Sino-Tibetan languages

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sino-Tibetan)
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We need your support to keep the flame of knowledge burning bright! Our hosting server bill is due on June 1st, and without your help, Bharatpedia faces the risk of shutdown. We've come a long way together in exploring and celebrating our rich heritage. Now, let's unite to ensure Bharatpedia continues to be a beacon of knowledge for generations to come. Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Together, let's preserve and share the essence of Bharat.

Thank you for being part of the Bharatpedia family!
Please scan the QR code on the right click here to donate.

0%

   

transparency: ₹0 raised out of ₹100,000 (0 supporter)


Sino-Tibetan
Trans-Himalayan
Geographic
distribution
South Asia, East Asia, North Asia, Southeast Asia
Linguistic classificationOne of the world's primary language families
Proto-languageProto-Sino-Tibetan
SubdivisionsSome 40 well-known subgroups, of which those with the most speakers are:
ISO 639-2 / 5sit
Linguasphere79- (phylozone)
Glottologsino1245
Major Sino-Tibetan groups.png
Major branches of Sino-Tibetan:

The Sino-Tibetan or Trans-Himalayan languages, form a language family. This includes Chinese and the Tibeto-Burman languages and some 250 languages of East Asia. Kra-Dai languages and Hmong–Mien languages are also sometimes included.

The largest language within this family are the Chinese languages by far with over 1.3 billion native speakers. It is also the one with the oldest writing (hanzi) going back to the Jiahu symbols in 6600 BC.[citation needed]

All these languages descend from a single proto-language. People are still working on what this sounded like.

Where did it come from?[edit]

Some researchers think the Sino-Tibetan languages very likely came from the Huanghe in North-Central China (Zhongyuan). Others think they came from much further west, in southwest China or even Northeast India.

Zhang et al. (2019) did a study of 109 Sino-Tibetan languages to suggest a Sino-Tibetan homeland in northern China near the Huanghe basin. He found there was a split between Sinitic languages and the Tibeto-Burman languages approximately 4,200-7,800 years ago (with an average of 5,900 years ago). This is connected with the expansion of the Yangshao culture and Majiayao culture.[1] Others agree by using different data; they say it came from around 7,200 years ago, around the Cishan and early Yangshao culture.[2]

Example languages[edit]

Evolution of language[edit]

Proto-Chinese and Proto-Tibeto-Burman had many different prefixes and suffixes. Proto-Chinese changed to Old Chinese around the Shang Dynasty. This is shown in the Book of songs. Nouns, verbs, and modifiers were all dependent on affixes (beginning of words) such as *s-, *p-, *-k.[3][4] After the Warring State Period in China, Old Chinese started using tones.[5] The suffix (end of words) *-s was also used.

The typical word order in Sino-Tibetan languages is object-verb. Modern Chinese, Bai, Karenic, and Mruic are exceptions.

SOV is likely the original word order.[6][7] Over time Chinese became subject–verb–object.[6] However, Chinese differs from almost all other VO languages in the world in placing relative clauses before the nouns they modify.[8]

Relation to other language families[edit]

Sino-Tibetan may be related to the Altaic languages. Mang Mulin, a Mongolian linguistics professor at the Inner Mongolia Normal University, began studying the origin of Mongolian words in the late 1970s.[9]

There are links between Sino-Tibetan, Austroasiatic (from South China), and Austronesian (from Taiwan) languages.

There may even be connections between Chinese and the native languages of the Americas (Na-Dene) and Western Eurasia (Yeniseian).

Sino-American (Dene-Caucasian)

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Zhang, Meng-han (张梦翰); Yan, Shi (严实); Pan, Wuyun (潘悟云); & Jin, Li (金力). (2019). Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature, 569, 112–115. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z
  2. Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill, and Johann-Mattis List (2019): Dated language phylogenies shed light on the history of Sino-Tibetan[permanent dead link]. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817972116
  3. Wu (1987).
  4. 吴, 安其. "汉藏语使动和完成体前缀的残存与同源的动词词根". Archived from the original on 2020-08-15. Retrieved 2019-07-24.
  5. Wang (1980), p. 221.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Dryer (2003), pp. 43–45.
  7. DeLancey, Scott. "On the origins of Sinitic". citeseerx.ist.psu.edu. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.637.1357. Retrieved 2019-07-24.
  8. Dryer (2003), pp. 50.
  9. "Han-Tibetan, Altaic Languages "Close Relatives"". www.china.org.cn. Retrieved 2019-07-24.