imported>Nsjlcuwdbcc: added hyperlinks

2021-05-09T06:50:16Z

added hyperlinks

New page

{{EngvarB|date=September 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2013}}
{{Infobox non-profit
| name = Save Your Voice
| image = [[File:Save Your Voice.jpg|Save Your Voice: a movement against internet censorship|220 px]]
| type = People's Movement
| founded_date = {{Start date|df=yes|2012||}}
| tax_id =
| registration_id =
| founder =
| location = [[New Delhi, India]]
| coordinates = 
| origins =
| area_served = [[India]]
| mission = [[Internet Freedom]]
| focus = Anti Censorship
| endowment =
| num_volunteers =
| num_employees =
| num_members = More than 5,000
| subsid =
| opponents =
| owner =
| former name =
| dissolved =
| footnotes =
}}
'''Save Your Voice''' is a movement against [[Internet censorship in India|internet censorship]] in India.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report_save-your-voice-a-movement-against-web-censorship_1661820 |title=Save Your Voice – A movement against Web censorship |date=13 May 2012}}</ref> It was founded by cartoonist [[Aseem Trivedi]], journalist [[Alok Dixit]], socialist Arpit Gupta and Chirag Joshi in January 2012. The movement was initially named "Raise Your Voice", before it was renamed. The movement started from [[Ujjain]] in [[Madhya Pradesh]], under the frontier-ship of the movement's four founders; with a "Langda March" at Ujjain. The movement opposes the [[The Information Technology Act, 2000|Information Technology Act of India]] and demands democratic rules for the governance of Internet. The campaign is targeted at the rules framed under [[the Information Technology Act, 2000]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5881&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=21&valid=true |title=Why is this cartoonist caged? |date=23 April 2012}}</ref>

==Internet Censorship==
The rules for blocking websites in India are governed by Section 69A of [[the Information Technology Act, 2000]]. This rule came into the power in 2008 after an amendment in the [[Information Technology Act, 2000|IT Act]]. Section 69A of the IT Act authorises the Central government, the power to direct either a government agency or an intermediary to block access to any website under a list of very specific circumstances.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/a-ludicrous-ban |title=A Ludicrous Ban |date=2 June 2012}}</ref> If intermediary sites fail to comply with a blocking order, they may be punished with imprisonment and fines. Intermediaries include telecom service providers, blogging sites, online payment sites, e-mail service providers and Web hosting companies.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-03-11/india-business/28679687_1_draft-rules-intermediaries-large-scale-commercial-interests |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130103092510/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-03-11/india-business/28679687_1_draft-rules-intermediaries-large-scale-commercial-interests |url-status=dead |archive-date=3 January 2013 |work=[[The Times of India]] |title=Draft IT guidelines may gag internet freedom |date=11 March 2011}}</ref>

The controversial Intermediary Due Diligence Rules, 2011 also take away the individual's right to free speech as it give power to intermediaries to decide the fate of the content.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite web |url=http://globalvoicesonline.org/2012/05/06/india-freedom-fast-to-save-your-voice/ |title=India: Freedom Fast To Save Your Voice |date=6 May 2012}}</ref> This rule has been a subject of heated debate among civil societies, activists, journalists and parliamentarians. The annulment of this rule has also been demanded in the upper house of the parliament.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3390327.ece |title=For the sake of free speech |date=8 May 2012}}</ref>

==Langda March or Disability Parade==
The "Langda March" was an eye-catching protest against internet censorship. Protestors "disabled themselves" by bandaging their hands and feet, appearing handicapped. The crowd of "handicaps" marched across the roads in [[Ujjain]], [[Meerut]], [[Bangalore]] and [[Chennai]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.iijnm.org/media_uploads/observer/2011_12/issue27/shubhankarvoice.html |title=Your voice matters}}</ref>

==Sibal's Day Campaign==
Save Your Voice celebrated April Fool's Day with [[Kapil Sibal]], the IT Minister of India and named it as "Sibal's Day". This was a direct attack on the minister who had advocated pre-censorship for the content on the social media. Save Your Voice staged demonstrations at prominent locations like the [[Indian parliament|Indian Parliament]], [[India Gate]], [[Jantar Mantar]] and the IT ministry of India with dummies of Kapil Sibal, who received postcards, messages and even garlands from passersby and supporters. The goal of this campaign was to rally public support in defense of free speech on the Internet.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2012/03/27/activists-to-celebrate-kapil-sibal-on-april-fools-day/ |title=Activists to 'Celebrate' Kapil Sibal on April Fools' Day |date=27 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sunday-guardian.com/artbeat/grand-sibals-day |title=Grand 'Sibal's' Day |date=1 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://kafila.org/2012/04/01/happy-kapil-sibals-day/ |title=Happy Kapil Sibal's Day |date=1 April 2012}}</ref>

==Freedom in the Cage==

Freedom in the cage was a creative protest by Save Your Voice which got a huge public attention in New Delhi with demonstrators symbolically locked in cages to help raise awareness about the problem of web censorship in India. Artists, Journalists and bloggers had caged themselves to give the message to the government that artistes inside a cage playing the guitar or painting a canvas was equal to the government's IT rules that have "caged" the freedom of the people granted by the Constitution of India. The motive behind the protest was to explain that the newly notified Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules-2011 prescribing principles to be observed by the Internet companies was unconstitutional as it provided for a system of censorship by private parties, adversely affected the right of privacy, would hamper the growth of the Internet and slow down economic growth in the process and limit the growth of IT-related services and industries in particular.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/article3345069.ece |title=Artistes protest government control over the Internet |date=23 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://kafila.org/2012/04/21/freedom-in-the-cage-22-april-2012/ |title=Freedom in the Cage: 22 April 2012 |date=21 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://kafila.org/2012/04/22/freedom-in-the-cage-photos-from-a-protest-against-internet-censorship-in-delhi/ |title=Freedom in the Cage: Photos from a protest against internet censorship in Delhi |date=22 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/eworld/article3509352.ece |title=The new Internet watchdogs}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.france24.com/en/20120430-2012-04-30-2050-wb-en-webnews |title=Protests in India against web censorship |date=1 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/gagged-and-bound-why-indias-free-internet-is-a-big-fat-lie-290483.html |title=Gagged and Bound: Why India's ‘free internet’ is a big, fat lie |date=27 April 2012}}</ref>

==Annulment Motion in the Parliament==
An annulment motion against the Information Technology (Inter-mediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 moved by Member of Parliament (MP) P. Rajeev of the [[Communist Party of India]] (Marxist) in the Rajya Sabha, was the first serious attempt by internet freedom activists to get the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 discussed and reviewed by the country's lawmakers. Save Your Voice supported the annulment motion and requested the political parties to support the motion in Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Parliament. As expected, the motion (specifically against the rules governing intermediaries – clause (zg) of subsection (2) of Section 87 read with subsection (2) of Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000) was not carried. However, the discussion that preceded it at least demonstrated the concerns of parliamentarians about what internet freedom activists have termed the "draconian" provisions of the IT Act.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.epw.in/commentary/poor-guarantee-online-freedom-india.html |title=Poor Guarantee of Online Freedom in India |date=16 June 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/special/rajya-sabha-to-consider-repealing-kapil-sibals-it-rules-special/20120419.htm |title=Rajya Sabha to consider repealing Kapil Sibal's IT Rules |date=19 April 2012}}</ref>

===Freedom Fast===
[[File:Freedom Fast.jpg|right|thumb|Freedom Fast: a hunger strike against internet censorship]]
Save Your Voice supported the annulment motion brought by the MP P Rajeev and to put pressure on the government, two of the movement's campaigners, the cartoonist [[Aseem Trivedi]] and journalist [[Alok Dixit]] started a hunger strike. People from various streams and in favour of this cause have visited the campaigning activists at Jantar Mantar, and helped to keep their motive intact. [[Arvind Gaur]], Director of Asmita Theatre (New Delhi) and a key member of [[India Against Corruption]], also joined them with his associates and assured that he would extend his support for the fight for 'Freedom of Speech & Expression' in a full-fledged manner. The seven days long Anshan was ended when both were forced to end a hunger strike they began on 2 May. Their health had deteriorated considerably and they were hospitalised. The annulment motion in the Rajyasabha could not be passed and India joined the league of dictator nations where internet is not free. However, the hunger strike successfully highlighted the issue in the global media.<ref name=autogenerated1 /><ref name=autogenerated2>{{cite web |url=http://en.rsf.org/two-cyber-activists-end-fast-but-12-05-2012,42614.html |title=TWO CYBER-ACTIVISTS END FAST BUT CAMPAIGN AGAINST IT RULES GATHERS PACE |date=12 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121018114526/http://en.rsf.org/two-cyber-activists-end-fast-but-12-05-2012,42614.html |archivedate=18 October 2012 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.blottr.com/world/breaking-news/internet-hackers-anonymous-pulls-down-supreme-court-india-and-government |title=Internet hackers Anonymous pulls down Supreme Court of India and government websites |date=17 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2012/05/17/netizenreport-runetedition/ |title=Netizen Report: RuNet Edition |date=17 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.worldbank.org/category/tags/global-voices-advocacy |title=Weekly Wire: the Global Forum |date=10 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2012/05/09/netizenreport-raise-your-voice/ |title=Netizen Report: Raise Your Voice Edition |date=9 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://bhadas4media.com/print/4231-freedom-fast-fifth-day-of-hunger-strike-for-internet-freedom.html |title=Freedom Fast : Fifth day of hunger strike for internet freedom}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2012/05/hunger-strike-of-aseem-trivedi-and-alok-dixit-from-save-your-voice/ |title=Hunger strike of Aseem Trivedi and Alok Dixit from Save Your Voice |date=20 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3390327.ece |title=For the sake of free speech |date=8 May 2012}}</ref>

The IT Rules 2011 were adopted in April last year as an addition to the 2000 Information Technology Act, which was amended in 2008. They require Internet companies to withdraw any content deemed objectionable, particularly if its nature is "defamatory", "hateful", "harmful to minors", or "infringes copyright" within 36 hours of being notified by the authorities, or face prosecution.

"This has turned technical intermediaries into Web censorship police informants," [[Reporters Without Borders]] said. "Although some content categories are justifiably objectionable, other more vague or subjective definitions could jeopardize informational content." The IT Rules also impose on cybercafé owners drastic regulations that violate personal [[information privacy|data privacy]] and place a presumption-of-guilt burden on all Indian netizens.

India was added in March to the list of countries under surveillance in Reporters Without Borders' latest report on Internet Enemies.<ref name=autogenerated2 />

===Occupy India===
Masked members of Save Your Voice held a protest at [[Jantar Mantar]] in New Delhi against Indian government's attempts to restrict freedom on the Internet.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/business/news/technology/anonymous-to-hit-road-for-web-freedom-protest_53387.html |title='Anonymous' to hit road for Web freedom protest |date=9 June 2012}}</ref> The protest in India was spearheaded by 'Save Your Voice' and '[[Anonymous (group)|Anonymous]]' at various historic monuments in 16 cities, of India. Save Your Voice conveners cartoonist [[Aseem Trivedi]] and activist [[Alok Dixit]] took active part in the networking between the International hacking group and Indian members of different civil society activists.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/anonymous-to-hit-road-for-web-freedom-protest/1009545.html |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130126041657/http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/anonymous-to-hit-road-for-web-freedom-protest/1009545.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=26 January 2013 |title='Anonymous' to hit road for Web freedom protest |date=9 June 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/06/09/india-hacking-group-protests-against-censorship.html |title=India: Hacking group protests against censorship |date=9 June 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120615171705/http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/06/09/india-hacking-group-protests-against-censorship.html |archivedate=15 June 2012 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>

The protest has resulted in access being denied to a host of websites that carry illegal copies of films and songs among other legal content, including isohunt.com and pastebin.com. The website of one of the Save Your Voice members, Trivedi, was also blocked by BigRock and against which the members protested and campaigned throughout India.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/the-world-wild-web |title=India: Hacking group protests against censorship |date=9 June 2012}}</ref> "The government is bringing censorship through the back door and we will oppose it," says Alok in one of his interviews with ''The Asian Age''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.asianage.com/india/anonymous-hackers-protest-over-india-internet-laws-374 |title=‘Anonymous' hackers protest over India Internet laws |date=9 June 2012}}</ref> To register their protest, campaigners have also hacked the website of state-run telecom provider MTNL and pasted the logo of the [[Anonymous (group)|Anonymous]] group, the mask of 17th century British revolutionary Guy Fawkes, on mtnl.net.in. MTNL's corporate website could not be accessed for over four hours, following the attack, but its individual city-specific websites (for Delhi and Mumbai) remained unaffected.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels/nation/north/anonymous-hackers-protest-indian-internet-laws-928 |title='Anonymous' hackers to protest Indian Internet laws |date=9 June 2012}}</ref>

===Arrest of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi===
Police in [[Maharashtra]] arrested [[Aseem Trivedi]], a political cartoonist and the co-founder of the Save Your Voice campaign, on Saturday, 9 September 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3878239.ece |title=‘Says complainant: Trivedi's cartoons insult Constitution |date=10 September 2012}}</ref> He faced charges of [[sedition]], violating Internet security laws, and insulting national honour for publishing cartoons mocking national symbols and criticising corruption on his website, [[Cartoons Against Corruption]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-19540565 |title=India cartoonist Aseem Trivedi's arrest sparks outrage |date=10 September 2012}}</ref> After Trivedi's arrest, Save Your Voice ran a nationwide campaign against the arrest of the cartoonist.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpj.org/2012/09/indian-cartoonist-jailed-for-images-criticizing-go.php |title=Indian cartoonist jailed for images criticizing government |date=10 September 2012}}</ref> The campaign received massive public support from civil society groups and artistan communities across borders. [[Mahesh Bhatt]], a prominent Bollywood figure and film director, joined the press conference at Mumabi Press Club with Save Your Voice co-founder [[Alok Dixit]] supporting Trivedi's case.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.timescontent.com/syndication-photos/reprint/news/287027/mahesh-bhat-producer-bollywood-alok.html |title=Mahesh Bhat |date=12 September 2012}}</ref> Dixit has also mediated between the Home Minister [[RR Patil]] and Trivedi when Trivedi refused to take bail.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-09-12/india/33788194_1_sedition-charge-sedition-case-section-124a |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120915024738/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-09-12/india/33788194_1_sedition-charge-sedition-case-section-124a |url-status=dead |archive-date=15 September 2012 |work=[[The Times of India]] |title=Cartoonist gets bail, sedition rap may be dropped |date=12 September 2012}}</ref>

==Hunger strike against Sec 66A of IT Act==
Save Your Voice initiated an indefinite hunger strike by [[Aseem Trivedi]] and [[Alok Dixit]] against [[IT Act]] Section-66A at [[Jantar Mantar]] on 8 December 2012, following various arrests of civilians expressing their views on [[social networking sites]]. This got a bigger public attention when activist turned politician [[Arvind Kejriwal]] joined this campaign and promised to make it a nationwide agenda. Both ended the fast after Arvind Kejriwal requested him not to waste his life and rather work towards 'uprooting the UPA government'.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.deccanchronicle.com/121215/news-current-affairs/article/kejriwal-requests-cartoonist-aseem-trivedi-ends-eight-day-fast |title='Kejriwal requests, cartoonist Aseem Trivedi ends eight-day fast |date=8 December 2012}}</ref>

Independent Member of Parliament [[Rajeev Chandrasekhar]] has battled tirelessly against growing internet censorship in India, using his position in the upper house of parliament to challenge legislation that chokes digital freedom. Through numerous articles and speeches he has urged the government to revise the 2011 Information Technology Rules and repeal part of the 2008 act on which it is based. He has described both as a "serious risk" to democracy. [http://rajeev.in/News/fetters_Internet/Mail_Today01.html]. Mr. Chandrasekhar has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in Supreme Court Challenging the IT Rules. [http://rajeev.in/News/Challenges_IT/Mail_Today.html]. The Supreme Court has issued Notice to the Government on the It Act. [http://rajeev.in/News/Challenges_IT/The_Hindu.html].

Rajeev Chandrasekhar is nominated for an Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Award. Index on Censorship has announced the shortlist for the 2013 Index Freedom of Expression Awards. [http://www.indexoncensorship.org/index-awards-2013/digital-freedom]

===Cause===
Section 66A's misuse flows from its draconian nature and imprecise terminology. People can face up to three years of prison for electronic communications that "grossly" offend or cause "annoyance or inconvenience", or, in case of information known to be false, cause "danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will". Together, this amounts to gagging citizens in a day and age the internet's an indispensable everyday platform for exchange of news and views.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://cis-india.org/internet-governance/resources/section-66A-information-technology-act |title='Section 66A of the Information Technology Act |date=25 November 2012}}</ref> Two girls Shaheen Dhada and Renu Srinivasan were arrested over a Facebook post, under sec 66 A, criticising the bandh like situation in Mumbai after Shiv Sena supremo [[Bal Thackeray]]'s death. Another boy, under the same act, was arrested within a week for posting "vulgar" comments against MNS chief [[Raj Thackeray]] and the people of Maharashtra on the social networking site. The arrests of [[Jadavpur University]] professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a cartoon lampooning [[West Bengal]]'s Chief Minister [[Mamata Banerjee]], cartoonist [[Aseem Trivedi]] and businessman Ravi Srinivasan for tweets against Union Finance Minister [[P. Chidambaram]]'s son [[Karti Chidambaram]], have also sparked popular anger among civil societies.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/saving-free-speech-from-the-police/article4133852.ece |title='Saving free speech from the police |date=26 November 2012}}</ref>

The movement specified eight particular reasons for which the indefinite hunger strike was commenced.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.saveyourvoice.in/2012/12/eight-reasons-why-we-want-section-66a.html| title = The reasons for initiating the hunger strike.}}</ref> The reasons include ambiguity in the purpose of the section, lack of control over cyber harassment, inequality in legal implementation, excessive strictness, misuse for vendetta, comparatively harsh magnitudes of punishments, curb on harmless speech and the section's being open to abuse. The protest saw Aseem Trivedi hold a banner in his hand stating "I am a big supporter of freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of thoughts."<ref>{{cite news| url = http://in.news.yahoo.com/video/national-22564751/aseem-trivedi-on-hunger-strike-for-abolition-of-sec-66a-31300266.html| title = Aseem Trivedi on hunger strike to abolish Section-66A.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP8hXci0lFg| title = Save Your Voice's movement to shun IT ACT.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url = http://in.news.yahoo.com/video/aseem-trivedi-hunger-strike-abolition-141500085.html| title = Cartoonist Aseem Trivedi and Alok Dixit on indefinite hunger strike.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url = http://news24online.com/aseem-trivedi-to-sit-on-indefinite-hunger-strike-from-today_LatestNews24_7019.aspx| title = Aseem Trivedi to sit on hunger strike.}}</ref>

==See also==
* [[Internet censorship in India]]
* [[Cartoons Against Corruption]]
* [[The Information Technology Act, 2000]]
* [[Aseem Trivedi]]
* [[Alok Dixit]]

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Internet censorship]]
[[Category:Censorship in India]]
[[Category:Internet in India]]
[[Category:Freedom of expression organizations]]
[[Category:2012 establishments in Delhi]]
[[Category:Organizations established in 2012]]

Save Your Voice - Revision history

imported>Nsjlcuwdbcc: added hyperlinks