imported>Nitesh003: WP:NOINDICSCRIPT

2021-09-01T15:34:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 1 September 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{Infobox government agency		{{Infobox government agency
	\| name = Ministry of AYUSH		\| name = Ministry of AYUSH
			\| native_name =
			\| type = Ayurvedic Medicine
	\| seal = Emblem of India.svg		\| seal = Emblem of India.svg
	\| seal_width = 70px		\| seal_width = 70px
	\| seal_caption = [[Emblem of India]]		\| seal_caption = [[Emblem of India]]
	\| logo =		\| logo =
	\| formed ={{start date and years ago\|2014\|11\|09\|df=y\|p=y\|br=y}}		\| formed = {{start date and years ago\|2014\|11\|09\|df=y\|p=y\|br=y}}
	\| employees =		\| employees =
	\| budget =		\| budget =
Line 15:		Line 17:
	\| minister2_name = [[Mahendra Munjapara]]		\| minister2_name = [[Mahendra Munjapara]]
	\| minister2_pfo = Minister of State		\| minister2_pfo = Minister of State
	\| chief1_name =[[Rajesh Kotecha]]		\| chief1_name = [[Rajesh Kotecha]]
	\| chief1_position = [[Secretary]]		\| chief1_position = [[Secretary]]
	\| chief2_name =		\| chief2_name =
Line 34:		Line 36:
	\| chief9_name =		\| chief9_name =
	\| chief9_position =		\| chief9_position =
	\| parent_department =		\| parent_department = [[Government of India]]
	\| website = {{url\|http://ayush.gov.in/}}		\| website = {{url\|http://ayush.gov.in/}}
	}}		}}
	The '''Ministry of [[Ayurveda]], [[Yoga]], [[Naturopathy]], [[Unani]], [[Siddha medicine\|Siddha]], Sowa-Rigpa and [[Homoeopathy]]''' (abbreviated as '''AYUSH''') is purposed with developing education, research and propagation of indigenous alternative medicine systems in [[India]]. As per a recent notification published in the Gazette of India on 13 April 2021, the Ministry of AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy), will now be known as the Ministry of Ayush. The Ministry of Ayush includes the '''seven traditional systems of healthcare.'''		The '''Ministry of [[Ayurveda]], [[Yoga]], [[Naturopathy]], [[Unani]], [[Siddha medicine\|Siddha]], Sowa-Rigpa and [[Homoeopathy]]''' (abbreviated as '''AYUSH''') is purposed with developing education, research and propagation of indigenous alternative medicine systems in [[India]]. As per a recent notification published in the Gazette of India on 13 April 2021, the Ministry of AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy), will now be known as the Ministry of Ayush. The Ministry of Ayush includes the '''seven traditional systems of healthcare.'''

	The Ministry is headed by [[Sarbananda Sonowal]].<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www.aajtak.in/india/news/story/modi-cabinet-reshuffle-now-new-ministers-portfolio-inside-details-ntc-1286673-2021-07-07\|title=Modi Cabinet Full List\|website=www.aajtak.in}}</ref>

	The ministry has faced significant criticism for funding systems that lack [[biological plausibility]] and are either untested or conclusively proven as ineffective. Quality of research has been poor, and drugs have been launched without any rigorous pharmacological studies and meaningful [[clinical trials on Ayurveda]] or other alternative healthcare systems.<ref name="Rathee2018">{{cite news\|title=What is AYUSH and the controversy around it?\|last=Rathee\|first=Pranshu\|work=[[Deccan Herald]]\|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/specials/what-ayush-and-controversy-703993.html\|url-status=live\|access-date=2021-04-04\|date=2018-11-20\|archive-date=2020-11-22\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122144706/https://www.deccanherald.com/specials/what-ayush-and-controversy-703993.html\|publisher=[[The Printers (Mysore)]]}}</ref><ref name="Narayanan2020">{{cite news\|work=[[Firstpost]]\|url=https://www.firstpost.com/india/patanajali-covid-19-ayush-ministry-weak-response-ramdevs-coronil-stunt-endangers-people-jeopardises-ayurveda-homeopathy-8529151.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121014011/https://www.firstpost.com/india/patanajali-covid-19-ayush-ministry-weak-response-ramdevs-coronil-stunt-endangers-people-jeopardises-ayurveda-homeopathy-8529151.html\|archive-date=2020-11-21\|date=2020-07-01\|last=Narayanan\|first=Kavya\|title=AYUSH Ministry is endangering people, jeopardising Ayurveda with lax response to Patanjali's Coronil and COVID-19, warn experts}}</ref> The ministry is well known for promoting pseudoscience and quackery in the form of unscientific alternative medicine.		The ministry has faced significant criticism for funding systems that lack [[biological plausibility]] and are either untested or conclusively proven as ineffective. Quality of research has been poor, and drugs have been launched without any rigorous pharmacological studies and meaningful [[clinical trials on Ayurveda]] or other alternative healthcare systems.<ref name="Rathee2018">{{cite news\|title=What is AYUSH and the controversy around it?\|last=Rathee\|first=Pranshu\|work=[[Deccan Herald]]\|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/specials/what-ayush-and-controversy-703993.html\|url-status=live\|access-date=2021-04-04\|date=2018-11-20\|archive-date=2020-11-22\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122144706/https://www.deccanherald.com/specials/what-ayush-and-controversy-703993.html\|publisher=[[The Printers (Mysore)]]}}</ref><ref name="Narayanan2020">{{cite news\|work=[[Firstpost]]\|url=https://www.firstpost.com/india/patanajali-covid-19-ayush-ministry-weak-response-ramdevs-coronil-stunt-endangers-people-jeopardises-ayurveda-homeopathy-8529151.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121014011/https://www.firstpost.com/india/patanajali-covid-19-ayush-ministry-weak-response-ramdevs-coronil-stunt-endangers-people-jeopardises-ayurveda-homeopathy-8529151.html\|archive-date=2020-11-21\|date=2020-07-01\|last=Narayanan\|first=Kavya\|title=AYUSH Ministry is endangering people, jeopardising Ayurveda with lax response to Patanjali's Coronil and COVID-19, warn experts}}</ref> The ministry is well known for promoting pseudoscience and quackery in the form of unscientific alternative medicine.
Line 155:		Line 155:
	*{{Cite book\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dwFKDwAAQBAJ\|page=293\|title=Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science\|last1=Kaufman\|first1=Allison B.\|last2=Kaufman\|first2=James C.\|date=2018-01-12\|publisher=MIT Press\|isbn=9780262037426\|language=en}}</ref>		*{{Cite book\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dwFKDwAAQBAJ\|page=293\|title=Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science\|last1=Kaufman\|first1=Allison B.\|last2=Kaufman\|first2=James C.\|date=2018-01-12\|publisher=MIT Press\|isbn=9780262037426\|language=en}}</ref>

	A strong consensus prevails among the scientific community that homeopathy is a pseudo-scientific,<ref name="Tuomela2">{{cite book\|title=Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning\|author=Tuomela, R\|publisher=Springer\|year=1987\|isbn=978-94-010-8181-8\|veditors=Pitt JC, Marcello P\|series=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science\|volume=98\|pages=83–101\|chapter=Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience\|doi=10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4\|author-link=Raimo Tuomela}}</ref><ref name="Smith20122">{{cite journal\|author=Smith K\|year=2012\|title=Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical\|journal=Bioethics\|volume=26\|issue=9\|pages=508–12\|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x\|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1035885}}</ref><ref name="Baran20142">{{cite book\|title=Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?\|vauthors=Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP\|journal=Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century\|publisher=Springer\|year=2014\|isbn=978-1-4614-8540-7\|pages=19–57\|chapter=Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?\|doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2\|quote=within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery}}</ref><ref name="Ladyman2">{{cite book\|title=Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem\|author=Ladyman J\|publisher=University of Chicago Press\|year=2013\|isbn=978-0-226-05196-3\|veditors=Pigliucci M, Boudry M\|pages=48–49\|chapter=Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience\|quote=Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).}}</ref> unethical<ref name="unethical">{{cite journal\|last1=Shaw\|first1=DM\|year=2010\|title=Homeopathy is where the harm is: Five unethical effects of funding unscientific 'remedies'\|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics\|volume=36\|issue=3\|pages=130–31\|doi=10.1136/jme.2009.034959\|pmid=20211989\|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite news\|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/jul/21/pharmacists.homeophathy\|title=Pharmacists urged to 'tell the truth' about homeopathic remedies\|author=Sample I\|date=21 July 2008\|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]\|location=London}}</ref> and implausible line of treatment.<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/pharmacologicalandbiologicaltreatment/homeopathy\|title=Homeopathy\|publisher=American Cancer Society\|access-date=12 October 2014}}</ref><ref name="inquiry_cfm">UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee - [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/inquiries/homeopathy-/ "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"]</ref><ref name="GrimesFACT">{{cite journal\|last1=Grimes\|first1=D.R.\|year=2012\|title=Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible\|journal=Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies\|volume=17\|issue=3\|pages=149–55\|doi=10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x}}</ref><ref name="EASAC2017">{{cite web\|url=http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final.pdf\|title=Homeopathic products and practices: assessing the evidence and ensuring consistency in regulating medical claims in the EU\|date=September 2017\|work=European Academies' Science Advisory Council\|page=1\|access-date=1 October 2017\|quote=... we agree with previous extensive evaluations concluding that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect.}}</ref> Ayurveda is deemed to be [[pseudoscientific]]<ref name="psych2013">{{cite book\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LiJKseis6OYC&pg=PA20\|title=Chapter 1: Psychomythology\|vauthors=Semple D, Smyth R\|work=Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|year=2013\|isbn=978-0-19-969388-7\|edition=3rd\|page=20}}</ref><ref name=":13">{{Cite book\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dwFKDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA293\|title=Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science\|last1=Kaufman\|first1=Allison B.\|last2=Kaufman\|first2=James C.\|date=2018-01-12\|publisher=MIT Press\|isbn=9780262037426\|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/13-10-09/\|title=13-10-09\|date=2013-10-09\|website=Skeptic\|language=en-US\|access-date=2019-01-31}}</ref> but is occasionally considered a [[protoscience]], or trans-science system instead.<ref name="Quack-2011">{{cite book\|title=Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India\|last=Quack\|first=Johannes\|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]\|year=2011\|isbn=9780199812608\|pages=3, 213}}</ref><ref name="Paranjape2009">{{cite book\|title=Science, Spirituality and the Modernization of India\|last=Manohar\|first=P. Ram\|publisher=Anthem Press\|year=2009\|isbn=9781843317760\|editor-last=Paranjape\|editor-first=Makarand R.\|pages=172–3\|chapter=The blending of science and spirituality in the Ayurvedic healing tradition\|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ey1v6JEmvakC&pg=FA172}}</ref> Naturopathy is considered to be a form of pseudo-scientific [[quackery]],<ref name="NaturoUnaniPesudo">Sources documenting the same:		A strong consensus prevails among the scientific community that homeopathy is a pseudo-scientific,<ref name="Tuomela2">{{cite book\|title=Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning\|author=Tuomela, R\|publisher=Springer\|year=1987\|isbn=978-94-010-8181-8\|veditors=Pitt JC, Marcello P\|series=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science\|volume=98\|pages=83–101\|chapter=Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience\|doi=10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4\|author-link=Raimo Tuomela}}</ref><ref name="Smith20122">{{cite journal\|author=Smith K\|year=2012\|title=Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical\|journal=Bioethics\|volume=26\|issue=9\|pages=508–12\|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x\|s2cid=143067523\|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1035885}}</ref><ref name="Baran20142">{{cite book\|title=Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?\|vauthors=Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP\|journal=Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century\|publisher=Springer\|year=2014\|isbn=978-1-4614-8540-7\|pages=19–57\|chapter=Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?\|doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2\|quote=within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery}}</ref><ref name="Ladyman2">{{cite book\|title=Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem\|author=Ladyman J\|publisher=University of Chicago Press\|year=2013\|isbn=978-0-226-05196-3\|veditors=Pigliucci M, Boudry M\|pages=48–49\|chapter=Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience\|quote=Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).}}</ref> unethical<ref name="unethical">{{cite journal\|last1=Shaw\|first1=DM\|year=2010\|title=Homeopathy is where the harm is: Five unethical effects of funding unscientific 'remedies'\|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics\|volume=36\|issue=3\|pages=130–31\|doi=10.1136/jme.2009.034959\|pmid=20211989\|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite news\|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/jul/21/pharmacists.homeophathy\|title=Pharmacists urged to 'tell the truth' about homeopathic remedies\|author=Sample I\|date=21 July 2008\|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]\|location=London}}</ref> and implausible line of treatment.<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/pharmacologicalandbiologicaltreatment/homeopathy\|title=Homeopathy\|publisher=American Cancer Society\|access-date=12 October 2014}}</ref><ref name="inquiry_cfm">UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee - [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/inquiries/homeopathy-/ "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"]</ref><ref name="GrimesFACT">{{cite journal\|last1=Grimes\|first1=D.R.\|year=2012\|title=Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible\|journal=Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies\|volume=17\|issue=3\|pages=149–55\|doi=10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x}}</ref><ref name="EASAC2017">{{cite web\|url=http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final.pdf\|title=Homeopathic products and practices: assessing the evidence and ensuring consistency in regulating medical claims in the EU\|date=September 2017\|work=European Academies' Science Advisory Council\|page=1\|access-date=1 October 2017\|quote=... we agree with previous extensive evaluations concluding that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect.}}</ref> Ayurveda is deemed to be [[pseudoscientific]]<ref name="psych2013">{{cite book\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LiJKseis6OYC&pg=PA20\|title=Chapter 1: Psychomythology\|vauthors=Semple D, Smyth R\|work=Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|year=2013\|isbn=978-0-19-969388-7\|edition=3rd\|page=20}}</ref><ref name=":13">{{Cite book\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dwFKDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA293\|title=Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science\|last1=Kaufman\|first1=Allison B.\|last2=Kaufman\|first2=James C.\|date=2018-01-12\|publisher=MIT Press\|isbn=9780262037426\|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/13-10-09/\|title=13-10-09\|date=2013-10-09\|website=Skeptic\|language=en-US\|access-date=2019-01-31}}</ref> but is occasionally considered a [[protoscience]], or trans-science system instead.<ref name="Quack-2011">{{cite book\|title=Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India\|last=Quack\|first=Johannes\|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]\|year=2011\|isbn=9780199812608\|pages=3, 213}}</ref><ref name="Paranjape2009">{{cite book\|title=Science, Spirituality and the Modernization of India\|last=Manohar\|first=P. Ram\|publisher=Anthem Press\|year=2009\|isbn=9781843317760\|editor-last=Paranjape\|editor-first=Makarand R.\|pages=172–3\|chapter=The blending of science and spirituality in the Ayurvedic healing tradition\|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ey1v6JEmvakC&pg=FA172}}</ref> Naturopathy is considered to be a form of pseudo-scientific [[quackery]],<ref name="NaturoUnaniPesudo">Sources documenting the same:
	*{{cite journal\|last=Atwood\|first=Kimball C., IV\|year=2003\|title=Naturopathy: A critical appraisal\|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/465994\|journal=Medscape General Medicine\|volume=5\|issue=4\|page=39\|pmid=14745386}}{{registration required}}		*{{cite journal\|last=Atwood\|first=Kimball C., IV\|year=2003\|title=Naturopathy: A critical appraisal\|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/465994\|journal=Medscape General Medicine\|volume=5\|issue=4\|page=39\|pmid=14745386}}{{registration required}}
	*{{cite journal\|last=Atwood IV\|first=Kimball. C.\|date=26 March 2004\|title=Naturopathy, pseudoscience, and medicine: Myths and fallacies vs truth\|journal=Medscape General Medicine\|volume=6\|issue=1\|page=33\|pmc=1140750\|pmid=15208545}}		*{{cite journal\|last=Atwood IV\|first=Kimball. C.\|date=26 March 2004\|title=Naturopathy, pseudoscience, and medicine: Myths and fallacies vs truth\|journal=Medscape General Medicine\|volume=6\|issue=1\|page=33\|pmc=1140750\|pmid=15208545}}
Line 164:		Line 164:

	==== Research ====		==== Research ====
	The quality of the research done by the ministry has been heavily criticized.{{by whom\|date=January 2020}} Clinical trials of homeopathic drugs, conducted by their research wings were rejected in totality by the [[The Lancet\|Lancet]] and [[National Health and Medical Research Council]], Australia. There has been an acute dearth of RCTs on Ayurveda<ref name=":1">{{Cite news\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/medicine-wars-homeopathy-allopathy-ayurveda-unani-in-india/article10792873.ece\|title=Questions over science swirl, but AYUSH stands firm\|last=Shrinivasan\|first=Rukmini\|date=2015-04-26\|work=The Hindu\|access-date=2019-01-22\|language=en-IN\|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> and multiple systemic reviews have highlighted several methodological problems with the studies and trials conducted by AYUSH and its associates in relation to developing an Ayurvedic drug for diabetes.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=Misra\|first1=Anoop\|last2=Gulati\|first2=Seema\|last3=Luthra\|first3=Atul\|year=2016\|title=Alternative medicines for diabetes in India: Maximum hype, minimum science~~\|url=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(15)00515-X/fulltext~~\|journal=The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology\|volume=4\|issue=4\|pages=302–303\|doi=10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00515-X\|pmid=27016323\|doi-access=free}}</ref> A tendency to publish in dubious predatory journals and [[Replication crisis\|non-reproducibility]] by independent studies has also been noted.<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":7">{{Cite news\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/big-claims-little-evidence/article22847938.ece\|title=Big claims, little evidence\|last=Pulla\|first=Priyanka\|date=2018-02-25\|work=The Hindu\|access-date=2018-12-16\|language=en-IN\|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> India is also yet to conduct a systematic review of any of the systems of medicine under the purview of AYUSH.<ref name=":1" />		The quality of the research done by the ministry has been heavily criticized.{{by whom\|date=January 2020}} Clinical trials of homeopathic drugs, conducted by their research wings were rejected in totality by the [[The Lancet\|Lancet]] and [[National Health and Medical Research Council]], Australia. There has been an acute dearth of RCTs on Ayurveda<ref name=":1">{{Cite news\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/medicine-wars-homeopathy-allopathy-ayurveda-unani-in-india/article10792873.ece\|title=Questions over science swirl, but AYUSH stands firm\|last=Shrinivasan\|first=Rukmini\|date=2015-04-26\|work=The Hindu\|access-date=2019-01-22\|language=en-IN\|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> and multiple systemic reviews have highlighted several methodological problems with the studies and trials conducted by AYUSH and its associates in relation to developing an Ayurvedic drug for diabetes.<ref>{{Cite journal\|last1=Misra\|first1=Anoop\|last2=Gulati\|first2=Seema\|last3=Luthra\|first3=Atul\|year=2016\|title=Alternative medicines for diabetes in India: Maximum hype, minimum science\|journal=The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology\|volume=4\|issue=4\|pages=302–303\|doi=10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00515-X\|pmid=27016323\|doi-access=free}}</ref> A tendency to publish in dubious predatory journals and [[Replication crisis\|non-reproducibility]] by independent studies has also been noted.<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":7">{{Cite news\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/big-claims-little-evidence/article22847938.ece\|title=Big claims, little evidence\|last=Pulla\|first=Priyanka\|date=2018-02-25\|work=The Hindu\|access-date=2018-12-16\|language=en-IN\|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> India is also yet to conduct a systematic review of any of the systems of medicine under the purview of AYUSH.<ref name=":1" />

	==== Drugs ====		==== Drugs ====

Ajay Kumar: Created page with "{{short description|Indian government ministry for traditional medicines}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} {{use Indian English|date=June 2016}} {{Infobox government agency |..."

2021-07-12T18:23:51Z

Created page with "{{short description|Indian government ministry for traditional medicines}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} {{use Indian English|date=June 2016}} {{Infobox government agency |..."

Show changes

Ministry of AYUSH - Revision history

UpdateBot: robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)

imported>Nitesh003: WP:NOINDICSCRIPT

Ajay Kumar: Created page with "{{short description|Indian government ministry for traditional medicines}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} {{use Indian English|date=June 2016}} {{Infobox government agency |..."