Bharatpedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback - Revision history

Bharatwiki Socrates at 17:09, 27 September 2026

2026-09-27T17:09:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 27 September 2026
Line 48:		Line 48:
	::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)		::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)
	:: {{Ping\|WikiDwarf}} thanks for ping. {{Ping\|Editorial Oversight}} having 150+ edits in mainspace alone should not necessarily be considered sufficient qualification for rollbacker access. The rollback tool can revert multiple consecutive edits with a single action, without providing an opportunity to add an edit summary for each reverted edit. Because of this, the tool must be used cautiously and should not be misused during edit wars. When evaluating rollbacker requests, consideration should be given to a user's demonstrated history of responsibly reverting vandalism, issuing warnings to vandals, and refraining from unnecessary edit warring. {{tq\|However, there may be cases where a user has already demonstrated sufficient experience on another language edition of Bharatpedia. For example, if a user has an established history of responsibly handling vandalism and using rollback on Hindi Bharatpedia, and subsequently requests rollback access on English Bharatpedia, it may not be necessary to require them to independently prove the same experience again on English Bharatpedia. Their established record on another language edition can be taken into consideration, and rollbacker tool access can be granted to them.}} In the case of [[User:Editorial Oversight\|Editorial Oversight]] , they has crossed the 150+ edit threshold but they do not currently have an sufficient record of reverting vandalism[https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Editorial%20Oversight&namespace=all&tagfilter=mw-undo] and warning vandals. At the same time, the user has stated that they have sufficient experience on non-bharatpedia wiki projects, I neither agree nor deny their claim. Therefore, I am willing to grant rollbacker access for period of '''three months as trial'''. During this period, Editorial Oversight should demonstrate that they can use rollback responsibly, particularly when dealing with vandalism, while avoiding unnecessary use of rollback in edit disputes or edit wars. If Editorial Oversight uses the tool responsibly throughout the three-month period, then... when the temporary access expires and they request rollbacker access again, I would be willing to grant indefinite rollbacker access. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:11, 27 September 2026 (IST)		:: {{Ping\|WikiDwarf}} thanks for ping. {{Ping\|Editorial Oversight}} having 150+ edits in mainspace alone should not necessarily be considered sufficient qualification for rollbacker access. The rollback tool can revert multiple consecutive edits with a single action, without providing an opportunity to add an edit summary for each reverted edit. Because of this, the tool must be used cautiously and should not be misused during edit wars. When evaluating rollbacker requests, consideration should be given to a user's demonstrated history of responsibly reverting vandalism, issuing warnings to vandals, and refraining from unnecessary edit warring. {{tq\|However, there may be cases where a user has already demonstrated sufficient experience on another language edition of Bharatpedia. For example, if a user has an established history of responsibly handling vandalism and using rollback on Hindi Bharatpedia, and subsequently requests rollback access on English Bharatpedia, it may not be necessary to require them to independently prove the same experience again on English Bharatpedia. Their established record on another language edition can be taken into consideration, and rollbacker tool access can be granted to them.}} In the case of [[User:Editorial Oversight\|Editorial Oversight]] , they has crossed the 150+ edit threshold but they do not currently have an sufficient record of reverting vandalism[https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Editorial%20Oversight&namespace=all&tagfilter=mw-undo] and warning vandals. At the same time, the user has stated that they have sufficient experience on non-bharatpedia wiki projects, I neither agree nor deny their claim. Therefore, I am willing to grant rollbacker access for period of '''three months as trial'''. During this period, Editorial Oversight should demonstrate that they can use rollback responsibly, particularly when dealing with vandalism, while avoiding unnecessary use of rollback in edit disputes or edit wars. If Editorial Oversight uses the tool responsibly throughout the three-month period, then... when the temporary access expires and they request rollbacker access again, I would be willing to grant indefinite rollbacker access. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:11, 27 September 2026 (IST)
			::{{done}}: granted until 22:27, 27 December 2026. Happy editing! When it expires, request again and we will evaluate your work to decide whether to grant you indefinite access or not based on your editing history. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:39, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Bharatwiki Socrates: /* User:Editorial Oversight */

2026-09-27T16:41:57Z

User:Editorial Oversight

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 27 September 2026
Line 47:		Line 47:

	::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)		::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)
			:: {{Ping\|WikiDwarf}} thanks for ping. {{Ping\|Editorial Oversight}} having 150+ edits in mainspace alone should not necessarily be considered sufficient qualification for rollbacker access. The rollback tool can revert multiple consecutive edits with a single action, without providing an opportunity to add an edit summary for each reverted edit. Because of this, the tool must be used cautiously and should not be misused during edit wars. When evaluating rollbacker requests, consideration should be given to a user's demonstrated history of responsibly reverting vandalism, issuing warnings to vandals, and refraining from unnecessary edit warring. {{tq\|However, there may be cases where a user has already demonstrated sufficient experience on another language edition of Bharatpedia. For example, if a user has an established history of responsibly handling vandalism and using rollback on Hindi Bharatpedia, and subsequently requests rollback access on English Bharatpedia, it may not be necessary to require them to independently prove the same experience again on English Bharatpedia. Their established record on another language edition can be taken into consideration, and rollbacker tool access can be granted to them.}} In the case of [[User:Editorial Oversight\|Editorial Oversight]] , they has crossed the 150+ edit threshold but they do not currently have an sufficient record of reverting vandalism[https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Editorial%20Oversight&namespace=all&tagfilter=mw-undo] and warning vandals. At the same time, the user has stated that they have sufficient experience on non-bharatpedia wiki projects, I neither agree nor deny their claim. Therefore, I am willing to grant rollbacker access for period of '''three months as trial'''. During this period, Editorial Oversight should demonstrate that they can use rollback responsibly, particularly when dealing with vandalism, while avoiding unnecessary use of rollback in edit disputes or edit wars. If Editorial Oversight uses the tool responsibly throughout the three-month period, then... when the temporary access expires and they request rollbacker access again, I would be willing to grant indefinite rollbacker access. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:11, 27 September 2026 (IST)

WikiDwarf: /* User:Editorial Oversight */ ping

2026-09-26T20:08:39Z

User:Editorial Oversight: ping

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 27 September 2026
Line 45:		Line 45:
	* {{rfplinks\|1=Editorial Oversight}}		* {{rfplinks\|1=Editorial Oversight}}
	:I am requesting rollback rights primarily to help with reverting vandalism. I have completed more than 150 edits in the mainspace and have a good understanding of identifying and reverting vandalism. I have also started using script tools to assist with vandalism-related work. I understand that my account is relatively new, but I have substantial prior experience with encyclopedic editing and am familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. I will use rollback only for clear vandalism and other appropriate cases, not for content disputes or good-faith edits. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 15:35, 22 September 2026 (IST)		:I am requesting rollback rights primarily to help with reverting vandalism. I have completed more than 150 edits in the mainspace and have a good understanding of identifying and reverting vandalism. I have also started using script tools to assist with vandalism-related work. I understand that my account is relatively new, but I have substantial prior experience with encyclopedic editing and am familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. I will use rollback only for clear vandalism and other appropriate cases, not for content disputes or good-faith edits. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 15:35, 22 September 2026 (IST)

			::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Editorial Oversight at 10:05, 22 September 2026

2026-09-22T10:05:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 22 September 2026
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)		:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)
	:{{not done}} [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (IST)		:{{not done}} [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (IST)

			====[[User:Editorial Oversight]]====
			* {{rfplinks\|1=Editorial Oversight}}
			:I am requesting rollback rights primarily to help with reverting vandalism. I have completed more than 150 edits in the mainspace and have a good understanding of identifying and reverting vandalism. I have also started using script tools to assist with vandalism-related work. I understand that my account is relatively new, but I have substantial prior experience with encyclopedic editing and am familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. I will use rollback only for clear vandalism and other appropriate cases, not for content disputes or good-faith edits. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 15:35, 22 September 2026 (IST)

WikiDwarf: /* User:Muskit Gergous */ not done

2023-12-02T18:10:58Z

User:Muskit Gergous: not done

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 2 December 2023
Line 39:		Line 39:
	::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)
	:::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} please understand and learn more as you are wrong here , Rollbacker Right never give you permission to block I.P.		:::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} please understand and learn more as you are wrong here , Rollbacker Right never give you permission to block I.P.


	:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)		:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)
			:{{not done}} [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (IST)

Bharatwiki Socrates: /* User:Muskit Gergous */

2023-12-02T13:30:46Z

User:Muskit Gergous

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 2 December 2023
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)
	::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)
			:::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} please understand and learn more as you are wrong here , Rollbacker Right never give you permission to block I.P.


			:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)

Muskit Gergous: /* User:Muskit Gergous */

2023-12-02T11:14:39Z

User:Muskit Gergous

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 2 December 2023
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:That my account has been up for a year and has painstakingly pushed Bharatpedia higher than Wikipedia. It is not meant that I am unfamiliar with this work, Alhamdulillah more than my experience and my editing. I don't mean to offend anyone, my point is I've worked hard, I'm more experienced than editing, and I've had my account for a year, thanks. I want to be a rollerbackers and take this bharatpedia to the top to be more on bharatpedia. [[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 10:23, 1 December 2023 (IST)		:That my account has been up for a year and has painstakingly pushed Bharatpedia higher than Wikipedia. It is not meant that I am unfamiliar with this work, Alhamdulillah more than my experience and my editing. I don't mean to offend anyone, my point is I've worked hard, I'm more experienced than editing, and I've had my account for a year, thanks. I want to be a rollerbackers and take this bharatpedia to the top to be more on bharatpedia. [[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 10:23, 1 December 2023 (IST)
	::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)
			::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)

WikiDwarf: /* User:Muskit Gergous */ question

2023-12-02T08:05:40Z

User:Muskit Gergous: question

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 2 December 2023
Line 36:		Line 36:
	* {{rfplinks\|1=Muskit Gergous}}		* {{rfplinks\|1=Muskit Gergous}}
	:That my account has been up for a year and has painstakingly pushed Bharatpedia higher than Wikipedia. It is not meant that I am unfamiliar with this work, Alhamdulillah more than my experience and my editing. I don't mean to offend anyone, my point is I've worked hard, I'm more experienced than editing, and I've had my account for a year, thanks. I want to be a rollerbackers and take this bharatpedia to the top to be more on bharatpedia. [[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 10:23, 1 December 2023 (IST)		:That my account has been up for a year and has painstakingly pushed Bharatpedia higher than Wikipedia. It is not meant that I am unfamiliar with this work, Alhamdulillah more than my experience and my editing. I don't mean to offend anyone, my point is I've worked hard, I'm more experienced than editing, and I've had my account for a year, thanks. I want to be a rollerbackers and take this bharatpedia to the top to be more on bharatpedia. [[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 10:23, 1 December 2023 (IST)
			::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)

Muskit Gergous at 05:32, 1 December 2023

2023-12-01T05:32:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:02, 1 December 2023
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::*'''Rationally Oppose''' : Muskit, could you please refrain from violating my requests by copying and modifying it? I find your behavior childish and inappropriate for using this tool. It's not about disliking your Pakistani English accent; rather, it's a matter of respecting the experience and purpose of this platform. The rollback tool is not intended for inexperienced users. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 16:18, 30 November 2023 (IST)		::*'''Rationally Oppose''' : Muskit, could you please refrain from violating my requests by copying and modifying it? I find your behavior childish and inappropriate for using this tool. It's not about disliking your Pakistani English accent; rather, it's a matter of respecting the experience and purpose of this platform. The rollback tool is not intended for inexperienced users. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 16:18, 30 November 2023 (IST)
	::{{not done}} I looked at your contributions and didn't see much recent anti-vandalism work. see much recent work on stopping vandalism. If you still want to use this tool, please spend at least a month regularly checking [[Special:RecentChanges\|RecentChanges]] and preventing vandalism. Also, when you reapply, make sure to write your request in your own words. Thanks. [[User:Ajay Kumar\|Ajay Kumar]] ([[User talk:Ajay Kumar\|talk]]) 20:07, 30 November 2023 (IST)		::{{not done}} I looked at your contributions and didn't see much recent anti-vandalism work. see much recent work on stopping vandalism. If you still want to use this tool, please spend at least a month regularly checking [[Special:RecentChanges\|RecentChanges]] and preventing vandalism. Also, when you reapply, make sure to write your request in your own words. Thanks. [[User:Ajay Kumar\|Ajay Kumar]] ([[User talk:Ajay Kumar\|talk]]) 20:07, 30 November 2023 (IST)

			====[[User:Muskit Gergous]]====
			* {{rfplinks\|1=Muskit Gergous}}
			:That my account has been up for a year and has painstakingly pushed Bharatpedia higher than Wikipedia. It is not meant that I am unfamiliar with this work, Alhamdulillah more than my experience and my editing. I don't mean to offend anyone, my point is I've worked hard, I'm more experienced than editing, and I've had my account for a year, thanks. I want to be a rollerbackers and take this bharatpedia to the top to be more on bharatpedia. [[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 10:23, 1 December 2023 (IST)

Ajay Kumar: /* User:Muskit Gergous */ not done

2023-11-30T14:37:56Z

User:Muskit Gergous: not done

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 30 November 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	* {{rfplinks\|1=Muskit Gergous}}		* {{rfplinks\|1=Muskit Gergous}}
	:I am writing to request rollback privileges on Bharatpedia to streamline the most common way to revert changes. Currently, trying to revert changes on my cell phone, I'm expected to switch to work area mode and change the past look, which can be overwhelming. Considering that I use Bharatpedia extraordinarily on my telephone for changes and returns, the freedom of rollbacks will essentially increase effectiveness.		:I am writing to request rollback privileges on Bharatpedia to streamline the most common way to revert changes. Currently, trying to revert changes on my cell phone, I'm expected to switch to work area mode and change the past look, which can be overwhelming. Considering that I use Bharatpedia extraordinarily on my telephone for changes and returns, the freedom of rollbacks will essentially increase effectiveness.
	Also, I am motivated to avoid unconstructive error, especially in my areas of interest—history, reasoning, and science.I accept that giving rollback freedom will not only save time but also increase the general maintenance and nature of the content in these specific places.[[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 3:34, 30 November 2023 (IST)		:Also, I am motivated to avoid unconstructive error, especially in my areas of interest—history, reasoning, and science.I accept that giving rollback freedom will not only save time but also increase the general maintenance and nature of the content in these specific places.[[User: Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 3:34, 30 November 2023 (IST)

	::*'''Rationally Oppose''' : Muskit, could you please refrain from violating my requests by copying and modifying it? I find your behavior childish and inappropriate for using this tool. It's not about disliking your Pakistani English accent; rather, it's a matter of respecting the experience and purpose of this platform. The rollback tool is not intended for inexperienced users. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 16:18, 30 November 2023 (IST)		::*'''Rationally Oppose''' : Muskit, could you please refrain from violating my requests by copying and modifying it? I find your behavior childish and inappropriate for using this tool. It's not about disliking your Pakistani English accent; rather, it's a matter of respecting the experience and purpose of this platform. The rollback tool is not intended for inexperienced users. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 16:18, 30 November 2023 (IST)
			::{{not done}} I looked at your contributions and didn't see much recent anti-vandalism work. see much recent work on stopping vandalism. If you still want to use this tool, please spend at least a month regularly checking [[Special:RecentChanges\|RecentChanges]] and preventing vandalism. Also, when you reapply, make sure to write your request in your own words. Thanks. [[User:Ajay Kumar\|Ajay Kumar]] ([[User talk:Ajay Kumar\|talk]]) 20:07, 30 November 2023 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 27 September 2026
Line 48:		Line 48:
	::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)		::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)
	:: {{Ping\|WikiDwarf}} thanks for ping. {{Ping\|Editorial Oversight}} having 150+ edits in mainspace alone should not necessarily be considered sufficient qualification for rollbacker access. The rollback tool can revert multiple consecutive edits with a single action, without providing an opportunity to add an edit summary for each reverted edit. Because of this, the tool must be used cautiously and should not be misused during edit wars. When evaluating rollbacker requests, consideration should be given to a user's demonstrated history of responsibly reverting vandalism, issuing warnings to vandals, and refraining from unnecessary edit warring. {{tq\|However, there may be cases where a user has already demonstrated sufficient experience on another language edition of Bharatpedia. For example, if a user has an established history of responsibly handling vandalism and using rollback on Hindi Bharatpedia, and subsequently requests rollback access on English Bharatpedia, it may not be necessary to require them to independently prove the same experience again on English Bharatpedia. Their established record on another language edition can be taken into consideration, and rollbacker tool access can be granted to them.}} In the case of [[User:Editorial Oversight\|Editorial Oversight]] , they has crossed the 150+ edit threshold but they do not currently have an sufficient record of reverting vandalism[https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Editorial%20Oversight&namespace=all&tagfilter=mw-undo] and warning vandals. At the same time, the user has stated that they have sufficient experience on non-bharatpedia wiki projects, I neither agree nor deny their claim. Therefore, I am willing to grant rollbacker access for period of '''three months as trial'''. During this period, Editorial Oversight should demonstrate that they can use rollback responsibly, particularly when dealing with vandalism, while avoiding unnecessary use of rollback in edit disputes or edit wars. If Editorial Oversight uses the tool responsibly throughout the three-month period, then... when the temporary access expires and they request rollbacker access again, I would be willing to grant indefinite rollbacker access. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:11, 27 September 2026 (IST)		:: {{Ping\|WikiDwarf}} thanks for ping. {{Ping\|Editorial Oversight}} having 150+ edits in mainspace alone should not necessarily be considered sufficient qualification for rollbacker access. The rollback tool can revert multiple consecutive edits with a single action, without providing an opportunity to add an edit summary for each reverted edit. Because of this, the tool must be used cautiously and should not be misused during edit wars. When evaluating rollbacker requests, consideration should be given to a user's demonstrated history of responsibly reverting vandalism, issuing warnings to vandals, and refraining from unnecessary edit warring. {{tq\|However, there may be cases where a user has already demonstrated sufficient experience on another language edition of Bharatpedia. For example, if a user has an established history of responsibly handling vandalism and using rollback on Hindi Bharatpedia, and subsequently requests rollback access on English Bharatpedia, it may not be necessary to require them to independently prove the same experience again on English Bharatpedia. Their established record on another language edition can be taken into consideration, and rollbacker tool access can be granted to them.}} In the case of [[User:Editorial Oversight\|Editorial Oversight]] , they has crossed the 150+ edit threshold but they do not currently have an sufficient record of reverting vandalism[https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Editorial%20Oversight&namespace=all&tagfilter=mw-undo] and warning vandals. At the same time, the user has stated that they have sufficient experience on non-bharatpedia wiki projects, I neither agree nor deny their claim. Therefore, I am willing to grant rollbacker access for period of '''three months as trial'''. During this period, Editorial Oversight should demonstrate that they can use rollback responsibly, particularly when dealing with vandalism, while avoiding unnecessary use of rollback in edit disputes or edit wars. If Editorial Oversight uses the tool responsibly throughout the three-month period, then... when the temporary access expires and they request rollbacker access again, I would be willing to grant indefinite rollbacker access. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:11, 27 September 2026 (IST)
			::{{done}}: granted until 22:27, 27 December 2026. Happy editing! When it expires, request again and we will evaluate your work to decide whether to grant you indefinite access or not based on your editing history. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 22:39, 27 September 2026 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 27 September 2026
Line 45:		Line 45:
	* {{rfplinks\|1=Editorial Oversight}}		* {{rfplinks\|1=Editorial Oversight}}
	:I am requesting rollback rights primarily to help with reverting vandalism. I have completed more than 150 edits in the mainspace and have a good understanding of identifying and reverting vandalism. I have also started using script tools to assist with vandalism-related work. I understand that my account is relatively new, but I have substantial prior experience with encyclopedic editing and am familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. I will use rollback only for clear vandalism and other appropriate cases, not for content disputes or good-faith edits. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 15:35, 22 September 2026 (IST)		:I am requesting rollback rights primarily to help with reverting vandalism. I have completed more than 150 edits in the mainspace and have a good understanding of identifying and reverting vandalism. I have also started using script tools to assist with vandalism-related work. I understand that my account is relatively new, but I have substantial prior experience with encyclopedic editing and am familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. I will use rollback only for clear vandalism and other appropriate cases, not for content disputes or good-faith edits. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 15:35, 22 September 2026 (IST)

			::{{ping\|Bharatwiki Socrates}} If you have some time, could you please take a look at this request? Thank you. [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 01:38, 27 September 2026 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 22 September 2026
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)		:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)
	:{{not done}} [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (IST)		:{{not done}} [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (IST)

			====[[User:Editorial Oversight]]====
			* {{rfplinks\|1=Editorial Oversight}}
			:I am requesting rollback rights primarily to help with reverting vandalism. I have completed more than 150 edits in the mainspace and have a good understanding of identifying and reverting vandalism. I have also started using script tools to assist with vandalism-related work. I understand that my account is relatively new, but I have substantial prior experience with encyclopedic editing and am familiar with relevant policies and guidelines. I will use rollback only for clear vandalism and other appropriate cases, not for content disputes or good-faith edits. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 15:35, 22 September 2026 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 2 December 2023
Line 39:		Line 39:
	::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)
	:::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} please understand and learn more as you are wrong here , Rollbacker Right never give you permission to block I.P.		:::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} please understand and learn more as you are wrong here , Rollbacker Right never give you permission to block I.P.


	:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)		:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)
			:{{not done}} [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (IST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 2 December 2023
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} before I make any decisions, could you please tell me what action you will take if you come across {{Diff\|DIAL Scam\|440703\|288679\|this kind\|diffonly=yes}} of edit, where an anonymous user added a spam link to the article? [[User:WikiDwarf\|WikiDwarf]] ([[User talk:WikiDwarf\|talk]]) 13:35, 2 December 2023 (IST)
	::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)		::{{re\|WikiDwarf}}Yes Why No If someone violates the policy of Bharatpedia or there is any problem with the article then I will delete it or block their IP address.You give me the responsibility of Rollerbackers, I take full responsibility for it.[[User:Muskit Gergous\|Muskit Gergous]] ([[User talk: Muskit Gergous\|talk]]) 4:20, 2 December 2023 (IST)
			:::{{re\|Muskit Gergous}} please understand and learn more as you are wrong here , Rollbacker Right never give you permission to block I.P.


			:::Okay , please learn, explaining everything to you what action I will take in such condition given by Administrator {{re\|WikiDwarf}} : If I come across an edit where an anonymous user added a spam link to an article, I would promptly revert the edit using the Rollback Tool to restore the previous, valid version of the article. Additionally, I would consider reporting the spamming user to administrators for further action.Certainly, if the edit is made by a registered user, I would not only revert the edit but also communicate with them by leaving a message on their talk page. In the message, I would explain the issue, discourage spam contributions, and provide guidance on adhering to Bharatpedia's content guidelines. This approach aims to foster positive collaboration with the editing community. [[User:Magadha Historian\|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian\|talk]]) 19:00, 2 December 2023 (IST)