed for a satirical tweet he made in 2018, in which he shared an unedited screenshot from a 1983 Indian comedy film ''[[Kissi Se Na Kehna]]'' by [[Hrishikesh Mukherjee]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Kissi Se Na Kehna! Mohammed Zubair Arrested for Tweeting Photo from 1983 Hindi Film |url=https://thewire.in/communalism/kissi-se-na-kehna-mohammed-zubair-arrested-for-tweeting-photo-from-1983-hindi-film |access-date=8 July 2022 |work=The Wire |date=28 June 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Alt News Co-founder Mohammed Zubair Moves SC For Bail, Claims Threat To His Life |url=https://www.outlookindia.com/national/alt-news-co-founder-mohammad-zubair-moves-sc-for-bail-news-207390 |access-date=8 July 2022 |work=www.outlookindia.com/ |date=7 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref>

==References==
{{reflist}}

==Further reading==
* Shrutika, Mayank Yadav, [https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-executive-seems-more-fragile-than-hurt-sentiment/article65457762.ece The executive seems more fragile than hurt sentiment], The Hindu, 25 May 2022.
* Apurva Vishwanath, [https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/hate-speech-ipc-sec-295a-how-courts-have-read-the-law-7972371/ Hate speech, IPC Sec 295A, and how courts have read the law], The Indian Express, 16 June 2022.
* [https://thewire.in/law/insults-to-religion-without-deliberate-intention-not-offence-under-section-295a-ipc-tripura-hc Insults To Religion Without Deliberate Intention Not Offence Under Section 295A IPC: Tripura HC], The Wire, 8 March 2022.
* {{cite web |title=Ramji Lal Modi v. State of Uttar Pradesh |url=https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/modi-v-uttar-pradesh/ |website=Global Freedom of Expression |publisher=Columbia University |access-date=29 June 2022}}

{{Indian Penal Code navbox}}

[[Category:Sections of the Indian Penal Code]]
[[Category:Blasphemy law by country]]

Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code - Revision history

Ajay Kumar: Created a new article