Ghazal Builders: Created New Stub First Draft

2026-04-24T20:57:17Z

Created New Stub First Draft

New page

{{Short description|Indian judge}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2022}}
{{Use Indian English|date=June 2022}}
{{Infobox officeholder
| name = Sadhana Sanjay Jadhav
| death_place =
| image_size =
| term_start =
| office2 = Retired judge of [[Bombay High Court]]
| term_end2 = 13 June 2022
| term_start2 = 23 January 2012
| successor2 =
| birth_place =
| death_date =
| birth_date = 14 June 1960
}}

'''Sadhana Sanjay Jadhav''' (born 14 June 1960) is a retired judge of the [[Bombay High Court]], in [[Maharashtra]], [[India]]. Jadhav has sat on the bench in a number of notable cases concerning criminal offences, including the [[Sheena Bora murder case|death of Sheena Bora]], the [[Adarsh Housing Society scandal|Adarsh Housing Society scam]], the trial of [[Bollywood]] actor [[Sanjay Dutt]] in relation to the [[1993 Bombay bombings]], the case concerning the suicide of [[Suicide of Payal Tadvi|medical resident Payal Tadvi]], and the case concerning the murder of writer [[Govind Pansare]]. Jadhav is also responsible for several legally significant interpretations of criminal law and procedure, concerning the right to appeal, and regarding penalties under the [[Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989|Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989]].

== Life ==
Jadhav was born in [[Solapur]] and was educated in [[Pune]], attending [[Fergusson College]] and [[Pune University]] to obtain a bachelor's degree and master's degree in political science. She studied law at [[Symbiosis Law School]] in [[Pune]], and initially practiced law at the [[Aurangabad]] bench of the [[Bombay High Court]], before practicing in [[Mumbai]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=Justice S. S. Jadhav|url=https://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/processjshowReq.php?bhcpar=bmlkPTE1|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|website=High Court of Bombay}}</ref>

== Judicial career ==
Jadhav was appointed an additional judge of the Bombay High Court on 23 January 2012.<ref name=":0" /> He retired on 13 June 2022.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-06-14 |title=Bombay HC justice Sadhana Jadhav retires; over 18,000 cases disposed |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/bombay-hc-justice-sadhana-jadhav-retires-over-18000-cases-disposed/articleshow/92189609.cms |access-date=2025-07-29 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref>

In 2012, Jadhav along with [[Bombay High Court]] Judge Abhay Oka established the principle that accused persons did not have an inherent right to appeal against judicial orders, but could only do so when such right was granted by a statute. They also held that a legislature could take away the right to appeal in any set of cases.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2012-11-12|title=Accused has no inherent right to appeal against conviction: Bombay HC|url=https://zeenews.india.com/news/maharashtra/accused-has-no-inherent-right-to-appeal-against-conviction-bombay-hc_810801.html|access-date=2020-10-03|website=Zee News|language=en}}</ref>

In 2013, Jadhav, along with Justice [[Vijaya Tahilramani]], were directed by the Bombay High Court to constitute a female-led bench to hear all appeals against acquittals for the offence of rape. This was following a decision from the Bombay High Court that all such acquittals would from 2013 onward, be heard by benches of female judges.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2013-01-12|title=Landmark HC order puts two women judges in charge of rape acquittals|url=https://www.mid-day.com/articles/landmark-hc-order-puts-two-women-judges-in-charge-of-rape-acquittals/196254|access-date=2020-10-03|website=mid-day|language=en}}</ref>

In 2016, Jadhav heard the case concerning the widely reported [[Sheena Bora murder case|murder of Sheena Bora]], and passed orders criticising the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as well as the CBI Special Court that was trying the case, for procedural improprieties and delays.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Nandy|first=Chandan|date=2016-06-30|title=Sheena Bora Case: Bombay HC Hauls CBI, Special Judge Over Coals|url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/sheena-bora-case-bombay-hc-haulscbispecial-judge-over-coals-sanjeev-khanna-shyamwar-rai-peter-mukherjea-rakesh-maria|access-date=2020-10-03|website=TheQuint|language=en}}</ref> The case is still ongoing.{{update inline|date=June 2022}}

In 2016, Jadhav heard appeals filed by several members of the [[Sanatan Sanstha]], a Hindu extremist group, in connection with the widely reported murder of writer [[Govind Pansare]].<ref>{{Cite news|title=Pansare case: Trial against Sameer Gaikwad stayed till further orders|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pansare-case-trial-against-sameer-gaikwad-stayed-till-further-orders/articleshow/52714280.cms|access-date=2020-10-03}}</ref> Jadhav allowed the proceedings to be stayed, in order to allow the Maharashtra government's Criminal Investigation Department to investigate possible links to the murder of writers [[Narendra Dabholkar]] and [[M. M. Kalburgi]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-06-24|title=Pansare murder case: Bombay HC extends stay on framing of charges against accused|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/govind-pansare-murder-case-bombay-hc-extends-stay-on-framing-of-charges-against-accused-2873332/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref> The case is still ongoing but has been transferred to a different judge.<ref>{{Cite web|title=HC raps CBI, CID over trial delay in Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare murder cases|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/feb/13/hc-raps-cbi-cid-over-trial-delay-in-narendra-dabholkar-govind-pansare-murder-cases-2102937.html|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref>

In 2017, Jadhav criticised the Maharashtra Government for ordering the early release of [[Bollywood]] actor [[Sanjay Dutt]] from jail, following his conviction for possession of arms, in relation to the [[1993 Bombay bombings]], and asked the government to justify it through court filings.<ref>{{Cite news|title=HC gives Maharashtra govt two weeks to justify Sanjay Dutt's early release|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/hc-gives-maharashtra-govt-two-weeks-to-justify-sanjay-dutts-early-release/articleshow/59423841.cms|access-date=2020-10-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Send Sanjay Dutt back to jail if you think rules were flouted: Maharashtra govt to HC|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/send-sanjay-dutt-back-to-jail-if-you-think-rules-were-flouted-maharashtra-govt-to-hc/articleshow/59791069.cms|access-date=2020-10-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=PTI|date=3 July 2017|title=Justify Sanjay Dutt's early release, Bombay High Court tells Maharashtra government|url=https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/crime/justify-sanjay-dutts-early-release-bombay-high-court-tells-maharashtra-government/articleshow/59424580.cms|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-03|website=Mumbai Mirror|language=en}}</ref> The case was later transferred to a different judge of the Bombay High Court, who found no illegalities in his release.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2018-02-01|title=No violation by govt in allowing early release to Sanjay Dutt: Bombay HC|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai-news/no-violation-by-govt-in-allowing-early-release-to-sanjay-dutt-bombay-hc/story-mw5LuXoaMDoBdJVb02uZ6J.html|access-date=2020-10-03|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref>

In 2017, Jadhav and another judge, Ranjit More, quashed an order of the Governor of Maharashtra, [[C. Vidyasagar Rao|Vidyasagar Rao]] granting sanction to prosecute former Maharashtra Chief Minister [[Ashok Chavan]] in connection with the politically significant [[Adarsh Housing Society scam]]. The order prevents Chavan from being tried in relation to the scam.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mumbai Mirror|date=23 December 201|title=Adarsh scam: HC quashes guv's nod to prosecute Ashok Chavan|url=https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/other/adarsh-scam-hc-quashes-guvs-nod-to-prosecute-ashok-chavan/articleshow/62215833.cms|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-03|website=Mumbai Mirror|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-12-23|title=Ashok Chavan: Adarsh scam allegations were politically motivated|url=https://www.mid-day.com/articles/ashok-chavan-adarsh-scam-allegations-were-politically-motivated/18850162|access-date=2020-10-03|website=mid-day|language=en}}</ref>

In 2017, Jadhav faced criticism following her remarks in a case concerning sexual abuse of a minor by the minor's adoptive father. Jadhav remarked, while granting bail to the accused, that minor victim was "inherently abnormal", "had a sexual instinct since childhood" and "was used to doing dirty things." The remarks were reported on and publicly criticized, and Jadhav later passed a second order, expunging her own remarks from the record, stating that they had been drawn from some documents submitted in evidence.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-02-05|title=Bombay HC blames girl, gives bail to father in sexual assault charge|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/bombay-hc-blames-girl-gives-bail-to-father-in-sexual-assault-charge-4508373/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Agnes|first=Flavia|title=A Bombay High Court judge expunges her comments on a minor rape victim, but the damage is done|url=https://scroll.in/article/829443/a-bombay-high-court-judge-expunges-her-comments-on-a-minor-rape-victim-but-the-damage-is-done|access-date=2020-10-03|website=Scroll.in|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Bombay HC's remark that rape victim 'used to do all dirty things' is depressing|url=https://www.dailyo.in/variety/bombay-hcs-remark-that-rape-victim-used-to-all-dirty-things-is-depressing/story/1/15521.html|access-date=2020-10-03|website=www.dailyo.in}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Saba|date=2017-02-20|title=Bombay HC Judge clarifies on her controversial comment referring to victim of sexual assault by her adoptive father|url=https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2017/02/20/bombay-hc-judge-clarifies-on-her-controversial-comment-referring-to-victim-of-sexual-assault-by-her-adoptive-father/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=SCC Blog|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Baghel|first=Sunil|date=4 February 2017|title=Rape accused father gets bail as 'girl was used to doing dirty things'|url=https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/crime/rape-accused-father-gets-bail-as-girl-was-used-to-doing-dirty-things/articleshow/56962819.cms|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-03|website=Mumbai Mirror|language=en}}</ref>

In 2017, Jadhav was also one of two judges to withdraw their membership from a housing project for official judges' residences, proposed by an association of judges, and approved by the [[Devendra Fadnavis]]-led [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] government in Maharashtra.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-09-10|title=Second Bombay HC judge gives up claim to flat in highrise for judges|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/second-bombay-hc-judge-gives-up-claim-to-flat-in-highrise-for-judges-4836344/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref> The project had attracted controversy because it was proposed to be built on land that had been allocated for affordable public housing, and regulatory requirements of public notice had been waived in order to have the project approved by the [[Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority|Maharashtra Housing and Development Authority]]. The Bombay High Court is currently hearing a petition challenging the approval to this project.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-09-27|title=High-rise for judges: Bombay HC judge recuses himself from hearing PIL|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/high-rise-for-judges-bombay-hc-judge-recuses-himself-from-hearing-pil-4862840/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-06-22|title=High-rise for HC judges on affordable housing plot|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/high-rise-for-hc-judges-on-affordable-housing-plot-4716138/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-06-21|title=Prime Mumbai plot to get a high-rise for HC judges|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/prime-mumbai-plot-to-get-a-high-rise-for-bombay-hc-judges-4714320/|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref>

In 2019, Jadhav rebuked prosecutors for delays in the case concerning the abetment of [[Suicide of Payal Tadvi|suicide of medical resident Payal Tadvi]], following alleged harassment by colleagues, and directed them to investigate hospital authorities for failing to act to prevent harm.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Payal Tadvi suicide case: Bombay HC pulls up investigators for gaps in probe|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/aug/06/payal-tadvi-suicide-case-bombay-hc-pulls-up-investigators-for-gaps-in-probe-2015032.html|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref> The case is still ongoing.

In 2019, Jadhav also established a new form of criminal procedure and penalty for offences committed under the [[Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989|Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989]]. Although the act only contemplates arrest, trial, and compensation for offences, Jadhav, in two separate orders, prohibited the arrest of persons accused under the Act, and directed them to engage in a series of 'reformative deeds' including the planting of 50 trees, instead.<ref>{{Cite web|title=To 'Reform' Man Accused in Caste Atrocity, Bombay High Court Orders Him to Plant Saplings|url=https://thewire.in/law/bombay-high-court-sc-st-atrocities-act-reformation|access-date=2020-10-03|website=The Wire}}</ref>

In 2022, Jadhav retired.<ref>{{cite web |title=Bombay HC justice Sadhana Jadhav retires; over 18,000 cases disposed |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/bombay-hc-justice-sadhana-jadhav-retires-over-18000-cases-disposed/articleshow/92189609.cms |website=The Times of India |date=14 June 2022}}</ref>

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Jadhav, Sadhana Sanjay}}
[[Category:1960 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:People from Solapur]]
[[Category:Judges of the Bombay High Court]]
[[Category:20th-century Indian lawyers]]
[[Category:20th-century Indian women lawyers]]
[[Category:21st-century Indian judges]]
[[Category:21st-century Indian women judges]]
[[Category:Savitribai Phule Pune University alumni]]

Sadhana Sanjay Jadhav - Revision history

Ghazal Builders: Created New Stub First Draft