People's Liberation Army

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We need your support to keep the flame of knowledge burning bright! Our hosting server bill is due on June 1st, and without your help, Bharatpedia faces the risk of shutdown. We've come a long way together in exploring and celebrating our rich heritage. Now, let's unite to ensure Bharatpedia continues to be a beacon of knowledge for generations to come. Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Together, let's preserve and share the essence of Bharat.

Thank you for being part of the Bharatpedia family!
Please scan the QR code on the right to donate.

0%

   

transparency: ₹0 raised out of ₹100,000 (0 supporter)




People's Liberation Army
中国人民解放军
Zhōngguó Rénmín Jiěfàngjūn
China Emblem PLA.svg
Emblem of the People's Liberation Army
People's Liberation Army Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg
Flag of the People's Liberation Army
The characters are "八一", referencing August 1.
Motto为人民服务
("Serve the People")
Founded1 August 1927; 96 years ago (1927-08-01)
Current form10 October 1947; 76 years ago (1947-10-10)[1][2][3]
Service branches
HeadquartersAugust First Building (ceremonial), etc., Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing
Website{{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
Leadership
Governing bodyDanghui.svg National Emblem of the People's Republic of China (2).svg Central Military Commission (CMC)
CMC leadershipChairman:
Xi Jinping

Vice Chairmen:

General Zhang Youxia

General He Weidong
Minister of National Defense General Li Shangfu
Director of the Political Work Department Admiral Miao Hua
Chief of the Joint Staff Department General Liu Zhenli
Secretary of Discipline Inspection Commission General Zhang Shengmin
Manpower
Military age18
ConscriptionYes by law, but not enforced in practice. All adult males must register for the draft.[4]
Active personnel2,035,000 (2022)[5] (ranked 1st)
Reserve personnel510,000 (2022)[5]
Expenditures
BudgetUS$293 billion (2022)[6]
(ranked 2nd)
Percent of GDP1.7% (2022)[6]
Industry
Domestic suppliers
Foreign suppliers
Historical:
Annual importsUS$14.858 billion (2010–2021)[8]
Annual exportsUS$18.121 billion (2010–2021)[8]
Related articles
HistoryHistory of the PLA
Modernization of the PLA
Historical Chinese wars and battles
Military engagements
RanksArmy ranks
Navy ranks
Air force ranks
Chinese People's Liberation Army
Script error: No such module "Infobox multi-lingual name".

Template:PRC military sidebar Template:Politics of China

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is the principal military force of the People's Republic of China and the armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The PLA consists of five service branches: the Ground Force, Navy, Air Force, Rocket Force, and Strategic Support Force. It is under the leadership of the Central Military Commission (CMC) with its chairman as commander-in-chief.

The PLA can trace its origins during the Republican Era to the left-wing units of the National Revolutionary Army (NRA) of the Kuomintang (KMT) when they broke away in 1927 in an uprising against the nationalist government as the Chinese Red Army, before being reintegrated into the NRA as units of New Fourth Army and Eighth Route Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. The two NRA communist units were reconstituted as the PLA in 1947.[9] Since 1949, the PLA has used nine different military strategies, which it calls "strategic guidelines". The most important came in 1956, 1980, and 1993.[10] In times of national emergency, the People's Armed Police (PAP) and the China Militia act as a reserve and support element for the PLAGF. Politically, the PLA and PAP are represented in the National People's Congress (NPC) through a delegation of 285 deputies, all of whom are CCP members. Since the formation of the NPC, the joint PLA–PAP delegation has always constituted the largest delegation and today comprises just over 9% of the NPC.[11]

PRC law explicitly asserts the leadership of the CCP over the armed forces of China and designates the CMC as the nationwide military command of the People's Republic of China. The Party CMC operates under the name of the State CMC for legal and governmental functions and as the ceremonial Ministry of National Defense (MoD) for diplomatic functions. The PLA is obliged to follow the principle of the CCP's absolute civilian control of the military under the doctrine of "the party commands the gun" (Chinese: 党指挥枪; pinyin: Dǎng zhǐhuī qiāng)[10] In this sense, the PLA is not a national army of the type of traditional nation-states, but a political army or the armed branch of the CCP itself since its allegiance is to the party only and not the state or any constitution. At present, the CMC chairman is customarily also the CCP general secretary.[12]

Today, the majority of military units around the country are assigned to one of five theater commands by geographical location. The PLA is the world's largest military force (not including paramilitary or reserve forces) and has the second largest defense budget in the world. China's military expenditure was US$292 billion in 2022, accounting for 13 percent of the world's defense expenditures.[13] It is also one of the fastest modernizing militaries in the world, and has been termed as a potential military superpower, with significant regional defense and rising global power projection capabilities.[14][15]

Stated mission[edit]

In 2004, paramount leader Hu Jintao stated the mission of the PLA as:[16]

  • The insurance of CCP leadership
  • The protection of the sovereignty, territorial integrity, internal security and national development of the People's Republic of China
  • Safeguarding the country's interests
  • Maintaining and safeguarding world peace

History[edit]

Early history[edit]

The CCP founded its military wing on 1 August 1927 during the Nanchang uprising, beginning the Chinese Civil War. Communist elements of the National Revolutionary Army rebelled under the leadership of Zhu De, He Long, Ye Jianying, Zhou Enlai, and other leftist elements of the Kuomintang (KMT), after the Shanghai massacre of 1927.[17] They were then known as the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army, or simply the Red Army.[18]

In 1934 and 1935, the Red Army survived several campaigns led against it by Chiang Kai-Shek's KMT and engaged in the Long March.[19]

During the Second Sino-Japanese War from 1937 to 1945, the CCP's military forces were nominally integrated into the National Revolutionary Army of the Republic of China forming two main units, the Eighth Route Army and the New Fourth Army.[9] During this time, these two military groups primarily employed guerrilla tactics, generally avoiding large-scale battles with the Japanese, at the same time consolidating by recruiting KMT troops and paramilitary forces behind Japanese lines into their forces.[20]

After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the CCP continued to use the National Revolutionary Army unit structures until the decision was made in February 1947 to merge the Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army, renaming the new million-strong force the People's Liberation Army (PLA).[9] The reorganization was completed by late 1948. The PLA eventually won the Chinese Civil War, establishing the People's Republic of China in 1949.[21] It then underwent a drastic reorganization, with the establishment of the Air Force leadership structure in November 1949, followed by the Navy leadership structure the following April.[22][23]

In 1950, the leadership structures of the artillery, armored troops, air defense troops, public security forces, and worker–soldier militias were also established. The chemical warfare defense forces, the railroad forces, the communications forces, and the strategic forces, as well as other separate forces (like engineering and construction, logistics and medical services), were established later on.

In this early period, the People's Liberation Army overwhelmingly consisted of peasants.[24] Its treatment of soldiers and officers was egalitarian[24] and formal ranks were not adopted until 1955.[25] As a result of its egalitarian organization, the early PLA overturned strict traditional hierarchies that governed the lives of peasants.[24] As sociologist Alessandro Russo summarizes, the peasant composition of the PLA hierarchy was a radical break with Chinese societal norms and "overturned the strict traditional hierarchies in unprecedented forms of egalitarianism[.]"[24]

Modernization and conflicts[edit]

PLA troops entering Beijing in 1949 during the Chinese Civil War
Chinese troops gathered on a T-34/85 or a Type 58 medium tank leaving North Korea in 1958, 5 years after the Korean War ended with an armistice (a ceasefire) in 1953. The banner in the background of the picture bears a slogan (in Chinese) which declares "The Friendship And Unity of the North Korean And Chinese Peoples Are Always Steadfast And Strong!"
Marshal Lin Biao surveying the soldiers during the 10th-anniversary military parade in 1959.

During the 1950s, the PLA with Soviet assistance began to transform itself from a peasant army into a modern one.[26] Since 1949, China has used nine different military strategies, which the PLA calls "strategic guidelines". The most important came in 1956, 1980, and 1993.[10] Part of this process was the reorganization that created thirteen military regions in 1955. The PLA also contained many former National Revolutionary Army units and generals who had defected to the PLA.[citation needed]

In November 1950, some units of the PLA under the name of the People's Volunteer Army intervened in the Korean War as United Nations forces under General Douglas MacArthur approached the Yalu River.[27] Under the weight of this offensive, Chinese forces drove MacArthur's forces out of North Korea and captured Seoul, but were subsequently pushed back south of Pyongyang north of the 38th Parallel.[27] The war also catalyzed the rapid modernization of the PLAAF.[28]

In 1962, the PLA ground force also fought India in the Sino-Indian War, achieving limited objectives.[29][30] In a series of border clashes in 1967 with Indian troops, the PLA suffered heavy numerical and tactical losses.[31][32][33]

Before the Cultural Revolution, military region commanders tended to remain in their posts for long periods. As the PLA took a stronger role in politics, this began to be seen as somewhat of a threat to the CCP's (or, at least, civilian) control of the military.[citation needed] The longest-serving military region commanders were Xu Shiyou in the Nanjing Military Region (1954–74), Yang Dezhi in the Jinan Military Region (1958–74), Chen Xilian in the Shenyang Military Region (1959–73), and Han Xianchu in the Fuzhou Military Region (1960–74).[34]

In the early days of the Cultural Revolution, the PLA abandoned the use of the military ranks that it had adopted in 1955.[35]

The establishment of a professional military force equipped with modern weapons and doctrine was the last of the Four Modernizations announced by Zhou Enlai and supported by Deng Xiaoping.[36][37] In keeping with Deng's mandate to reform, the PLA has demobilized millions of men and women since 1978 and has introduced modern methods in such areas as recruitment and manpower, strategy, and education and training.[38] In 1979, the PLA fought Vietnam over a border skirmish in the Sino-Vietnamese War where both sides claimed victory.[39] However, western analysts agree that Vietnam handily outperformed the PLA.[34]

During the Sino-Soviet split, strained relations between China and the Soviet Union resulted in bloody border clashes and mutual backing of each other's adversaries.[40] China and Afghanistan had neutral relations with each other during the King's rule.[41] When the pro-Soviet Afghan Communists seized power in Afghanistan in 1978, relations between China and the Afghan communists quickly turned hostile.[42][better source needed] The Afghan pro-Soviet communists supported China's enemies in Vietnam and blamed China for supporting Afghan anticommunist militants.[43] China responded to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan by supporting the Afghan mujahideen and ramping up their military presence near Afghanistan in Xinjiang.[43] China acquired military equipment from the United States to defend itself from Soviet attacks.[44]

The People's Liberation Army Ground Force trained and supported the Afghan Mujahideen during the Soviet-Afghan War, moving its training camps for the mujahideen from Pakistan into China itself.[45] Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of anti-aircraft missiles, rocket launchers, and machine guns were given to the Mujahideen by the Chinese.[46] Chinese military advisors and army troops were also present with the Mujahideen during training.[47]

Since 1980[edit]

In 1981, the PLA conducted its largest military exercise in North China since the founding of the People's Republic.[10][48] In the 1980s, China shrunk its military considerably to free up resources for economic development, resulting in the relative decline in resources devoted to the PLA.[49] Following the PLA's suppression of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, ideological correctness was temporarily revived as the dominant theme in Chinese military affairs.[50]

Reform and modernization have today resumed their position as the PLA's primary objectives, although the armed forces' political loyalty to the CCP has remained a leading concern.[51][52] Another area of concern to the political leadership was the PLA's involvement in civilian economic activities. These activities were thought to have impacted PLA readiness and have led the political leadership to attempt to divest the PLA from its non-military business interests.[53][54]

Beginning in the 1980s, the PLA tried to transform itself from a land-based power centered on a vast ground force to a smaller, more mobile, high-tech one capable of mounting operations beyond its borders.[10] The motivation for this was that a massive land invasion by Russia was no longer seen as a major threat, and the new threats to China are seen to be a declaration of independence by Taiwan, possibly with assistance from the United States, or a confrontation over the Spratly Islands.[55]

In 1985, under the leadership of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the CMC, the PLA changed from being constantly prepared to "hit early, strike hard and to fight a nuclear war" to developing the military in an era of peace.[10] The PLA reoriented itself to modernization, improving its fighting ability, and becoming a world-class force. Deng Xiaoping stressed that the PLA needed to focus more on quality rather than on quantity.[55]

The decision of the Chinese government in 1985 to reduce the size of the military by one million was completed by 1987. Staffing in military leadership was cut by about 50 percent. During the Ninth Five Year Plan (1996–2000) the PLA was reduced by a further 500,000. The PLA had also been expected to be reduced by another 200,000 by 2005. The PLA has focused on increasing mechanization and informatization to be able to fight a high-intensity war.[55]

The PLA Honor Guard in Beijing, 2007

Former CMC chairman Jiang Zemin in 1990 called on the military to "meet political standards, be militarily competent, have a good working style, adhere strictly to discipline, and provide vigorous logistic support" (Chinese: 政治合格、军事过硬、作风优良、纪律严明、保障有力; pinyin: zhèngzhì hégé, jūnshì guòyìng, zuòfēng yōuliáng, jìlǜ yánmíng, bǎozhàng yǒulì).[56] The 1991 Gulf War provided the Chinese leadership with a stark realization that the PLA was an oversized, almost-obsolete force.[57][58]

The possibility of a militarized Japan has also been a continuous concern to the Chinese leadership since the late 1990s.[59] In addition, China's military leadership has been reacting to and learning from the successes and failures of the American military during the Kosovo War,[60] the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan,[61] the 2003 invasion of Iraq,[62] and the Iraqi insurgency.[62] All these lessons inspired China to transform the PLA from a military based on quantity to one based on quality. Chairman Jiang Zemin officially made a "Revolution in Military Affairs" (RMA) part of the official national military strategy in 1993 to modernize the Chinese armed forces.[63]

A goal of the RMA is to transform the PLA into a force capable of winning what it calls "local wars under high-tech conditions" rather than a massive, numbers-dominated ground-type war.[63] Chinese military planners call for short decisive campaigns, limited in both their geographic scope and their political goals. In contrast to the past, more attention is given to reconnaissance, mobility, and deep reach. This new vision has shifted resources towards the navy and air force. The PLA is also actively preparing for space warfare and cyber-warfare.[64][65][66]

For the past 10 to 20 years, the PLA has acquired some advanced weapons systems from Russia, including Sovremenny class destroyers,[67] Sukhoi Su-27[68] and Sukhoi Su-30 aircraft,[69] and Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines.[70] It has also started to produce several new classes of destroyers and frigates including the Type 052D class guided-missile destroyer.[71][72] In addition, the PLAAF has designed its very own Chengdu J-10 fighter aircraft[73] and a new stealth fighter, the Chengdu J-20.[74] The PLA launched the new Jin class nuclear submarines on 3 December 2004 capable of launching nuclear warheads that could strike targets across the Pacific Ocean[75] and have three aircraft carriers, with the latest, the Fujian, launched in 2022.[76][77][78]

In 2015, the PLA formed new units including the PLA Ground Force, the PLA Rocket Force and the PLA Strategic Support Force.[79]

The PLA on 1 August 2017 marked its 90th anniversary.[80] Before the big anniversary it mounted its biggest parade yet and the first outside of Beijing, held in the Zhurihe Training Base in the Northern Theater Command (within the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region).[81]

Peacekeeping operations[edit]

The People's Republic of China has sent the PLA to various hotspots as part of China's role as a prominent member of the United Nations.[82] Such units usually include engineers and logistical units and members of the paramilitary People's Armed Police and have been deployed as part of peacekeeping operations in Lebanon,[83][84] the Republic of the Congo,[83] Sudan,[85] Ivory Coast,[86] Haiti,[87][88] and more recently, Mali and South Sudan.[83][89]

Engagements[edit]

Organization[edit]

National military command[edit]

The state military system upholds the principle of the CCP's absolute leadership over the armed forces. The party and the State jointly established the CMC that carries out the task of supreme military leadership over the armed forces. The 1954 Constitution stated that the State President directs the armed forces and made the State President the chairman of the National Defense Commission. The National Defense Commission is an advisory body and does not hold any actual power over the armed forces.

On 28 September 1954, the Central Committee of the CCP re-established the CMC as the commanding organ of the PLA.[citation needed] From that time onward, the current system of a joint system of party and state leadership of the military was established. The Central Committee of the CCP leads in all military affairs. The State President directs the state military forces and the development of the military forces which is managed by the State Council.

To ensure the absolute leadership of the CCP over the armed forces, every level of the party committee in the military forces implements the principles of democratic centralism.[citation needed] In addition, division-level and higher units establish political commissars and political organizations, ensuring that the branch organizations are in line. These systems combined the party organization with the military organization to achieve the party's leadership and administrative leadership. This is seen as the key guarantee to the absolute leadership of the CCP over the military.

In October 2014 the People's Liberation Army Daily reminded readers of the Gutian Congress, which stipulated the basic principle of CCP control of the military, and called for vigilance as "[f]oreign hostile forces preach the nationalization and de-politicization of the military, attempting to muddle our minds and drag our military out from under the Party's flag."[114]

The CMC is ceremonially housed in the Ministry of National Defense compound ("August 1st Building")

Leadership[edit]

The leadership by the CCP is a fundamental principle of the Chinese military command system. The PLA reports not to the State Council but rather to two Central Military Commissions, one belonging to the state and one belonging to the CCP.

In practice, the two central military commissions usually do not contradict each other because their membership is usually identical. Often, the only difference in membership between the two occurs for a few months every five years, during the period between a party congress, when Party CMC membership changes, and the next ensuing National People's Congress, when the state CMC changes. The CMC carries out its responsibilities as authorised by the Constitution and National Defense Law.[115]

The leadership of each type of military force is under the leadership and management of the corresponding part of the Central Military Commission of the CCP Central Committee. Forces under each military branch or force such as the subordinate forces, academies and schools, scientific research and engineering institutions and logistical support organisations are also under the leadership of the CMC. This arrangement has been especially useful as China over the past several decades has moved increasingly towards military organisations composed of forces from more than one military branch.

In September 1982, to meet the needs of modernisation and to improve coordination in the command of forces including multiple service branches and to strengthen unified command of the military, the CMC ordered the abolition of the leadership organisation of the various military branches. Today, the PLA has an air force, navy and second artillery leadership organs.

In 1986, the People's Armed Forces Department, except in some border regions, was placed under the joint leadership of the PLA and the local authorities.[citation needed] Although the local party organizations paid close attention to the People's Armed Forces Department, as a result of some practical problems, the CMC decided that from 1 April 1996, the People's Armed Forces Department would once again fall under the jurisdiction of the PLA.[citation needed]

According to the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, the CMC is composed of the following: the chairman, Vice-chairmen and Members. The Chairman of the Central Military Commission has overall responsibility for the commission.

The Central Military Commission of the Chinese Communist Party and the Central Military Commission of the People's Republic of China
Chairman
Vice Chairmen
Members

Central Military Commission[edit]

In December 1982, the fifth National People's Congress revised the state constitution to state that the State Central Military Commission (CMC) leads all the armed forces of the state. The chairman of the State CMC is chosen and removed by the full NPC while the other members are chosen by the NPC standing committee. However, the CMC of the Central Committee of the CCP remained the party organization that directly commands the military and all the other armed forces.

In actual practice, the party CMC, after consultation with the democratic parties, proposes the names of the State CMC members of the NPC so that these people after going through the legal processes can be elected by the NPC to the State Central Military Commission (CMC). That is to say, the CMC of the Central Committee and the CMC of the State are one group and one organisation. However, looking at it organizationally, these two CMCs are subordinate to two different systems – the party system and the state system.

Therefore, the armed forces are under the absolute leadership of the CCP and are also the armed forces of the state. This is a unique joint leadership system that reflects the origin of the PLA as the military branch of the CCP. It only became the national military when the People's Republic of China was established in 1949.

By convention, the chairman and vice-chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) are civilian members of the CCP, but they are not necessarily the heads of the civilian government. Both Jiang Zemin and Deng Xiaoping retained the office of chairman even after relinquishing their other positions. All of the other members of the CMC are uniformed active military officials. Unlike other nations, the Minister of National Defense is not the head of the military but is usually a vice-chairman of the CMC.

2016 military reforms[edit]

On 1 January 2016, the CMC released guidelines[116] on deepening national defense and military reform, about a month after Xi Jinping called for an overhaul of the military administration and command system.[citation needed]

On 11 January 2016, the PLA was restructured and a joint staff department directly attached to the CMC.[citation needed] The previous four general headquarters of the PLA were disbanded. They were divided into 15 functional departments instead — an expansion from the domain of the General Office, which is now a single department within the Central Military Commission.[citation needed]

  1. General Office (办公厅)
  2. Joint Staff Department (联合参谋部)
  3. Political Work Department (政治工作部)
  4. Logistic Support Department (后勤保障部)
  5. Equipment Development Department (装备发展部)
  6. Training and Administration Department (训练管理部)
  7. National Defense Mobilization Department (国防动员部)
  8. Discipline Inspection Commission (纪律检查委员会)
  9. Politics and Legal Affairs Commission (政法委员会)
  10. Science and Technology Commission (科学技术委员会)
  11. Office for Strategic Planning (战略规划办公室)
  12. Office for Reform and Organizational Structure (改革和编制办公室)
  13. Office for International Military Cooperation (国际军事合作办公室)
  14. Audit Office (审计署)
  15. Agency for Offices Administration (机关事务管理总局)

Included among the 15 departments are three commissions. The CMC Discipline Inspection Commission is charged with rooting out corruption. Template:Familytree/start Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree Template:Familytree/end

Theater commands[edit]

The five theater commands of the PLA[117]

Until 2016, China's territory was divided into seven military regions, but they were reorganized into five theater commands in early 2016. This reflects a change in their concept of operations from primarily ground-oriented to mobile and coordinated movement of all services.[118] The five new theatre commands, in order of stated significance are:

The PLA garrisons in Hong Kong and Macau both come under the Southern Theater Command.[citation needed]

The military reforms have also introduced a major change in the areas of responsibility. Rather than separately commanding their troops, service branches are now primarily responsible for administrative tasks (like equipping and maintaining the troops). It is the theater commands now that have the command authority. This should, in theory, facilitate the implementation of joint operations across all service branches.[120]

Coordination with civilian national security groups such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is achieved primarily by the leading groups of the CCP. Particularly important are the leading groups on foreign affairs, which include those dealing with Taiwan.[citation needed]

Ranks[edit]

Officers[edit]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/BlankTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/People's Republic of ChinaTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/People's Republic of ChinaTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/People's Republic of ChinaTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/People's Republic of China (PLARF)Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/People's Republic of China (PLASSF)

Other ranks[edit]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/People's Republic of ChinaTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OR/People's Republic of ChinaTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OR/People's Republic of ChinaTemplate:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OR/People's Republic of China (PLARF)Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OR/People's Republic of China (PLASSF)
Equivalent
NATO code
OR-9 OR-8 OR-7 OR-6 OR-5 OR-4 OR-3 OR-2 OR-1

Service branches[edit]

The PLA encompasses five main service branches (Chinese: 军种; pinyin: jūnzhǒng): the Ground Force, the Navy, the Air Force, the Rocket Force, and the Strategic Support Force. Following the 200,000 troop reduction announced in 2003, the total strength of the PLA has been reduced from 2.5 million to just under 2.3 million. Further reforms will see an additional 300,000 personnel reduction from its current strength of 2.28 million personnel. The reductions will come mainly from non-combat ground forces, which will allow more funds to be diverted to naval, air, and strategic missile forces. This shows China's shift from ground force prioritisation to emphasising air and naval power with high-tech equipment for offensive roles over disputed coastal territories.[121]

In recent years, the PLA has paid close attention to the performance of US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. As well as learning from the success of the US military in network-centric warfare, joint operations, C4ISR, and hi-tech weaponry, the PLA is also studying unconventional tactics that could be used to exploit the vulnerabilities of a more technologically advanced enemy. This has been reflected in the two parallel guidelines for the PLA ground forces development. While speeding up the process of introducing new technology into the force and retiring the older equipment, the PLA has also emphasized asymmetric warfare, including exploring new methods of using existing equipment to defeat a technologically superior enemy.[citation needed]

In addition to the four main service branches, the PLA is supported by two paramilitary organizations: the People's Armed Police (including the China Coast Guard, CCG) and the Militia (including the maritime militia).[citation needed]

Ground Force (PLAGF)[edit]

A Type 99A main battle tank in service with the PLAGF

The PLA Ground Force (PLAGF) is the largest of the PLA's five services with 975,000 active duty personnel, approximately half of the PLA's total manpower of around 2 million personnel.[122] The PLAGF is organized into twelve active duty group armies sequentially numbered from the 71st Group Army to the 83rd Group Army which are distributed to each of the PRC's five theatre commands, receiving two to three group armies per command. In wartime, numerous PLAGF reserve and paramilitary units may be mobilized to augment these active group armies. The PLAGF reserve component comprises approximately 510,000 personnel divided into thirty infantry and twelve anti-aircraft artillery (AAA) divisions. The PLAGF is led by Commander Liu Zhenli and Political Commissar Qin Shutong.[123][124]

While much of the PLA Ground Force was being reduced over the past few years, technology-intensive elements such as special operations forces (SOF), army aviation, surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), and electronic warfare units have all experienced rapid expansion. The latest operational doctrine of the PLA ground forces highlights the importance of information technology, electronic and information warfare, and long-range precision strikes in future warfare. The older generation telephone/radio-based command, control, and communications (C3) systems are being replaced by an integrated battlefield information networks featuring local/wide-area networks (LAN/WAN), satellite communications, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based surveillance and reconnaissance systems, and mobile command and control centers.[125][unreliable source?]

Navy (PLAN)[edit]

A PLAN destroyer conducting maritime interdiction operations at RIMPAC 2016

Until the early 1990s, the PLA Navy (PLAN) performed a subordinate role to the PLA Ground Force (PLAGF). Since then it has undergone rapid modernisation. The 300,000 strong PLAN is organised into three major fleets: the North Sea Fleet headquartered at Qingdao, the East Sea Fleet headquartered at Ningbo, and the South Sea Fleet headquartered in Zhanjiang.[126] Each fleet consists of a number of surface ship, submarine, naval air force, coastal defence, and marine units.[127][128]

The navy includes a 25,000 strong Marine Corps (organised into seven brigades), a 26,000 strong Naval Aviation Force operating several hundred attack helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft.[129] As part of its overall programme of naval modernisation, the PLAN is in the stage of developing a blue water navy.[130] In November 2012, then Party General Secretary Hu Jintao reported to the CCP's 18th National Congress his desire to "enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resource and build China into a strong maritime power".[131] According to the United States Department of Defense, the PLAN has numerically the largest navy in the world.[132] The PLAN is led by Commander Dong Jun and Political Commissar Yuan Huazhi.[133][134]

Air Force (PLAAF)[edit]

A Chengdu J-20 5th generation stealth fighter

The 395,000 strong People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) is organised into five Theater Command Air Forces (TCAF) and 24 air divisions.[135] The largest operational units within the Aviation Corps is the air division, which has 2 to 3 aviation regiments, each with 20 to 36 aircraft. The surface-to-air missile (SAM) Corps is organised into SAM divisions and brigades. There are also three airborne divisions manned by the PLAAF. J-XX and XXJ are names applied by Western intelligence agencies to describe programs by the People's Republic of China to develop one or more fifth-generation fighter aircraft.[136][137] The PLAAF is led by Commander Chang Dingqiu and Political Commissar Guo Puxiao.[138][139]

Rocket Force (PLARF)[edit]

DF-21Ds at the 2015 Victory Parade

The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) is the main strategic missile force of the PLA and consists of at least 120,000 personnel.[140] It controls China's nuclear and conventional strategic missiles.[141] China's total nuclear arsenal size is estimated to be between 100 and 400 thermonuclear warheads. The PLARF is organised into bases sequentially numbered from 61 through 67, wherein the first six are operational and allocated to the nation's theater commands while Base 67 serves as the PRC's central nuclear weapons storage facility.[142] The PLARF is led by Command Li Yuchao and Political Commissar Xu Zhongbo.[143][144]

Strategic Support Force (PLASSF)[edit]

A space launch from the Wenchang Space Launch Site

Founded on 31 December 2015 as part of the first wave of reforms of the PLA, the People's Liberation Army Strategic Support Force (PLASSF) was established as the newest and latest branch of the PLA. Personnel numbers are estimated at 175,000.[140] Initial announcements regarding the Strategic Support Force did not provide much detail, but Yang Yujun of the Chinese Ministry of Defense described it as an integration of all current combat support forces including but limited to space, cyber, electronic and intelligence branches. Additionally, commentators have speculated that the new service branch will include high-tech operations forces such as space, cyberspace and electronic warfare operations units, independent of other branches of the military.[145]

Yin Zhuo, rear admiral of the People's Liberation Army Navy and member of the eleventh Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) said that "the major mission of the PLA Strategic Support Force is the provision of support to the combat operations so that the PLA can gain regional advantages in the aerospace, space, network and electromagnetic space warfare and ensure integrated operations in the conduction of US joint warfare style operations."[146]

Conscription and terms of service[edit]

Technically, military service with the PLA is obligatory for all Chinese citizens. In practice, mandatory military service has not been implemented since 1949 as the People's Liberation Army has been able to recruit sufficient numbers voluntarily.[147] All 18-year-old males have to register themselves with the government authorities, in a way similar to the Selective Service System of the United States. In practice, registering does not mean that the person doing so must join the People's Liberation Army.[citation needed]

Article 55 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China prescribes conscription by stating: "It is a sacred duty of every citizen of the People's Republic of China to defend his or her motherland and resist invasion. It is an honoured obligation of the citizens of the People's Republic of China to perform military service and to join the militia forces."[148] The 1984 Military Service Law spells out the legal basis of conscription, describing military service as a duty for "all citizens without distinction of race . . . and religious creed". This law has not been amended since it came into effect. Technically, those 18–22 years of age enter selective compulsory military service, with a 24-month service obligation. In reality, numbers of registering personals are enough to support all military posts in China, creating "volunteer conscription".[149][better source needed]

Residents of the Special administrative regions, Hong Kong and Macau, are exempted from joining the military.

Departments[edit]

Joint Staff Department[edit]

The Joint Staff Department carries out staff and operational functions for the PLA and had major responsibility for implementing military modernisation plans. Headed by the chief of the joint staff (formerly chief of the general staff), the department serves as the headquarters for the entire PLA and contained directorates for the five armed services: Ground Forces, Air Force, Navy, Rocket Forces and Support Forces.

The Joint Staff Department included functionally organised subdepartments for operations, training, intelligence, mobilisation, surveying, communications and politics. The departments for artillery, armoured units, quartermaster units and joint forces engineering units were later dissolved, with the former two forming now part of the Ground Forces. The engineering formations are now split amongst the service branches and the quartermaster formations today form part of the Joint Logistics Forces.

Navy Headquarters controls the North Sea Fleet, East Sea Fleet, and South Sea Fleet. Air Force Headquarters generally exercised control through the commanders of the five theater commands. Nuclear forces were directly subordinate to the Joint Staff Department through the Rocket Forces commander and political commissar. Conventional main, regional, and militia units were controlled administratively by the theater commanders, but the Joint Staff Department in Beijing could assume direct operational control of any main-force unit at will.

Thus, broadly speaking, the Joint Staff Department exercises operational control of the main forces, and the theater commanders controlled as always the regional forces and, indirectly, the militia. The post of principal intelligence official in the top leadership of the Chinese military has been taken up by several people of several generations, from Li Kenong in the 1950s to Xiong Guangkai in the late 1990s; and their public capacity has always been assistant to the deputy chief of staff or assistant to the chief of staff.

Ever since the CCP officially established the system of "theater commands" for its army in the 2010s as a successor to the "major military regions" policy of the 1950s, the intelligence agencies inside the Army have, after going through several major evolutions, developed into the present three major military intelligence setups:

  1. The central level is composed of the Second and Third Departments under the Joint Staff Headquarters and the Liaison Department under the Political Work Department.
  2. At the Theater Command level intelligence activities consist of the Second Bureau established at the same level as the Operation Department under the headquarters, and the Liaison Department established under the Political Work Department.
  3. The third system includes several communications stations directly established in the garrison areas of all the theater commands by the Third Department of the Joint Staff Headquarters.

The Second Bureau under the headquarters and the Liaison Department under the Political Work Departments of the theater commands are only subjected to the "professional leadership" of their "counterpart" units under the Central Military Commission (CMC) and are still considered the direct subordinate units of the major military region organizationally. Those entities whose names include the word "institute", all research institutes under the charge of the Second and the Third Departments of the Joint Staff Headquarters, including other research organs inside the Army, are at least of the establishment size of brigade level. Among the deputy commanders of a major Theater command in China, there is always one who is assigned to take charge of intelligence work, and the intelligence agencies under his charge are directly affiliated to the headquarters and the political department of the corresponding theater command.

The Conference on Strengthening Intelligence Work was held from 3 September 1996 – 18 September 1996 at the Xishan Command Center of the Ministry of State Security and the General Staff Department. Chi Haotian delivered a report entitled "Strengthen Intelligence Work in a New International Environment To Serve the Cause of Socialist Construction." The report emphasised the need to strengthen the following four aspects of intelligence work:

  • Efforts must be made to strengthen understanding of the special nature and role of intelligence work, as well as an understanding of the close relationship between strengthening intelligence work on the one hand, and of the Four Modernizations of the motherland, the reunification of the motherland, and opposition to hegemony and power politics on the other.
  • The United States and the West have all along been engaged in infiltration, intervention, sabotage, and intelligence gathering against China on the political, economic, military, and ideological fronts. The response must strengthen the struggle against their infiltration, intervention, sabotage, and intelligence gathering.
  • Consolidating intelligence departments and training a new generation of intelligence personnel who are politically reliable, honest and upright in their ways, and capable of mastering professional skills, the art of struggle, and advanced technologies.
  • Strengthening the work of organising intelligence in two international industrial, commercial, and financial ports—Hong Kong and Macau.

Although the four aspects emphasised by Chi Haotian appeared to be defensive measures, they were both defensive and offensive in nature.

Second Department[edit]

The Second Department of the Joint Staff Headquarters is responsible for collecting military intelligence. Activities include military attachés at Chinese embassies abroad, clandestine special agents sent to foreign countries to collect military information, and the analysis of information publicly published in foreign countries. This section of the PLA Joint Staff Headquarters act in a similar capacity to its civilian counterpart the Ministry of State Security.

The Second Department oversees military human intelligence (HUMINT) collection, widely exploits open source (OSINT) materials, fuses HUMINT, signals intelligence (SIGINT), and imagery intelligence data, and disseminates finished intelligence products to the CMC and other consumers. Preliminary fusion is carried out by the Second Department's Analysis Bureau which mans the National Watch Center, the focal point for national-level indications and warning. In-depth analysis is carried out by regional bureaus. Although traditionally the Second Department of the Joint Staff Department was responsible for military intelligence, it is beginning to increasingly focus on scientific and technological intelligence in the military field, following the example of Russian agencies in stepping up the work of collecting scientific and technological information.

The research institute under the Second Department of the Joint Staff Headquarters is publicly known as the Institute for International Strategic Studies; its internal classified publication "Foreign Military Trends" (Chinese: 外军动态, Wai Jun Dongtai) is published every 10 days and transmitted to units at the division level.

The PLA Institute of International Relations at Nanjing comes under the Second Department of the Joint Staff Department and is responsible for training military attachés, assistant military attachés and associate military attachés as well as secret agents to be posted abroad. It also supplies officers to the military intelligence sections of various military regions and group armies. The institute was formed from the PLA "793" Foreign Language Institute, which moved from Zhangjiakou after the Cultural Revolution and split into two institutions at Luoyang and Nanjing.

The Institute of International Relations was known in the 1950s as the School for Foreign Language Cadres of the Central Military Commission (CMC), with the current name being used since 1964. The training of intelligence personnel is one of several activities at the institute. While all graduates of the Moscow Institute of International Relations were employed by the KGB, only some graduates of the Beijing Institute of International Relations are employed by the Ministry of State Security.

The former Institute of International Relations, since being renamed the Foreign Affairs College, is under the administration of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and is not involved in secret intelligence work. The former Central Military Commission (CMC) foreign language school had foreign faculty members who were either CCP sympathizers or were members of foreign communist parties. But the present Institute of International Relations does not hire foreign teachers, to avoid the danger that its students might be recognised when sent abroad as clandestine agents.

Those engaged in professional work in military academies under the Second Department of the Joint Staff Headquarters usually have a chance to go abroad, either for advanced studies or as military officers working in the military attaché's office of Chinese embassies in foreign countries. People working in the military attaché's office of embassies are usually engaged in collecting military information under the cover of "military diplomacy". As long as they refrain from directly subversive activities, they are considered as well-behaved "military diplomats".

Some bureaus under the Second Department are responsible for espionage in different regions, of which the First Bureau is responsible for collecting information in the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, and also in Taiwan. Agents are dispatched by the Second Department to companies and other local corporations to gain cover.

The "Autumn Orchid" intelligence group assigned to Hong Kong and Macau in the mid-1980s mostly operated in the mass media, political, industrial, commercial, and religious circles, as well as in universities and colleges. The "Autumn Orchid" intelligence group was mainly responsible for the following three tasks:

  • Finding out and keeping abreast of the political leanings of officials of the Hong Kong and Macau governments, as well as their views on major issues, through social contact with them and information provided by them.
  • Keeping abreast of the developments of foreign governments' political organs in Hong Kong, as well as of foreign financial, industrial, and commercial organisations.
  • Finding out and having a good grasp of the local media's sources of information on political, military, economic, and other developments on the mainland, and deliberately releasing false political or military information to the media to test the outside response.

The "Autumn Orchid" intelligence group was awarded a Citation for Merit, Second Class, in December 1994. It was further awarded another Citation for Merit, Second Class, in 1997. Its current status is not publicly known. During the 2008 Chinese New Year celebration CCTV held for Chinese diplomatic establishments, the head of the Second Department of the Joint Headquarters was revealed for the first time to the public: the current head was Major General Yang Hui (Chinese: 杨晖).

Third Department[edit]

The Third Department of the Joint Staff Department is responsible for monitoring the telecommunications of foreign armies and producing finished intelligence based on the military information collected.

The communications stations established by the Third Department of the Joint Staff Headquarters are not subject to the jurisdiction of the provincial military district and the major theater command of where they are based. The communications stations are entirely the agencies of the Third Department of the Joint Staff Headquarters which have no affiliations to the provincial military district and the military region of where they are based. The personnel composition, budgets, and establishment of these communications stations are entirely under the jurisdiction of the Third Department of the General PLA General Staff Headquarters and are not related at all with local troops.

China maintains the most extensive SIGINT network of all the countries in the Asia-Pacific region. As of the late 1990s, SIGINT systems included several dozen ground stations, half a dozen ships, truck-mounted systems, and airborne systems. Third Department headquarters is in the vicinity of the GSD First Department (Operations Department), AMS, and NDU complex in the hills northwest of the Summer Palace. As of the late 1990s, the Third Department was allegedly manned by approximately 20,000 personnel, with most of their linguists trained at the Luoyang Institute of Foreign Languages.

Ever since the 1950s, the Second and Third Departments of the Joint Staff Headquarters have established several institutions of secondary and higher learning for bringing up "special talents". The PLA Foreign Language Institute at Luoyang comes under the Third Department of the Joint Staff Department and is responsible for training foreign language officers for the monitoring of foreign military intelligence. The institute was formed from the PLA "793" Foreign Language Institute, which moved from Zhangjiakou after the Cultural Revolution and split into two institutions at Luoyang and Nanjing.

Though the distribution order they received upon graduation indicated the "Joint Staff Headquarters", many of the graduates of these schools found themselves being sent to all parts of the country, including remote and uninhabited backward mountain areas. The reason is that the monitoring and control stations under the Third Department of the PLA General Staff Headquarters are scattered in every corner of the country.

The communications stations located in the Shenzhen base of the PLA Hong Kong Garrison started their work long ago. In normal times, these two communications stations report directly to the Central Military Commission (CMC) and the Joint Staff Headquarters. Units responsible for coordination are the communications stations established in the garrison provinces of the military regions by the Third Department of the PLA General Staff Headquarters.

By taking direct command of military communications stations based in all parts of the country, the CCP Central Military Commission (CMC) and the Joint Staff Headquarters can not only ensure a successful interception of enemy radio communications, but can also make sure that none of the wire or wireless communications and contacts among major military regions can escape the detection of these communications stations, thus effectively attaining the goal of imposing direct supervision and control over all the theater commands, all provincial military districts, and all group armies.

Monitoring stations[edit]

China's main SIGINT effort is in the Third Department of the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission (CMC), with additional capabilities, primarily domestic, in the Ministry of State Security (MSS). SIGINT stations, therefore, are scattered through the country, for domestic as well as international interception. Prof. Desmond Ball, of the Australian National University, described the largest stations as the main Technical Department SIGINT net control station on the northwest outskirts of Beijing, and the large complex near Lake Kinghathu in the extreme northeast corner of China.

As opposed to other major powers, China focuses its SIGINT activities on its region rather than the world. Ball wrote, in the eighties, that China had several dozen SIGINT stations aimed at the Soviet Union, Japan, Taiwan, Southeast Asia and India, as well as internally. Of the stations apparently targeting Russia, there are sites at Jilemutu and Jixi in the northeast, and at Erlian and Hami near the Mongolian border. Two Russian-facing sites in Xinjiang, at Qitai and Korla may be operated jointly with resources from the US CIA's Office of SIGINT Operations, probably focused on missile and space activity.

Other stations aimed at South and Southeast Asia are on a net controlled by Chengdu, Sichuan. There is a large facility at Dayi, and, according to Ball, "numerous" small posts along the Indian border. Other significant facilities are located near Shenyang, near Jinan and in Nanjing and Shanghai. Additional stations are in the Fujian and Guangdong military districts opposite Taiwan.

On Hainan Island, there is a naval SIGINT facility that monitors the South China sea, and a ground station targeting US and Russian satellites. China also has ship and aircraft platforms in this area, under the South Sea Fleet headquarters at Zhanjiang immediately north of the island. Targeting here seems to have an ELINT as well as COMINT flavor. There are also truck-mounted mobile ground systems, as well as ship, aircraft, and limited satellite capability. There are at least 10 intelligence-gathering auxiliary vessels.

As of the late nineties, the Chinese did not appear to be trying to monitor the United States Pacific Command to the same extent as does Russia. In future, this had depended, in part, on the status of Taiwan.

Fourth Department[edit]

The Fourth Department (ECM and Radar) of the Joint Staff Headquarters Department has the electronic intelligence (ELINT) portfolio within the PLA's SIGINT apparatus. This department is responsible for electronic countermeasures, requiring them to collect and maintain databases on electronic signals. 25 ELINT receivers are the responsibility of the Southwest Institute of Electronic Equipment (SWIEE). Among the wide range of SWIEE ELINT products is a new KZ900 airborne ELINT pod. The GSD 54th Research Institute supports the ECM Department in the development of digital ELINT signal processors to analyze parameters of radar pulses.

Special forces[edit]

A PLA Navy Special Operations Forces marine during a maritime operations exercise in RIMPAC 2014.

China's special ground force is called PLASF (People's Liberation Army Special Operations Forces). Typical units include consist of highly trained soldiers, a team commander, assistant commander, sniper, spotter, machine-gun support, bomber, and a pair of assault groups.[citation needed] China's counter-terrorism unit members are drawn from the public security apparatus rather than the military. The name of such units change frequently. As of 2020, it is known as the Immediate Action Unit (IAU).[150]

China has reportedly developed a force capable of carrying out long-range airborne operations, long-range reconnaissance, and amphibious operations. Formed in China's Guangzhou military region and known by the nickname "South Blade", the force supposedly receives army, air force, and naval training, including flight training, and is equipped with "hundreds of high-tech devices", including global-positioning satellite systems. All force members officers are military staff college graduates, and 60 percent are said to have university degrees.

Soldiers are reported to be cross-trained in various specialties, and training encompassing a wide range of operating environments. It is far from clear whether this unit is considered operational by the Chinese. It is also not clear how such a force would be employed. Among the missions stated missions include: "responding to contingencies in various regions" and "cooperating with other services in attacks on islands".

According to the limited reporting, the organisation appears to be in a phase of testing and development and may constitute an experimental unit. While no size for the force has been revealed, there have been Chinese media claims that "over 4,000 soldiers of the force are all-weather and versatile fighters and parachutists who can fly airplanes and drive terrain vehicles and amphibious boats".[citation needed]

Other branches[edit]

  • The Third Department and the Navy co-operate on shipborne intelligence collection platforms.
  • PLAAF Sixth Research Institute: Air Force SIGINT collection is managed by the PLAAF Sixth Research Institute in Beijing.

Weapons and equipment[edit]

According to the United States Department of Defense, China is developing kinetic-energy weapons, high-powered lasers, high-powered microwave weapons, particle-beam weapons, and electromagnetic pulse weapons with its increase of military fundings.[151]

The PLA has said of reports that its modernisation is dependent on sales of advanced technology from American allies, senior leadership have stated "Some have politicized China's normal commercial cooperation with foreign countries, damaging our reputation." These contributions include advanced European diesel engines for Chinese warships, military helicopter designs from Eurocopter, French anti-submarine sonars and helicopters,[152] Australian technology for the Houbei class missile boat,[153] and Israeli supplied American missile, laser and aircraft technology.[154]

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's data, China became the world's third largest exporter of major arms in 2010–14, an increase of 143 percent from the period 2005–2009.[155] SIPRI also calculated that China surpassed Russia to become the world's second largest arms exporter by 2020.[156]

China's share of global arms exports hence increased from 3 to 5 percent. China supplied major arms to 35 states in 2010–14. A significant percentage (just over 68 percent) of Chinese exports went to three countries: Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar. China also exported major arms to 18 African states. Examples of China's increasing global presence as an arms supplier in 2010–14 included deals with Venezuela for armoured vehicles and transport and trainer aircraft, with Algeria for three frigates, with Indonesia for the supply of hundreds of anti-ship missiles and with Nigeria for the supply of several unmanned combat aerial vehicles.[157]

Following rapid advances in its arms industry, China has become less dependent on arms imports, which decreased by 42 percent between 2005–2009 and 2010–14. Russia accounted for 61 percent of Chinese arms imports, followed by France with 16 percent and Ukraine with 13 per cent. Helicopters formed a major part of Russian and French deliveries, with the French designs produced under licence in China.[157]

Over the years, China has struggled to design and produce effective engines for combat and transport vehicles. It continued to import large numbers of engines from Russia and Ukraine in 2010–14 for indigenously designed combat, advanced trainer and transport aircraft, and naval ships. It also produced British-, French- and German-designed engines for combat aircraft, naval ships and armoured vehicles, mostly as part of agreements that have been in place for decades.[157]

In August 2021, China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile that circled the globe before speeding towards its target.[158] The Financial Times reported that "the test showed that China had made astounding progress on hypersonic weapons and was far more advanced than U.S. officials realized."[159] During the Exercise Zapad-81 in 2021 with Russian forces, most of the gear were novel Chinese arms such as the KJ-500 airborne early warning and control aircraft, J-20 and J-16 fighters, Y-20 transport planes, and surveillance and combat drones.[160] Another joint forces exercise took place in August 2023 near Alaska.[161]

Cyberwarfare[edit]

There is a belief in the Western military doctrines that the PLA have already begun engaging countries using cyber-warfare.[162] There has been a significant increase in the number of presumed Chinese military initiated cyber events from 1999 to the present day.[163]

Cyberwarfare has gained recognition as a valuable technique because it is an asymmetric technique that is a part of information operations and information warfare. As is written by two PLAGF Colonels, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui in the book Unrestricted Warfare, "Methods that are not characterized by the use of the force of arms, nor by the use of military power, nor even by the presence of casualties and bloodshed, are just as likely to facilitate the successful realization of the war's goals, if not more so.[164]

While China has long been suspected of cyber spying, on 24 May 2011 the PLA announced the existence of having 'cyber capabilities'.[165]

In February 2013, the media named "Comment Crew" as a hacker military faction for China's People's Liberation Army.[166] In May 2014, a Federal Grand Jury in the United States indicted five Unit 61398 officers on criminal charges related to cyber attacks on private companies based in the United States after alleged investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation who exposed their identities in collaboration with US intelligence agencies such as the CIA.[167][168]

In February 2020, the United States government indicted members of China's People's Liberation Army for the 2017 Equifax data breach, which involved hacking into Equifax and plundering sensitive data as part of a massive heist that also included stealing trade secrets, though the CCP denied these claims.[169][170]

Nuclear capabilities[edit]

The range of the PLA Rocket Force's medium and intercontinental ballistic missiles (2006)

In 1955, China decided to proceed with a nuclear weapons program. The decision was made after the United States threatened the use of nuclear weapons against China should it take action against Quemoy and Matsu, coupled with the lack of interest of the Soviet Union for using its nuclear weapons in defense of China.[citation needed]

After their first nuclear test (China claims minimal Soviet assistance before 1960) on 16 October 1964, China was the first state to pledge no-first-use of nuclear weapons. On 1 July 1966, the Second Artillery Corps, as named by Premier Zhou Enlai, was formed. In 1967, China tested a fully functional hydrogen bomb, only 32 months after China had made its first fission device. China thus produced the shortest fission-to-fusion development known in history.

China became a major international arms exporter during the 1980s. Beijing joined the Middle East arms control talks, which began in July 1991 to establish global guidelines for conventional arms transfers, and later announced that it would no longer participate because of the US decision to sell 150 F-16A/B aircraft to Taiwan on 2 September 1992.

It joined the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1984 and pledged to abstain from further atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons in 1986. China acceded to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1992 and supported its indefinite and unconditional extension in 1995. Nuclear weapons tests by China ceased in 1996, when it signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and agreed to seek an international ban on the production of fissile nuclear weapons material.

In 1996, China committed[clarification needed] to assisting unsafeguarded nuclear facilities.[citation needed] China attended the May 1997 meeting of the NPT Exporters (Zangger) Committee as an observer and became a full member in October 1997. The Zangger Committee is a group that meets to list items that should be subject to IAEA inspections if exported by countries, which have, as China has signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty. In September 1997, China issued detailed nuclear export control regulations.

China began implementing regulations[which?] establishing controls over nuclear-related dual-use items in 1998.[citation needed] China also has decided not to engage in new nuclear cooperation with Iran (even under safeguards) and will complete existing cooperation, which is not of proliferation concern, within a relatively short period. Based on significant, tangible progress with China on nuclear nonproliferation, President Clinton in 1998 took steps to bring into force the 1985 US-China Agreement on Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation.[citation needed]

Beijing has deployed a modest ballistic missile force, including land and sea-based intermediate-range and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). It was estimated in 2007 that China has about 100–160 liquid-fuelled ICBMs capable of striking the United States with approximately 100–150 IRBMs able to strike Russia or Eastern Europe, as well as several hundred tactical SRBMs with ranges between 300 and 600 km.[171] Currently, the Chinese nuclear stockpile is estimated to be between 50 and 75 land and sea based ICBMs.[172]

China's nuclear program has historically followed a doctrine of minimal deterrence, which involves having the minimum force needed to deter an aggressor from launching a first strike. The current efforts of China appear to be aimed at maintaining a survivable nuclear force by, for example, using solid-fuelled ICBMs in silos rather than liquid-fuelled missiles. China's 2006 published deterrence policy states that they will "uphold the principles of counterattack in self-defense and limited development of nuclear weapons", but "has never entered, and will never enter into a nuclear arms race with any country". It goes on to describe that China will never undertake a first strike, or use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state or zone.[171]

In 2007, however, the United States' Department of Defense suggested that the Chinese position may be ambiguous, and nuclear weapons may be used both to deter conventional strikes/invasions on the Chinese mainland or as an international political tool – limiting the extent to which other nations can coerce China politically, an inherent, often inadvertent phenomenon in international relations as regards any state with nuclear capabilities.[171]

Space[edit]

Having witnessed the crucial role of space to United States military success in the Gulf War, China continues to view space as a critical domain in both conflict and international strategic competition.[173][174] The PLA operates a various satellite constellations performing reconnaissance, navigation, communication, and counterspace functions.[175][176][177][178]

Significant components of the PLA's space-based reconnaissance include Jianbing (vanguard) satellites with cover names Yaogan (遥感; 'remote sensing') and Gaofen (高分; 'high resolution').[175][179][180] These satellites collect electro-optical (EO) imagery to collect a literal representation of a target, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery to penetrate the cloudy climates of southern China,[181] and electronic intelligence (ELINT) to provide targeting intelligence on adversarial ships.[182][183] The PLA also leverages a restricted, high-performance service of the country's BeiDou positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) satellites for its forces and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platforms.[184][185] For secure communications, the PLA uses the Zhongxing and Fenghuo series of satellites which enable secure data and voice transmission over C-band, Ku-band, and UHF.[177] PLA deployment of anti-satellite and counterspace satellites including those of the Shijian and Shiyan series have also brought significant concern from western nations.[186][187][188]

The PLA also plays a significant role in the Chinese space program.[173] To date, all the participants have been selected from members of the PLA Air Force.[173] China became the third country in the world to have sent a man into space by its own means with the flight of Yang Liwei aboard the Shenzhou 5 spacecraft on 15 October 2003,[189] the flight of Fei Junlong and Nie Haisheng aboard Shenzhou 6 on 12 October 2005,[190] and Zhai Zhigang, Liu Boming, and Jing Haipeng aboard Shenzhou 7 on 25 September 2008.[191]

The PLA started the development of an anti-ballistic and anti-satellite system in the 1960s, code named Project 640, including ground-based lasers and anti-satellite missiles.[192] On 11 January 2007, China conducted a successful test of an anti-satellite missile, with an SC-19 class KKV.[193]

The PLA has tested two types of hypersonic space vehicles, the Shenglong Spaceplane and a new one built by Chengdu Aircraft Corporation. Only a few pictures have appeared since it was revealed in late 2007. Earlier, images of the High-enthalpy Shock Waves Laboratory wind tunnel of the CAS Key Laboratory of high-temperature gas dynamics (LHD) were published in the Chinese media. Tests with speeds up to Mach 20 were reached around 2001.[194][195]

Budget and expenditure[edit]

Official budget
Publication
date
Value
(billions of US$)
March 2000 14.6[citation needed]
March 2001 17.0[citation needed]
March 2002 20.0[citation needed]
March 2003 22.0[citation needed]
March 2004 24.6[citation needed]
March 2005 29.9[citation needed]
March 2006 35.0[citation needed]
March 2007 44.9[citation needed]
March 2008 58.8[196]
March 2009 70.0[citation needed]
March 2010 76.5[197]
March 2011 90.2[197]
March 2012 103.1[197]
March 2013 116.2[197]
March 2014 131.2[197]
March 2015 142.4[197]
March 2016 143.7[197]
March 2017 151.4[197]
March 2018 165.5[198]
March 2019 177.6[199]
May 2020 183.5[200]
March 2021 209.4[201]
March 2022 229.4[202]

Military spending for the People's Liberation Army has grown about 10 percent annually over the last 15 years.[203] The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimated China's military expenditure for 2013 to US$188.5bn.[204] China's military budget for 2014 according to Janes Information Services, a defense industry consulting and analysis company, will be US$148bn,[205] which is the second largest in the world. The United States military budget for 2014 in comparison, is US$574.9bn,[206] which is down from a high of US$664.3bn in 2012.

According to SIPRI, China became the world's third-largest exporter of major arms in 2010–2014, an increase of 143 per cent from the period 2005–2009. China supplied major arms to 35 states in 2010–2014. A significant percentage (just over 68 per cent) of Chinese exports went to three countries: Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. China also exported major arms to 18 African states. Examples of China's increasing global presence as an arms supplier in 2010–2014 included deals with Venezuela for armored vehicles and transport and trainer aircraft, with Algeria for three frigates, with Indonesia for the supply of hundreds of anti-ship missiles and with Nigeria for the supply of several unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Following rapid advances in its domestic arms industry, China has become less dependent on arms imports, which decreased by 42 per cent between 2005–2009 and 2010–2014.[157]

China's rise in military spending come at a time when there are tensions along the South China Sea with territorial disputes involving the Philippines, Vietnam, and Taiwan, as well as escalating tensions between China and Japan involving the disputed Senkaku Islands. Former-United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has urged China to be more transparent about its military capabilities and intentions.[207][208] The years 2018 and 2019 both saw significant budget increases as well. China announced 2018's budget as 1.11 trillion yuan (US$165.5bn), an 8.1% increase on 2017, and 2019's budget as 1.19 trillion yuan (US$177.61bn), an increase of 7.5 per cent on 2018.[209][210]

Budget figures are published on the website of the State Council via a document named 'Central and Local Budgets' followed by the preceding year of the publication.

A pie chart showing global military expenditures by country for 2019, in US$ billions, according to SIPRI

Commercial activities[edit]

PLA Factory No. 6907, Wuhan. The white characters on the blue sign roughly translate to: "Secret/Classified Area, Do Not Enter Unless Invited."

Historical[edit]

Until the mid-1990s the PLA had extensive commercial enterprise holdings in non-military areas, particularly real estate. Almost all of these holdings were supposedly spun off in the mid-1990s. In most cases, the management of the companies remained unchanged, with the PLA officers running the companies simply retiring from the PLA to run the newly formed private holding companies.[211]

The history of PLA involvement in commercial enterprises began in the 1950s and 1960s.[citation needed] Because of the socialist state-owned system and from a desire for military self-sufficiency, the PLA created a network of enterprises such as farms, guest houses, and factories intended to financially support its own needs. One unintended side effect of the Deng-era economic reforms was that many of these enterprises became very profitable.[citation needed]

For example, a military guest house intended for soldier recreation could be easily converted into a profitable hotel for civilian use. Two main factors increased PLA commercial involvement in the 1990s. One was that running profitable companies decreased the need for the state to fund the military from the government budget. The second was that in an environment where legal rules were unclear and political connections were important, PLA influence was very useful.[citation needed]

By the early 1990s party officials and high military officials were becoming increasingly alarmed at the military's commercial involvement for several reasons. The military's involvement in commerce was seen to adversely affect military readiness and spread corruption. Further, there was great concern that having an independent source of funding would lead to decreased loyalty to the CCP. The result of this was an effort to spin off the PLA's commercial enterprises into private companies managed by former PLA officers, and to reform military procurement from a system in which the PLA directly controls its sources of supply to a contracting system more akin to those of Western countries. The separation of the PLA from its commercial interests was largely complete by 2000. It was met with very little resistance, as the spinoff was arranged in such a way that few lost out.[211]

Anthem[edit]

The Central Military Band of the People's Liberation Army of China at the Great Hall of the People. The band is a common performer of the military anthem of the PLA at ceremonial protocol events.

The military anthem of the PLA is the Military Anthem of the People's Liberation Army (simplified Chinese: 中国人民解放军军歌; traditional Chinese: 中國人民解放軍軍歌; pinyin: Zhōngguó Rénmín Jiěfàngjūn Jūngē) (Chinese People's Liberation Army Song). The Central Military Commission (CMC) adopted the song as the official anthem on 25 July 1988.[212] The lyrics of the anthem were written by composer Gong Mu (real name: Zhang Yongnian; Chinese: 张永年) and the music was composed by Korea born Chinese composer Zheng Lücheng.[213][214]

Flag and insignia[edit]


The PLA's insignia consists of a roundel with a red star bearing the two Chinese characters "八一"(literally "eight-one"), referring to the Nanchang uprising which began on 1 August 1927 (first day of the eighth month) and symbolic as the CCP's founding of the PLA.[215] The inclusion of the two characters ("八一") is symbolic of the party's revolutionary history carrying strong emotional connotations of the political power which it shed blood to obtain. The flag of the Chinese People's Liberation Army is the war flag of the People's Liberation Army; the layout of the flag has a golden star at the top left corner and "八一" to the right of the star, placed on a red field. Each service branch also has its flags: The top ​58 of the flags is the same as the PLA flag; the bottom ​38 are occupied by the colors of the branches.[216]

The flag of the Ground Forces has a forest green bar at the bottom. The naval ensign has stripes of blue and white at the bottom. The Air Force uses a sky blue bar. The Rocket Force uses a yellow bar at the bottom. The forest green represents the earth, the blue and white stripes represent the seas, the sky blue represents the air and the yellow represents the flare of missile launching.[217][218]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. "【延安记忆】"中国人民解放军"称谓由此开始". 1 August 2020. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  2. "1947年10月10日,《中国人民解放军宣言》发布". 中国军网. 10 October 2017. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  3. "中国共产党领导的红军改编为八路军的背景和改编情况 – 太行英雄网". Archived from the original on 7 January 2022. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  4. "解放軍地位高 農夫搶當兵 | 全球中央". Archived from the original on 3 February 2017.
  5. 5.0 5.1 The International Institute for Strategic Studies 2022, p. 255.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Tian, Nan; Fleurant, Aude; Kuimova, Alexandra; Wezeman, Pieter D.; Wezeman, Siemon T. (24 April 2022). "Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2021" (PDF). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Archived from the original on 25 April 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
  7. Xue, Maryann (4 July 2021). "China's arms trade: which countries does it buy from and sell to?". South China Morning Post.
  8. 8.0 8.1 "TIV of arms imports/exports from China, 2010-2021". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 7 February 2022.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Benton, Gregor (1999). New Fourth Army: Communist Resistance Along the Yangtze and the Huai, 1938-1941. University of California Press. p. 396. ISBN 978-0-520-21992-2.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Fravel, M. Taylor (23 April 2019). Active Defense: China's Military Strategy since 1949. Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv941tzj. ISBN 978-0-691-18559-0. JSTOR j.ctv941tzj. S2CID 159282413.
  11. "第十三届全国人民代表大会代表名额分配方案" [Allocation Plan for Deputies to the Thirteenth National People's Congress]. National People's Congress (in 中文). 27 April 2017. Archived from the original on 26 June 2017.
  12. "Xi Jinping Has a New Title: Commander-in-Chief of the People's Liberation Army". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
  13. "Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2022" (PDF). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. April 2023. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  14. International Institute for Strategic Studies (15 February 2020). The Military Balance 2020. London, England: Routledge. p. 259. ISBN 9780367466398.
  15. "Global military spending remains high at $1.7 trillion". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2 May 2018. Archived from the original on 27 May 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2018.
  16. "The PLA Navy's New Historic Missions: Expanding Capabilities for a Re-emergent Maritime Power" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
  17. Carter, James (4 August 2021). "The Nanchang Uprising and the birth of the PLA". The China Project.
  18. "History of the PLA's Ground Force Organisational Structure and Military Regions". Royal United Services Institute. 17 June 2004.
  19. Bianco, Lucien (1971). Origins of the Chinese Revolution, 1915-1949. Stanford University Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-8047-0827-2.
  20. Zedong, Mao (2 November 2017). On Guerilla Warfare: Mao Tse-Tung On Guerilla Warfare. Martino Fine Books. ISBN 978-1-68422-164-6.
  21. "The Chinese Revolution of 1949". United States Department of State, Office of the Historian.
  22. Ken Allen, Chapter 9, "PLA Air Force Organization" Archived 2007-09-29 at the Wayback Machine, The PLA as Organization, ed. James C. Mulvenon and Andrew N.D. Yang (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002), 349.
  23. "中国人民解放军海军成立70周年多国海军活动新闻发布会在青岛举行". mod.gov.cn (in 中文). Ministry of National Defence of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 Russo, Alessandro (2020). Cultural Revolution and revolutionary culture. Durham: Duke University Press. pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-4780-1218-4. OCLC 1156439609.
  25. "China's People's Liberation Army, the world's second largest conventional..." UPI. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  26. Pamphlet number 30-51, Handbook on the Chinese Communist Army (PDF), Department of the Army, 7 December 1960, archived from the original (PDF) on 29 April 2011, retrieved 1 April 2011
  27. 27.0 27.1 Stewart, Richard (11 November 2015). The Korean War: The Chinese Intervention. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 978-1-5192-3611-1.
  28. Cliff, Roger; Fei, John; Hagen, Jeff; Hague, Elizabeth; Heginbotham, Eric; Stillion, John (2011), "The Evolution of Chinese Air Force Doctrine", Shaking the Heavens and Splitting the Earth, Chinese Air Force Employment Concepts in the 21st Century, RAND Corporation, pp. 33–46, ISBN 978-0-8330-4932-2, JSTOR 10.7249/mg915af.10
  29. Hoffman, Steven A. (1990). India and the China Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 101–104. ISBN 978-0-520-30172-6. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  30. Van Tronder, Gerry (2018). Sino-Indian War: Border Clash: October–November 1962. Pen and Sword Military. ISBN 978-1-5267-2838-8. Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  31. Brahma Chellaney (2006). Asian Juggernaut: The Rise of China, India, and Japan. HarperCollins. p. 195. ISBN 9788172236502. Indeed, Beijing's acknowledgement of Indian control over Sikkim seems limited to the purpose of facilitating trade through the vertiginous Nathu-la Pass, the scene of bloody artillery duels in September 1967 when Indian troops beat back attacking Chinese forces.
  32. Van Praagh, David (2003). Greater Game: India's Race with Destiny and China. McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP. p. 301. ISBN 9780773525887. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 6 August 2021. (Indian) jawans trained and equipped for high-altitude combat used US provided artillery, deployed on higher ground than that of their adversaries, to decisive tactical advantage at Nathu La and Cho La near the Sikkim-Tibet border.
  33. Hoontrakul, Ponesak (2014), "Asia's Evolving Economic Dynamism and Political Pressures", in P. Hoontrakul; C. Balding; R. Marwah (eds.), The Global Rise of Asian Transformation: Trends and Developments in Economic Growth Dynamics, Palgrave Macmillan US, p. 37, ISBN 978-1-137-41236-2, archived from the original on 25 December 2018, retrieved 6 August 2021, Cho La incident (1967) - Victorious: India / Defeated : China
  34. 34.0 34.1 Li, Xiaobing (2007). A History of the Modern Chinese Army. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-2438-4. JSTOR j.ctt2jcq4k.
  35. "China's People's Liberation Army, the world's second largest conventional..." UPI. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  36. Ebrey, Patricia Buckley. "Four Modernizations Era". A Visual Sourcebook of Chinese Civilization. University of Washington. Archived from the original on 7 October 2010. Retrieved 20 October 2012.
  37. 人民日报 (31 January 1963). 在上海举行的科学技术工作会议上周恩来阐述科学技术现代化的重大意义 [Science and Technology in Shanghai at the conference on Zhou Enlai explained the significance of modern science and technology]. People's Daily (in 中文). Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. p. 1. Archived from the original on 14 February 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2011.
  38. Mason, David (1984). "China's Four Modernizations: Blueprint for Development or Prelude to Turmoil?". Asian Affairs. 11 (3): 47–70. doi:10.1080/00927678.1984.10553699. ISSN 0092-7678. JSTOR 30171968.
  39. Vincent, Travils (9 February 2022). "Why Won't Vietnam Teach the History of the Sino-Vietnamese War?". The Diplomat.
  40. Fravel, M. Taylor (2007). "Power Shifts and Escalation: Explaining China's Use of Force in Territorial Disputes". International Security. 32 (3): 44–83. doi:10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.44. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 30130518. S2CID 57559936.
  41. China and Afghanistan, Gerald Segal, Asian Survey, Vol. 21, No. 11 (Nov., 1981), University of California Press
  42. "中华人民共和国外交部".
  43. 43.0 43.1 Hilali, A.Z (September 2001). "China's response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan". Central Asian Survey. 20 (3): 323–351. doi:10.1080/02634930120095349. ISSN 0263-4937. S2CID 143657643.
  44. S. Frederick Starri (2004). S. Frederick Starr (ed.). Xinjiang: China's Muslim Borderland (illustrated ed.). M.E. Sharpe. p. 157. ISBN 0765613182. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
  45. Szczudlik-Tatar, Justyna (October 2014). "China's Evolving Stance on Afghanistan: Towards More Robust Diplomacy with "Chinese Characteristics"" (PDF). Strategic File. Polish Institute of International Affairs. 58 (22).
  46. Galster, Steve (9 October 2001). "Volume II: Afghanistan: Lessons from the Last War". National Security Archive, George Washington University.
  47. S. Frederick Starr (2004). S. Frederick Starr (ed.). Xinjiang: China's Muslim Borderland (illustrated ed.). M.E. Sharpe. p. 158. ISBN 0765613182. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
  48. Godwin, Paul H. B. (18 June 2019). The Chinese Defense Establishment: Continuity And Change In The 1980s. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-31540-0.
  49. Zissis, Carin (5 December 2006). "Modernizing the People's Liberation Army of China". Council on Foreign Relations.
  50. "PLA's "Absolute Loyalty" to the Party in Doubt". The Jamestown Foundation. 30 April 2009.
  51. "Xi Jinping insists on PLA's absolute loyalty to Communist Party". The Economic Times. 20 August 2018.
  52. Chan, Minnie (23 September 2022). "China's military told to 'resolutely do what the party asks it to do'". South China Morning Post.
  53. "The PLA's business interests: A long-term source of extra revenue". Strategic Comments. 3 (10): 1–2. December 1997. doi:10.1080/1356788973104. ISSN 1356-7888.
  54. Bickford, Thomas J. (1994). "The Chinese Military and Its Business Operations: The PLA as Entrepreneur". Asian Survey. 34 (5): 460–474. doi:10.2307/2645058. ISSN 0004-4687. JSTOR 2645058.
  55. 55.0 55.1 55.2 The Political System of the People's Republic of China. Chief Editor Pu Xingzu, Shanghai, 2005, Shanghai People's Publishing House. ISBN 7-208-05566-1, Chapter 11 The State Military System.
  56. News of the Communist Party of China, Hyperlink Archived 13 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 28 March 2007.
  57. Farley, Robert (1 September 2021). "China Has Not Forgotten the Lessons of the Gulf War". National Interest.
  58. Scobell, Andrew (2011). Chinese Lessons from Other Peoples' Wars (PDF). Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. ISBN 978-1-58487-511-6.
  59. Sasaki, Tomonori (23 September 2010). "China Eyes the Japanese Military: China's Threat Perception of Japan since the 1980s*". The China Quarterly. 203: 560–580. doi:10.1017/S0305741010000597. ISSN 1468-2648. S2CID 153828298.
  60. Sakaguchi, Yoshiaki; Mayama, Katsuhiko (1999). "Significance of the War in Kosovo for China and Russia" (PDF). NIDS Security Reports (3): 1–23.
  61. Sun, Yun (8 April 2020). "China's Strategic Assessment of Afghanistan". War on the Rocks.
  62. 62.0 62.1 Chase, Michael S. (19 September 2007). "China's Assessment of the War in Iraq: America's "Deepest Quagmire" and the Implications for Chinese National Security". China Brief. The Jamestown Foundation. 7 (17).
  63. 63.0 63.1 JI, YOU (1999). "The Revolution in Military Affairs and the Evolution of China's Strategic Thinking". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 21 (3): 344–364. doi:10.1355/CS21-3B. ISSN 0129-797X. JSTOR 25798464.
  64. Wortzel, Larry M. (2007). "The Chinese People's Liberation Army and Space Warfare". American Enterprise Institute. JSTOR resrep03013. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  65. Hjortdal, Magnus (2011). "China's Use of Cyber Warfare: Espionage Meets Strategic Deterrence". Journal of Strategic Security. 4 (2): 1–24. doi:10.5038/1944-0472.4.2.1. ISSN 1944-0464. JSTOR 26463924. S2CID 145083379.
  66. Jinghua, Lyu. "What Are China's Cyber Capabilities and Intentions?". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  67. Osborn, Kris (21 March 2022). "China Modernizes Its Russian-Built Destroyers With New Weapons". The National Interest. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  68. Gao, Charlie (1 January 2021). "How China Got Their Own Russian-Made Su-27 "Flanker" Jets". The National Interest. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  69. Kadam, Tanmay (26 September 2022). "2 Russian Su-30 Fighters, The Backbone Of Indian & Chinese Air Force, Knocked Out By Ukraine - Kiev Claims". The Eurasian Times. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  70. Larson, Caleb (11 May 2021). "China's Deadly Kilo-Class Submarines Are From Russia With Love". The National Interest. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  71. Vavasseur, Xavier (21 August 2022). "Five Type 052D Destroyers Under Construction In China". Naval News.
  72. Wertheim, Eric (January 2020). "China's Luyang III/Type 052D Destroyer Is a Potent Adversary". United States Naval Institute.
  73. Rogoway, Tyler; Helfrich, Emma (18 July 2022). "China's J-10 Fighter Spotted In New 'Big Spine' Configuration (Updated)". The Warzone.
  74. Osborn, Kris (4 October 2022). "China Boosts J-20 Fighter Production to Counter U.S. Stealth Fighters". The National Interest. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  75. Funaiole, Matthew P. (4 August 2021). "A Glimpse of Chinese Ballistic Missile Submarines". Center for Strategic & International Studies.
  76. Lendon, Brad (25 June 2022). "Never mind China's new aircraft carrier, these are the ships the US should worry about". CNN. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  77. "Fujian aircraft carrier doesn't have radar, weapon systems yet, photos show". South China Morning Post. 19 July 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  78. Hendrix, Jerry (6 July 2022). "The Ominous Portent of China's New Carrier". National Review. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  79. "China establishes Rocket Force and Strategic Support Force – China Military Online". Archived from the original on 10 April 2016. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  80. "Exclusive: Massive parade tipped for PLA's 90th birthday". South China Morning Post. 15 March 2017. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  81. Buckley, Chris (30 July 2017). "China Shows Off Military Might as Xi Jinping Tries to Cement Power". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 12 October 2021.
  82. Gowan, Richard (14 September 2020). "China's pragmatic approach to UN peacekeeping". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  83. 83.0 83.1 83.2 83.3 Rowland, Daniel T. (September 2022). Chinese Security Cooperation Activities: Trends and Implications for US Policy (PDF) (Report).
  84. China's Role in UN Peacekeeping (PDF) (Report). Institute for Security & Development Policy. March 2018.
  85. Daniel M. Hartnett, 2012-03-13, China's First Deployment of Combat Forces to a UN. Peacekeeping Mission—South Sudan Archived 14 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission
  86. Bernard Yudkin Geoxavier, 2012-09-18, China as Peacekeeper: An Updated Perspective on Humanitarian Intervention Archived 31 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Yale Journal of International Affairs
  87. "Chinese Peacekeepers to Haiti: Much Attention, More Confusion". Royal United Services Institute. 1 February 2005.
  88. Nichols, Michelle (14 July 2022). "China pushes for U.N. arms embargo on Haiti criminal gangs". Reuters.
  89. Dyrenforth, Thomas (19 August 2021). "Beijing's Blue Helmets: What to Make of China's Role in UN Peacekeeping in Africa". Modern War Institute. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  90. Lew, Christopher R.; Leung, Pak-Wah, eds. (2013). Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Civil War. Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. p. 3. ISBN 978-0810878730.
  91. Paine, S. C. M. (20 August 2012). The Wars for Asia, 1911–1949. Cambridge University Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-1-139-56087-0. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  92. "Security Check Required". Archived from the original on 14 April 2015. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  93. "Sinkiang and Sino-Soviet Relations" (PDF). Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  94. Shakya 1999 p.32 (6 Oct); Goldstein (1997), p. 45 (7 Oct).
  95. Ryan, Mark A.; Finkelstein, David M.; McDevitt, Michael A. (2003). Chinese warfighting: The PLA experience since 1949. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. p. 125. ISBN 0-7656-1087-6.
  96. Rushkoff, Bennett C. (1981). "Eisenhower, Dulles and the Quemoy-Matsu Crisis, 1954-1955". Political Science Quarterly. 96 (3): 465–480. doi:10.2307/2150556. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2150556.
  97. Zhai, Qiang (2000). China and the Vietnam wars, 1950–1975. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0807825327. OCLC 41564973.
  98. The 1958 Taiwan Straits Crisis_ A Documented History. 1975.
  99. Lintner, Bertil (25 January 2018). China's India War: Collision Course on the Roof of the World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-909163-8. OCLC 1034558154.
  100. Brahma Chellaney (2006). Asian Juggernaut: The Rise of China, India, and Japan. HarperCollins. p. 195. ISBN 9788172236502. Indeed, Beijing's acknowledgement of Indian control over Sikkim seems limited to the purpose of facilitating trade through the vertiginous Nathu-la Pass, the scene of bloody artillery duels in September 1967 when Indian troops beat back attacking Chinese forces.
  101. "Некоторые малоизвестные эпизоды пограничного конфликта на о. Даманском". Военное оружие и армии Мира. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
  102. Carl O. Schustser. "Battle for Paracel Islands".
  103. Elleman, Bruce A. (2001). Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795–1989. Routledge. p. 297. ISBN 0415214742.
  104. Carlyle A. Thayer, "Security Issues in Southeast Asia: The Third Indochina War", Conference on Security and Arms Control in the North Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, August 1987.
  105. "Secrets of the Sino-Vietnamese skirmish in the South China Sea Archived 2013-05-31 at the Wayback Machine", WENWEIPO.COM LIMITED, March 14, 1988.
  106. McFadden, Robert D. (5 June 1989). "The West Condemns the Crackdown". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 25 May 2021.
  107. Dreyer, June Teufel (2005). "China's Vulnerability to Minority Separatism". Asian Affairs. 32 (2): 69–85. doi:10.3200/AAFS.32.2.69-86. ISSN 0092-7678. JSTOR 30172869. S2CID 153883722.
  108. Qimao, Chen (1996). "The Taiwan Strait Crisis: Its Crux and Solutions". Asian Survey. 36 (11): 1055–1066. doi:10.2307/2645635. ISSN 0004-4687. JSTOR 2645635.
  109. Henry, Jérôme (November 2016). "China's Military Deployments in the Gulf of Aden: Anti-Piracy and Beyond" (PDF). Notes de l'Ifri (89).
  110. Torode, Greg (13 March 2014). "A nervous region eyes robust Chinese response to missing Malaysian plane". Reuters.
  111. "Troop and police contributors". United Nations Peacekeeping. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  112. "UNMISS Fact Sheet". UNMISS. Retrieved 22 December 2017.
  113. Tellis, Ashley J. (June 2020). Hustling in the Himalayas: The Sino-Indian Border Confrontation (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Report). Retrieved 29 June 2020. These efforts to bring new territorial enclaves under Chinese control are occurring simultaneously at several different locations, such as on the northern bank of the Pangong Tso, at Hot Springs, and in the Galwan Valley, places that all lie astride the LAC in eastern Ladakh
  114. 在弘扬古田会议精神中铸牢军魂, Zài hóngyáng gǔtián huìyì jīngshén zhōng zhù láo jūn hún Archived 2 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine PLA Daily 27 October 2014
  115. The Political System of the People's Republic of China. Chief Editor Pu Xingzu, Shanghai, 2005, Shanghai People's Publishing House. ISBN 7-208-05566-1 Chapter 11, the State Military System, pp. 369–392.
  116. "China releases guideline on military reform". Xinhua. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  117. "Considerations for replacing Military Area Commands with Theater Commands". english.chinamil.com.cn. Archived from the original on 23 February 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  118. Xi declares victory over old rivals Jiang, Hu Archived 27 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine Asia Nikkei Asian Review, 11 Feb 2016
  119. Army Techniques Publication 7-100.3: Chinese Tactics (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, United States Army. 2021. p. 34. ISBN 9798457607118.
  120. "2.12 The military and politics," in: Sebastian Heilmann, editor, ["China's Political System - Publications - About us - Mercator Institute for China Studies". Archived from the original on 23 March 2017. Retrieved 11 May 2017. China's Political System], Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2017) ISBN 978-1442277342
  121. China plans military reform to enhance its readiness Archived 2 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine – The-Japan-news.com, 2 January 2014
  122. International Institute for Strategic Studies: The Military Balance 2020, p. 260.
  123. Jia Nan (贾楠) (5 July 2021). 4人晋升上将!. Sina (in 中文). Retrieved 6 July 2021.
  124. 文罗摩 [@wenluomo] (21 January 2022). "General Qin Shutong, Political Commissar of PLA Ground Forces; Admiral Yuan Huazhi, Political Commissar, PLAN; General Li Yuchao, Commander of PLA Rocket Force & General Zhang Hongbing, Political Commissar of People's Armed Police Force" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  125. "Chinese Ground Forces". SinoDefence.com. Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
  126. Chi-yuk, Choi (27 May 2013). "PLA Navy's three fleets meet in South China Sea for rare show of force". South China Morning Post.
  127. International Institute for Strategic Studies (14 February 2020). The Military Balance 2020. Routledge. p. 261. ISBN 9780367466398. Archived from the original on 23 April 2022. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  128. The PLA Navy: New Capabilities and Missions for the 21st Century (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: Office of Naval Intelligence. 2 December 2015.
  129. International Institute for Strategic Studies (14 February 2020). The Military Balance 2020. Routledge. pp. 263–264. ISBN 9780367466398. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  130. Farley, Robert (10 November 2021). "Does China Qualify as Having a True Blue Water Navy?". The National Interest.
  131. "China launches two destroyers with tech similar to US Navy's Aegis system". 3 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
  132. Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2020 Annual Report to Congress (PDF). U.S. Department of Defense. 9 July 2021.
  133. 习近平今再晋升5名上将. rfi.fr (in 中文). 6 September 2021. Retrieved 7 September 2021.
  134. Mei Changwei (梅常伟) (21 January 2022). 中央军委举行晋升上将军衔警衔仪式 习近平颁发命令状并向晋衔的军官警官表示祝贺. news.cn (in 中文). Archived from the original on 21 January 2022. Retrieved 21 January 2022.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  135. International Institute for Strategic Studies (14 February 2018). The Military Balance 2018. Routledge. pp. 249–259. ISBN 978-1-85743-955-7. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 13 October 2018.
  136. Chang 2002
  137. Coniglio 2006, P.44
  138. Marcus, Clay; Rod, Lee (24 September 2021). "Star General Chang Dingqiu Takes Command of China's Air Force". The Diplomat. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  139. "[军事报道]张又侠在出席中央军委纪委扩大会议时强调 坚决贯彻全面从严治党战略方针 深入做好新时代军队纪检监察工作" [[Military Report] Zhang Youxia, when attending the enlarged meeting of the Disciplinary Commission of the Central Military Commission, emphasized that we must resolutely implement the strategic policy of strictly governing the party in an all-round way and do a good job in the military discipline inspection and supervision work in the new era.]. [[China Central Television] (in 中文). 22 January 2022. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022.
  140. 140.0 140.1 International Institute for Strategic Studies (14 February 2020). The Military Balance 2020. Routledge. p. 259. ISBN 9780367466398. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  141. Lee, Roderick; Béraud-Sudreau, Lucie; Brewster, David; Cairns, Christopher; Ellis, R. Evan; Herlevi, April; Nantulya, Paul; Nouwens, Meia; Pincus, Rebecca; Wuthnow, Joel (2022). "PLA Rocket Force as a Service: New Team Player or Increasingly Irrelevant?". Enabling a More Externally Focused and Operational Pla — 2020 Pla Conference Papers: 133–154.
  142. Kristensen, Hans M.; Korda, Matt (2 November 2021). "Chinese nuclear weapons, 2021". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 77 (6): 318–336. Bibcode:2021BuAtS..77f.318K. doi:10.1080/00963402.2021.1989208. ISSN 0096-3402. S2CID 244118657.
  143. Ma Xiu [@@conanwhatisbest] (25 March 2022). "More on Li Yuchao's promotion to PLARF commander: Li previously commanded Base 63, a primarily nuclear Base. General wisdom was that the PLARF has traditionally emphasized conventional force officers for senior promotion. Evidence of a shift in priorities toward nuclear force?" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  144. Xiu, Ma (24 October 2022). PLA Rocket Force Organization (PDF) (Report). China Aerospace Studies Institute.
  145. "China Takes Bold Steps Toward Military Reform". Stratfor. Archived from the original on 26 May 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2016.
  146. Yao, Jianing. "Expert: PLA Strategic Support Force a key force to win wars – China Military Online". english.chinamil.com.cn. Archived from the original on 5 May 2016. Retrieved 31 March 2016.
  147. Kang Shi-ren (康世人) (2 April 2015). "解放軍地位高 農夫搶當兵" [The PLA is respected, peasants are scrambling to join the army]. Central News Agency (Republic of China). Archived from the original on 3 February 2017.
  148. Constitution of the People's Republic of China
  149. "今年征兵准备工作全面展开 国防部征兵办公室下发通知确保高质量完成征兵任务 (The Preparation of Conscription in This Year Has Begun. Ministry of Defence Announced That the Conscription should be finished in high quality)". Xinhua News Agency. 11 January 2016. Archived from the original on 1 October 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  150. Guo, Xuezhi (29 August 2012). China's Security State: Philosophy, Evolution, and Politics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02323-9. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  151. The Standard, 5 March 2008, Volume 1, No. 134, Major jump in military spending, Alarm raised over cyber, space advance, the Pentagon said in a report. . . . "The PLA is also exploring satellite jammers, kinetic-energy weapons, high-powered lasers, high-powered microwave weapons, particle-beam weapons, and electromagnetic pulse weapons for counterspace application", it said, adding it was not clear if the cyber intrusions were backed by the military.
  152. Lague, David (19 December 2013). "Chinese military's secret to success: European engineering". Reuters. Archived from the original on 20 December 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
  153. Lague, David. "Insight: From a ferry, a Chinese fast-attack boat." Archived 16 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine Reuters, 31 May 2012.
  154. "U.S. up in arms over Sino-Israeli ties". Asia Times. 21 December 2004. Archived from the original on 16 May 2008. Retrieved 11 June 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  155. "The United States leads upward trend in arms exports, Asian and Gulf states arms imports up, says SIPRI". sipri.org. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 16 March 2015. Archived from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  156. "New SIPRI data reveals scale of Chinese arms industry". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 27 January 2020. Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  157. 157.0 157.1 157.2 157.3 "Trends in International Arms Transfer, 2014". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Archived from the original on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  158. "Biden airs hypersonic missile fears as probable ambassador labels China 'untrustworthy'". Deutsche Welle. 20 October 2021. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  159. "China successfully tested hypersonic weapon in August: report". Space.com. 17 October 2021. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  160. Bonny Lin, Matthew P. Funaiole, Brian Hart, et.al. China Power Project. (2023). "How Deep Are China-Russia Military Ties?". Center for Strategic and International Studies website Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  161. Michael R. Gordon and Nancy A. Youssef. (6 Aug 2023). "Russia and China Sent Large Naval Patrol Near Alaska". Wall Street Journal website Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  162. Gorman, Siobhan (8 April 2009). "Electricity Grid in U.S. Penetrated By Spies". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 8 January 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
  163. Krekel, Bryan (2009), Capability of the People's Republic of China to Conduct Cyber Warfare and Computer Network Exploitation (PDF), Northrop Grumman, archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2011
  164. Qiao, Liang; Wang, Xiangsui (1999), Unrestricted Warfare (PDF), PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House via Foreign Broadcast Information Service, archived from the original (PDF) on 15 August 2000
  165. Beech, Hannah. "Meet China's Newest Soldiers: An Online Blue Army." Archived 27 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine Time, 27 May 2011.
  166. Sanger, David E. (18 February 2013). "China's Army Is Seen as Tied to Hacking Against U.S". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  167. "U.S. Charges Five Chinese Military Hackers for Cyber Espionage . . . " Archived 3 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine, 19 May 2014, justice.gov
  168. "5 in China Army Face U.S. Charges of Cyberattacks" Archived 19 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine, 19 May 2014, NY Times
  169. "Data from Equifax credit hack could "end up on the black market," expert warns". CBS News. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 2 July 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
  170. "Four Members of China's Military Indicted Over Massive Equifax Breach". The Wall Street Journal. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  171. 171.0 171.1 171.2 "Military Power of the People's Republic of China" (PDF). U.S. Department of Defense. 2007. pp. 19–20. Retrieved 13 November 2022.
  172. "Annual Report to Congress - Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 January 2015. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  173. 173.0 173.1 173.2 Cheng, Dean (2012). "China's military role in space" (PDF). Strategic Studies Quarterly. 6 (1): 55–77 – via Air University.
  174. "China's National Defense in the New Era". Andrew S. Erickson: China analysis from original sources. July 2019.
  175. 175.0 175.1 Clark, Stephen (29 January 2021). "China launches military spy satellite trio into orbit". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022.
  176. "China GPS rival Beidou starts offering navigation data". BBC. 27 December 2011. Archived from the original on 3 February 2012. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
  177. 177.0 177.1 Bruce, Leo (26 November 2021). "China successfully launches tactical military communications satellite". NASA Spaceflight.
  178. Dickinson, General James H. (21 April 2021). United States Space Command Presentation to the Senate Armed Services Committee U.S. Senate (PDF) (Report).
  179. Jonathan McDowell [@planet4589] (7 April 2021). "The Jianbing-7 03 radar satellite, cover name Yaogan 18, reentered at 0035 UTC Apr 7 over the South Atlantic. It was launched in Oct 2013, operated until Feb 2019, and had its orbit lowered from Apr-Jul 2020; it underwent uncontrolled decay since 2020 Jul 7" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 3 July 2022 – via Twitter.
  180. Jones, Andrew (22 November 2021). "China launches new Gaofen-11 high resolution spy satellite to match U.S. capabilities". SpaceNews.
  181. "JianBing 5 (YaoGan WeiXing 1/3) Synthetic Aperture Radar". Sino Defense. 12 November 2007. Archived from the original on 21 April 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
  182. "The Chinese Maritime Surveillance System". SatelliteObservation.net. 20 September 2016. Archived from the original on 17 March 2022.
  183. Blizzard, Timothy J. (2016). "The PLA, A2/AD and the ADF: Lessons for Future Maritime Strategy". Security Challenges. 12 (3): 69–70. JSTOR 26465599 – via JSTOR.
  184. "Precise orbit determination of Beidou Satellites with precise positioning". Science China. 2012. Archived from the original on 17 June 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  185. Dotson, John (15 July 2020). "The Beidou Satellite Network and the "Space Silk Road" in Eurasia". Jamestown. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  186. Smith, Marcia (19 August 2013). "Surprise Chinese Satellite Maneuvers Mystify Western Experts". SpacePolicyOnline.
  187. Dickinson, General James H. (21 April 2021). United States Space Command Presentation to the Senate Armed Services Committee U.S. Senate (PDF) (Report).
  188. Jones, Andrew (27 January 2022). "China's Shijian-21 towed dead satellite to a high graveyard orbit". SpaceNews.
  189. Yardley, Jim (15 October 2003). "China Sends a Man Into Orbit, Entering the U.S.-Russian Club". The New York Times.
  190. Mali, Tariq (18 October 2005). "Shenzhou 6 Taikonauts Achieve Firsts for China". SpaceNews.
  191. Jones, Andrew (7 November 2021). "China's Shenzhou 13 crew takes its first spacewalk, the country's 1st by a female astronaut". Space.com.
  192. Stokes, Mark A. (1999). China's Strategic Modernization: Implications for the United States. DIANE Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4289-1197-0.
  193. China plays down fears after satellite shot down Archived 29 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine, AFP via Channelnewsasia, 20 January 2007
  194. "氢氧爆轰驱动激波高焓风洞". 中国科学院高温气体动力学重点实验室. 17 March 2005. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2008.
  195. Fisher, Jr., Richard (29 June 2011). "PLA and U.S. Arms Racing in the Western Pacific". International Assessment and Strategy Center. Archived from the original on 31 January 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2012. It is also possible that during this decade the PLA Navy could deploy initial railgun and laser weapons. It is known that the PLA has invested heavily in both technologies.
  196. Lague, David (4 March 2008). "China increases military spending". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 26 November 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  197. 197.0 197.1 197.2 197.3 197.4 197.5 197.6 197.7 "What does China really spend on its military?". 28 December 2015. Archived from the original on 16 August 2018. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
  198. "China says defence spending increase to be 'appropriate' | News | al Jazeera". Archived from the original on 13 May 2019. Retrieved 13 May 2019.
  199. "China Sets Date for 'Two Sessions' in Latest Move Toward Post-COVID Normal". Archived from the original on 5 May 2020. Retrieved 6 May 2020.
  200. "What Does China Really Spend on its Military?". 28 December 2015. Archived from the original on 16 August 2018. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
  201. Grevatt, Jon; Andrew, MacDonald (5 March 2021). "China announces 6.8% increase in 2021 defence budget". Janes. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
  202. Yew Lun Tian (5 March 2022). "China plans 7.1% defence spending rise this year, outpacing GDP target". Reuters. Archived from the original on 5 March 2022. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  203. 2007 Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China. p. 25.
  204. "SIPRI Military Expenditure Database". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Archived from the original on 13 May 2016. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  205. Ramzy, Austin (4 February 2014). "Middle East, Russia and China fuel 2014 global defense spending surge: report". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on 24 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  206. Lawrence, Dune (3 February 2014). "China to Ramp Up Military Spending". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  207. "US, China need transparent military ties: Gates." Archived 3 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine Agence France-Presse, 30 May 2009.
  208. "Amid development of stealth fighter, aircraft carrier, China insists its military not a threat." Archived 23 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine Associated Press, 13 June 2011.
  209. Shepherd, Christian; Martina, Michael (4 March 2018). "China boosts defense spending, rattling its neighbors' nerves". Reuters. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  210. Olsen, Kelly (5 March 2019). "China's defense spending is growing more slowly. But that doesn't mean military tensions are easing". CNBC. Archived from the original on 20 April 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  211. 211.0 211.1 Chan, Minnie; Zhen, Liu (28 November 2015). "China's President Xi Jinping wants 'PLA Inc' to stop its song and dance, plans end for profit-making activities". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 28 November 2015. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
  212. "1988年7月25日,中央軍事委員會決定將《中國人民解放軍進行曲》,定為中國人民解放軍的軍歌。" [July 25, 1988: March of the Chinese People's Liberation Army is designate as the military song of the People's Liberation Army]. Our China Story (in 中文). 25 July 2021.
  213. "军歌歌词是怎样变迁的?那些"飘扬的旗帜"" [How did the lyrics of military songs change? Those "Flags Waving"]. China News Service (in 中文). 16 July 2010.
  214. Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women - Volume 2 - Page 145 Lily Xiao Hong Lee, A. D. Stefanowska, Sue Wiles - 2003 "... situation of their conflicting nationalities by returning to China, where Zheng Lücheng took out Chinese citizenship. ... PRC, Zheng Lücheng was active in his work as a composer; he wrote the music for the Western-style opera Cloud Gazing."
  215. Wu, Fei (1 October 2009). "Military Parade Marks Anniversary". China Daily. Xinhua. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
  216. "81 Flag and Other Signs" (in 中文). Archived from the original on 1 December 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
  217. "Flag, Emblem and Song of the People's Liberation Army". Xinhua Net News (in 中文). Xinhua. 23 June 2004. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
  218. "Uniform of Rocket Force". People's Daily (in 中文). 1 July 2016. Archived from the original on 4 November 2020. Retrieved 6 July 2016.

Works cited[edit]

Further reading[edit]

History[edit]

Present-day[edit]

Preceded by
Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army
Armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party
1 November 1948 – present
Incumbent

Template:People's Liberation Army

Template:Asian topic