Nyuntam Aay Yojana - Revision history

->Fcbcampnou: Use Indian English

2022-01-08T11:06:53Z

Use Indian English

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 8 January 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{short description\|Proposed Indian social welfare program}}		{{short description\|Proposed Indian social welfare program}}
	{{italic}}		{{italic}}
	The '''''Nyuntam Aay Yojana''''' ({{trans\|[[Guaranteed minimum income\|Minimum income]] scheme}}; abbr. '''Nyay'''; a Hindi word meaning "justice") was a proposed [[social welfare]] ~~program~~ by the [[Indian National Congress]] in its 2019 general election manifesto.<ref name=etApril32019a>{{cite news \|title=Congress releases manifesto for 2019 Lok Sabha elections, promises wealth and welfare \|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/congress-releases-manifesto-for-2019-lok-sabha-polls-details-here/articleshow/68684073.cms \|access-date=4 April 2019 \|work=The Economic Times \|date=3 April 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web \|title=Congress Manifesto 2019 - We Will Deliver \|url=https://manifesto.inc.in/en/index.html \|website=Indian National Congress \|access-date=4 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://manifesto.inc.in/pdf/english.pdf Congress Will Deliver], Manifesto Lok Sabha Elections 2019, Indian National Congress</ref> It promised that the party, if voted to power in the [[2019 Indian general election]], would enact a law under which it would distribute cash to the bottom 20 ~~percent~~ of India's families in terms of wealth, as a minimum guarantee programme. These households would each receive up to {{INRConvert\|72000}} a year, a program the Congress claimed would benefit 250 million people in India.<ref name=ndtv03262019>[https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-nyay-nyuntam-aay-yojana-scheme-minimum-income-guarantee-proposal-explained-2012735 Congress's Minimum Income Guarantee Scheme "NYAY" Explained In 10 Points], NDTV (26 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424013835/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-nyay-nyuntam-aay-yojana-scheme-minimum-income-guarantee-proposal-explained-2012735\|date=24 April 2019}}</ref>		The '''''Nyuntam Aay Yojana''''' ({{trans\|[[Guaranteed minimum income\|Minimum income]] scheme}}; abbr. '''Nyay'''; a Hindi word meaning "justice") was a proposed [[social welfare]] programme by the [[Indian National Congress]] in its 2019 general election manifesto.<ref name=etApril32019a>{{cite news \|title=Congress releases manifesto for 2019 Lok Sabha elections, promises wealth and welfare \|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/congress-releases-manifesto-for-2019-lok-sabha-polls-details-here/articleshow/68684073.cms \|access-date=4 April 2019 \|work=The Economic Times \|date=3 April 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web \|title=Congress Manifesto 2019 - We Will Deliver \|url=https://manifesto.inc.in/en/index.html \|website=Indian National Congress \|access-date=4 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://manifesto.inc.in/pdf/english.pdf Congress Will Deliver], Manifesto Lok Sabha Elections 2019, Indian National Congress</ref> It promised that the party, if voted to power in the [[2019 Indian general election]], would enact a law under which it would distribute cash to the bottom 20 per cent of India's families in terms of wealth, as a minimum guarantee programme. These households would each receive up to {{INRConvert\|72000}} a year, a program the Congress claimed would benefit 250 million people in India.<ref name=ndtv03262019>[https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-nyay-nyuntam-aay-yojana-scheme-minimum-income-guarantee-proposal-explained-2012735 Congress's Minimum Income Guarantee Scheme "NYAY" Explained In 10 Points], NDTV (26 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424013835/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-nyay-nyuntam-aay-yojana-scheme-minimum-income-guarantee-proposal-explained-2012735\|date=24 April 2019}}</ref>

	In May 2020, a reworked version of the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', named as the ''Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyay Yojana'' (RGKNY; {{lit\|Rajiv Gandhi Farmer Justice Scheme}}) in honour of former Indian Prime Minister [[Rajiv Gandhi]], was announced. Under the scheme, up to Rs 10,000 per acre a year will be transferred into the bank accounts of farmers; the first instalment totalling Rs 1,500 crore was transferred by [[Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh]] [[Bhupesh Baghel]] to nearly two million farmers during the launch.<ref>{{Cite news\|date=2020-05-21\|title=Sonia launches Nyay scheme for farmers in Chhattisgarh\|language=en\|work=The Hindu\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/sonia-launches-nyay-scheme-for-farmers-in-chhattisgarh/article31639694.ece\|access-date=2020-05-25\|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news\|last=Mohanty\|first=Meera\|date=2020-05-20\|title=Chhattisgarh to transfer Rs 5,700 crores directly to farmers\|work=The Economic Times\|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rahul-gandhi-to-jointly-launch-kisan-nyay-scheme-in-chhattisgarh/articleshow/75851979.cms\|access-date=2020-05-25}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|title=Chhattisgarh to launch Rajiv Gandhi Nyay scheme in new avatar on former PM's death anniversary today\|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/coronavirus-chhattisgarh-rajiv-gandhi-death-anniversary-congress-nyay-scheme-1680259-2020-05-21\|first=Rahul\|last=Noronha\|date=May 21, 2020\|website=India Today\|language=en\|access-date=2020-05-25}}</ref>		In May 2020, a reworked version of the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', named as the ''Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyay Yojana'' (RGKNY; {{lit\|Rajiv Gandhi Farmer Justice Scheme}}) in honour of former Indian Prime Minister [[Rajiv Gandhi]], was announced. Under the scheme, up to Rs 10,000 per acre a year will be transferred into the bank accounts of farmers; the first instalment totalling Rs 1,500 crore was transferred by [[Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh]] [[Bhupesh Baghel]] to nearly two million farmers during the launch.<ref>{{Cite news\|date=2020-05-21\|title=Sonia launches Nyay scheme for farmers in Chhattisgarh\|language=en\|work=The Hindu\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/sonia-launches-nyay-scheme-for-farmers-in-chhattisgarh/article31639694.ece\|access-date=2020-05-25\|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news\|last=Mohanty\|first=Meera\|date=2020-05-20\|title=Chhattisgarh to transfer Rs 5,700 crores directly to farmers\|work=The Economic Times\|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rahul-gandhi-to-jointly-launch-kisan-nyay-scheme-in-chhattisgarh/articleshow/75851979.cms\|access-date=2020-05-25}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|title=Chhattisgarh to launch Rajiv Gandhi Nyay scheme in new avatar on former PM's death anniversary today\|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/coronavirus-chhattisgarh-rajiv-gandhi-death-anniversary-congress-nyay-scheme-1680259-2020-05-21\|first=Rahul\|last=Noronha\|date=May 21, 2020\|website=India Today\|language=en\|access-date=2020-05-25}}</ref>
Line 15:		Line 15:
	The Nyuntam Aay Yojana has been criticised by newspapers, politicians and economists on grounds of impracticality and the large expenses of maintaining such a scheme.		The Nyuntam Aay Yojana has been criticised by newspapers, politicians and economists on grounds of impracticality and the large expenses of maintaining such a scheme.

	According to ''[[The Economic Times]]'', the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' is "yet another welfare ~~program~~ for India, but one that is "between promising the moon and simply loony".<ref name="et03252019" /> It will lead to fiscal ruin if existing welfare ~~programs~~ and food, fuel and other subsidies operate in parallel to the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana''. The program will cost between {{INRConvert\|3.6\|lc\|lk=b}} and {{INRConvert\|7.2\|lc\|lk=b}} a year, worsen the fiscal deficit of the Indian government, lead to "soaring inflation" and a "flight of capital" from India.<ref name="et03252019" /> To pay for the new welfare ~~program~~ and maintain India's current deficit level, the Congress party will need to raise GST rate, income taxes and wealth tax. Since the proposed welfare ~~program~~ would be a cash redistribution without any link to work or jobs, it will create no new jobs and worsen the recent productivity growth India has witnessed".<ref name="et03252019">[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-view/et-view-between-promising-the-moon-and-simply-loony/articleshow/68562087.cms?from=mdr ET View: Between promising the moon and simply loony], The Economic Times (25 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190409104023/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-view/et-view-between-promising-the-moon-and-simply-loony/articleshow/68562087.cms\|date=9 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/view-congress-nyuntam-aay-yojana-simply-doesnt-work/articleshow/68586494.cms View: Congress' Nyuntam Aay Yojana simply doesn’t work], The Economic Times (27 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330072621/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/view-congress-nyuntam-aay-yojana-simply-doesnt-work/articleshow/68586494.cms\|date=30 March 2019}}</ref> The UK-based weekly ''[[The Economist]]'' stated that "India already has "over 950 centrally-funded schemes and subsidies", but the benefits of these welfare ~~programs~~ never reach the poor because it typically lands up in the government officials' pockets and those of the wealthier sections of society who are politically and bureaucratically well connected. Welfare ~~programs~~ that "prevent participants from doing any other work" are problematic. Another major flaw in ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', stated by ''The Economist'' is its assumption that the government officials will be able to identify the poor. Given the incentive of government income for being within the poorest 20%, people will likely compete to be poor or appear to be poor so as to avail the benefits".<ref>[https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/04/04/indias-big-national-parties-vie-for-poor-voters-affections India’s big, national parties vie for poor voters’ affections], ''The Economist'' (4 April 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/04/06/a-better-anti-poverty-plan-for-india Welfare in India: A better anti-poverty plan for India], ''The Economist'' (6 April 2019)</ref>		According to ''[[The Economic Times]]'', the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' is yet another welfare programme for India, but one that is 'between promising the moon and simply loony'.<ref name="et03252019" /> It will lead to fiscal ruin if existing welfare programmes and food, fuel and other subsidies operate in parallel to the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana''. The program will cost between {{INRConvert\|3.6\|lc\|lk=b}} and {{INRConvert\|7.2\|lc\|lk=b}} a year, worsen the fiscal deficit of the Indian government, lead to "soaring inflation" and a "flight of capital" from India.<ref name="et03252019" /> To pay for the new welfare programme and maintain India's current deficit level, the Congress party will need to raise GST rate, income taxes and wealth tax. Since the proposed welfare programme would be a cash redistribution without any link to work or jobs, it will create no new jobs and worsen the recent productivity growth India has witnessed".<ref name="et03252019">[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-view/et-view-between-promising-the-moon-and-simply-loony/articleshow/68562087.cms?from=mdr ET View: Between promising the moon and simply loony], The Economic Times (25 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190409104023/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-view/et-view-between-promising-the-moon-and-simply-loony/articleshow/68562087.cms\|date=9 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/view-congress-nyuntam-aay-yojana-simply-doesnt-work/articleshow/68586494.cms View: Congress' Nyuntam Aay Yojana simply doesn’t work], The Economic Times (27 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330072621/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/view-congress-nyuntam-aay-yojana-simply-doesnt-work/articleshow/68586494.cms\|date=30 March 2019}}</ref> The UK-based weekly ''[[The Economist]]'' stated that "India already has "over 950 centrally-funded schemes and subsidies", but the benefits of these welfare programmes never reach the poor because it typically lands up in the government officials' pockets and those of the wealthier sections of society who are politically and bureaucratically well connected. Welfare programmes that "prevent participants from doing any other work" are problematic. Another major flaw in ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', stated by ''The Economist'' is its assumption that the government officials will be able to identify the poor. Given the incentive of government income for being within the poorest 20%, people will likely compete to be poor or appear to be poor so as to avail the benefits".<ref>[https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/04/04/indias-big-national-parties-vie-for-poor-voters-affections India’s big, national parties vie for poor voters’ affections], ''The Economist'' (4 April 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/04/06/a-better-anti-poverty-plan-for-india Welfare in India: A better anti-poverty plan for India], ''The Economist'' (6 April 2019)</ref>

	According to [[Raghuram Rajan]] – the former governor of [[Reserve Bank of India]], the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' was "good in theory but needs to take into account the fiscal realities of India". The ~~program~~ details and "how it will roll out" are unclear, states Rajan, and such a ~~program~~ if implemented properly at the grassroots level can revolutionise things, but "given where we [Indian government fiscal deficits] are, can we add another 7 lakh crore subsidy? The answer is no."<ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/raghuram-rajan-congress-nyay-minimum-income-guarantee-scheme-1487080-2019-03-26 Raghuram Rajan says Rahul Gandhi's NYAY scheme workable, conditions apply], India Today (26 March 2019)</ref> Any Direct Bank Transfer scheme, such as the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' should aim to alleviate poverty, but to be effective they should bring "more people into productive work force" and they "should not discourage work".<ref>[https://www.btvi.in/economy/btvi-exclusive--the-big-picture-with-raghuram-rajan-/130534 BTVI Exclusive: The Big Picture With Raghuram Rajan], BTVI (27 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424031751/https://www.btvi.in/economy/btvi-exclusive--the-big-picture-with-raghuram-rajan-/130534\|date=24 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://www.thehansindia.com/business/nyay-scheme-poses-fiscal-challenge-panagariya--516144 'Nyay' scheme poses fiscal challenge: Panagariya] The Hans India (28 March 2019)</ref> James Crabtree – a professor of Public Policy Practice and the former Mumbai Bureau chief of ''[[The Financial Times]]'', states that the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' idea is not supported by the "best economists" contrary to Rahul Gandhi's beliefs. The idea is a copy of Universal Basic Income idea that is currently fashionable among left-wing advocacy groups worldwide and is innovative compared to past proposals of the Congress party. However, it is unworkable, states Crabtree, in part because it is politically infeasible as it promises to discriminate between the poor by targeting the lowest 20% when similar impoverishment affects far more Indian families. Even if ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' can politically ignore the impoverished families above the bottom 20%, it is fiscally unaffordable because it would cost about 2% of India's gross domestic product, according to Jamestree. The ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' cannot end poverty in India, predicted Jamestree.<ref>[https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Gandhi-s-universal-income-pledge-cannot-end-Indian-poverty Gandhi's universal income pledge cannot end Indian poverty], James Crabtree (3 April 2019), Nikkei Asian Review, Tokyo, Japan, {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402220743/https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Gandhi-s-universal-income-pledge-cannot-end-Indian-poverty\|date=2 April 2019}}</ref>{{refn\|group=note\|Salman Soz – a member of the Indian National Congress, has criticized Crabtree's analysis. Soz states that the program is not a Universal Basic Income idea because it is "not universal" and it will only focus on the poorest 20%. According to Soz, while the full cost of the program is 1.8% of the GDP, in practice it will be 1.2 to 1.5% at its peak because his Congress party will start small and will be able to identify the poor. The fiscal impact will be lower because India's GDP will continue to grow and because Congress party's plan is to mandate the state governments to come up with 50% of the cost of ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', thus costing 50% to the central government finances. Such welfare programs may boost consumption demand, states Soz, and therefore have a "multiplier effect on the economy".<ref>[https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/India-needs-Rahul-Gandhi-s-minimum-income-scheme-to-fight-poverty India needs Rahul Gandhi's minimum income scheme to fight poverty], Salman Soz (8 April 2019), Nikkei Asian Review, Tokyo, Japan</ref> In contrast, according to [[Ashwini Deshpande]] – an economist at the Ashoka University, the "current welfare schemes [in India] amount to between 5 and 10% of India’s GDP", and the overall cost of implementing the proposed ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' would be "a similar amount, according to current estimates". It cannot be funded with "the existing system of taxation and [with] the existing welfare schemes intact".<ref name=time0130219>[http://time.com/5515591/universal-basic-income-india-election/ India's Main Opposition Party Is Promising a Basic Income for the Poor. Can It Work?], Billy Perrigo (30 January 2019), The Time</ref> According to [[Guy Standing (economist)\|Guy Standing]] – it has been beneficial but implemented as not beneficial according to critics. An economist who has been an early advocate of Universal Basic Income, India could implement the welfare program and target the lowest economic segment of its population by using the national [[Aadhaar]] card identification system.<ref name=time0130219/>}}		According to [[Raghuram Rajan]] – the former governor of [[Reserve Bank of India]], the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' was "good in theory but needs to take into account the fiscal realities of India". The programme details and "how it will roll out" are unclear, states Rajan, and such a programme if implemented properly at the grassroots level can revolutionise things, but "given where we [Indian government fiscal deficits] are, can we add another 7 lakh crore subsidy? The answer is no."<ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/raghuram-rajan-congress-nyay-minimum-income-guarantee-scheme-1487080-2019-03-26 Raghuram Rajan says Rahul Gandhi's NYAY scheme workable, conditions apply], India Today (26 March 2019)</ref> Any Direct Bank Transfer scheme, such as the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' should aim to alleviate poverty, but to be effective they should bring "more people into productive work force" and they "should not discourage work".<ref>[https://www.btvi.in/economy/btvi-exclusive--the-big-picture-with-raghuram-rajan-/130534 BTVI Exclusive: The Big Picture With Raghuram Rajan], BTVI (27 March 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424031751/https://www.btvi.in/economy/btvi-exclusive--the-big-picture-with-raghuram-rajan-/130534\|date=24 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://www.thehansindia.com/business/nyay-scheme-poses-fiscal-challenge-panagariya--516144 'Nyay' scheme poses fiscal challenge: Panagariya] The Hans India (28 March 2019)</ref> James Crabtree – a professor of Public Policy Practice and the former Mumbai Bureau chief of ''[[The Financial Times]]'', states that the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' idea is not supported by the "best economists" contrary to Rahul Gandhi's beliefs. The idea is a copy of Universal Basic Income idea that is currently fashionable among left-wing advocacy groups worldwide and is innovative compared to past proposals of the Congress party. However, it is unworkable, states Crabtree, in part because it is politically infeasible as it promises to discriminate between the poor by targeting the lowest 20% when similar impoverishment affects far more Indian families. Even if ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' can politically ignore the impoverished families above the bottom 20%, it is fiscally unaffordable because it would cost about 2% of India's gross domestic product, according to Jamestree. The ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' cannot end poverty in India, predicted Jamestree.<ref>[https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Gandhi-s-universal-income-pledge-cannot-end-Indian-poverty Gandhi's universal income pledge cannot end Indian poverty], James Crabtree (3 April 2019), Nikkei Asian Review, Tokyo, Japan, {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402220743/https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Gandhi-s-universal-income-pledge-cannot-end-Indian-poverty\|date=2 April 2019}}</ref>{{refn\|group=note\|Salman Soz – a member of the Indian National Congress, has criticized Crabtree's analysis. Soz states that the program is not a Universal Basic Income idea because it is "not universal" and it will only focus on the poorest 20%. According to Soz, while the full cost of the program is 1.8% of the GDP, in practice it will be 1.2 to 1.5% at its peak because his Congress party will start small and will be able to identify the poor. The fiscal impact will be lower because India's GDP will continue to grow and because Congress party's plan is to mandate the state governments to come up with 50% of the cost of ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', thus costing 50% to the central government finances. Such welfare programs may boost consumption demand, states Soz, and therefore have a "multiplier effect on the economy".<ref>[https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/India-needs-Rahul-Gandhi-s-minimum-income-scheme-to-fight-poverty India needs Rahul Gandhi's minimum income scheme to fight poverty], Salman Soz (8 April 2019), Nikkei Asian Review, Tokyo, Japan</ref> In contrast, according to [[Ashwini Deshpande]] – an economist at the Ashoka University, the "current welfare schemes [in India] amount to between 5 and 10% of India’s GDP", and the overall cost of implementing the proposed ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' would be "a similar amount, according to current estimates". It cannot be funded with "the existing system of taxation and [with] the existing welfare schemes intact".<ref name=time0130219>[http://time.com/5515591/universal-basic-income-india-election/ India's Main Opposition Party Is Promising a Basic Income for the Poor. Can It Work?], Billy Perrigo (30 January 2019), The Time</ref> According to [[Guy Standing (economist)\|Guy Standing]] – it has been beneficial but implemented as not beneficial according to critics. An economist who has been an early advocate of Universal Basic Income, India could implement the welfare program and target the lowest economic segment of its population by using the national [[Aadhaar]] card identification system.<ref name=time0130219/>}}

	[[Mayawati]] ~~– the~~ president of Bahujan Samaj Party and a former [[Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh]], asserted that the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' was "just vote bank politics" of the Congress party.<ref>[https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/120419/poor-became-poorer-rich-got-richer-under-bjp-rule-mayawati.html Poor became poorer, rich got richer under BJP rule: Mayawati], Deccan Chronicle (12 April 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424013836/https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/120419/poor-became-poorer-rich-got-richer-under-bjp-rule-mayawati.html\|date=24 April 2019}}</ref>		[[Mayawati]], president of the [[Bahujan Samaj Party]] and former [[Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh]], asserted that the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' was "just [[vote bank politics]]" of the Congress party.<ref>[https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/120419/poor-became-poorer-rich-got-richer-under-bjp-rule-mayawati.html Poor became poorer, rich got richer under BJP rule: Mayawati], Deccan Chronicle (12 April 2019), {{webarchive\|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424013836/https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/120419/poor-became-poorer-rich-got-richer-under-bjp-rule-mayawati.html\|date=24 April 2019}}</ref> [[Abhijit Banerjee]], the [[Ford Foundation]] International Professor of Economics at [[MIT]] criticised NYAY, asserting that "it will only be funded with high taxes and inflation".<ref>[https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/mit-professor-abhijit-banerjee-suggested-minimum-income-rs-2500-per-month-congress-taxes-rise-fund-nyay/story/331823.html MIT professor suggested minimum income plan to Congress, but not Rs 6,000 per month], [[Business Today (India)]]</ref>

	~~The~~ [[Ford Foundation]] International Professor of Economics at [[MIT~~]] [[Abhijit Banerjee~~]] criticised NYAY, asserting that "it will only be funded with high taxes and inflation".<ref>[https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/mit-professor-abhijit-banerjee-suggested-minimum-income-rs-2500-per-month-congress-taxes-rise-fund-nyay/story/331823.html MIT professor suggested minimum income plan to Congress, but not Rs 6,000 per month], [[Business Today (India)]]</ref>

	==Notes==		==Notes==

imported>Neils51: minor ce

2021-07-26T11:47:14Z

minor ce

New page

{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
{{Use Indian English|date=October 2019}}
{{short description|Proposed Indian social welfare program}}
{{italic}}
The '''''Nyuntam Aay Yojana''''' ({{trans|[[Guaranteed minimum income|Minimum income]] scheme}}; abbr. '''Nyay'''; a Hindi word meaning "justice") was a proposed [[social welfare]] program by the [[Indian National Congress]] in its 2019 general election manifesto.<ref name=etApril32019a>{{cite news |title=Congress releases manifesto for 2019 Lok Sabha elections, promises wealth and welfare |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/congress-releases-manifesto-for-2019-lok-sabha-polls-details-here/articleshow/68684073.cms |access-date=4 April 2019 |work=The Economic Times |date=3 April 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Congress Manifesto 2019 - We Will Deliver |url=https://manifesto.inc.in/en/index.html |website=Indian National Congress |access-date=4 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://manifesto.inc.in/pdf/english.pdf Congress Will Deliver], Manifesto Lok Sabha Elections 2019, Indian National Congress</ref> It promised that the party, if voted to power in the [[2019 Indian general election]], would enact a law under which it would distribute cash to the bottom 20 percent of India's families in terms of wealth, as a minimum guarantee programme. These households would each receive up to {{INRConvert|72000}} a year, a program the Congress claimed would benefit 250 million people in India.<ref name=ndtv03262019>[https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-nyay-nyuntam-aay-yojana-scheme-minimum-income-guarantee-proposal-explained-2012735 Congress's Minimum Income Guarantee Scheme "NYAY" Explained In 10 Points], NDTV (26 March 2019), {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424013835/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-nyay-nyuntam-aay-yojana-scheme-minimum-income-guarantee-proposal-explained-2012735|date=24 April 2019}}</ref>

In May 2020, a reworked version of the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', named as the ''Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyay Yojana'' (RGKNY; {{lit|Rajiv Gandhi Farmer Justice Scheme}}) in honour of former Indian Prime Minister [[Rajiv Gandhi]], was announced. Under the scheme, up to Rs 10,000 per acre a year will be transferred into the bank accounts of farmers; the first instalment totalling Rs 1,500 crore was transferred by [[Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh]] [[Bhupesh Baghel]] to nearly two million farmers during the launch.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-05-21|title=Sonia launches Nyay scheme for farmers in Chhattisgarh|language=en|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/sonia-launches-nyay-scheme-for-farmers-in-chhattisgarh/article31639694.ece|access-date=2020-05-25|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Mohanty|first=Meera|date=2020-05-20|title=Chhattisgarh to transfer Rs 5,700 crores directly to farmers|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rahul-gandhi-to-jointly-launch-kisan-nyay-scheme-in-chhattisgarh/articleshow/75851979.cms|access-date=2020-05-25}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Chhattisgarh to launch Rajiv Gandhi Nyay scheme in new avatar on former PM's death anniversary today|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/coronavirus-chhattisgarh-rajiv-gandhi-death-anniversary-congress-nyay-scheme-1680259-2020-05-21|first=Rahul|last=Noronha|date=May 21, 2020|website=India Today|language=en|access-date=2020-05-25}}</ref>

== Background ==
The Nyuntam Aay Yojana was proposed as part of the [[Indian National Congress campaign for the 2019 Indian general election]], which primarily focused on agrarian distress while the [[Bharatiya Janata Party campaign for the 2019 Indian general election]] focused on infrastructural development and anti-immigration policies. The program was announced on 3 March 2019, at the manifesto’s release event at the All India Congress Committee’s headquarters at New Delhi.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2019-04-03|title=Congress releases manifesto for 2019 Lok Sabha elections, promises wealth and welfare|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/congress-releases-manifesto-for-2019-lok-sabha-polls-details-here/articleshow/68684073.cms|access-date=2020-05-09}}</ref>

The scheme was backed by [[Rahul Gandhi]], then-president of the INC, who stated that "the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' is "an extremely powerful, extremely dynamic, extremely well-thought-through idea"", claiming that it is supported by "the best economists"".<ref name=ndtv03262019/> According to Bhalchandra Mungekar – a former member of India's Planning Commission and a member of Congress party's manifesto committee, the scheme would redistribute about {{INRConvert|3.6|lc|lk=b}} a year. Mungekar stated that the Indian GDP in 2018 was $2.67 trillion, and the promised welfare program of the Congress party, if enacted and implemented, would collect and redistribute 1.9 percent of India's Gross Domestic Product to the poor. He states that the welfare program would be an affordable and just redistribution of national income.<ref>[https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/the-nyay-scheme-is-a-game-changer/article26822386.ece The NYAY scheme is a game changer], Bhalchandra Mungekar (12 April 2019), The Hindu Business Line</ref> According to [[P. Chidambaram|P Chidambaram]] – former [[Finance Minister of India]], the proposed welfare program "will not affect other welfare program subsidies India already operates, will constitute 1.8 percent of India's GDP, and benefit 50 million families".<ref>[https://www.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=warticle&dt=2019-03-28%2010:53:50&msec=556 Nyuntam Aay Yojana to be rolled out in phases: P Chidambaram, Scheme will not affect subsidies], Nidhi Bhati (28 March 2019), Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190425151130/https://www.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=warticle&dt=2019-03-28%2010:53:50&msec=556|date=25 April 2019}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|According to the 2018 country report of the [[International Monetary Fund]], the total tax and non-tax revenues of the Indian government in fiscal year 2017–18 was 8.8% of the GDP.<ref>[https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2018/08/06/India-2018-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-Staff-Report-and-Statement-by-the-Executive-46155 India: 2018 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for India], International Monetary Fund. Asia and Pacific Dept (6 August 2018), pages 11-12</ref> An additional 1.8% of GDP for redistribution the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' will imply a 20.5% increase in tax and non-tax collections by the Indian government every year, assuming no other pre-existing subsidies and welfare programs in India are affected and the cost of implementing the new plan is negligible.}}

== Criticism ==
The Nyuntam Aay Yojana has been criticised by newspapers, politicians and economists on grounds of impracticality and the large expenses of maintaining such a scheme.

According to ''[[The Economic Times]]'', the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' is "yet another welfare program for India, but one that is "between promising the moon and simply loony".<ref name="et03252019" /> It will lead to fiscal ruin if existing welfare programs and food, fuel and other subsidies operate in parallel to the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana''. The program will cost between {{INRConvert|3.6|lc|lk=b}} and {{INRConvert|7.2|lc|lk=b}} a year, worsen the fiscal deficit of the Indian government, lead to "soaring inflation" and a "flight of capital" from India.<ref name="et03252019" /> To pay for the new welfare program and maintain India's current deficit level, the Congress party will need to raise GST rate, income taxes and wealth tax. Since the proposed welfare program would be a cash redistribution without any link to work or jobs, it will create no new jobs and worsen the recent productivity growth India has witnessed".<ref name="et03252019">[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-view/et-view-between-promising-the-moon-and-simply-loony/articleshow/68562087.cms?from=mdr ET View: Between promising the moon and simply loony], The Economic Times (25 March 2019), {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190409104023/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-view/et-view-between-promising-the-moon-and-simply-loony/articleshow/68562087.cms|date=9 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/view-congress-nyuntam-aay-yojana-simply-doesnt-work/articleshow/68586494.cms View: Congress' Nyuntam Aay Yojana simply doesn’t work], The Economic Times (27 March 2019), {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330072621/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/view-congress-nyuntam-aay-yojana-simply-doesnt-work/articleshow/68586494.cms|date=30 March 2019}}</ref> The UK-based weekly ''[[The Economist]]'' stated that "India already has "over 950 centrally-funded schemes and subsidies", but the benefits of these welfare programs never reach the poor because it typically lands up in the government officials' pockets and those of the wealthier sections of society who are politically and bureaucratically well connected. Welfare programs that "prevent participants from doing any other work" are problematic. Another major flaw in ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', stated by ''The Economist'' is its assumption that the government officials will be able to identify the poor. Given the incentive of government income for being within the poorest 20%, people will likely compete to be poor or appear to be poor so as to avail the benefits".<ref>[https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/04/04/indias-big-national-parties-vie-for-poor-voters-affections India’s big, national parties vie for poor voters’ affections], ''The Economist'' (4 April 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/04/06/a-better-anti-poverty-plan-for-india Welfare in India: A better anti-poverty plan for India], ''The Economist'' (6 April 2019)</ref>

According to [[Raghuram Rajan]] – the former governor of [[Reserve Bank of India]], the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' was "good in theory but needs to take into account the fiscal realities of India". The program details and "how it will roll out" are unclear, states Rajan, and such a program if implemented properly at the grassroots level can revolutionise things, but "given where we [Indian government fiscal deficits] are, can we add another 7 lakh crore subsidy? The answer is no."<ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/raghuram-rajan-congress-nyay-minimum-income-guarantee-scheme-1487080-2019-03-26 Raghuram Rajan says Rahul Gandhi's NYAY scheme workable, conditions apply], India Today (26 March 2019)</ref> Any Direct Bank Transfer scheme, such as the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' should aim to alleviate poverty, but to be effective they should bring "more people into productive work force" and they "should not discourage work".<ref>[https://www.btvi.in/economy/btvi-exclusive--the-big-picture-with-raghuram-rajan-/130534 BTVI Exclusive: The Big Picture With Raghuram Rajan], BTVI (27 March 2019), {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424031751/https://www.btvi.in/economy/btvi-exclusive--the-big-picture-with-raghuram-rajan-/130534|date=24 April 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://www.thehansindia.com/business/nyay-scheme-poses-fiscal-challenge-panagariya--516144 'Nyay' scheme poses fiscal challenge: Panagariya] The Hans India (28 March 2019)</ref> James Crabtree – a professor of Public Policy Practice and the former Mumbai Bureau chief of ''[[The Financial Times]]'', states that the ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' idea is not supported by the "best economists" contrary to Rahul Gandhi's beliefs. The idea is a copy of Universal Basic Income idea that is currently fashionable among left-wing advocacy groups worldwide and is innovative compared to past proposals of the Congress party. However, it is unworkable, states Crabtree, in part because it is politically infeasible as it promises to discriminate between the poor by targeting the lowest 20% when similar impoverishment affects far more Indian families. Even if ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' can politically ignore the impoverished families above the bottom 20%, it is fiscally unaffordable because it would cost about 2% of India's gross domestic product, according to Jamestree. The ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' cannot end poverty in India, predicted Jamestree.<ref>[https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Gandhi-s-universal-income-pledge-cannot-end-Indian-poverty Gandhi's universal income pledge cannot end Indian poverty], James Crabtree (3 April 2019), Nikkei Asian Review, Tokyo, Japan, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402220743/https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Gandhi-s-universal-income-pledge-cannot-end-Indian-poverty|date=2 April 2019}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|Salman Soz – a member of the Indian National Congress, has criticized Crabtree's analysis. Soz states that the program is not a Universal Basic Income idea because it is "not universal" and it will only focus on the poorest 20%. According to Soz, while the full cost of the program is 1.8% of the GDP, in practice it will be 1.2 to 1.5% at its peak because his Congress party will start small and will be able to identify the poor. The fiscal impact will be lower because India's GDP will continue to grow and because Congress party's plan is to mandate the state governments to come up with 50% of the cost of ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'', thus costing 50% to the central government finances. Such welfare programs may boost consumption demand, states Soz, and therefore have a "multiplier effect on the economy".<ref>[https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/India-needs-Rahul-Gandhi-s-minimum-income-scheme-to-fight-poverty India needs Rahul Gandhi's minimum income scheme to fight poverty], Salman Soz (8 April 2019), Nikkei Asian Review, Tokyo, Japan</ref> In contrast, according to [[Ashwini Deshpande]] – an economist at the Ashoka University, the "current welfare schemes [in India] amount to between 5 and 10% of India’s GDP", and the overall cost of implementing the proposed ''Nyuntam Aay Yojana'' would be "a similar amount, according to current estimates". It cannot be funded with "the existing system of taxation and [with] the existing welfare schemes intact".<ref name=time0130219>[http://time.com/5515591/universal-basic-income-india-election/ India's Main Opposition Party Is Promising a Basic Income for the Poor. Can It Work?], Billy Perrigo (30 January 2019), The Time</ref> According to [[Guy Standing (economist)|Guy Standing]] – it has been beneficial but implemented as not beneficial according to critics. An economist who has been an early advocate of Universal Basic Income, India could implement the welfare program and target the lowest economic segment of its population by using the national [[Aadhaar]] card identification system.<ref name=time0130219/>}}

[[Mayawati]] – the president of Bahujan Samaj Party and a former [[Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh]], asserted that the ''Nyantam Aay Yojana'' was "just vote bank politics" of the Congress party.<ref>[https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/120419/poor-became-poorer-rich-got-richer-under-bjp-rule-mayawati.html Poor became poorer, rich got richer under BJP rule: Mayawati], Deccan Chronicle (12 April 2019), {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424013836/https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/120419/poor-became-poorer-rich-got-richer-under-bjp-rule-mayawati.html|date=24 April 2019}}</ref>

The [[Ford Foundation]] International Professor of Economics at [[MIT]] [[Abhijit Banerjee]] criticised NYAY, asserting that "it will only be funded with high taxes and inflation".<ref>[https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/mit-professor-abhijit-banerjee-suggested-minimum-income-rs-2500-per-month-congress-taxes-rise-fund-nyay/story/331823.html MIT professor suggested minimum income plan to Congress, but not Rs 6,000 per month], [[Business Today (India)]]</ref>

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}
Nyuntam is a [[Hindi]] word meaning "minimum", and is not to be confused with "NYAY" meaning justice.

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Welfare in India]]
[[Category:2019 Indian general election]]
[[Category:Indian general election campaigns]]
[[Category:Indian National Congress campaigns]]
[[Category:Rahul Gandhi]]