<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=P._D._Dinakaran</id>
	<title>P. D. Dinakaran - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=P._D._Dinakaran"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=P._D._Dinakaran&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-18T12:46:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=P._D._Dinakaran&amp;diff=115465&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>&gt;GreenC bot: Rescued 4 archive links. Wayback Medic 2.5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=P._D._Dinakaran&amp;diff=115465&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-04-21T21:34:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rescued 4 archive links. &lt;a href=&quot;/w/index.php?title=User:GreenC/WaybackMedic_2.5&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;User:GreenC/WaybackMedic 2.5 (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;Wayback Medic 2.5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{EngvarB|date=September 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Infobox Judge&lt;br /&gt;
| image         = &lt;br /&gt;
| name          = P. D. Dinakaran &lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize     = &lt;br /&gt;
| caption       = &lt;br /&gt;
| office        = Chief Justice of the [[Sikkim High Court]]&lt;br /&gt;
| termstart     = 8 August 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.zeenews.com/news461006.html|title=PD Dinakaran sworn in as Karnataka CJ}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| termend       = 29 July 2011&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran resigns&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| nominator     = &lt;br /&gt;
| predecessor   = Barin Ghosh&lt;br /&gt;
| successor     = Permod Kohli&lt;br /&gt;
| birth_date    = 9 May 1950&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kar_jud&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in/bio_data/sitting_judges/cj_pddj.htm|title=Profile of Paul Daniel Dinakaran on Karnataka High Court website|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090923164703/http://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in/bio_data/sitting_judges/cj_pddj.htm|archivedate=23 September 2009|df=dmy-all}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| birth_place   = [[Arakkonam]], Tamil Nadu&lt;br /&gt;
| death_date    = &lt;br /&gt;
| death_place   = &lt;br /&gt;
| spouse        = &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Paul Daniel Dinakaran Premkumar&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (born 9 May 1950) was the [[Chief Justice]] of the [[Sikkim High Court]]. He resigned from the post following allegations of corruption and subsequent [[impeachment#India|removal]] proceedings.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran resigns&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Childhood and education ==&lt;br /&gt;
P.D Dinakaran was born in a [[Christian]] family at [[Arakkonam]], [[North Arcot]] (now [[Vellore District]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|date=2009-09-23|title=Dinakaran targeted for being a South Indian and a Dalit |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/dinakaran-targeted-for-being-a-south-indian-and-a-dalit/|access-date=2020-06-02|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did his schooling and then attended the [[Madras Christian College]], [[Chennai]] and studied chemistry. He obtained his Masters in [[Political Science]] and [[Public Administration]] and [[Bachelor of Law]] Degree from [[Madras Law College]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kar_jud&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Career==&lt;br /&gt;
He started his career in [[Madras High Court]]. He also practised in the State and Central Administrative Tribunals at Madras. He served as [[Legal Adviser]] and Standing Counsel for [[Pondicherry University]] and for several State owned Corporations, such as [[TASMAC|Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation]] (TASMAC), Tamil Nadu Sugar Corporation, Tamil Nadu Sugar Federation Limited, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation (Aavin).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kar_jud&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was also standing counsel for various religious institutions, such as [[Church of South India|Churches of South India]], Madras Diocese and Coimbatore Diocese and [[Tiruttani|Sri Subramania Swami Temple, Tiruttani]] and for several Local Bodies, Educational Institutions, Teacher&amp;#039;s Federations, Agriculturists Associations, Marketing Societies and Social Organisations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kar_jud&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 28 August 2009, the [[Supreme Court of India]] announced that Dinakaran would be elevated to a [[Supreme Court of India#Sitting judges of the court|Supreme Court Judge]], but this was halted due to allegations of corruption and surrounding controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Karnataka-Chief-Justice-Dinakaran-to-go-on-leave/articleshow/5756749.cms|title=SC asks Karnataka Chief Justice Dinakaran to go on leave|date=3 April 2010|newspaper=[[The Times of India]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dinakaran subsequently refused to go on leave when asked by [[Chief Justice of India]] [[K.G. Balakrishnan]] and was transferred to the [[Sikkim High Court]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dinakaran-to-go-to-Sikkim-protests-begin/articleshow/5779584.cms|title=Dinakaran to go to Sikkim, protests begin|date=10 April 2010|newspaper=[[The Times of India]]|first1=Dhananjay|last1=Mahapatra}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On 29 July 2011 he resigned from the post of Sikkim High Court Chief Justice. He was facing impeachment allegedly on the charges of corruption and judicial misconduct.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran resigns&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/i-am-a-victim-of-politics-and-legal-system-justice-dinakaran/articleshow/9423077.cms | work=The Times of India | title=I am a victim of politics and legal system: Justice Dinakaran | date=30 July 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversies==&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009, allegations were made against Dinakaran by several members of the [[Bar Council of India]] including Former Union Law Minister [[Ram Jethmalani]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2009/20090915/main3.htm|title=Judge&amp;#039;s integrity in question|date=14 September 2009|newspaper = [[The Tribune (Chandigarh)|The Tribune]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating that he had huge assets and land acquisitions in his Hometown Arakkonam more than what was fixed by the Tamil Nadu Land reforms. The lawyers requested [[Chief Justice of India]] and Union Law Minister not to appoint Dinakaran as Supreme Court Judge and initiate an enquiry process regarding the allegation. The members wrote a letter to [[President of India|President]] [[Pratibha Patil]], Prime Minister [[Manmohan Singh]] and Union Law Minister to intervene in this matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091653530100.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090917070321/http://www.hindu.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091653530100.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=17 September 2009|title=CJI summoned Justice Dinakaran to Delhi|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=16 October 2009|location=Chennai, India}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?261852|title=Issues of deep concern|date=16 September 2009|newspaper=[[Outlook India]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Dinakaran had not been performing any judicial functions since December 2009 when the Chairman of the [[Rajya Sabha]] admitted a motion seeking his removal on charges of corruption and abuse of his judicial office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/03/stories/2010040363460100.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100406164337/http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/03/stories/2010040363460100.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=6 April 2010|title=Justice Dinakaran asked to go on leave|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=3 April 2010|location=Chennai, India}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Supreme Court [[collegium]] headed by Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan had decided to replace Justice Dinakaran with [[Uttarakhand High Court]] Chief Justice [[JS Khehar]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article393299.ece|title=J.S. Khehar to replace Dinakaran in Karnataka|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=10 April 2010|location=Chennai, India}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and recommended transfer of Dinakaran to the [[Sikkim High Court]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/25/stories/2010042555161300.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100504064058/http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/25/stories/2010042555161300.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=4 May 2010|title=Dinakaran not above law: Moily|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=25 April 2010|location=Chennai, India}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh questioned about the desirability of shifting Chief Justices. The Law Ministry returned the file to the collegium for consideration afresh. As a result, the collegium, headed by the then incumbent Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia, met and reconsidered the whole issue and stuck to the earlier decision to shift the Chief Justices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran shifted to Sikkim High Court&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/karnataka/article542259.ece | title=Justice Dinakaran shifted to Sikkim High Court | date=30 July 2010 | accessdate=15 January 2012 | location=Chennai, India | work=The Hindu | first=J. | last=Venkatesan}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Sikkim Bar Association opposed the transfer of Dinakaran to the Sikkim High Court and asked the Supreme Court to reconsider the proposal, (which requires approval from Indian President [[Pratibha Patil]]). The Sikkim Bar Association president D R Thapa had asked &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;How come the person be fit to be discharge judicial duties in one state if he has not been found worthy of doing the same in another state?&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/article392924.ece|title=Sikkim Bar Association protests Dinakaran&amp;#039;s transfer (to Sikkim) |newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=9 April 2010|location=Chennai, India}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/30/stories/2010043054251300.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107114907/http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/30/stories/2010043054251300.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=7 November 2012|title=Supreme Court collegium sticks to shifting Justice Dinakaran to Sikkim|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=30 April 2010|location=Chennai, India}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impeachment proceedings and resignation==&lt;br /&gt;
Facing impeachment on charges of corruption and judicial misconduct, he resigned from the post of Sikkim high court Chief Justice on 29 July 2011 expressing &amp;quot;lack of faith and confidence&amp;quot; in the three-member inquiry Committee probing charges against him.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran resigns&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Before demitting office, I must confess with a very heavy heart that in spite of my constitutional position, I have been denied fair opportunity to defend myself and my reputation by the Judges Inquiry Committee,&amp;quot; he said in a two-page letter of resignation sent to President Pratibha Patil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran resigns&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Dinakaran, a Dalit, also said he had a &amp;quot;sneaking suspicion&amp;quot; that his &amp;quot;misfortune&amp;quot; was because of the circumstances of his birth in the socially oppressed and underprivileged section of the society.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran resigns&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This opinion of his at the time of resignation is surprising to say the least because of following facts:&lt;br /&gt;
# At first, [[Supreme Court of India]] had decided to elevate him as a Judge of the [[Supreme Court of India]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Then cases of misconduct and corruption were alleged against him by Chennai-based Forum for Judicial Accountability, in September 2009. These allegations were confirmed by the Tiruvallur Collector in two reports. Only after this, the [[Supreme Court of India]] collegium dropped Justice Dinakaran&amp;#039;s name for elevation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Thereafter on a complaint from 76 members of Parliament, the Rajya Sabha chairman admitted a motion for the removal of Justice Dinakaran.&lt;br /&gt;
# After that, Rajya Sabha chairman Hamid Ansari had in January 2010 constituted the three-member panel comprising Supreme Court Justice [[Aftab Alam (judge)]], Karnataka High Court Chief Justice J S Khehar and senior advocate P P Rao to examine the 12 charges framed in the notice of motion adopted by the House. &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Supreme Court of India]] bench headed by a very senior judge, Justice [[GS Singhvi]] permitted Dinakaran&amp;#039;s plea seeking Rao&amp;#039;s removal just on the ground that Rao was biased against him. However, the same bench refused to quash the charges framed by three-member panel saying &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;They are legally trained minds who can detect the fabricated material. In fact, it (three-member panel) would offer protection to a judge also from baseless allegations,&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SC lifts justice Dinakaran’s impeachment proceedings&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news | url=http://www.firstpost.com/fwire/sc-lifts-justice-dinakarans-impeachment-proceedings-36574.html | title=SC lifts justice Dinakaran&amp;#039;s impeachment proceedings | date=5 July 2011 | accessdate=15 January 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mysteriously, on 4 August 2011, Justice Dinakaran had a &amp;quot;change of heart&amp;quot; and wrote to the law ministry seeking to withdraw his resignation. But the ministry rejected his request.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Justice Dinakaran bid to get back job rejected&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news | url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-08-12/india/29879804_1_justice-dinakaran-sikkim-high-court-sikkim-hc | archive-url=https://archive.today/20130103141049/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-08-12/india/29879804_1_justice-dinakaran-sikkim-high-court-sikkim-hc | url-status=dead | archive-date=3 January 2013 | title=Justice Dinakaran bid to get back job rejected | date=12 August 2011| work=[[The Times of India]] &amp;lt;!--, 04.08am IST--&amp;gt; | accessdate=15 January 2012 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, his pre-emptive resignation did manage to scuttle the probe against him as the chairman of [[Rajya Sabha]], [[Hamid Ansari]], quietly buried the inquiry committee citing Dinakaran&amp;#039;s resignation in July.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dinakaran&amp;#039;s pre-emptive resignation scuttles probe&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news | url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dinakarans-pre-emptive-resignation-scuttles-probe/articleshow/10201564.cms | title=Dinakaran&amp;#039;s pre-emptive resignation scuttles probe | work=Times of India | date=2 October 2011&amp;lt;!--, 03.09AM IST--&amp;gt; | accessdate=16 January 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Post retirement benefits ==&lt;br /&gt;
On 15 January 2012, it became public through an RTI query that Justice Dinakaran along with his other colleague facing similar accusations Justice [[Soumitra Sen]] will keep getting their post-retirement benefits, even though they resigned ahead of impeachment proceedings against them, as there are no Constitutional or statutory provisions restricting their entitlements in such a scenario.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dinakaran, Sen to get retirement perks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news | url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/219583/dinakaran-sen-get-retirement-perks.html | title=Dinakaran, Sen to get retirement perks | date=15 January 2012 | accessdate=16 January 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soumitra Sen]] – former High Court judge of who became the first judge to be impeached by Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[V. Ramaswami]] – former Supreme Court judge who became the first judge against whom Parliament initiated impeachment proceedings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{authority control}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dinakaran, Pd}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1950 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:20th-century Indian judges]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Judges of the Karnataka High Court]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Vellore district]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Impeached Indian officials]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chief Justices of the Sikkim High Court]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>&gt;GreenC bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>