Ashok Mehta Committee - Revision history

Villagetalkies: corrected references for accuracy per standard format

2024-06-17T09:28:32Z

corrected references for accuracy per standard format

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}}
+#REDIRECT [[Asoka Mehta Committee]]
-In December 1977, the [[Janata Party|Janata]] Government appointed a committee on  [[Panchayati Raj]] institutions under the chairmanship of [[Ashoka Mehta]]. The committee submitted its report in August 1978 and made 132 recommendations to revive and strengthen the declining [[Panchayati Raj]] system in the country. As a result of this report, the Indian states of [[Karnataka]], [[Andhra Pradesh]], and [[West Bengal]] passed new legislation. However, the flow of politics at the state level did not allow the institutions to develop their own political dynamics.
+{{Redirect category shell|
+{{R from move}}
-==Recommendations==
+}}

150.129.236.139: robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)

2022-02-02T05:41:27Z

robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 2 February 2022
Line 17:		Line 17:
	# The voluntary agencies should play an important role in mobilising the support of the people for Panchayati Raj.		# The voluntary agencies should play an important role in mobilising the support of the people for Panchayati Raj.
	# A minister for Panchayati Raj should be appointed in the state council of ministers to look after the affairs of the Panchayati Raj institutions.		# A minister for Panchayati Raj should be appointed in the state council of ministers to look after the affairs of the Panchayati Raj institutions.
	# Seats for SCs and Sts should be reserved on the basis of their population.<ref name=Debroy>{{cite book\|last=Debroy\|first=Bibek\|title=Energising Rural Development Through 'Panchayats'\|year=2005\|page=81\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rCxDSCVpOLsC&q=Ashok+Mehta+Committee&pg=PA81\|author2=Pitambar Datta Kaushik\|isbn=9788171884179\|accessdate=26 February 2013}}</ref>{{failed verification\|date=February 2013}}		# Seats for SCs and Sts should be reserved on the basis of their population.1/3rd seats should be reserved for women.
			<ref name=Debroy>{{cite book\|last=Debroy\|first=Bibek\|title=Energising Rural Development Through 'Panchayats'\|year=2005\|page=81\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rCxDSCVpOLsC&q=Ashok+Mehta+Committee&pg=PA81\|author2=Pitambar Datta Kaushik\|isbn=9788171884179\|accessdate=26 February 2013}}</ref>{{failed verification\|date=February 2013}}
	# A Constitutional recognition should be accorded to the Panchayati Raj institutions. This would give them the requisite status and an assurance of continuous functioning.		# A Constitutional recognition should be accorded to the Panchayati Raj institutions. This would give them the requisite status and an assurance of continuous functioning.

2409:4063:6E00:98AC:30F4:BE2:B910:81A2 at 11:10, 9 September 2021

2021-09-09T11:10:48Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:40, 9 September 2021
(No difference)

>Kurousagi: Reverted edits by 106.203.139.246 (talk) to last version by 106.217.6.62

2021-03-02T13:07:10Z

Reverted edits by 106.203.139.246 (talk) to last version by 106.217.6.62

New page

{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}}

In December 1977, the [[Janata Party|Janata]] Government appointed a committee on [[Panchayati Raj]] institutions under the chairmanship of [[Ashoka Mehta]]. The committee submitted its report in August 1978 and made 132 recommendations to revive and strengthen the declining [[Panchayati Raj]] system in the country. As a result of this report, the Indian states of [[Karnataka]], [[Andhra Pradesh]], and [[West Bengal]] passed new legislation. However, the flow of politics at the state level did not allow the institutions to develop their own political dynamics.

==Recommendations==
The main recommendations of the committee were:

# The 3-tier system of Panchayati Raj should be replaced by the 2-tier system: [[District Councils of India|Zilla Parishad]] at the district level, and below it, the [[Panchayat Samiti|Mandal Panchayat]] consisting of a group of villages covering a population of 15000 to 20000.
# A district should be the first point for decentralisation under popular supervision below the state level.
# Zila Parishad should be the executive body and made responsible for planning at the district level.
# There should be an official participation of political parties at all levels of Panchayat elections.
# The Panchayat Raj institutions should have compulsory powers of taxation to mobilise their own financial resources.
# There should be a regular social audit by a district level agency and by a committee of legislators to check whether the funds allotted for the vulnerable social and economic groups are actually spent on them.
# The state government should not supersede the Panchayat Raj institutions. In case of an imperative supersession, election should be held within 6 months from the date of supersession.
# The Nyaya Panchayats should be kept as separate bodies from that of development of the state in consultation with the Chief Election Commissioner should organise and conduct the Panchayati Raj elections.
# Development functions should be transferred to the Zila Parishad and all development staff should work under its control and supervision.
# The voluntary agencies should play an important role in mobilising the support of the people for Panchayati Raj.
# A minister for Panchayati Raj should be appointed in the state council of ministers to look after the affairs of the Panchayati Raj institutions.
# Seats for SCs and Sts should be reserved on the basis of their population.<ref name=Debroy>{{cite book|last=Debroy|first=Bibek|title=Energising Rural Development Through 'Panchayats'|year=2005|page=81|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rCxDSCVpOLsC&q=Ashok+Mehta+Committee&pg=PA81|author2=Pitambar Datta Kaushik|isbn=9788171884179|accessdate=26 February 2013}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=February 2013}}
# A Constitutional recognition should be accorded to the Panchayati Raj institutions. This would give them the requisite status and an assurance of continuous functioning.

== References ==
{{reflist}}

{{Indian committees}}

{{authority control}}

[[Category:Government agencies of India]]
[[Category:Panchayati raj (India)]]

{{India-gov-stub}}