Bharatpedia:Requests for page protection - Revision history

Dokania: /* Isha Malviya */

2026-11-08T18:02:33Z

Isha Malviya

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 8 November 2026
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Please review the page's edit history and assess whether the repeated additions of AI-generated images warrant protection under Wikipedia's protection policy. If the disruption is ongoing, semi-protection may help prevent further inappropriate edits by unregistered and new users.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:59, 29 October 2026 (IST)		Please review the page's edit history and assess whether the repeated additions of AI-generated images warrant protection under Wikipedia's protection policy. If the disruption is ongoing, semi-protection may help prevent further inappropriate edits by unregistered and new users.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:59, 29 October 2026 (IST)
	:{{RFPP\|d}} for now. I have reviewed the page history: there have been only two edits, both from the same IPv6 range, swapping the infobox image back and forth, and both have already been reverted. Semi-~~protection~~ is generally a last resort for repeated disruption coming from multiple users. If the disruption returns from the same range, the range itself can be blocked instead; and if it later comes from several different IPs or accounts, please re-request and the page can be protected then. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 11:07, 30 October 2026 (IST)		:{{RFPP\|d}} for now. I have reviewed the page history: there have been only two edits, both from the same IPv6 range, swapping the infobox image back and forth, and both have already been reverted. Semi-protecti[[user:Harishroo\|Harishroo]]on is generally a last resort for repeated disruption coming from multiple users. If the disruption returns from the same range, the range itself can be blocked instead; and if it later comes from several different IPs or accounts, please re-request and the page can be protected then. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 11:07, 30 October 2026 (IST)

	:'''Update (1 November):''' The disruption returned after that decline, now from more than one IP range, and a reverted change was restored by a second IP. I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the lastclean version. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 04:22, 1 November 2026 (IST)		:'''Update (1 November):''' The disruption returned after that decline, now from more than one IP range, and a reverted change was restored by a second IP. I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the lastclean version. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 04:22, 1 November 2026 (IST)
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	::::::::Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site, but that is not my main concern anymore. Regarding copyright, the image was uploaded to Bharatpedia through Wikimedia Commons, where image uploads are subject to the platform's permissions and licensing requirements. Only the actual photographer or copyright owner can legitimately claim ownership of an image and release it under an appropriate licence. I have also reviewed this editor's contribution history and found other instances where copyrighted photographs appear to have been uploaded while being claimed as the editor's own work. This raises serious concerns about possible copyright violations and misrepresentation of ownership. I will report the evidence through the appropriate process, and the matter will be investigated. Appropriate action may follow.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::::::Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site, but that is not my main concern anymore. Regarding copyright, the image was uploaded to Bharatpedia through Wikimedia Commons, where image uploads are subject to the platform's permissions and licensing requirements. Only the actual photographer or copyright owner can legitimately claim ownership of an image and release it under an appropriate licence. I have also reviewed this editor's contribution history and found other instances where copyrighted photographs appear to have been uploaded while being claimed as the editor's own work. This raises serious concerns about possible copyright violations and misrepresentation of ownership. I will report the evidence through the appropriate process, and the matter will be investigated. Appropriate action may follow.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			:::::::::You should avoid personal attacks like {{green\|Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site}}, otherwise you will invite a block as warnings are already issued in the past too. The image asserted by you belongs to [https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdiVHFLsz0t/ Instagram], uploaded by [[user:Harishroo]] and holds the same copyright status as the current image.[[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:32, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Editorial Oversight: /* Isha Malviya */Replay

2026-11-08T17:47:51Z

Isha Malviya: Replay

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 8 November 2026
Line 46:		Line 46:
	::::::If the article were about the Kama Sutra, I would have no objection to such an image. However, this is an article about Isha Malviya, a public figure, and repeatedly adding an inappropriate image can damage the quality and presentation of her article. More importantly, the image appears to have been created in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. check no source and licensing. Wikipedia may remove the image after reviewing the copyright issue. Until its copyright status is established, my reverts were justified to prevent potentially copyrighted material from remaining in the article.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::::If the article were about the Kama Sutra, I would have no objection to such an image. However, this is an article about Isha Malviya, a public figure, and repeatedly adding an inappropriate image can damage the quality and presentation of her article. More importantly, the image appears to have been created in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. check no source and licensing. Wikipedia may remove the image after reviewing the copyright issue. Until its copyright status is established, my reverts were justified to prevent potentially copyrighted material from remaining in the article.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			::::::::Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site, but that is not my main concern anymore. Regarding copyright, the image was uploaded to Bharatpedia through Wikimedia Commons, where image uploads are subject to the platform's permissions and licensing requirements. Only the actual photographer or copyright owner can legitimately claim ownership of an image and release it under an appropriate licence. I have also reviewed this editor's contribution history and found other instances where copyrighted photographs appear to have been uploaded while being claimed as the editor's own work. This raises serious concerns about possible copyright violations and misrepresentation of ownership. I will report the evidence through the appropriate process, and the matter will be investigated. Appropriate action may follow.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Dokania: /* Isha Malviya */

2026-11-08T17:34:36Z

Isha Malviya

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 8 November 2026
Line 45:		Line 45:
	:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing. [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 21:52, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing. [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 21:52, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	::::::If the article were about the Kama Sutra, I would have no objection to such an image. However, this is an article about Isha Malviya, a public figure, and repeatedly adding an inappropriate image can damage the quality and presentation of her article. More importantly, the image appears to have been created in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. check no source and licensing. Wikipedia may remove the image after reviewing the copyright issue. Until its copyright status is established, my reverts were justified to prevent potentially copyrighted material from remaining in the article.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::::If the article were about the Kama Sutra, I would have no objection to such an image. However, this is an article about Isha Malviya, a public figure, and repeatedly adding an inappropriate image can damage the quality and presentation of her article. More importantly, the image appears to have been created in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. check no source and licensing. Wikipedia may remove the image after reviewing the copyright issue. Until its copyright status is established, my reverts were justified to prevent potentially copyrighted material from remaining in the article.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Editorial Oversight: /* Isha Malviya */Replay

2026-11-08T16:31:32Z

Isha Malviya: Replay

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 8 November 2026
Line 44:		Line 44:
	::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing. [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 21:52, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing. [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 21:52, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			::::::If the article were about the Kama Sutra, I would have no objection to such an image. However, this is an article about Isha Malviya, a public figure, and repeatedly adding an inappropriate image can damage the quality and presentation of her article. More importantly, the image appears to have been created in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. check no source and licensing. Wikipedia may remove the image after reviewing the copyright issue. Until its copyright status is established, my reverts were justified to prevent potentially copyrighted material from remaining in the article.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Dokania: /* Isha Malviya */ sign

2026-11-08T16:22:54Z

Isha Malviya: sign

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 8 November 2026
Line 43:		Line 43:
	:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing.		:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing. [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 21:52, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Dokania at 16:22, 8 November 2026

2026-11-08T16:22:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 8 November 2026
Line 43:		Line 43:
	:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			:::::The image isn't vulgar as private parts are covered but I am not sure if they are modified or not. Image is newer than your image so I think it makes sense to put it there. If the user had disruptive intentions he might have tried other disruptive words or images but he's only insisting on this image as he deems it fit. He's not indulged in any other disruptive editing.

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Editorial Oversight: /* Isha Malviya */Replay

2026-11-08T16:11:51Z

Isha Malviya: Replay

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 8 November 2026
Line 42:		Line 42:
	::Try to find the original image. Share link. Also, this is not the first time this has happened on Isha's page; it has happened multiple times. So it is clear that this is a long-term abuse and blocking the IP is necessary.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:19, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::Try to find the original image. Share link. Also, this is not the first time this has happened on Isha's page; it has happened multiple times. So it is clear that this is a long-term abuse and blocking the IP is necessary.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:19, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			::::The image is extremely vulgar and inappropriate for an encyclopaedic article. This does not appear to be a constructive attempt to improve the article; rather, the editor seems intent on repeatedly inserting an image based on personal preference. The repeated replacement of the image despite objections raises concerns about disruptive editing. Please compare the image with the original source and assess whether it is appropriate under image policies. I believe further protection may be necessary if this behaviour continues.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Dokania: /* Isha Malviya */

2026-11-08T15:06:33Z

Isha Malviya

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 8 November 2026
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:It's [https://youtube.com/shorts/Itq_mjFEv94?si=NVInccsJSv_yAadq not AI-generated] though it may be AI-modified. Thus, I don't find any reason to block the editor or protect the page. Also does anyone know why there's no reply button in this page? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 18:15, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:It's [https://youtube.com/shorts/Itq_mjFEv94?si=NVInccsJSv_yAadq not AI-generated] though it may be AI-modified. Thus, I don't find any reason to block the editor or protect the page. Also does anyone know why there's no reply button in this page? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 18:15, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	::Try to find the original image. Share link. Also, this is not the first time this has happened on Isha's page; it has happened multiple times. So it is clear that this is a long-term abuse and blocking the IP is necessary.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:19, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::Try to find the original image. Share link. Also, this is not the first time this has happened on Isha's page; it has happened multiple times. So it is clear that this is a long-term abuse and blocking the IP is necessary.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:19, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			:::How's changing an image abuse? Even his image is newer than your image so it's fit to be there. He may be unaware of the policies but why you yourself have engaged in editing war? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 20:36, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Editorial Oversight: /* Isha Malviya */Replay

2026-11-08T14:49:54Z

Isha Malviya: Replay

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 8 November 2026
Line 40:		Line 40:
	'''Duration:''' 3 months. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 18:12, 8 November 2026 (IST)		'''Duration:''' 3 months. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 18:12, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	:It's [https://youtube.com/shorts/Itq_mjFEv94?si=NVInccsJSv_yAadq not AI-generated] though it may be AI-modified. Thus, I don't find any reason to block the editor or protect the page. Also does anyone know why there's no reply button in this page? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 18:15, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:It's [https://youtube.com/shorts/Itq_mjFEv94?si=NVInccsJSv_yAadq not AI-generated] though it may be AI-modified. Thus, I don't find any reason to block the editor or protect the page. Also does anyone know why there's no reply button in this page? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 18:15, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			::Try to find the original image. Share link. Also, this is not the first time this has happened on Isha's page; it has happened multiple times. So it is clear that this is a long-term abuse and blocking the IP is necessary.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:19, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

Dokania: Bringing together

2026-11-08T12:48:55Z

Bringing together

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 8 November 2026
Line 30:		Line 30:

	===[[Isha Malviya]]===		===[[Isha Malviya]]===
			* {{pagelinks\|Isha Malviya}}
	I would like to request temporary semi-protection for [[Isha Malviya]] due to repeated disruptive edits involving the addition of multiple AI-generated images.		I would like to request temporary semi-protection for [[Isha Malviya]] due to repeated disruptive edits involving the addition of multiple AI-generated images.

Line 37:		Line 37:

	:'''Update (1 November):''' The disruption returned after that decline, now from more than one IP range, and a reverted change was restored by a second IP. I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the lastclean version. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 04:22, 1 November 2026 (IST)		:'''Update (1 November):''' The disruption returned after that decline, now from more than one IP range, and a reverted change was restored by a second IP. I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the lastclean version. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 04:22, 1 November 2026 (IST)
			'''Semi-protection request:''' After the protection expires, the IP editor returns and adds the same AI-generated images again. Longer-term page protection and an IP block are needed to prevent further disruption.
			'''Duration:''' 3 months. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 18:12, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	:It's [https://youtube.com/shorts/Itq_mjFEv94?si=NVInccsJSv_yAadq not AI-generated] though it may be AI-modified. Thus, I don't find any reason to block the editor or protect the page. Also does anyone know why there's no reply button in this page? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 18:15, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:It's [https://youtube.com/shorts/Itq_mjFEv94?si=NVInccsJSv_yAadq not AI-generated] though it may be AI-modified. Thus, I don't find any reason to block the editor or protect the page. Also does anyone know why there's no reply button in this page? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 18:15, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	~~=== [[Isha Malviya]] ===~~
	* {{pagelinks\|Isha Malviya}}
	'''Semi-protection:''' After the protection expires, the IP editor returns and adds the same AI-generated images again. Longer-term page protection and an IP block are needed to prevent further disruption. '''Duration:''' 3 months. [[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 18:12, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 8 November 2026
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Please review the page's edit history and assess whether the repeated additions of AI-generated images warrant protection under Wikipedia's protection policy. If the disruption is ongoing, semi-protection may help prevent further inappropriate edits by unregistered and new users.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:59, 29 October 2026 (IST)		Please review the page's edit history and assess whether the repeated additions of AI-generated images warrant protection under Wikipedia's protection policy. If the disruption is ongoing, semi-protection may help prevent further inappropriate edits by unregistered and new users.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 20:59, 29 October 2026 (IST)
	:{{RFPP\|d}} for now. I have reviewed the page history: there have been only two edits, both from the same IPv6 range, swapping the infobox image back and forth, and both have already been reverted. Semi-~~protection~~ is generally a last resort for repeated disruption coming from multiple users. If the disruption returns from the same range, the range itself can be blocked instead; and if it later comes from several different IPs or accounts, please re-request and the page can be protected then. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 11:07, 30 October 2026 (IST)		:{{RFPP\|d}} for now. I have reviewed the page history: there have been only two edits, both from the same IPv6 range, swapping the infobox image back and forth, and both have already been reverted. Semi-protecti[[user:Harishroo\|Harishroo]]on is generally a last resort for repeated disruption coming from multiple users. If the disruption returns from the same range, the range itself can be blocked instead; and if it later comes from several different IPs or accounts, please re-request and the page can be protected then. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 11:07, 30 October 2026 (IST)

	:'''Update (1 November):''' The disruption returned after that decline, now from more than one IP range, and a reverted change was restored by a second IP. I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the lastclean version. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 04:22, 1 November 2026 (IST)		:'''Update (1 November):''' The disruption returned after that decline, now from more than one IP range, and a reverted change was restored by a second IP. I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the lastclean version. [[User:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#1f618d;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #3498db;">🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁</span>]][[User talk:Bharatwiki_Socrates\|<span style="color:#FF9933;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 04:22, 1 November 2026 (IST)
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)		:::::::The inage is clearly covering private parts, so that shouldn't be an issue. About copyright, tbis isn't Wikipedia. I think Bharatpedia allows more liberty in adding images regardless of copyright issues? Anyways, what's the copyright status of your image? Is it freely licensed? [[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:04, 8 November 2026 (IST)
	::::::::Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site, but that is not my main concern anymore. Regarding copyright, the image was uploaded to Bharatpedia through Wikimedia Commons, where image uploads are subject to the platform's permissions and licensing requirements. Only the actual photographer or copyright owner can legitimately claim ownership of an image and release it under an appropriate licence. I have also reviewed this editor's contribution history and found other instances where copyrighted photographs appear to have been uploaded while being claimed as the editor's own work. This raises serious concerns about possible copyright violations and misrepresentation of ownership. I will report the evidence through the appropriate process, and the matter will be investigated. Appropriate action may follow.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 8 November 2026 (IST)		::::::::Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site, but that is not my main concern anymore. Regarding copyright, the image was uploaded to Bharatpedia through Wikimedia Commons, where image uploads are subject to the platform's permissions and licensing requirements. Only the actual photographer or copyright owner can legitimately claim ownership of an image and release it under an appropriate licence. I have also reviewed this editor's contribution history and found other instances where copyrighted photographs appear to have been uploaded while being claimed as the editor's own work. This raises serious concerns about possible copyright violations and misrepresentation of ownership. I will report the evidence through the appropriate process, and the matter will be investigated. Appropriate action may follow.[[User:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight\|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 8 November 2026 (IST)
			:::::::::You should avoid personal attacks like {{green\|Perhaps such images are considered acceptable in your own site}}, otherwise you will invite a block as warnings are already issued in the past too. The image asserted by you belongs to [https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdiVHFLsz0t/ Instagram], uploaded by [[user:Harishroo]] and holds the same copyright status as the current image.[[User:Dokania\|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#FB8C00">Dokania😎</span>]][[User talk:Dokania\|<span style="color:#208C00;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 2px #1f618d;">(📩)</span>]] 23:32, 8 November 2026 (IST)

	== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==		== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

	== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==		== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==