Lodha Committee - Revision history

Nayeem: updated details

2024-02-22T01:20:55Z

updated details

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:50, 22 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''Lodha Committee''' was appointed by the [[Supreme Court of India]] on 22 January 2015 to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the [[Board of Control for Cricket in India]] (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for [[Gurunath Meiyappan]] and [[Raj Kundra]] in the [[Indian Premier League]] (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of [[Sundar Raman]].<ref>{{Cite ~~web~~\|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/timeline-of-bcci-v-lodha-committee/articleshow/61845064.cms\|title=Timeline of BCCI v Lodha Committee - Times of India\|website=The Times of India\|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/story/898285.html\|title=All you need to know ahead of the Lodha panel verdict\|date=2015-07-13\|~~website~~=~~Cricinfo~~\|language=en\|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www.legallyindia.com/views/entry/justice-rm-lodha-committee-to-give-its-verdict-on-14-july-in-the-ipl-betting-case\|title=Justice RM Lodha committee to give its verdict on 14 July in the IPL betting case\|last=OneLawStreet\|website=www.legallyindia.com\|language=en-gb\|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref> The Lodha Committee report was submitted on 14 July 2015.<ref>[https://www.gujaratcricketassociation.com/file-manager/lodha/Lodha_Committee_Report.pdf Lodha Committee Report]</ref>		{{Short description\|Supreme court of India appointed committee, 2015}}
			{{Use dmy dates\|date=August 2022}}
			{{Use Indian English\|date=August 2022}}
			The '''Lodha Committee''' was appointed by the [[Supreme Court of India]] on 23 January 2015 to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the [[Board of Control for Cricket in India]] (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for [[Gurunath Meiyappan]] and [[Raj Kundra]] in the [[Indian Premier League]] (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of [[Sundar Raman]].<ref>{{Cite news\|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/timeline-of-bcci-v-lodha-committee/articleshow/61845064.cms\|title=Timeline of BCCI v Lodha Committee - Times of India\|website=The Times of India\|date=29 November 2017 \|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/story/898285.html\|title=All you need to know ahead of the Lodha panel verdict\|date=2015-07-13\|work=ESPNcricinfo\|language=en\|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://www.legallyindia.com/views/entry/justice-rm-lodha-committee-to-give-its-verdict-on-14-july-in-the-ipl-betting-case\|title=Justice RM Lodha committee to give its verdict on 14 July in the IPL betting case\|last=OneLawStreet\|website=www.legallyindia.com\|date=13 July 2015 \|language=en-gb\|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref> The Lodha Committee report was submitted on 14 July 2015.<ref>[https://www.gujaratcricketassociation.com/file-manager/lodha/Lodha_Committee_Report.pdf Lodha Committee Report]</ref>

	== History ==		== History ==
	The establishment of the Lodha Committee was the result of the report submitted by the [[Mudgal Committee\|Justice Mukul Mudgal Committee]] after an investigation into the [[2013 Indian Premier League spot-fixing and betting case\|2013 IPL betting scandal]]. The purpose of the Lodha Committee was to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the [[Board of Control for Cricket in India]] (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for [[Gurunath Meiyappan]] and [[Raj Kundra]] in the [[Indian Premier League]] (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of [[Sundar Raman]]. The report suggested various changes within the BCCI such as the appointment conditions of the CFO and CEO, age of office bearers, advertisements during the IPL matches, and appointment of the [[Comptroller and Auditor General of India\|Comptroller and Auditor General]] (CAG) official. The Lodha Committee report was submitted on 14 July 2015.<ref>{{Cite ~~web~~\|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/timeline-of-bcci-v-lodha-committee/articleshow/61845064.cms\|title=Timeline of BCCI v Lodha Committee - Times of India\|website=The Times of India\|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web\|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/16616908/a-line-bcci-lodha-committee-reforms-case-supreme-court-india\|title=A timeline of the BCCI and Lodha Committee reforms case\|date=2017-01-30\|~~website~~=ESPNcricinfo\|language=en\|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>		The establishment of the Lodha Committee was the result of the report submitted by the [[Mudgal Committee\|Justice Mukul Mudgal Committee]] after an investigation into the [[2013 Indian Premier League spot-fixing and betting case\|2013 IPL betting scandal]]. The committee was chaired by Justice [[R. M. Lodha]]. The purpose of the Lodha Committee was to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the [[Board of Control for Cricket in India]] (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for [[Gurunath Meiyappan]] and [[Raj Kundra]] in the [[Indian Premier League]] (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of [[Sundar Raman]]. The report suggested various changes within the BCCI such as the appointment conditions of the CFO and CEO, age of office bearers, advertisements during the IPL matches, and appointment of the [[Comptroller and Auditor General of India\|Comptroller and Auditor General]] (CAG) official. The Lodha Committee report was submitted on 14 July 2015.<ref>{{Cite news\|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/timeline-of-bcci-v-lodha-committee/articleshow/61845064.cms\|title=Timeline of BCCI v Lodha Committee - Times of India\|website=The Times of India\|date=29 November 2017 \|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web\|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/16616908/a-line-bcci-lodha-committee-reforms-case-supreme-court-india\|title=A timeline of the BCCI and Lodha Committee reforms case\|date=2017-01-30\|work=ESPNcricinfo\|language=en\|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>

	In brief, the Lodha Committee offered the following recommendations:<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://blog.ipleaders.in/lodha-committee/\|title=Lodha Committee on BCCI Reforms- All you need to know!\|last=Middya\|first=Ranojoy\|date=2018-08-21\|website=iPleaders\|language=en-US\|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>		In brief, the Lodha Committee offered the following recommendations<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://blog.ipleaders.in/lodha-committee/\|title=Lodha Committee on BCCI Reforms- All you need to know!\|last=Middya\|first=Ranojoy\|date=2018-08-21\|website=iPleaders\|language=en-US\|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>

	# The retirement age to be fixed at 70 years. Any administrator who (a) has criminal charge/s, (b) is of unsound mind, (c) is insolvent, and (d) holds a position in any other athletic association needs to be removed. The tenure of any officer bearer to be fixed for two consecutive terms.		# The retirement age to be fixed at 70 years. Any administrator who (a) has criminal charge/s, (b) is of unsound mind, (c) is insolvent, and (d) holds a position in any other athletic association needs to be removed. The tenure of any officer bearer to be fixed for two consecutive terms.
Line 12:		Line 15:
	# To ensure that BCCI officials are not involved in any betting, they need to disclose their assets to the governing board.		# To ensure that BCCI officials are not involved in any betting, they need to disclose their assets to the governing board.

	The recommendations of the Lodha Committee shook the BCCI hierarchy and its related associations. The BCCI raised objections to the recommendations and approached the Supreme Court. The final judgment by the Supreme Court was delivered on 18 July 2016, by a two-judge bench consisting of Justice Ibrahim Kalifulla and ~~TS Thakur, the~~ Chief Justice ~~of India~~. The final judgment upheld the Lodha Committee recommendations, paving the way for a major change within the BCCI.<ref name=":0" />		The recommendations of the Lodha Committee shook the BCCI hierarchy and its related associations. The BCCI raised objections to the recommendations and approached the Supreme Court. The final judgment by the Supreme Court was delivered on 18 July 2016, by a two-judge bench consisting of Justice [[Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla\|F. M. Ibrahim Kalifulla]] and Chief Justice [[T. S. Thakur]]. The final judgment upheld the Lodha Committee recommendations, paving the way for a major change within the BCCI.<ref name=":0" />

	== References ==		== References ==
	<!--- See http://en.~~wikipedia~~.org/wiki/~~Wikipedia~~:Footnotes on how to create references using <ref></ref> tags, these references will then appear here automatically -->		<!--- See http://en.Bharatpedia.org/wiki/Bharatpedia:Footnotes on how to create references using <ref></ref> tags, these references will then appear here automatically -->
	{{Reflist}}<br />		{{Reflist}}<br />

	<!--- Categories --->		<!--- Categories --->
	[[Category:Cricket controversies]]		[[Category:Cricket controversies]]
	[[Category:~~Indian Premier League~~]]		[[Category:Cricket administration in India]]

imported>GoingBatty: removed Category:Indian Premier League articles; added Category:Indian Premier League using HotCat

2021-01-14T06:02:17Z

removed Category:Indian Premier League articles; added Category:Indian Premier League using HotCat

New page

The '''Lodha Committee''' was appointed by the [[Supreme Court of India]] on 22 January 2015 to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the [[Board of Control for Cricket in India]] (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for [[Gurunath Meiyappan]] and [[Raj Kundra]] in the [[Indian Premier League]] (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of [[Sundar Raman]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/timeline-of-bcci-v-lodha-committee/articleshow/61845064.cms|title=Timeline of BCCI v Lodha Committee - Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/story/898285.html|title=All you need to know ahead of the Lodha panel verdict|date=2015-07-13|website=Cricinfo|language=en|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.legallyindia.com/views/entry/justice-rm-lodha-committee-to-give-its-verdict-on-14-july-in-the-ipl-betting-case|title=Justice RM Lodha committee to give its verdict on 14 July in the IPL betting case|last=OneLawStreet|website=www.legallyindia.com|language=en-gb|access-date=2019-01-05}}</ref> The Lodha Committee report was submitted on 14 July 2015.<ref>[https://www.gujaratcricketassociation.com/file-manager/lodha/Lodha_Committee_Report.pdf Lodha Committee Report]</ref>

== History ==
The establishment of the Lodha Committee was the result of the report submitted by the [[Mudgal Committee|Justice Mukul Mudgal Committee]] after an investigation into the [[2013 Indian Premier League spot-fixing and betting case|2013 IPL betting scandal]]. The purpose of the Lodha Committee was to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the [[Board of Control for Cricket in India]] (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for [[Gurunath Meiyappan]] and [[Raj Kundra]] in the [[Indian Premier League]] (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of [[Sundar Raman]]. The report suggested various changes within the BCCI such as the appointment conditions of the CFO and CEO, age of office bearers, advertisements during the IPL matches, and appointment of the [[Comptroller and Auditor General of India|Comptroller and Auditor General]] (CAG) official. The Lodha Committee report was submitted on 14 July 2015.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/timeline-of-bcci-v-lodha-committee/articleshow/61845064.cms|title=Timeline of BCCI v Lodha Committee - Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/16616908/a-line-bcci-lodha-committee-reforms-case-supreme-court-india|title=A timeline of the BCCI and Lodha Committee reforms case|date=2017-01-30|website=ESPNcricinfo|language=en|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>

In brief, the Lodha Committee offered the following recommendations:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://blog.ipleaders.in/lodha-committee/|title=Lodha Committee on BCCI Reforms- All you need to know!|last=Middya|first=Ranojoy|date=2018-08-21|website=iPleaders|language=en-US|access-date=2019-02-05}}</ref>

# The retirement age to be fixed at 70 years. Any administrator who (a) has criminal charge/s, (b) is of unsound mind, (c) is insolvent, and (d) holds a position in any other athletic association needs to be removed. The tenure of any officer bearer to be fixed for two consecutive terms.
# A "one vote per state" policy to make BCCI more transparent in its dealings.
# BCCI President cannot have a tenure of more than two years.
# An independent and sovereign governing body for the [[Indian Premier League|IPL]].
# To ensure that BCCI officials are not involved in any betting, they need to disclose their assets to the governing board.

The recommendations of the Lodha Committee shook the BCCI hierarchy and its related associations. The BCCI raised objections to the recommendations and approached the Supreme Court. The final judgment by the Supreme Court was delivered on 18 July 2016, by a two-judge bench consisting of Justice Ibrahim Kalifulla and TS Thakur, the Chief Justice of India. The final judgment upheld the Lodha Committee recommendations, paving the way for a major change within the BCCI.<ref name=":0" />

== References ==

{{Reflist}}<br />


[[Category:Cricket controversies]]
[[Category:Indian Premier League]]